If you see this text then you need to update your flash player.

Print this pagePrint this page.

Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
These are all the Blogs posted on Thursday, 14, 2008.
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Cliché corner

This week's cliché is: "Good luck with that."

Reform Islam? Good luck with that. World peace? Good luck with that.

It was sardonic and pithy, but its time has passed.

I like to catch such expressions at their peak, and replace them with something new and fresh. My ultimate goal is to eradicate clichés from the English language.

Yes, I know what you're going to say. Well don't. Help me out here.

 

Posted on 4:34 AM by Mary Jackson
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Tawny Sands and Sheikhy Ground

In my article Dozy Bints – Western Handmaids of Allah, I make much of the "swooner". A swooner is a Western woman whose heart goes pitter-patter and whose knees – and brain - go weak at the sight of a Son of Allah. This is nothing new – those liquid brown eyes, those sensuous yet cruel mouths have been mesmerising the English rose for at least a century. The BBC reports on Sheikhs’ appeal:

 

It is the stuff of escapist fantasy. A tall, dark and handsome type sweeps a cream-and-roses Home Counties heroine off her feet. In its 100 years of publishing, the exotic alpha male has been a staple of the Mills and Boon romance.

 

The tale of the passionate desert sheikh who sweeps secretary Janna Smith off her feet in Violet Winspear's 1970 romance Tawny Sands is perhaps the quintessential Mills and Boon story.

 

Violet Winspear? Not Violet Sheikhspeare?

 

"His tone of voice was softly mocking, but she knew he didn't really jest. He was Raul Cesar Bey and the further they travelled into the desert the more aware she was of his affinity with the savage sun and tawny sands." 

Shocking, suggestive, the tale of their love was wildly popular with a generation of romance readers. 

It is also typical of a taste for foreign pleasures when it comes to romantic fiction.

It's 100 years since Mills and Boon published their first book. Sold in 109 countries and translated into 26 different languages, it is arguably Britain's best-known publishing house worldwide. 

From early in the company's history, its winsome heroines have looked beyond Britain's shores to find love.  

Nobody can quite identify the very first Mills and Boon romance to feature an exotic hero or location. But Dr Joseph McAleer, author of Passion's Fortune: The Story of Mills and Boon, says it was probably in the 1910s, following the lead of Hollywood cinema and its preoccupation with desert sheikhs and jungle escapades. 

The fascination still exists today with the best-selling title of the June 2008 Modern Romance series being Desert King, Pregnant Mistress by Susan Stephens.

"Exotic locations gave great scope to authors to be a bit racier. It is usually an English person going into the tropics to experience this different culture," Dr McAleer says.  

"But they never lose their moral foundation. The heroines normally wind up reforming the sheikh."

 

Good luck with that. Ooops.

Posted on 5:30 AM by Mary Jackson
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Dumb Britain pats itself on the back

The Times runs an advice column for readers with a moral dilemma. Last year, a reader wrote to say that he was unsure whether it was ethical to cheat on his CV and claim to have three Grade As at A-Level. Twenty years ago he got three Grade Cs, but in today’s coinage that is worth three As. I can see his point.

 

The reader was advised not to cheat, because employers know the difference. Older employers perhaps, but does a twenty-five-year-old, told from an early age that he has an A-Grade intellect, know that he is really a C-Grade? In fact those who lose out are the people who got real A-Grades twenty or more years ago. They are now lumped in with the inflated A-Grades of today.

 

The annual A-Level farce is with us once again. The Telegraph, whose leader-writers are old enough to have passed A-Levels when they were rigorous, points out the obvious:

Without wishing to diminish the hard-earned successes of those who have done well, it nevertheless beggars belief that - for the 28th year in a row - there has been a rise in standards, with a 97 per cent pass rate and the highest ever number of A grades.

Even to whisper that this might be the result of "grade inflation" is to risk the wrath of ministers, who maintain that the improvements can be ascribed entirely to better teaching and cleverer pupils.

Yet the evidence is difficult to dispute. Over the past 40 years, the percentage of A-level entries awarded a pass grade has risen by 40 per cent. Since the mid-1980s, the proportion awarded an A grade has risen from nine per cent to more than 25 per cent.

Research published this week suggested that an A grade today is the equivalent of a C 20 years ago. This is unfair both to those who are exceptional students and would have secured a top grade in any generation, and to those awarded a mark beyond their capabilities.

It is also unfair to universities, which find it impossible to differentiate between the very bright and the mediocre.

While promoting its new vocational diplomas, the Government has realised it must also restore the academic rigour of an exam once considered the gold standard of the education system. From 2010, the best pupils will be able to obtain an A* and changes to the modular structure will help underpin the exam's integrity.

It is crucial for the survival of the A-level that these reforms are not undermined, otherwise alternatives such as the International Baccalaureate and the Pre-U will look increasingly attractive to the best schools, top universities and parents.

Posted on 6:08 AM by Mary Jackson
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Nice Americanism of the week

Ann Treneman writes:

Why does homesickness always strike when you least expect it? There I was, in the middle of the Yorkshire Dales, minding my own business. We were staying at the Stone House (please don't book, it's my secret) near Hawes at the same time as a gaggle of Americans. Most of the time I find random Americans irritating and pretend to be English but this group were classier and a bit intriguing and so I admitted to having grown up in the States.

We then embarked on the game of finding a common geographical link. This turned out to be Iowa, my birthplace and their former home. Plus they were now at a retirement community in Texas, a state where I have also lived. I beamed. Why is it so satisfying that this game is completed successfully? I have no idea. I fell to talking to one of the men who said they were off to the Lake District for another week of walking. “After that,” he chuckled, “we won't be walking anywhere. We'll be all tuckered out.”

All tuckered out. Just three words but, the moment he said them, they wrapped around me. In general, or so I believe from my current comfortable position of great distance, I remember American English as a gentler and more understated form of the language. The words “all tuckered out” unlocked something inside that brought back entire scenes from childhood: riding my bike, without hands, down the silent roads of America's suburbia, picnicking beneath the huge mossy oaks, spending a whole day, back against the roots of a huge fir, reading a book.

"All tuckered out" is much pleasanter - and less coarse - than the British "knackered". I think we should adopt it. But why do the best Americanisms seem to have "-uck" in them?

Posted on 6:57 AM by Mary Jackson
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Plumb Tuckered Out
Ann Treneman may have been born in corn-fed Iowa, and even lived for a time in Texas,  but perhaps she should return for a refresher course in our demotic. The True-West (that is, based on the dialogue of movie Westerns) version (west of the Mississippi and south of Amarillo, and she should if she lived in Texas have known it) of "all tuckered out" is "plumb tuckered out" as in "You look plumb tuckered out. Why don't you come on in and set a spell." That “plumb” implies the sagebrush, and the tumbling tumbleweed, and the view of Monument Valley, and being back in the saddle again.

While I don’t have much truck with her last generalization, either, I won't raise a ruckus about it. I am, you see, an American, a real life nephew of my Uncle Sam, and born -- well, born very close to the Fourth of July.

Posted on 8:52 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Thursday, 14 August 2008
A Musical Interlude: Yankee Doodle Dandy (Jimmy Cagney)
Posted on 8:55 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Thursday, 14 August 2008
No truck

"While I don’t have much truck with her last generalization..." (Hugh)

I suppose the English version of this should be "have no lorry with..."

Many people have no truck with things. Hugh hasn't much truck with one thing. Has there ever been someone who has had a bit of truck with something? Or a lot of truck?

Is anyone, in other words, plumb truckered out?

 

Posted on 9:27 AM by Mary Jackson
Thursday, 14 August 2008
A Musical Interlude: My Old Man Said Follow The Van (Lily Morris)
Posted on 10:11 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Phares: South Ossetia: The Perfect Wrong War

Walid Phares writes in The American thinker (with thanks to Andrew Bostom):

(...) Since 1999, the outcome of the Western campaign in Kosovo brought about a parallel status quo to the one established in South Ossetia and in Abkhasia. In short, NATO had created an autonomous area for the ethnic Albanians inside a sovereign country, Serbia; while Russia and the CIS have insured autonomous status for South Ossetians and Abkhasians inside another sovereign state, Georgia.

From a Russian perspective the two cases were linked and would eventually be resolved via negotiations. From a Western perspective Kosovo was "unique" and was to be resolved differently, that is granted independence unilaterally. But as long as Russian-American relations especially under Presidents Bush and Putin were warm, the de facto enclaves in Kosovo and Ossetia lived in stability.

The challenge began when during winter 2008, the US and the European Union decided to unleash Kosovo's separation despite Serbia's opposition. In international jurisprudence, breaking away entities need validation by the country the partition is going to affect. In Canada for example, Quebec would always need the other provinces to agree on separation. Agreement of "both sides" is usually sought.

But in the case of Kosovo, for international political motivations, including a gesture to please the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in the midst of a campaign to win hearts and minds, Washington and Brussels went ahead swiftly and endorsed Pristina's declaration of separation from Belgrade. The Western powers argued that going back to Serbia was out of question for the Kosovars; therefore going forward was the only option, despite Serbian claims inside the province.

The underlying geopolitical reasoning was that no force including the Russians would be able to oppose the move. "They are too far" to intervene, assumed the diplomats. But Moscow made its intentions known the day of Kosovo's declaration of independence.

The Russian statement was poorly covered in the international media. The release said the Russian Federation will recognize the efforts by South Ossetia and Abkhazia to secede from Georgia. It was a clear eye for an eye declaration, but it went unnoticed in the West. In an article titled "Be Wise on Kosovo," published on December 13, 2007 in the American Thinker,  I warned that a chain reaction may begin elsewhere. The confrontations taking place today in the Caucasus were triggered strategically in the Balkans few months before. Russia was ignored on the shores of the Mediterranean, it responded on the shores of the Black sea. To Moscow, Georgia's allies are also "too far" when the enclaves would move to separation.

Direct causes

But Georgia's Government realized the sense of Russia's statements and still decided to act preemptively. President Mikheil Saakashvili must have calculated that by moving fast on the ground he would avoid the repetition of a Kosovo-like declaration in South Ossetia. His strategic algebra is still unclear to me. Was he hoping for a blitz seizure of Tskhinvali and the formation of a pro-Georgian local government? Was he predicting a slow Russian reaction? Historians will tell. But the chain reaction is clear. Moscow gave the green light to South Ossetia and Abkhazia to follow the Kosovo model, and Tbilisi rushed to abort these moves. Hence Georgian forces were ordered by Saakashvili to "bring back constitutional order" to the breakaway republics -- 16 years after a status quo -- and Medvedev and Putin responded by sending Russian forces to drive the Georgians out of the two provinces. In its own response Russia was telling the West: South Ossetia is Kosovo and Georgia is Serbia; I am applying your doctrine in the Caucasus.
 
(...) But meanwhile, a growing number of observers in the West are connecting the dots from the South Ossetia drama to much wider and strategic horizons.  How to look at the Caucasus crisis is the question. Do we want to bring back the Cold war and the Russo-Western struggle? Do we want to drop the War on Terror and swim back to the pre 1990s years? Or do we want to win the global confrontation with the forthcoming Jihadi Caliphate?

(...) The world Salafists' ultimate wish is to see the two infidel superpowers at odds with each other again; and that is happening. The combat-Jihadists want bloodshed both in Moscow and in Washington now and in the future. The long-term Wahabis likes the idea of an American demobilization against Jihadism and a re-mobilization against Russia. Ending the War on Terror and reigniting the Cold war is the ultimate fantasy of the oil producing fundamentalist powers.

On the other hand, the Iranian regime and its allies in Syria and Lebanon have clearly opted for privileged strategic relations with Russia as a way to counterbalance the US and its allies in the region. The flow of petro cash from Iranian oil revenues can ensure a good business and military relationship with Moscow. Some in the latter city -- still recalling Cold War feelings -- like the idea of client states (or so they think) counterbalancing American presence in the Middle East.

In the final analysis, the two main trees of Jihadism are playing West against East to ensure the weakening and ultimately the collapse of their grand foes. The Wahabis wants to bring Russia down via the establishment of several Wahabi emirates in its midst --from Chechnya to Central Asia. And the Khomeinists want the US out of the region so that they can establish their own dominance instead.

Moscow and Washington (and Brussels as well) should not be manipulated by oil fundamentalist powers against each other. The Cold War should not be brought back at the expense of winning the conflict against Jihadi Terrorism. In clear terms: no wars should be waged outside the international campaign against the terrorists, should it be an ethnic or economic one. These, including the current Caucasus conflict, are wrong wars as they would profit the global Jihadi forces, both political and military...
Posted on 10:08 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Tongue twister

British tongue twister: red lorry, yellow lorry.

American tongue twister: red truck, yellow truck.

Posted on 10:14 AM by Mary Jackson
Thursday, 14 August 2008
A Somali In Denver With Cyanide

DENVER -- Police confirmed Wednesday that they found about a pound of sodium cyanide in a Denver hotel room where the body of a Canadian man was discovered earlier this week.

Police spokesman John White identified the white powder as sodium cyanide, the crystal form of cyanide. Fire officials say they found a bottle containing about a pound of the white powder, or between a pint and a quart by volume.

An expert told the Denver Post that the amount of cyanide is enough to kill hundreds of people.

The medical examiner's office said it is awaiting test results to determine whether cyanide killed 29-year-old Saleman Abdirahman Dirie, of Ottawa, Canada.

His body was found Monday inside Room 408 at The Burnsley Hotel, which is about four blocks from the state Capitol. White said Dirie had been dead for several days. Friends told The Ottawa Sun that he was dead six days before he was discovered.

Foul play is not suspected and his death appears to be an isolated incident, White said.

The FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force is assisting in the investigation but FBI spokeswoman Kathy Wright said the incident has no apparent connection to terrorism.

The usual statement - the perpetrator had no known connections to Al-Qaeda and a history of mental troubles (the latter part will come up later). They probably use a form letter.

"You have a suspicious substance that was found in a hotel room in conjunction with person being a foreign national, and we have a lot of questions and that is why we are assisting," Wright told the Post.

An online threat posted in July by a man with a similar name warned of death.

"Having the bible in one hand, and a bread in the other hand, is not a correct thing! Kill Them , Kill them, Kill them, that is my massage (sic),!" read the posting by Abdirahman Dirie on the 'Solmali's for Jesus' Blog....

Posted on 12:34 PM by Rebecca Bynum
Thursday, 14 August 2008
“Putin’s Strategic Game” and Israel’s Loss

Ken Timmerman has it exactly right in this NewsMax.com article about what Putin’s KGB thugocracy is doing in the ‘great game’ of the 21st Century by attacking Georgia and its strategic Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Witness these comments:

    Sources in Tehran with close ties to senior regime officials tell me that Iran’s leaders are “looking and laughing” at the slaughter in Georgia, because they feel they will benefit from the closure of the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline, as well as from Russia’s Cold-War style confrontation with the West.

    Iran derived an added, and possibly unsuspected, benefit from the recent fighting when Georgian president Saakashvili ordered the 2000 Georgian troops on duty with the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq to return home to guard their nation’s capital.

    “The Georgian soldiers had been guarding Iran’s border with Iraq,” my sources in Tehran say. “This will put new pressure on the United States and Iraq, and in the meantime make it easier for the people who want to cross the border from Iran” to carry out terrorist attacks against the U.S. and our Iraqi allies.

    The timing of the current conflict in Georgia has not been lost on Iran’s leaders. “They are convinced that Russia will not help the United States at the U.N. Security Council in getting a new sanctions resolution,” my sources say.

The Putin Georgia attack is also aimed at Israel, a potential partner in the BTC pipeline deal. Israel was to get oil for local energy use and to transship via a pipeline from Ashdod to Eilat and hence to tankers plying the Asian oil trades. Looks like the Russians and the Iranian Islamic Republic are in cahoots on this caper in Georgia So, why are the corrupt Olmert and the Bushites dithering, when these are the geo - political realities of the energy ‘great game’, eh?

by Kenneth Timmerman, NewsMax.com, August 14, 2008

A senior White House official confirmed on Monday what reporters on the ground in Georgia have known since their first glimpse of the ongoing hostilities: Russia’s invasion of Georgia was not a hastily-improvised event, in response to provocation, but had been planned well in advance.

Russia moved the equivalent of two heavy divisions into the mountainous terrain of northern Georgia, in addition to mobilizing its navy to blockade the Georgian coast and its air force to launch hundreds of bombing raids. These are not the type of things any modern nation can do overnight. Russia’s planning shows foresight, and intent.

So besides reasserting Russia’s control over its “near abroad,” and opposing the expansion of NATO into Georgia, what is czar Vladimir Putin’s game?

Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili has accused Russia of seeking to control energy routes from the Caspian. Georgian officials have told reporters that Russian aircraft have bombed portions of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil and gas pipeline dozens of times since hostilities began. Russia has denied the attacks. So has pipeline operator, British Petroleum.

But a reporter from the London Daily Telegraph witnessed the damage from one Russian air strike over the weekend, during which “over 50 missiles” were fired against a stretch of the pipeline on the outskirts of Tbilisi.

“I have no doubt they wanted to target the pipeline, there is nothing else here,” a policeman who witnessed the attack told The Telegraph’s reporter.

Why would the Russians attempt to take out the recently-built pipeline, which carries energy resources from Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan to Western Europe?

Because the Russians and their strategic partner, the Islamic Republic of Iran, have been opposed to the pipeline since it was first planned in the mid-1990s. Through terrorist proxies in Turkey, where the pipeline feeds into the Ceyhan terminal on the Mediterranean, they have repeatedly sabotaged it....

Posted on 12:46 PM by Jerry Gordon
Thursday, 14 August 2008
Musharraf Is Expected to Resign in Next Few Days

New Duranty: ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Faced with desertions by his political supporters and the neutrality of the Pakistani military, President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan, an important ally of the United States, is expected to resign in the next few days rather than face impeachment charges, Pakistani politicians and Western diplomats said Thursday.

His departure from office would be likely to unleash new instability in the country as the two main parties in the civilian government jockeyed for the division of power.

The details of how Mr. Musharraf would exit, and whether he would be able to stay in Pakistan — apparently his strong preference — or would seek residency abroad were now under discussion, the politicians said.

Mr. Musharraf was expected to resign before the governing coalition presented charges for impeachment to the Parliament early next week, said Nisar Ali Khan, a senior official in the Pakistani Muslim League-N, the minority partner in the coalition government.

(...)

“The United States is now accepting Musharraf’s removal as a fait accompli,” Mr. Khan said.

“They just want that he should not be humiliated. We don’t want his humiliation either.” ...

Posted on 3:43 PM by Rebecca Bynum
Thursday, 14 August 2008
I like children, but I couldn't eat a whole one

Paul in the comments to this piece:

Babies should be deep-frozen at birth, and allowed to gradually defrost around the age of 35.

From an earlier post:

When Baby’s cries grew hard to bear
I popped him in the Frigidaire
I never would have done it if
I’d known that he’d be frozen stiff
My wife said, “George, I’m so unhappé
Our darling is completely frappé!”

Posted on 5:20 PM by Mary Jackson
Thursday, 14 August 2008
"If That's True This Country Is Doomed."

From a news story about Aafia Siddique: 

"Long before Aafia Siddique was arrested in Afghanistan last month, allegedly in possession of a list of New York targets and chem-bio weapons information, she had allegedly developed a plot, however improbable or amateurish, to kill Presidents Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush and to attack the White House. Siddique plotted to use weapons that included biological agents to contaminate former president Carter's water, according to multiple federal sources.

Those allegations, some contained in the federal complaint filed on July 31st by the US Attorney in Manhattan, the details expanded on by sources spoken to by ABC News, paint Siddique, 36, as a committed Al Qaeda operative, and one whose capture could hold the key to identifying other operatives and supporters both in the US and overseas.

But her lawyer, activist attorney Elizabeth Fink, says the entire government case against Siddique is a lie.

"They used the same stuff 40 years ago...against the Black Panthers, against the Attica Brothers...a list of targets in their possession...why would anyone be in Ghanzi, Afghanistan walking around with a list of landmarks of New York?," Fink asked. "These people are nuts and don't even know how to lie."

Fink, a protégé of now deceased firebrand William H. Kunstler, says that everything in Siddique's past points to a life completely different than the government has alleged in its criminal complaint.

"She graduates MIT summa cum laude. She gets her MS and her PhD from Brandeis -- Brandeis! Eating Kosher and living with the Jews; all of a sudden she turns into an Al Qaeda operative? If that's true this country is doomed. Doomed," said Fink.

Posted on 5:46 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Thursday, 14 August 2008
A Politico-Musical Interlude: A Song About Soldiers' Boots (Bulat Okudzhava)
Posted on 7:25 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
 
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31       

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed