Print this pagePrint this page.

Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
Here are the Blogs in the Jerry Gordon category.
Thursday, 15 May 2008
Act for America National Poll on Islamic Issues
Act for America commissioned a national polling organization, Moore Information, to conduct a survey of Americans on ten Islamic issues using a random sample of 800. The polling was conducted April 14 to 16, 2008.

The Moore Information survey results were released on May 14th and ACT for America executive director, Guy Rodgers, briefed American Congress for Truth members during a conference call Town Hall Forum. Over 1,400 ACT members participated in the forum.

The following is a summary of results:

1.   Seven out of ten respondents (69%) disagreed with FBI translator hiring practices favoring Muslims over qualified Christians, Jews and other qualified linguist/analysts.

2    Seven out ten respondents (71%) disagreed with employers giving Muslim workers time off for daily and weekly prayer..

3.   Nine out of ten respondents (89%) disagreed that separate Sharia law courts should be permitted in legal systems in the West.

4.   Eight out of ten respondents (79%) disagreed that Muslim cab drivers can reject fares whose actions may violate their Islamic beliefs.

5.   Three out of four  respondents (74%) disagreed that criticizing or mocking the Prophet Mohammed or Islam constitutes hate speech.

6.   Nearly nine out of ten respondents (89%) disagreed that Banks that engage in Shariah Compliant Finance should be allowed to devote 2.5% or more of earnings to questionable Islamic charitable contributions with direct or indirect ties to terrorist organizations.

7.   Over three-fifths of respondents (61%)  disagreed that Muslim chaplains in our prison systems have the right to indoctrinate inmates in hate and violence under Freedom of Religion.

8.   Two thirds of respondents (67%) indicated the increase in Islamic terrorism around the world was due to Militant Muslims because of their aggressive and violent actions toward non-Muslims.

9.   Three out of four respondents (74%) approved of Congress investigating materials distributed in some American mosques that advocate hatred for Jews and Christians, and encourage Muslims to take up the cause of holy war against all unbelievers to see if they violate federal laws applying to tax-exempt organizations or laws relating to terrorism?

10.  Eight out of ten respondents (81%) approved the designation as a terrorist organization of Jaamat ul-Fuqra (JF) that runs a network of secret compounds through North America and has engaged in terrorist attacks and crime to support their violent extremist doctrine.


We note that ACT for America has launched a national petition drive-
click here- urging Congress to conduct investigations into Question 9- hate-filled materials in American Mosques, 3 out of 4  Mosques (100) evaluated by  the Mapping Sharia Project have been rated as ‘extremist’.  Further to Q. 1- bias in hiring by the FBI in favor of Muslim translators over qualified Christian, Jews and Others, Rep. Sue Myrick, leader of the House Anti-Terror Caucus has made this an issue in her “Wake Up America” agenda released on April 18th. The Myrick proposal calls for a GAO audit to determine the extent of such hiring discrimination and possible remedies.

For detailed poll results-click here

Posted on 6:18 AM by Jerry Gordon
Thursday, 8 May 2008
Vatican Flypaper May Entrap Shia Iran

Dr. Richard L. Rubenstein, noted theologian, distinguished university professor of comparative religion and former University president is among the few academics who ‘get it’ about the threat of radical Islam.  He sent a number of us an interesting article about a recent Vatican encounter with Shia clerics captured in a La Chiesa article entitled: “When the Turbans of Persia Pay Homage to the Pastor of Rome.”

The La Chiesa article noted the following:

The latest talks with Muslim representatives took place in the Vatican, with eight representatives of the Islamic Culture and Relations Organization of Tehran, and therefore with representatives of Shiite Islam, which has its center of gravity in Iran but is present in many other countries, with a following that accounts for about 12-15 percent of the Muslim community worldwide.

The colloquium began on Monday, April 28, and concluded on Wednesday, April 30, with a meeting with Benedict XVI in a room adjacent to the general audience hall. The Holy See, in a statement, reported that "the pope said he was particularly satisfied with the topic chosen."

And in effect, the topic was one of those most dear to Joseph Ratzinger: "Faith and Reason in Christianity and Islam".

It was developed in three subtopics, each introduced by one Catholic representative and one Muslim:

1. "Faith and reason: Which relation?", with the speaker for the Catholic side Vittorio Possenti, a professor of political philosophy at the University of Venice and a member of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences;

2. "Theology/Kalam as inquiry into the rationality of faith," with the speaker for the Catholic side Piero Coda, a professor of theology at the Pontifical Lateran University and the president of the Italian Theological Association;

3. "Faith and reason confronted with the phenomenon of violence," with the speaker for the Catholic side Jesuit Fr. Michel Fédou, a theologian and Church historian of the Centre Sèvres in Paris.

The Shia delegation was headed by a ‘spiritual adviser” to Mahdist Iranian President Ahmadinejad.  Note this:

Jointly presiding over the colloquium were Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, president of the pontifical council for interreligious dialogue, and Mahdi Mostafavi, president of the Islamic Culture and Relations Organization of Tehran.

Mostafavi is a "Seyyed," or one of the direct descendants of the prophet Muhammad, and until two years ago he was deputy foreign minister of Iran. Before returning to Iran, he told the Rome newspaper "il Riformista":

"I see president Ahmadinejad at least two times a week. Spiritual and moral values are fundamental in our government decisions, and I am his spiritual adviser".

This is enough to demonstrate how high the profile of the Iranian designation is, and how closely connected it is to the leadership of Ahamadinejad, an exponent of the most hardline wing of the Khomeinist regime, the one most hostile to the West and most explicit in denying the state of Israel's right to exist.

The two day colloquium came up with ‘agreement’:

At the end of the colloquium of April 28-30, the two delegations agreed on seven points, which were summarized in a statement as follows:

"1. Faith and reason are both gifts of God to mankind.

"2. Faith and reason do not contradict each other, but faith might in some cases be above reason, but never against it.

"3. Faith and reason are intrinsically non-violent. Neither reason nor faith should be used for violence; unfortunately, both of them have been sometimes misused to perpetrate violence. In any case, these events cannot question either reason or faith.

"4. Both sides agreed to further co-operate in order to promote genuine religiosity, in particular spirituality, to encourage respect for symbols considered to be sacred and to promote moral values.

"5. Christians and Muslims should go beyond tolerance, accepting differences, while remaining aware of commonalities and thanking God for them. They are called to mutual respect, thereby condemning derision of religious beliefs.

"6. Generalization should be avoided when speaking of religions. Differences of confessions within Christianity and Islam, diversity of historical contexts are important factors to be considered.

"7. Religious traditions cannot be judged on the basis of a single verse or a passage present in their respective holy Books. A holistic vision as well as an adequate hermeneutical method is necessary for a fair understanding of them."

A noted authority on the Islamic Law of Jihad and threat doctrine observes:

“I think the Vatican trapped Tehran in fly paper and will use it to demonstrate over time that Islam cannot agree to the terms they accepted as the condition for getting the joint declaration.”

We’d like to believe that pope Benedict XVI has the cut off the jib under those Shia Turbans and will wait for the appropriate moment to paste them on the ‘flypaper’ that Coughlin sees in the statements from this Vatican colloquium.  Bat Ye’or, ever the Cassandra warns us that the choice we have in America: Freedom or Dhimmitude.  As Frank Gaffney has recently argued, America is now on the slippery slope to Amerabia. That eventuality must be stopped dead in its tracks if our Judeo Christian civilization is to survive this ‘long war” with Islam in the 21st Century.

Posted on 5:39 PM by Jerry Gordon
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
 
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed