New English Review " />
Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications from New English Review Press
Easy Meat
by Peter McLoughlin
The Tongue is Also a Fire
by James Como
Out Into The Beautiful World
by Theodore Dalrymple
Unreading Shakespeare
by David P. Gontar
Islam Through the Looking Glass: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J. B. Kelly, Vol. 3
edited by S. B. Kelly
The Real Nature of Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
As Far As The Eye Can See
by Moshe Dann
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum

Date: 27/05/2016
Email: Keep my email address private
HTML is NOT allowed!
**Your comments must be approved before they appear on the site.

You are posting a comment about...
Did Iraq harm the "war on terror"?

"If the report had argued that Iraq has weakened the U.S. position because we are effectively abetting an Iranian-backed Shi'ite takeover of the country, and thus aiding rather than weakening the global jihad, that would be a defensible, indeed a cogent, position."
-- from Robert Spencer's comment on this report

Or if the report had argued that while the initial invasion of Iraq in order to scour for major weapons and disrupt relevant weapons projects was rational, remaining in Iraq, attempting to bring "freedom" and "democracy" to warring sectarian and ethnic parties when their mistrust, propensity for violence, inability to compromise, all of which has its roots in the attitudes and atmospherics naturally arising in societies suffused with Islam, was not only a mistake, but the very opposite of what, at this point, the Americans should wish to be doing. They should not be trying to improve the situation, to make things better, for Islamic societies, but to divide and demoralize them, wherever possible (and not by doing anything -- malign neglect will do the trick), so as to buy time for the Infidels to view these "demonstration projects" and come to their own conclusions.

There is much that is wrong with Iraq. And it is even true, no doubt, that it serves as a recruiting tool -- but so does everything else. The Pope, Israel, the Thai army, the Danish cartoons, the English police raids, the refusal to permit the hijab, the continued existence of Coptic Churches in Egypt, the new prep school being founded by King Abdullah on the Deerfield model, so very inattentive to Qur'anic memorization, so much more attentive to English, biology, and lacrosse, the failure of the Italian authorities to remove anti-Muhammad Dante from the school curriculum, the failure of this or that country to remove absolutely every conceivable obstacle to the campaigns of Da'wa, the insistence in some countries that the local laws --such as those about polygamy -- be observed, the insistence that Muslims should take oaths of allegiance to the local Infidel nation-state when that contravenes, insults even, the principle of sole loyalty owed by Muslims to Islam and to fellow Muslims.

Yesterday it was bases in Saudi Arabia. Today it may be Iraq. Tomorrow it may be bases in Kuwait or Qatar. It may be attempts to jam broadcasts, or prevent reception, of such menacing organs of the Ikhwan as al-Jazeera.

The report, one assumes, nowhere suggests that the situation of turmoil in Iraq is not to be deplored but welcomed, and that the real foolishness of the Bush Administration is the stubborn refusal of so many, taking their cue from Bush himself, who prides himself on his stubbornness, which he regards as a sterling quality, one he delights in polishing every day -- at the expense of the American taxpayers, the American army, and American interests in weakening the world-wide camp of Islam, not in making Iraq that Light Unto the Muslim Nations that Bush continues to hallucinate so maddeningly about, and so do those in his claque, who can no longer think straight. And of course, those who hate him are, alas, haters for all the wrong reasons, and even -- if such is possible -- even more wrong-headed than Bush.

Guns, Germs and Steel in Tanzania
The Thinking Person's Safari
Led by Geoffrey Clarfield
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31