Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky

The Iconoclast

Wednesday, 30 July 2014

The hatred is of two kinds -- the classical Western antisemitism, and Muslim antisemitism. The latter is now far more important, all over the West, but it offers a kind of local support group for the Muslims who have moved themselves in, all over the Western world. There is not one antisemitism; there are antisemitisms. These two forms differ in their origins (Muslim antisemitism is a subset of anti-Infidel hatred, directed at all non-Musliims), but the result is the same murderous one.


Posted on 07/30/2014 6:39 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Wednesday, 30 July 2014

  " In the Fall Semester of that particular year (1950), the enrolment in the Russian Language courses consisted of one student, plump and earnest Betty Bliss, in the Transitional Group, one, a mere name (Ivan Dub, who never materialized) in the Advanced, and three in the flourishing Elementary: Josephine Malkin, whose grandparents had been born in Minsk; Charles McBeth, whose prodigious memory had already disposed of ten languages and was prepared to entomb ten more; and languid Eileen Lane, whom somebody had told that by the time one had mastered the Russian alphabet onecould practically read 'Anna Karamazov' in the original." --- from Pnin, by Vladimir Nabokov

Posted on 07/30/2014 6:25 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Wednesday, 30 July 2014

Wednesday, 30 July 2014

Jesse Wegman writes part 2 of the NYTimes series on marijuana:

America’s four-decade war on drugs is responsible for many casualties, but the criminalization of marijuana has been perhaps the most destructive part of that war. The toll can be measured in dollars — billions of which are thrown away each year in the aggressive enforcement of pointless laws. It can be measured in years — whether wasted behind bars or stolen from a child who grows up fatherless. And it can be measured in lives — those damaged if not destroyed by the shockingly harsh consequences that can follow even the most minor offenses.

In October 2010, Bernard Noble, a 45-year-old trucker and father of seven with two previous nonviolent offenses, was stopped on a New Orleans street with a small amount of marijuana in his pocket. His sentence: more than 13 years.

At least he will be released. Jeff Mizanskey, a Missouri man, was arrested in December 1993, for participating (unknowingly, he said) in the purchase of a five-pound brick of marijuana. Because he had two prior nonviolent marijuana convictions, he was sentenced to life without parole.

Outrageously long sentences are only part of the story. The hundreds of thousands of people who are arrested each year but do not go to jail also suffer; their arrests stay on their records for years, crippling their prospects for jobs, loans, housing and benefits. These are disproportionately people of color, with marijuana criminalization hitting black communities the hardest.

Meanwhile, police departments that presumably have far more important things to do waste an enormous amount of time and taxpayer money chasing a drug that two states have already legalized and that a majority of Americans believe should be legal everywhere.

A Costly, Futile StrategyThe absurdity starts on the street, with a cop and a pair of handcuffs. As the war on drugs escalated through the 1980s and 1990s, so did the focus on common, low-level offenses — what became known as “broken windows” policing. In New York City, where the strategy was introduced and remains popular today, the police made fewer than 800 marijuana arrests in 1991. In 2010, they made more than 59,000.

Nationwide, the numbers are hardly better. From 2001 to 2010, the police made more than 8.2 million marijuana arrests; almost nine in 10 were for possession alone. In 2011, there were more arrests for marijuana possession than for all violent crimes put together.

The costs of this national obsession, in both money and time, are astonishing. Each year, enforcing laws on possession costs more than $3.6 billion, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. It can take a police officer many hours to arrest and book a suspect. That person will often spend a night or more in the local jail, and be in court multiple times to resolve the case. The public-safety payoff for all this effort is meager at best: According to a 2012 Human Rights Watch report that tracked 30,000 New Yorkers with no prior convictions when they were arrested for marijuana possession, 90 percent had no subsequent felony convictions. Only 3.1 percent committed a violent offense.

The strategy is also largely futile. After three decades, criminalization has not affected general usage; about 30 million Americans use marijuana every year. Meanwhile, police forces across the country are strapped for cash, and the more resources they devote to enforcing marijuana laws, the less they have to go after serious, violent crime. According to F.B.I. data, more than half of all violent crimes nationwide, and four in five property crimes, went unsolved in 2012.

The Racial Disparity

The sheer volume of law enforcement resources devoted to marijuana is bad enough. What makes the situation far worse is racial disparity. Whites and blacks use marijuana at roughly the same rates; on average, however, blacks are 3.7 times more likely than whites to be arrested for possession, according to a comprehensive 2013 report by the A.C.L.U.

In Iowa, blacks are 8.3 times more likely to be arrested, and in the worst-offending counties in the country, they are up to 30 times more likely to be arrested. The war on drugs aims its firepower overwhelmingly at African-Americans on the street, while white users smoke safely behind closed doors.

Only about 6 percent of marijuana cases lead to a felony conviction; the rest are often treated as misdemeanors resulting in fines or probation, if the charges aren’t dismissed completely. Even so, every arrest ends up on a person’s record, whether or not it leads to prosecution and conviction. Particularly in poorer minority neighborhoods, where young men are more likely to be outside and repeatedly targeted by law enforcement, these arrests accumulate. Before long a person can have an extensive “criminal history” that consists only of marijuana misdemeanors and dismissed cases. That criminal history can then influence the severity of punishment for a future offense, however insignificant.

While the number of people behind bars solely for possessing or selling marijuana seems relatively small — 20,000 to 30,000 by the most recentestimates, or roughly 1 percent of America’s 2.4 million inmates — that means nothing to people, like Jeff Mizanskey, who are serving breathtakingly long terms because their records contained minor previous offenses. Nor does it mean anything to the vast majority of these inmates who have no history of violence (about nine in 10, according to a 2006 study). And as with arrests, the racial disparity is vast: Blacks are more than 10 times as likely as whites to go to prison for drug offenses. For those on probation or parole for any offense, a failed drug test on its own can lead to prison time — which means, again, that people can be put behind bars for smoking marijuana.

Even if a person never goes to prison, the conviction itself is the tip of the iceberg. In a majority of states, marijuana convictions — including those resulting from guilty pleas — can have lifelong consequences for employment, education, immigration status and family life.

In some states, a felony conviction can result in a lifetime ban on voting, jury service, or eligibility for public benefits like food stamps. People can be fired from their jobs because of a marijuana arrest. Even if a judge eventually throws the case out, the arrest record is often available online for a year, free for any employer to look up.

Correcting an Old Inequity

As recently as the mid-1970s, politicians and the public generally agreed that marijuana abuse was handled better by treatment than by prosecution and incarceration. Jimmy Carter ran for president and won while supporting decriminalization. But that view lost out as the war on drugs broadened and intensified, sweeping marijuana along with it.

In recent years, public acceptance of marijuana has grown significantly. Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia now permit some form of medical marijuana, and Colorado and Washington fully legalized it for recreational use in 2012. And yet even as “ganjapreneurs” scramble to take economic advantage, thousands of people remain behind bars, or burdened by countless collateral punishments that prevent them from full and active membership in society.

In a March interview, Michelle Alexander, a law professor whose book, “The New Jim Crow,” articulated the drug war’s deeper costs to black men in particular, noted the cruel paradox at play in Colorado and Washington. She pointed to “40 years of impoverished black kids getting prison time for selling weed, and their families and futures destroyed,” and said, “Now, white men are planning to get rich doing precisely the same thing?”

As pioneers in legalization, those two states should set a further example by providing relief to people convicted of crimes that are no longer crimes, including overturning convictions. A recent ruling by a Colorado appeals court overturned two 2011 convictions because of the changed law, and the state’s Legislature has enacted laws in the last two years to give courts more power to seal records of drug convictions and to make it easier for defendants to get jobs and housing after a conviction. These are both important steps into an uncharted future.

Posted on 07/30/2014 4:47 AM by Rebecca Bynum

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Secretary of State Kerry and Israeli PM Netanyahu

Jerruslaem, July 24, 2014

Source: BBC

This afternoon we held the third weekly conversation about Israel’s War with Hamas in Gaza on Pensacola Radio station 1330amWEBY with host Mike Bates, Rabbi Eric Tokajer and myself. We discussed the status of the conflict, its nuances and what was the fifth Hamas rejection of a cease fire from Egypt that Israel approved.  We also discussed Secretary of State Kerry’s handling of the latest cease fire proposals that infuriated Israelis across the political divide. We noted what Ari Shavit, columnist for Ha’aretz, and author of My Promised Land said: "U.S. Secretary of State of State John Kerry ruined everything”."Very senior officials in Jerusalem described the proposal that Kerry put on the table as a strategic terrorist attack.”  That was a reference to Kerry’s conveying to Israel what were Hamas’ demands for lifting of the blockade and opening of the frontier with Egypt. 

The better to return to crony capitalism that enriched Hamas’ leaders while impoverishing the rest of the 1.8 million inhabitants in the 25 square mile area. Rabbi Tokajer made the wry observation that ex-pat Khaled Mashal, the keeper of $2.6 billion in contributed funds living in relative luxury in Qatar could distribute $13,333 apiece to the inhabitants and would still have $200 million left. Don’t worry that won’t happen. Besides the Gazan hoi polloi are just human shields for errant mortars and rockets fired by Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad killing innocent women and children while sending millions of Israelis scampering to shelter on 15 second red alerts.

 I referred to Kerry’s alleged dialogue with Bibi in a recent New Republic article, wherein Netanyahu informs Kerry that Gazan children are incited to hatred of Jews and Israel in conformance with the Charter of the terrorist group designated by Kerry’s State Department.  Kerry while conceding the point suggested that those poor Gazan residents reminded him of looking into the eyes of Vietnamese when he was a Riverine Navy patrol boat officer during the Viet Nam war.  They just wanted to get rid of us. Just like Hamas wants to get rid of Israel, for good. 

We discussed the contrast between polls in Israel and the Pew Trust poll on US reaction to the Israel War with Hamas and the political divide.   Before the program I spoke with Dan Diker Voice of Israel Executive producer and its Chief Middle East Affairs analyst. Diker was the former secretary general of the World Jewish Congress.  He noted the strong solidarity across the political spectrum for Operation Protective Edge reflected in University of Haifa poll that found over 91 percent of Israelis support Operation Protective Edge.  85 Percent favor a cease fire 85% of respondents would only support a cease-fire agreement if Israel eliminated every Hamas rocket and destroyed the full network of terror tunnels before agreeing to do so. crushing Hamas. Diker was disturbed by the Pew findings pointed to a great divide between GOP, Independent and Democrat voters:

A Pew Research Center survey conducted earlier this month found that the partisan gap in Mideast sympathies is as wide as it has been at any point since the late 1970s. Nearly three quarters of Republicans (73%) said they sympathize more with Israel than the Palestinians, compared with 45% of independents and 44% of Democrats.

We also spoke of the comment from House minority leader Nancy Pelosi who said that Hamas was really a humanitarian group. When asked by Interviewer Candy Crowley on CNN’s State of the Union how, she knew that she replied, because Turkey and Qatar said so.   Note The Blaze excerpt:

Pelosi talked about America’s need to support “the two-state solution” and Palestinian leader Abbas. She also stated that we need to “support Iron Dome to protect the Israelis from the missiles.”

Then, the former Speaker made a statement (summarizing something told to her) that seemed to take Candy Crowley by surprise.

“And we have to confer with the Qataris, who have told me over and over again that Hamas is a humanitarian organization. Maybe they could use their influence to–”

Crowley jumped in, stopping Pelosi, asking her to clarify that statement, “The U.S. thinks they’re a terrorist organization though, correct? Do you?”

Pelosi did not actually speak a word in response to that question. Instead she uttered, “Mmm hmm.”

Watch the CNN Video of Crowley’s exchange with House Minority Leader, Pelosi:


When we brought up Turkey and Premier Erdogan, we noted his outrageous demand  that Jewish citizens criticize Israel, who he considered worse than the Nazis by committing “genocide” in Gaza against the people and Hamas. Jack Rosen of the American Jewish Congress (AJC) demanded return of an award the American Jewish  defense group bestowed on Erodgan chastizing the Turkish Premiere saying, he was  "inciting the Turkish population to violence against the Jewish people".  Turkey's Ambassador to the US, Serdar Kilic said he was "glad" to return the AJC award,. He contested Foxman's allegations in a statement saying, "Attempts to depict Prime Minister Erdogan's legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government's attacks on civilians as expressions of anti-Semitism is an obvious distortion and an effort to cover up the historical wrongdoings of the Israeli government." We spoke of the launch of  a new Turkish Free Gaza flotilla, four years after the Mavi Marmara incident that took nine lives during a battle with Israeli Naval commandos in May 2010. During Obama’s 2012 visit to Jerusalem, he  suggested that  Bibi  call Erodgan  and apologize.. We pointed out that the same Islamist charity, IHH, that backed the Mavi Marmara incident was sending another vessel. However, as Mike Bates pointed out this time Turkey was sending naval escort vessels.  Bates hoped that Netanyahu wouldn’t offer compensation in the event of another clash.

But then we spoke about the alleged leak by a “senior official” of the heated conversation between President Obama and PM Netanyahu on Sunday, that Israeli Channel One had transcripted and the Times of Israel translated into English.  The circulation of the remarks further inflamed the situation, as the President was alleged to have demanded a unilateral unconditional cease fire to which the PM replied what’s in it for Israel? 

The consensus of the three of us on the radio program was that if the alleged exchange had occurred between President Obama and PM Netanyahu was this anyway  to treat the head of a sovereign country and America's only relaiable democratic ally in the Middle East?

Below is the alleged exchange and what follows is the denial that the conversation was anything but the usual  exchange of views between two people who are known to dislike one another.  You may recall this November 2011 exchange between former French President Sarkozy and President Obama caught on microphone at a Cannes restaurant during a G20 meeting:

"I cannot bear Netanyahu, he's a liar," Sarkozy told Obama, unaware that the microphones in their meeting room had been switched on, enabling reporters in a separate location to listen in to a simultaneous translation.

"You're fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you," Obama replied.

Here is what Market Watch reported on the alleged kerfuffle between President Obama and PM Netanyahu:

It’s not unusual for either side to publish what’s called a “readout” — basically, a diplomatic summary of the conversation — and the readout from the White House side of a Sunday call between the two leaders wasn’t effusive. “Building on Secretary Kerry’s efforts, the President made clear the strategic imperative of instituting an immediate, unconditional humanitarian ceasefire that ends hostilities now and leads to a permanent cessation of hostilities based on the November 2012 ceasefire agreement. The President reaffirmed the United States’ support for Egypt’s initiative, as well as regional and international coordination to end hostilities,” the White House call said.

Yes, but what did they really say? Israel’s Channel One has published a transcript, in Hebrew, and The Times of Israel has translated it into English.

Barack Obama: I demand that Israel agrees to an immediate, unilateral ceasefire and halt all offensive activities, in particular airstrikes.

Benjamin Netanyahu: And what will Israel receive in exchange for a ceasefire?

BO: I believe that Hamas will cease its rocket fire — silence will be met with silence.

BN: Hamas broke all five previous ceasefires. It’s a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel.

BO: I repeat and expect Israel to stop all its military activities unilaterally. The pictures of destruction in Gaza distance the world from Israel’s position.

BN: Kerry’s proposal was completely unrealistic and gives Hamas military and diplomatic advantages.

BO: Within a week of the end of Israel’s military activities, Qatar and Turkey will begin negotiations with Hamas based on the 2012 understandings, including Israel’s commitment to removing the siege and restrictions on Gaza.

BN: Qatar and Turkey are the biggest supporters of Hamas. It’s impossible to rely on them to be fair mediators.

BO: I trust Qatar and Turkey. Israel is not in the position that it can choose its mediators.

BN: I protest because Hamas can continue to launch rockets and use tunnels for terror attacks –

BO: (interrupting Netanyahu) The ball’s in Israel’s court and it must end all its military activities.

Now, that can’t be taken as verbatim, though as expressions of opinions, the transcript seems on the mark.

The first notable element is the transcript itself — which got official reaction, and denial, from both sides.

Ben Rhodes         @rhodes44


This "transcript of POTUS-PM call" report is totally false

Paul Danahar         @pdanahar


.@statedeptspox full response to question about Israel's Channel 1 claim of leaked transcript of Obama/Netanyahu chat

PM of Israel         @IsraeliPM


We have seen reports of an alleged POTUS-Netanyahu transcript; neither reports nor alleged transcript bear any resemblance to reality 1/2

And it’s noteworthy that the Israeli television station said the transcript came from American sources.

Neri Zilber @NeriZilber


Israel Ch. 1 scoop re. difficult Obama-Netanyahu phone call is sourced to "American sources." Very curious. #Israel #Gaza

The tension seems palpable in the call.

Jon Williams         @WilliamsJon


If you thought read-out of Obama-Netanyahu call Sunday tense, supposed transcript shows thinly veiled contempt on both sides! #Gaza #Israel

New York, NY, United States




Posted on 07/29/2014 11:39 PM by Jerry Gordon

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

I think it's deserved, given the week that was.


Posted on 07/29/2014 9:59 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words. The Jewish Youth of Vienna gathered in the Stephanplatz before the Cathedral, the city center. The result was this stunning graphic message of soldiarity with fellow Jews in Israel.

Watch this You Tube video and make sure that you send it far and wide, especially to the media:

Posted on 07/29/2014 8:16 PM by Jerry Gordon

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

From The Tablet:

The idea that one of Hamas’s main command bunkers is located beneath Shifa Hospital in Gaza City is one of the worst-kept secrets of the Gaza war. So why aren’t reporters in Gaza ferreting it out? The precise location of a large underground bunker equipped with sophisticated communications equipment and housing some part of the leadership of a major terrorist organization beneath a major hospital would seem to qualify as a world-class scoop—the kind that might merit a Pulitzer, or at least a Polk.

So why isn’t the fact that Hamas uses Shifa Hospital as a command post making headlines? In part, it’s because the location is so un-secret that Hamas regularly meets with reporters there. On July 15, for example, William Booth of the Washington Post wrote that the hospital “has become a de facto headquarters for Hamas leaders, who can be seen in the hallways and offices.” Back in 2006, PBS even aired a documentary showing how gunmen roam the halls of the hospital, intimidate the staff, and deny them access to protected locations within the building—where the camera crew was obviously prohibited from filming. Yet the confirmation that Hamas is using Gaza City’s biggest hospital as its de facto headquarters was made in the last sentence of the eighth paragraph of Booth’s story—which would appear to be the kind of rookie mistake that is known in journalistic parlance as “burying the lede.”

But Booth is no rookie—he’s an experienced foreign reporter, which means that he buried the lede on purpose. Why? Well, one reason might be that the “security sources” quoted whenever the location of the Hamas command bunker is mentioned—which, as evidenced by this 2009 article by the excellent and highly experienced foreign correspondent Steven Erlanger of the New York Times, happens every time there’s a war in Gaza—are obviously Israelis, not members of Hamas. It might be hard to believe the Israelis, the simple logic might run, since they obviously have an investment in arguing that Hamas is using hospitals and schools as human shields.

The Israelis are so sure about the location of the Hamas bunker, however, not because they are trying to score propaganda points, or because it has been repeatedly mentioned in passing by Western reporters—but because they built it. Back in 1983, when Israel still ruled Gaza, they built a secure underground operating room and tunnel network beneath Shifa hospital—which is one among several reasons why Israeli security sources are so sure that there is a main Hamas command bunker in or around the large cement basement beneath the area of Building 2 of the Hospital, which reporters are obviously prohibited from entering.

Hamas obviously has no interest in having a photo-layout of one of its command bunkers beneath Shifa Hospital splashed on the front pages of newspapers. After all, such pictures would show that the organization uses the sick and wounded of Gaza as human shields while launching missiles against Israeli civilians. What Hamas wants is for reporters to use very different pictures from Shifa—namely, photos of Palestinians killed and wounded by Israelis, which make Palestinians look like innocent victims of wanton Israeli brutality.

To that end, the rules of reporting from Shifa Hospital are easy for any newbie reporter to understand: No pictures of members of Hamas with their weapons inside the hospital, and don’t go anywhere near the bunkers, or the operating rooms where members of Hamas are treated. While reporters can meet with members of Hamas inside the hospital—because it’s obviously convenient for everyone—they are not allowed to take pictures. Reporters inside Gaza who are risking their lives to bring the world whatever news they can should hardly be blamed for obeying Hamas’s media rules, which the organization has helpfully written down in case anyone has doubts about what they are permitted to show.

Reporters who bravely or foolishly violate Hamas’ rules even on their social media accounts can be seen to repent with such alacrity that it’s not difficult to imagine how scared and dependent they are. Nick Casey of the Wall Street Journal, for example, tweeted that “You have to wonder w the shelling how patients at Shifa hospital feel as Hamas uses it as a safe place to see media.” Casey then quickly deleted his tweet, which didn’t save him from being put on a list of journalists who “lie/fabricate info for Israel” and “must be sued” – a threat which is surely the least of Casey’s fears. Last week, French-Palestinian journalist Radjaa Abu Dagg was summoned to Shifa by Hamas and interrogated. He wrote about the experience of “attempted intimidation” for Liberation—and then quickly had the paper take down the article.

It can hardly be lost on any sane journalist that tempers in combat zones can be short, and that Hamas has used the kidnapping of foreign journalists like Alan Johnson of the BBC to advance its own agenda. The fact that Hamas has closed the border and will not let journalists in or out of Gaza can’t make journalists who being used as de facto human shields by a terrorist organization feel any more eager to offend their hosts.

What Hamas has done, therefore, is to turn Shifa Hospital into a Hollywood sound-stage filled with real, live war victims who are used to score propaganda points, while the terrorists inside the hospital itself are erased from photographs and news accounts through a combination of pressure and threats, in order to produce the stories that Hamas wants. So if reporters aren’t entirely to blame for participating in this sick charade, then who is?

The answer is that reporters write what they can, and some do their job better than others, and some are braver or more foolhardy than their peers. But it’s the job of editors, sitting thousands of miles away, at a very safe remove from the battlefield, to note that dispatches were produced under pressure, or that key information was removed by a government—as nearly all mainstream media outlets do when battlefield dispatches pass through the hands of the IDF censor. A good editor might attach similar notes to dispatches from combat zones controlled by terrorist organizations. He or she might also decide that reporting only the news that Hamas deems fit to print from Shifa Hospital isn’t actually reporting at all: It’s propaganda.

Posted on 07/29/2014 3:19 PM by Rebecca Bynum

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

The war of the tunnels, here and there and everywhere.

Posted on 07/29/2014 2:09 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Tuesday, 29 July 2014


And they were taught about Ramadan, to increase their "cultura sensitivity." You can imagine the glowing terms in which it is depicted.

And this is supposed to be part of some kind of education in Islam. But will that education in Islam include Sura 9 -- say, 9.5 and 9.29? Will it include any of the more than 100 Jihad verses set out in the Calcutta Qur'an Petition? What parts of Islam will not be discussed, while the military are busy inculcating soldiers in the splendors of Ramadan?

Posted on 07/29/2014 2:04 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

In Aleppo, and not just once.


Posted on 07/29/2014 1:58 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Tuesday, 29 July 2014
Posted on 07/29/2014 1:54 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

from AFP via Yahoo News and the BBC

Dozens of people were killed and injured in a "terrorist attack" in China's far western Xinjiang region, home to the mainly Muslim Uighur minority, state media reported Tuesday . . . The attack came on the eve of Muslims in China marking the Eid festival at the end of the fasting month of Ramadan.

Xinhua said that more than 30 police cars had been damaged or destroyed in the "terror attack", six of them burnt out. Quoting local police, it said "dozens of Uighur and Han civilians were killed or injured". According to Xinhua, the gang began their attack in the township of Elixku before moving to another nearby settlement, attacking civilians and vehicles on the way.

Dilxat Raxit, a spokesman for the exile World Uyghur Congress, an exile group, said in an e-mail that more than 20 Uighurs were shot dead by armed authorities while 10 were injured.

In a bylined commentary Xinhua said that the attack was intended to "destabilise the region and spread fear and hatred . . . Police shooting dead of the mobsters was decisive and well justified," it said. "The attack is against the spirit of Ramadan, which is about the practice of self-discipline and self-control ... The rioters were committing blasphemy against Islam, 'the religion of peace'."

Posted on 07/29/2014 1:41 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

From Hurriyet Daily News

Speaking during an Eid el-Fitr meeting on July 28, Arınç described his ideal of the chaste man or woman, saying they should both have a sense of shame and honor.

“Chastity is so important. It is not only a name. It is an ornament for both women and men. . . [The woman] will know what is haram and not haram. She will not laugh in public. She will not be inviting in her attitudes and will protect her chasteness,” 

People needs to discover the Quran once again, Arınç said . . . “Where are our girls, who slightly blush, lower their heads and turn their eyes away when we look at their face, becoming the symbol of chastity?”

Targeting women once more, Arınç said women talk about unnecessary things on the phone. “Women give each other meal recipes while speaking on the mobile phone. ‘What else is going on?’ ‘What happened to Ayşe’s daughter?’ ‘When is the wedding?’ Talk about this face to face,” 

Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, who is running for the presidency against Arınç’s boss, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, commented on Arınç’s statement via Twitter, saying Turkey needed women to laugh, as well as to hear everybody’s happy laughter more than anything.

Posted on 07/29/2014 1:26 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

The American weapons that keep going missing, everywhere in the Muslim world.


Posted on 07/29/2014 12:36 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

See here.

(...) After the Arab Spring, the Islamists briefly gained the upper hand. But when the Muslim Brotherhood government fell, the military leaders cracked down. They sentenced hundreds of the Brotherhood’s leadership class to death. They also closed roughly 95 percent of the tunnels that connected Egypt to Gaza, where the Brotherhood’s offshoot, Hamas, had gained power.

As intended, the Egyptian move was economically devastating to Hamas. Hamas derived 40 percent of its tax revenue from tariffs on goods that flowed through those tunnels. One economist estimated the economic losses at $460 million a year, nearly a fifth of the Gazan G.D.P.

Hamas needed to end that blockade, but it couldn’t strike Egypt, so it struck Israel. If Hamas could emerge as the heroic fighter in a death match against the Jewish state, if Arab TV screens were filled with dead Palestinian civilians, then public outrage would force Egypt to lift the blockade. Civilian casualties were part of the point. When Mousa Abu Marzook, the deputy chief of the Hamas political bureau, dismissed a plea for a cease-fire, he asked a rhetorical question, “What are 200 martyrs compared with lifting the siege?”

The eminent Israeli journalist Avi Issacharoff summarized the strategy in The Times of Israel, “Make no mistake, Hamas remains committed to the destruction of Israel. But Hamas is firing rockets at Tel Aviv and sending terrorists through tunnels into southern Israel while aiming, in essence, at Cairo.”...

Posted on 07/29/2014 11:59 AM by Geoffrey Clarfield

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Les anciens de ce blog savent que je suis Belge d’origine et Canadien d’adoption, et que toute ma famille a quitté l’Europe sans intention d’y revenir. Quant à moi, je partage en ce moment ma vie entre la Belgique et le Canada, le temps de m’établir définitivement dans mon pays d’adoption. J’ai donc les idées et une attitude bien claires au sujet de ce dernier. Je le respecte et je l’aime. Je n’y vais pas pour en profiter mais par choix, afin d’y donner le meilleur de moi-même. Et si pour une raison quelconque il ne me convenait plus, je réagirais à ma façon, avec correction, en prenant l’avion vers une autre destination.

Vous comprendrez donc aisément que je ne puisse admettre qu’en France des millions de citoyens ou considérés comme tels sur le papier n’y sont que pour bénéficier des aides insensées d’une République pourtant si endettée. Et encore moins, même de l’étranger, qu’ils haïssent au point désormais atteint le pays qui les a accueillis. Cela fait maintenant des décennies que cela dure. Mais il y a pire aujourd’hui, surtout depuis que, dans un moment d’égarement effarant, les Français ont choisi de confier leur destinée à une bande d’illuminés dirigés (?) par Normal 1er, la plus grande nullité que l’on puisse trouver parmi les énarques.

Pire ? Oui, car l’idéologie et la lâcheté de ces derniers se sont hissées à un tel niveau d’abandon et de trahison de la population vraiment française qu’ils emboîtent le pas de leur clientèle la plus extrême dans ses délires et excès, au lieu de réagir comme il se devrait dans un véritable état de droit soucieux en priorité d’assurer la sécurité des gens et des biens. Hélas, la dictature socialiste pousse tellement loin sa complicité avec les enragés, ces chances pour la France que le monde entier envie à celle-ci, qu’elle en fait des privilégiés, des intouchables, des protégés, des impunis. Jusqu’à favoriser l’antisémitisme qui refleurit.

L’alliance contre nature et de circonstance entre le fascisme rouge et le fascisme vert est un cancer létal qui mène à une issue fatale. Pour ne pas en arriver là il faudra que la France s’en débarrasse quel qu’en soit le prix. Mais les vœux pieux, les incantations et les médecines douces ne suffiront pas, car seules des mesures radicales pourront l’enrayer s’il est encore temps pour les remèdes violents. En attendant, le président devenu son propre porte-parole à propos du vol dramatique d’Air Algérie, s’est caricaturé lui-même dans sa quête ridicule de points dans les sondages. Un crash de plus pour ce triste et cynique personnage.

Alors, comme ce n’est pas à ce mode de communication que je me réfère, je ne sais pas ce que Twitter dit de la France, le soi-disant pays des droits de l’Homme, sauf des Juifs, des Chrétiens et de la majorité de ses citoyens. Mais moi je ne me cache pas ou plus, ici et ailleurs, pour dire pis que pendre de ses élites corrompues à coups de pétrodollars et vendues au Qatar et autres supports du terrorisme international, des agressions perpétuelles contre Israël et de la guerre déclarée au monde occidental, le seul où les collabos et dhimmis entretiennent le déni. Le seul qui, menacé par une idéologie de mort, ne se bat plus pour sa vie ?

Posted on 07/29/2014 11:34 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

From the Evening Chronicle

Police have charged four teenagers in connection with an assault on a rabbi in Gateshead in the early hours of the morning of Friday July 18. The victim, in his 40s, was attacked as he left a Jewish study centre at the centre of the North East’s biggest Orthodox Jewish Community, in Bensham. . . suffered minor injuries.

Qaiser Malik, 19, and Balawal Sultan, 18, both of Newcastle, and male youths aged 17 and 16 have been charged with racially aggravated common assault. They appeared at South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court on Saturday July 19. All four are due at Newcastle Crown Court on August 4, for a plea and case management hearing.

Posted on 07/29/2014 11:02 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Here is ISIS' treatment of prisoners of war (this one has been removed, but Vlad Tepes has the long version here. It seems this ia actually and ISIS propaganda video. They are proud of what they're doing. 

Here is ISIS in Syria showing off prior treatment of prisoners - this is a warning to others who might resist.

Posted on 07/29/2014 10:01 AM by Rebecca Bynum

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

With those involved including Hashim Thaci, the current Prime Minister of the Muslim state, created by NATO and above all by the American government,  of what was carved out of Serbia and is now called "Kosovo."


The paragraph about Hashim Thaci deserves to be excerpted:

"The Marty Report said current Kosovo Prime Minister Hashim Thaçi was a mafia-like crime boss during the war, leading a group that committed assassinations, beatings, trafficking in organs and drugs and other crimes."

The numbers involved are surely much larger than what the Marty Report says. I have already heard, in the BBC, Serbian survivors describe the perfectly healthy men who then "died" and had their organs removed for sale. But the Marty Report deals only in what can be absolutely proven, not on what everybody knows but for which the evidence no longer exists. It has taken 15 years, after all, for this report to finally be produced.

Posted on 07/29/2014 8:54 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Tuesday, 29 July 2014

From the Copenhagen Post

Seven men from Denmark, Sweden and Norway travelled to war zones last year to kill themselves – and others.

A man known as Abu Sa’ad al-Denmark claimed that he would commit a suicide bombing near Mosul in Iraq this year, according to Berlingske. The last part of the name he has give himself means ‘of Denmark’.

Abdulrahman Ahmed Haji, a 26-year-old Danish-Somali man blew himself up at a hotel party in Mogadishu, Somalia in 2009. Haji had disguised himself as woman wearing a veil. At least 24 people, including members of the Somali government, were killed in the attack. More than 60 more were injured. The man had lived in Denmark for 15 years before taking his deadly trip.

Security agencies say young Somalis and more and more Muslims are abandoning the safety and comfort of their homes in the West to join the ranks of extremist groups.

From which it is clear that these young men are better described as holders of passports from the Scandinavian countries rather than Scandinavians.

Posted on 07/29/2014 7:41 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax

Tuesday, 29 July 2014
Posted on 07/29/2014 6:15 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald

Monday, 28 July 2014

He had, you see, sent out to some of Australia's Jewish community an email in which he stated that Israel's actions in Gaza are purely self-defensive.  Which happens to be the truth.

But the Mohammedan Mob rose up at once in fury and threw a collective tantrum, and kept it up to the point where poor Mr Alhadeff gave up and gave in, and resigned from his position.

The whole affaire blew up in less than a week.

Here's how the Australian Jewish News reported the first round.

"Minister Backs Alhadeff".

'[NSW] Minister for Citizenship and Communities Victor Dominello has backed NSW Jewish Board of Deputies CEO Vic Alhadeff to remain as chair of the NSW Community Relations Commission (CRC) amid calls for his resignation by leaders of the local Arab [sic: "the local Muslim and Islamochristian" - CM] community.

'A letter sent to the minister this week, which was endorsed by a number of organisations, asked for Alhadeff to be terminated as head of the CRC on the basis that he was not "capable of exercising sound judgment on community relations", after he sent a community update about Operation Protective Edge to Jewish community members last week.

"In that update, Alhadeff said Hamas had committed "war crimes" (which they have, and how! - CM), and used civilian launching sites for its rocket attacks on Israel (which they have - CM).  He wrote that "all options are on the table" for Israel to defend its citizens, but it was operating with care to avoid civilian casualites.  

And that, too, is perfectly true, and quite plain to anyone with half a brain.  Mr Alhadeff's opinion is confirmed by the expert judgement of, inter alia, former British Army colonel Richard Kemp. - CM

'Signatories to the letter sent to Dominello charged Alhadeff with "making divisive and one-sided comments that only serve to alienate a large section of the community, incite disharmony and intolerance".

So he should have told lies to make the Jew-hating Mohammedans happy?   Strikes me that that stuff about 'alienate a large section of the community" and "incite disharmony and intolerance" is nothing but a veiled threat: "If you defend Israel in any way, we (the Muslim mob) will riot in the streets and smash things and beat up and kill people. - CM

"His about disseminating the justification of violence by the armed forces of another country against an occupied and besieged people", they wrote. 

Nonsense. Israel does not occupy Gaza.  And Hamas started the fight.  - CM

'Alhadeff's one-sided statement contradicts the ethos of the CRC and its charter and highlights the inherent conflict of interest between the two roles he currently occupies."

Thought experiment. Would they be squealing about a conflict of interest, and calling for resignations, if Mr Alhadeff had been a Muslim and had sent round to the Muslim "community" an email expressing solidarity with Hamas and the jihadis of Gaza, stating that Israel had no right to respond militarily to Muslim attack, no matter what, and stating a desire for the defeat and destruction of Israel and its total replacement by an Arab Islamic state of "Palestine"? - CM

'But Dominello confirmed to the AJN that Alhadef, who he said "is doing an outstanding job" as CRC chair, would remain in the post.  "We all bring different perspectives to international issues (though some perspectives, Mr Dominello, are closer to the ascertainable historical facts, than others - CM), and he has conceded the language used has offended some members of the Muslim community", he said.

Who are so very, very quick to be offended, by anything and everything not-Islam, and above all, by even the tiniest sign of any kind of Infidel opposition to Muslim dominance and resistance to Muslim assault. - CM

"We must not overlook Mr Alhadeff's substantial achievements in promoting inter-faith understanding between the Jewish and Muslim communities".

Waste of time. Don't any of these people read the Islamic texts and pay any attention to what those texts say about kuffar in general, and the Jews, in particular? - CM

'He said he would meet with the authors of the letter to discuss their concerns.

He shouldn't have given these whining, threatening, tantrum-throwing mohammedans the time of day. - CM

'Alhadeff told the AJN, "Despite occasionally differing views on issues, we all share a determination to live peacefully and harmoniously together in a tolerant and inclusive NSW."

"The role of the CRC Chair is to fight racism, promote multiculturalism, and ensure community harmony. This is what I have done passionately and will continue to do", he said...

Mate, please research the terms "Dar al Islam" and "Dar al Harb" and read Dr Mark Durie's devastating little book "The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom" and Sam Solomon's "Al Hijra: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration". Then you will know that the only "peace" and "harmony" that Muslims have in mind is when Muslims rule and do as they please and everybody else knuckles under.  - CM

"The Sydney Morning Herald reported last Friday that Premier Mike Baird (he who on Eid al-Fitra fawningly and effusively pledged friendship to the Mohammedan Mob - CM) had "publicly reprimanded" Alhadeff.

'However the Premier's full statement to the Herald suggested otherwise.

"Few people have done more to promote interfaith engagement and understanding between the Jewish and Muslim communities in NSW than Mr Alhadeff.  he has done an excellent job since his appointment as CRC Chair", the statement read.

"The Premier expects Mr Alhadeff to use his position to bring together multicultural communities and promote community harmony".

But what happens when Muslims take offence at the very idea of anyone's agreeing that an Infidel state can and should defend itself against Muslim jihad assault? - CM

"While Mr Alhadeff was not writing in his capacity as CRC chair, his statements may be considered inconsistent with these objectives".

So one should tell lies, or mince one's words, so as not to offend the Religion of Perpetual Outrage? - CM

"He has acknowledged the need to focus on issues in NSW, and avoid using inappropriate language regarding overseas conflicts".

So it is "inappropriate language" to tell the truth about Hamas' war crimes and acts of terror both achieved and plotted, and about Israel's remarkable attempts to avoid Gazan civilian casualties whilst attempting to defend its citizens from a nonstop and indiscriminate rocket barrage? Further question: what would Mr Baird consider to be "appropriate" language? And has Mr Baird been paying attention to the sorts of things that very large numbers of visibly-identifying Muslims have been screaming, about Jews, in massed threat displays on the streets of Sydney and Melbourne?  Aren't those things just a tad "inappropriate"? 

To do them credit,  the Premier and the Minister refused to sack Mr Alhadeff.

However, the Muslims continued to throw tantrums and sulk, as reported by Nicole Hasham in this Sydney Morning Herald article from July 25.


"Empty tables at Ramadan dinner as Vic Alhadeff stands by Gaza comments".

'NSW Community Relations Commission chair Vic Alhadeff has refused to withdraw controversial (no: true and accurate - CM) comments defending Israel's deadly force against Gaza (Israeli self-defence against the Jihad waged against her from Gaza - CM) that have badly fractured goodwill between Sydney's Jewish and Muslim groups.

That have exposed the reality of Muslim Jew-hatred. - CM

'Mr Alhadeff issued a belated apology on  Thursday for causing offence two weeks ago.

"But his insistence on standing by the remarks (which happened to be true - CM) has done little to placate Arab and Muslim groups, or relieve pressure on him to resign from his role on the commission, which promotes racial harmony.

My dear Ms Nicole Hasham, get a clue.  Islam is an ideology. A belief system. A set of ideas inside people's heads. It is not a "race".  And it - and the behaviour it promotes - should not be exempt from criticism. - CM

'The Federation of Ethnic Communities' Council of Australia on Friday said Mr Alhadeff must "consider his position" as community relations chief, given the damage his comments caused.

So we cannot and must not tell the truth about Jihad, or allow to any infidel the right to resist it, because that will make the Muslims angry? - CM

'Mr Alhadeff, who is also chief executive of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, emailed the Jewish community during the early stages of the conflict around Gaza.  He said Israel uses "care to avoid civilian casualties", and "pinpoint technologies to hit the targeted infrastructure".

Quite true. It does. - CM

'He condemned acts by Palestinian [sic - CM] militant Islamist group  Hamas, adding that Israel would "do whatever is needed to defend its citizens.  All options are on the table."

'The Palestinian [sic - CM] death toll in Gaza (that is: the claimed local Arab, mostly-Muslim, death toll in Gaza - CM) now stands at more than 720, most of them civilians (that is: of which Hamas and the UNRWA claim that most are civilians; although a list of names and ages released by Al Jazeera show that the single largest cohort among the dead is comprised of males of military age who might reasonably be supposed to be combatants - CM).  At least 15 people were killed and scores hurt when a UN shelter was bombarded by Israeli forces on Thursday.  (In fact, there is a high probability that this strike was an "own goal" by Hamas or other jihadis within Gaza. - CM).  On the Israeli side, 32 troops and three civilians have died. (Why don't you write "have been killed", Ms Hasham? - CM).

'The email triggered an outcry from Arab groups, who questioned how Mr Alhadeff can hold dual roles requiring him to both support the Jewish cause and promote community unity in NSW.

So "unity" can only be achieved if everyone toes the Muslim line? - CM

'Outside an Iftar dinner at NSW Parliament to mark Ramadan on Thursday night (and what is Parliament doing holding an Iftar dinner in the first place? If people understood that Ramadan is the "month of jihad" the last thing they would want is anything to do with it; any more than one would want to join a bunch of Neo-Nazis at a party celebrating Hitler's Birthday - CM) Mr Alhadeff said, "I don't resile from the comments", adding that he did not intend to cause offence and was "pro-Palestinian and pro-Israeli".

It would be wonderful if the local Arabs in and around Israel were to ditch the Death Cult, the Religion of Blood and War.  For if they did, peace could be had in minutes.  But seeing as they are unlikely to apostasise en masse at any time in the foreseeable future, one must ultimately choose sides; and sensible people will choose the Jewish side, the side that affirms life and freedom. - CM

'In an earlier statement issued on Thursday, Mr Alhadeff expressed "regret that some took umbrage" at his email.

"I am sorry if the comments in the briefing served inadvertently to offend members of some communities in NSW, because I agree with [Premier Mike Baird] that the role of the to work with all faiths and cultures in promoting multiculturalism and harmony", he said.

So long as we have a large and ever-larger Muslim presence in Australia, Mr Alhadeff, you can kiss the idea of harmony goodbye, unless by "harmony" one means that the Muslims say "grovel" and everybody else hits the dirt. - CM

'Mr Alhadeff said every civilian death (nicely worded; for not all deaths in Gaza are civilian, many are the deaths of persons - male or female, young or old - actively engaged in Jihad - CM) was "a tragedy", and "pain is felt by local communities with ties to both sides of this conflict".

Australians of German background, with cousins in Germany, no doubt felt pain and anxiety during World War II; but no sane and decent German-Australians took offence at the degree of force deployed by the Allies in order to defeat Hitler, or demanded that the Allies should cease from military action, because German civilians were getting killed.  One of my grandmother's cousins, of German-Australian parentage, flew in Bomber Command sorties over Germany, even though he knew full well that his mother's parents came from Lower Saxony and that he had cousins and second-cousins aplenty still residing there. - CM

'He affirmed his commitment to his part-time Community Relations Commission Role, for which he is paid $35 000 a year.

'The apology angered Australia Palestine Advocacy Network Vice President Issa Shaweesh, who described it as "insulting".

"He has apologised for the offence his comments caused, but not for the comments themselves. (Why should he apologise for telling the truth? - CM) His position as chairman of the NSW Community Relations Commission is utterly untenable".

'In a statement on Friday, the Federation of Ethnic Communities Councils of Australia, a peak national body, said Mr Alhadeff "certainly needs to consider his position...and whether he can continue in the role given the impact of his comments".

So to get someone fired, all the Muslims should have to do is throw a tantrum?- CM

'It said Mr Alhadeff showed "poor judgement" (no, he did not, as far as I am concerned he showed good judgement - CM) and the CRC chairman should "maintain a position of impartiality and sensitivity in the face of increasing global unrest" which can affect Australians with relatives living in conflict zones.

If one side is screaming "Slaughter the Jews" and intends the annihilation of the world's only Jewish state, and the other side - the side assailed by that would-be genocidal onslaught - is simply trying to defend itself, then I really don't see why anyone but a moral imbecile can pretend to be "impartial".  I feel absolutely no need at all to be "sensitive" to the feelings of people who support Hamas, Hamas which trains the children of Gaza, even from their toddler years, to become murder-"martyrs", and whose Charter praises and quotes from and endorses not only the most savagely-Jewhating passages in Islamic scripture, but also that vicious forgery, the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion". - CM

'Mr Baird on Thursday said Mr Alhadeff has his "full confidence'.

"He has apologised and he understands that the role of the CRC is to work with all faiths and cultures", Mr Baird said...

'Joseph Wakim (with that name, he is either a Muslim or a dhimmi Islamochristian - CM), a former Victorian Multicultural Affairs Commissioner, and founder of the Australian Arabic Council, welcomed the apology but said it "does not retract the damage done".

'He said Mr Alhadeff's dual roles still represented an "intrinsic conflict of interest" and calls for him to resign from the commisison were "not negotiable".

Mr Wakim should have been asked whether he would still think there was an "intrinsic conflict of interest" if Mr Alhadeff were to be replaced with an allahu-akbaring Muslim who cheered for every Hamas rocket that hit a target in Israel, and openly declared a desire for the destruction of Israel. - CM

'Some Arab and Muslim groups boycotted the iftar dinner, hosted by Mr Baird, leaving a number of empty tables at the event.

'Labor MP Shaoquett Moselmane (who was born in Lebanon to Muslim parents - CM), the first Muslim elected to the NSW Parliament, also pulled out of the event, along with other Muslim Labor councillors. 

Well, now we know. They endorse Hamas and deny Israel the right of self-defence against Jihad. - CM

'Liberal Auburn councillor (by "councillor", I assume this means a Member of the Legislative Council of the NSW Parliament - CM) Ronney Oueik did attend, saying later he was unaware of the controversy.

NSW Greens MP Mehreen Faruqi (who was born and brought up in Pakistan - CM) the first Muslim woman elected to a Parliament in Australia, was not invited.

"She said Mr Alhadeff's comments "clearly show a lack of judgement and commitment to multicultural harmony in NSW" and his explanation was "an affront to the Palestinian [sic - CM] and multicultural community".

Why is a Muslim from Pakistan so incensed when an Aussie Jew asserts the right of Israel to defend itself against would-be-genocidal Jihad waged by the Arab Muslims next door to it?  Answer: she accepts and practises the Jew-hatred and megalomaniacal Muslim supremacism - the goal of Total World Domination - that is hard-wired into the core Islamic texts. - CM

'She called for the comments to be withdrawn.'

And after more screams of rage from Muslims and dhimmis and with the tantrums continuing, poor Mr Alhadeff gave in, and quit his position.

As gleefully reported by the Sydney Morning Herald, here.

'The NSW Community Relations Commission chairman, Vic Alhadeff, has quit after his controversial comments defending Israel's attacks on Gaza (that is: defending Israel's right of self-defence against Hamas' would-be genocidal jihad assault - CM) caused a furore between Sydney's Jewish and Muslim groups.

Not "between".  More truthfully, the SMH should have written - "was greeted with irrational rage by many Muslims." - CM

"Mr Alhadeff...said on Sunday it was "with considerable regret" that he was quitting his role on the commission.

'"I have chosen to do so in the interests of the CRC and its important work in fostering social harmony within our society", he said.

Mate, when you have Muslims in a society, social harmony is what you won't get, because they believe they have the right to rule over everybody else, absolutely, and they will stop at nothing in their attempts to force everyone else to Submit. - CM

"It is clear that a briefing paper issued under my name inadvertently caused offence to some, and this is greatly regretted.

"While this was unintended, and despite the backing of numerous community leaders who acknowledged my record of goodwill, the reaction from some has become a distraction to the work of the CRC and the role of the chair".

'Mr Alhadeff said he had long "committed myself to building bridges and to intercultural harmony, and I intend to continue this work as a representative of the Jewish community"...

Please, Mr Alhadeff: before you do anything else, stop and read Bat Yeor, "Islam and Dhimmitude" and Dr Mark Durie "The Third Choice".  And get a clue.  Because right now, what has happened is that you have been hounded out of your post because you refused to accept the idea that Israel must behave as a dhimmi toward the Muslim entities that surround her. - CM

'Communities Minister Victor Dominello said he accepted Mr Alhadeff's resignation "with great regret" and thanked him for his service...

Perhaps they should appoint a Buddhist or Hindu as Mr Alhadeff's replacement.  And if they do, I wonder how long it will be before the Muslims find an excuse to be offended with that person, also? - CM

'Mr Alhadeff last week expressed "regret that some took umbrage" at his email, adding that every civilian death was "a tragedy".

Civilians, yes.  Combatants - including 14 year old child jihadis with explosive vests or toting AK-47s - no.- CM

'But his apology was rejected by many critics, including Australia-Palestine Advocacy Network president George Browning, a former Anglican bishop of Canberra, who said Mr Alhadeff's ongoing appointment "diminishes the credibility" of the Community Relations Commission.

Mr Browning, former bishop, has got to be either a Useful Idiot or an antisemite, and either way, is acting as a perfect dhimmi, serving the cause of the Jihad against the Jews. - CM

'President of the Lebanese Muslim Association, Samier Dandan, welcomed Mr Alhadeff's resignation, saying his position had become untenable.

"Mr Dandan said the decision would "ensure that the work of the CRC continues to build on the charter of community harmony and cohesion".

Grooming people for dhimmitude. "Harmony and cohesion", I see, = "never say or do anything that Muslims dislike, even if what you say is true and what you do is in self-defence against prior Muslim aggression." - CM

'Joseph Wakim, former Victorian Multicultural Affairs Commissioner and founder of the Australian Arabic Council, said Mr Alhadeff had thrown "one last stone" at his critics by attributing his resignation to the reaction to his comments, rather than the comments themselves.

The comments were true.  Why should not the CRC chair state what is true, even if others do not like it?  And he also stated the truth when he said he resigned because of the actions of others. They wore him down by their tantrums.  I wonder whether he also received threats, whether against himself personally, or against the Jewish community in Australia? - CM

"Integrity is imperative to the CRC charter. Never again can a neutral arbiter for a state government also be a mouthpiece for a foreign government", Mr Wakim said."

As opposed to being, say, a fifth-column agent of the Ummah, or Mohammedan Mob, the Allah Gang, the de facto Empire of Islam, actively furthering and participating in its 1400-year-long campaign to subjugate the entirety of the planet to itself and the despots that it spawns?  In any case, the idea that Mr Alhadeff, in making the comments that he did, was acting as a "mouthpiece" for a "foreign government", is nonsense; he was simply applying his judgement to the situation. There are plenty of non-Jewish Australians, such as myself, who share Mr Alhadeff's view of Israel's self-defensive action against the Hamas jihadis.  Does that mean that we, too, are "mouthpieces" of the government of Israel???  No, it does not.  It just means that we can see who started the fight, and who did not; and who is fighting dirty, and who is not; and that we feel perfectly entitled to call it as we see it. - CM


Posted on 07/28/2014 11:47 PM by Christina McIntosh

Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30