Please Help New English Review
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff

Date: 11/02/2012
Name:
Email: Keep my email address private
Reply:
**Your comments must be approved before they appear on the site.
Authentication:  
6 + 3 = ?: (Required) Please type in the correct answer to the math question.

  
You are posting a comment about...
JTA Special Series: Jewish Extremists-Smoke Screen for Obama

The Jewish Telegraph Agency,  JTA,  appears to be a  veritable shill for the Obama Administration’s ‘settlements’ propaganda regarding Israel.  It published and sent as an alert to subscribers a special series on Jewish Extremists.  That is most unfortunate, as the series of articles endeavors to portray Religious Nationalists in West Bank settlements as anti-Israel, and anti-Muslim thereby presenting threats to the IDF trying to maintain security there.

There are three articles by JTA staff writer Dina Kraft in this ‘special series’. The focus on these pieces is to show that Religious Nationalists are the equivalent of the cheredi  Neturei Karta opposing Israeli government attempts to eject them from Hevron, building more than 100 so-called illegal hill top caravan settlements and engaged in ‘terrorist ‘activities against Palestinians.

My suspicions were aroused when I found this commentary from one of  the cheer leaders for the Obama settlements mantra, the Israel Policy Forum (IPF).  You may recall the
IPF full page ad in the New Duranty Times excoriating Israeli settlement policies as contra the two-state solution, the division of Jerusalem and return of Arab refugees.  It supported President Obama and presented five steps:

1. RE-START NEGOTIATIONS. US-mediated talks toward the establishment of a Palestinian
state alongside Israel must be re-launched without delay.
2. STRENGTHEN SECURITY. Weapons smuggling into Gaza and Palestinian terror attacks on Israelis must stop. The number of American-trained Palestinian security forces in the West Bankmust be increased and their role in preventing violence strengthened.
3. IMPROVE THE FACTS ON THE GROUND. West Bank settlement construction and the
demolition of Palestinian houses in East Jerusalem must be stopped. Illegal outposts, superfluous
checkpoints and unnecessary roadblocks in the West Bank must be removed.
4. FOCUS ON GAZA. The Gaza Strip must be reconstructed with a focus on civilian needs andthe local economy.
5. PROMOTE REGIONAL PEACE. The Arab Peace Initiative must be embraced and used as a basis for negotiations for a comprehensive peace between Israel and its neighbors, including Syria.

Under the headline of
The Wild West” on the West Bank on the IPF blog, “The Pulse”, these JTA excerpts were found:

Over the last year and a half, radical settlers seem to have upped the ante. They have defaced Muslim tombstones, set fire to Palestinian olive groves, assaulted Palestinians, slashed tires of IDF vehicles and thrown acid at Israeli soldiers.

Outside the yeshiva, some younger students speak with resolute voices. They say they stand for a new path, unflinching and messianic.
"Our parents have their heads still in the Galut," said one, a tall, square-framed 20-year-old named Ariel Perelman, referring to a Diaspora mentality. "They agree with us, but they don't have time to make revolutions."
Yediah Shoam, 19, said, "We are in a war for the Land of Israel, and yeah, we'd shoot. I'm both kidding and not kidding. We need to prevent evacuations, and war is war."

When two top Israeli army commanders in the West Bank received threatening letters in early June, the suspects weren't the army's traditional enemies in the territory.
Instead, Israeli Jews angry about the army's recent demolition of several illegal settlement outposts appeared to have sent the letters.
The conundrum for Israel is how to bring the lawlessness of radical settlers under control and end the cat-and-mouse game with settlers who return almost as soon as they're evacuated by force.
Critics of Israel's 42-year presence in the West Bank say the occupation has fostered a Wild West, anything-goes approach to the law, with the result apparent in land grabs and physical assaults on Palestinians by both soldiers and civilians. This, they say, makes a crackdown against Israeli lawbreakers in the territories a challenge.
"When a society gets used to lawlessness being the norm, the abnormal becomes the norm," said Dror Etkes of Yesh Din. "It's very hard to wake up from that and say let's change things now."
 
In a related post “Recognizing Israel "As a Jewish State" Is a Brand New Israeli Demand.” by Washington, DC Policy Analyst of the IPF,  M.J. Rosenberg,  is  the ‘smoking gun’  a piece in  today’s Washington Post , “Netanyahu's Peace Stipulation- Israeli Premier Is First to Seek Recognition of Jewish Homeland by Jerusalem-based  Post staffer, Howard Schneider.

Schneider endeavors to portray PM Bibi Netanyahu’s condition for Palestinian negotiations  recognition of  Israel as a Jewish State as a ‘red herring’ and ‘novel demand’.   Rosenberg quotes an adviser during the Oslo Accord process, Ron Pundak, now with the Peres Peace Center:

"It has never been an Israeli demand," said Ron Pundak, a member of Israel's negotiating team in Norway and now director of the Peres Center for Peace in Tel Aviv. "When we negotiated Oslo, the issue of the characteristics of our state was never an issue."

Israeli  Ambassador to Washington designee, Michael Oren endeavors to set the record straight:

"If there is no recognition that the Jewish people exist, that the Jewish people emerged from this land, then you have no end of conflict," said Michael B. Oren, Netanyahu's incoming ambassador to Washington. "During Oslo, the thinking was: We don't need recognition. We are strong. We are the winners. Give them a chance. Give them an opportunity to acclimate to peace. This was wrong."

"The Israelis recognize that the Palestinians have suffered, and we are going to try to relieve that to the extent we can within our security needs," he said. "We ask that we are recognized as a people that are not alien."

The Schneider WAPO article, the JTA Jewish Extremists article and the IPF blog  appear to be exquisite timing  aimed at undermining  the core Zionist ethos for the Jewish State of Israel.  That is in the belief of both Dan Diker of the  Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs and Jon Schanzer of the Washington-based Jewish Policy Center, an “absurdity.”  Witness  their comments in a recent 1330AMWEBY radio forum  on the ‘settlements’ issue:

Schanzer noted that Israel captured the West Bank and Gaza in 1967 to safeguard its citizens from attack. Settlements in disputed territories  were temporary in nature.  He  illustrated  this by noting Israeli abandonment of  settlements in the Sinai as a result of the peace treaty with Egypt and the unilateral withdrawal from the Gush Katif settlements in Gaza.  He contends that the focus on settlements by the Obama administration as a  major  issue  in the Middle East disregards the Iran nuclear  threat and the looming prospect of a possible nuclear war.  Netanyahu addressed those concerns in his Bar-Ilan speech.  Schanzer noted a clear rift in the US Israel relationship appeared in the wake of the speeches by  President Obama  and  PM Netanyahu. 

  Diker contended that Obama refuses to understand what the late Israeli PM  Rabin in the   Oslo    process was uniquely concerned about, the various dimensions of complete security and  defensible borders  for the Jewish state.   In the words of  the late Israeli Foreign Minister Abba  Eban,  Israel should not return to the pre-1967 War so-called “Auschwitz borders,” and  that Israel needed defensible borders.  The West Bank, encompassing Samaria and Judea, is less than  9 to 12 miles wide.  92 to 94 % of the West Bank is virtually unpopulated public lands and  Palestinian towns and settlements account for  less than 3 to 4% of the disputed area.

Diker believes that Obama has zero tolerance on settlements and wants all of them dismantled. The reality, as Diker noted , is that most of the municipalities  with an estimated Israeli  population of over 350,000 ‘hug’ the so-called green line.  Obama’s conditions for restricting so-called natural growth of these municipalities are an absurdity.

This is not the first time that the JTA has been the equivalent of a useful idiot for the extreme left among American Jews, whether J Street or the IPF, nor do I expect it will be the last. 

I wrote the JTA editor, Uriel Heilman, who sent this series on Jewish Extremists around to subscribers:

This  JTA series on alleged Jewish Extremists  only feeds Obama's Mantra on settlements, which is disingenuous. I'm surprised, but not really that the JTA would assist in  supporting the Administration's position and contributing to misdirecting attention of American  Jews from the real issues supporting Israel- the canary in the mines of Jihadism on display in Tehran.  More attention should be given to how the remaining Iranian Jews under threat from the Shia Mullahs, bent on their annihilation, can be  evacuated  from Iran, now dangerously  in pieces.

Helen Freedman, a stalwart in Americans for a Strong Israel commented:

You're right. It's a smokescreen to attack the idealistic Jews and let the bad guys slip by.

Fred Leder, a Connecticut Jewish Activist commented:

This stuff is dangerous and extremely counterproductive. We need American Jews to choose Israel over Obama and this nonsense gives them reason to stick with the big O.

American Jews might ask why they contribute to the JTA with this biased inflammatory reporting. This JTA series on Jewish Extremists is part of a patent disinformation campaign being orchestrated by leftist Jewish Washington lobbyists out to sabotage a Jewish Israel.  Diker, Leder and  Freedman are right. This is an “absurdity” and a dangerous 'smokescreen'.  

Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29    

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed