Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky

These are all the Blogs posted on Saturday, 8, 2010.
Saturday, 8 May 2010
The media, mystified as to the Times Square bomber's motivation, gives it their best shot

Links in original.  From The Week:

The private life of Faisal Shahzad

How did an "average" suburbanite become an alleged jihadist? The media is finding clues in the Times Square bomber's web habits, his handwriting, even his fridge

The news media has taken to digging through Faisal Shahzad's personal life, his garbage, and his fridge to understand how "an average student in college, an average employee in the workplace, an average neighbor in suburbia," became an alleged would-be mass murderer.


What did he and his family do for fun?
Until about a year ago, it seems, their (not particularly radical) [radical what?] diversions included watching Hollywood hits (Up in the Air) on DVD, oil-painting, and shopping. "They really loved Kohl's and Macy's," says Shelton neighbor Brenda Thurman, who characterizes Mian as a bit of a clotheshorse. Shahzad liked jogging at night in all black attire.

Uh.  Okay.


A photo she posted of her husband ("he's my everything") has led observers to conclude that he over-indulged in hair gel and kept his narrow beard "meticulously neat." His online résumé, three-pages long, is set in the ubiquitous font Georgia.

Calling all cars.  Be on the lookout for any serif font users.  Use extreme caution in apprehension.  Repeat.  Use extreme caution.


And his actual handwriting?
The New York Daily News asked a graphologist to analyze Shahzad's signature (see sample and analysis here). The expert sees evidence of anger (checkmark-like "ticks"), a focus on religious matters (letter forms that reach lofty heights), and a bizarre need to stand out (a "curlicue" in lieu of an i-dot).

I've got a short, written imperative statement that I'd like the graphologist to analyze.

Posted on 05/08/2010 1:11 AM by Artemis Gordon Glidden
Saturday, 8 May 2010
In a high-security British jail, a Serbian warlord has his throat slashed by three Muslim inmates

From The Daily Mail

A former Serb general convicted of Europe's worst massacre since the Second World War had his neck slashed open by three Muslim prisoners in a British jail yesterday. Radislav Krstic, 62, serving a 35-year sentence for war crimes, was in a critical condition in hospital after the attack at top security Wakefield Prison. At least one of Krstic's attackers is said to be a Bosnian Muslim.

It is almost certain to be raised at diplomatic level and questions will be asked about how the suspects were able to attack him.

He was convicted for his part in the massacre of more than 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys who had been rounded up in the UN's supposedly safe haven of Srebrenica in July 1995. . . (serving a) 35-year sentence for aiding and abetting genocide. Under the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Britain is obliged to take a share of prisoners convicted at the (War Crimes) tribunal (in the Hague).

He was slashed using a homemade weapon - believed to be a razorblade embedded in a toothbrush.

Last night it emerged that one of his suspected assailants was serving life for the torture and murder of a girl in a suburban park in 2005. He is Indrit Krasniqi, 22, of Chiswick, West London, convicted in 2006 of the gang murder of Mary-Ann Leneghan, 16, in Reading. That poor girl, who was a tearaway who had fallen into bad company but didn't deserve her fate, also had her throat slit.

Krstic was found by prison officers on the floor in a pool of blood at 11am. One of the cuts narrowly missed a major artery. He had also been beaten around the head and body. He was unconscious when he was taken to nearby Pinderfields Hospital. An insider said: 'At first it was thought that Krstic was dead because of all of the blood. It was a well-planned and executed ambush. The view is that it was an act of revenge'.

Last night Krstic, although critically ill, was not said to be in a life-threatening condition. The jail was in 'lockdown' as staff searched for the weapon used in the assault.

Posted on 05/08/2010 3:51 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Saturday, 8 May 2010
American Academy of Pediatrics Advocates "Ritual Nick" as FGM Option

Georganne Chapin, executive director of an advocacy group called Intact America, said she was “astonished that a group of intelligent people did not see the utter slippery slope that we put physicians on” with the new policy statement. “How much blood will parents be satisfied with?”

She added: “There are countries in the world that allow wife beating, slavery and child abuse, but we don’t allow people to practice those customs in this country. We don’t let people have slavery a little bit because they’re going to do it anyway, or beat their wives a little bit because they’re going to do it anyway.”

Read the whole story here.

Posted on 05/08/2010 8:08 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Saturday, 8 May 2010
Squatter, 59, holed up in No 10

From The Sun, with thanks to Alan:

A MAN aged 59 was squatting in a luxury home near the Houses of Parliament last night.

The squatter, named as a Mr Gordon Brown from Scotland, was refusing to budge from the Georgian townhouse in Downing Street, central London - denying entry to its rightful tenant.

But the problem could be solved today after clear General Election winner David Cameron invited Nick Clegg to form a Tory-Lib Dem coalition government.

The offer came after the poll resulted in Britain's first hung parliament in 36 years.

The Tories won 306 seats with 36 per cent of the popular vote, with Labour taking 258 on 29 per cent and the Lib Dems winning 57 with 23 per cent.

The idea of the smug, shallow, callow Nick Clegg and his party of anti-Semitic bureau-Euro-crats acting as king-makers is nauseating. Far more nauseating, and far more damaging is a Lib-Lab coalition. As junior partner with the Tories taking the important decisions (on the Euro, on trident and on immigration) the LibDems can be tamed. This is the lesser of two evils.

Posted on 05/08/2010 8:09 AM by Mary Jackson
Saturday, 8 May 2010
And let's not forget ...

From the BBC:

The Prince of Wales has led veterans in a service marking 65 years since the end of World War II in Europe.

The national ceremony at the Cenotaph in London commemorates VE Day - declared on 8 May 1945.

The Prince, accompanied by the Duchess of Cornwall, laid a wreath ahead of a reception at Horse Guards Parade.

The leaders of the three main political parties took time away from negotiating the formation of the new government to attend the ceremony.

Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg also laid wreaths.

About 2,000 veterans, serving members of the three armed forces, ambassadors, religious and political figures, and members of the public attended.

Up to 580,406, UK and Commonwealth forces were killed in the six year conflict, and 67,073 civilians died in the Blitz.

The Last Post was sounded and a one-minute silence observed during the service for those who made the ultimate sacrifice.

Royal Navy veteran George Broomhead said it was important for him to be there during the ceremony.

He said: "I never thought I would see this day. It is absolutely wonderful."

Mr Broomhead said that he celebrated after Prime Minister Winston Churchill announced the end of hostilities in Europe in 1945.

"I climbed on top of the lion's head in Trafalgar Square when it happened. I'll never forget it - I've never seen such joy in people's faces."

Cpt Edward Oliver, a current member of the Household Cavalry said he had been inspired to join the army by his grandfather who was a spitfire pilot in the war.

He said it was a privilege to attend the event and added: "It's a great occasion to get together to celebrate the wonderful achievements of George's generation and, again, focus on what the armed forces are doing today."

However he said the ceremony was tinged by sadness as not everybody returned home when the fighting ended.

The reception at Horse Guards Parade was hosted by the Royal British Legion.

Later in the evening, a commemoration gala concert will be held at the Royal Albert Hall in aid of the British Red Cross.

Posted on 05/08/2010 8:21 AM by Mary Jackson
Saturday, 8 May 2010
I’m ever so slightly out of sorts this morning. I’m less worried about the future of Lib/Lab, Lib/Con, Con/Uncle Tom Cobbley and all. More concerned at the blatant electoral abuses that went on all around that no one in authority seems to be at all worried about.
They range from the sheer incompetence and lack of initiative in the polling stations which resulted in 1000s of people turned away unable to vote.
Through the naïve idiocy of the ‘Give your Vote’ scheme in which silly young people donated their  vote to people in Afghanistan, Ghana and Bangladesh who directed them how to vote here on their behalf.
To the outright fraud of postal vote theft, fake voters and the malign influence of the Islamic Forum of Europe which has tentacles not just in Tower Hamlets, but so I have been told, Waltham Forest and even Barking and Dagenham. I am no lover of the BNP but their 12 council seats there (which they were expected to increase), plus the Conservative seats being all wiped out by Labour candidates (Ashraf, Aziz, Hussain, Saeed, and so on) in one fell swoop doesn’t ring true to me. Even if disillusioned by BNP ineffectiveness many voters would turn instead to the numerous good candidates for the Conservatives and UKIP surely? Not the most unpopular and discredited party in the country. But every one of the 51 council seats in Barking and Dagenham are now Labour, as are the 60 seats in London Borough of Newham adjoining.
I smell halibut. I fear something like this may have happened. Sorry, but I do.
Posted on 05/08/2010 9:36 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Saturday, 8 May 2010
In The Guardian A Sign Of Intelligent Life

Ayaan Hirsi Ali: 'Why are Muslims so hypersensitive?'

She says Islam is backward and the Qur'an is terrible. But Ayaan Hirsi Ali – whose provocative new book is extracted here – is not about to let a fatwa intimidate her. She talks to Emma Brocke

Emma Brockes The Guardian, Saturday 8 May 2010

Ayaan Hirsi AliView larger picture

'Even with death threats,' says Ayaan Hirsi Ali, 'I can publish, I can travel and I can live the life that I want.' To see the full photograph by Chris Buck, click on the detail above.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali enters an apartment in New York followed by a bodyguard. The 40-year-old, who for the last six years has been unable to turn up at a venue without it being checked by security, is a writer, polemicist and critic of Islam. She is also a Somali immigrant, an ex-Muslim, a survivor of child genital mutilation, an exile many times over, a former Dutch MP, a black woman whose language would not, in places, look amiss in a BNP pamphlet, a remarked-upon beauty and a lady-in-peril, identities that lend her as a figurehead to disparate causes and bring on confusion in the people she meets.

"I'm a serious person," she says, frowning, as the photographer suggests various fashion poses, but she is also quietly, almost coyly glamorous, moving around with fawn-like grace. It's a combination that works particularly well on male polemicists of the muscular left, who can't do enough to defend her: her gentle charm, her small wrists, her big eyes – oh, and her brave commitment to Enlightenment values – in the face of all that extremism.

It was after fleeing an arranged marriage and settling as an asylum-seeker in Holland that Hirsi Ali converted from Islam to atheism with the kind of zeal that usually powers journeys going the other way. She can, she has said, make statements that a white person simply could not: on the "dangers" posed to the west not just by radical, but by regular Islam; on the "backward" nature of the religion; on how "terrible" the Qur'an is; and, in the most startling argument of her new book, Nomad (a follow-up to her bestselling memoir Infidel), how Muslims would do well to learn from Christianity. She is aware of the liberal twitching she causes – what if accusing her of racism is in itself racist? What if her experience trumps all other arguments? In 2004, after her friend Theo Van Gogh, the Dutch journalist with whom she made a film about women and Islam, was murdered, she was put under 24-hour security. (In the US it is paid for by private donors; when she returns to Europe, where she is still a Dutch citizen, she is protected by the state.) Two years later she left Holland following a controversy around her citizenship and for the last three years she has worked in Washington for the American Enterprise Institute, a rightwing thinktank, contributing papers on how the failures of multiculturalism have allowed for the rise of Islamic extremism in the west.

The accusation that most irritates her – that the events of her life have left her "traumatised" and an easy pawn for rightwing politicians – is, as she says, a sexist presumption. And yet the suspicion remains: that those convictions one arrives at – and fights hardest for – via fraught personal experience are emotional, not rational, and as such beyond reach of most useful debate.

"I'm not being rightwing," she says. "The people who believe themselves to be on the left, and who defend the agents of Islam in the name of tolerance and culture, are being rightwing. Not just rightwing. Extreme rightwing. I don't understand how you can be so upset about the Christian right and just ignore the Islamic right. I'm talking about equality." (She is seeing the rightwing historian Niall Ferguson, who, she wrote recently in a Dutch magazine, she is "enormously in love with", but won't comment on it today, nor smile at the suggestion that in most people's minds this will instantly reposition her on the political scale.)

The impetus to write Nomad came in 2008, when she visited her dying father at a hospital in London and saw her family for the first time in years. The reunion was short and inadequate, and brought about "the horrible feelings that come with death; lots of things that I regret". Primarily that she hadn't spoken to him sooner, but also that in what she saw as his internal fight between western and Islamic principles – he believed in educating his daughter, but forced her into a marriage and disowned her when she ran away – the latter won.

Her critique of Islam as a "moral framework not compatible with the modern westernised way of living" is rooted in a critique of her family, her father's unbending will and particularly her mother, a woman who she says was pulled apart by the contradictions of maintaining her faith in a modern society and an identity crisis from which Hirsi Ali herself suffered. (She speaks six languages – English, Somali, Arabic, Swahili, Amharic and Dutch.) The phrasing she uses is startlingly direct. When she writes that "violence is an integral part" of Islamic social discipline, or says in our interview that "Muhammad's example is terrible, don't follow it", it is deliberately, almost narcissistically provocative, the result, one imagines, of a siege mentality and the defensive self-assurance that goes with it. To Hirsi Ali, the act of speaking out, of saying what no one else will say, seems at this stage to be almost a pathology; to override all other considerations.

The subtitle of Nomad is "A personal journey through the clash of civilisations". I ask if she understands why Muslims going about their business are incredibly hurt by these kinds of statements. "But if you compare the reaction of Christians to what is written about Christianity – Richard Dawkins, who's a supporter, says religion is a form of madness – whereby Christians just shrug their shoulders and don't respond. If you compare the way Muslims take offence at perceived insults that are not insults, but are just a critical way of looking at their religion, then I start to ask myself, why are Muslims so hypersensitive to criticism and why don't they do anything with it except to respond by denying it or playing the victim? And I've come to the conclusion it's because of the gradual indoctrination – from parents, teachers – that everything in the Qur'an is true; Muhammad is infallible, you have to follow his example and defend Islam at all times, at all costs. Instead of going along as most people are doing now and saying, OK, let's refrain from criticising Islam, let's refrain from calling Islamic terrorism Islamic, I think we should do the opposite."

When people throw out accusations of racism, she says, they forget that Islam is not a race but a religion; one chooses to follow it. But after 7/7, the racist on the street who's about to beat up a foreign-looking guy doesn't stop to ask him if he believes in Muhammad.

"There is racism that will fall under freedom of expression and there is racism that incites violence or is violent, and those [violent] people have to meet with the law, just like the radical Muslims do. But to say that we are simply not going to talk about Islam – which inspires in today's world the greatest possible danger to world peace – because a few people here and there get offended, I think is the wrong approach.

"The burden of proof now is on the Muslims; if the theology they subscribe to requires you to perform jihad, I think we should engage them by saying, 'Hey, we want to talk about this with you'; that's not to insult you. It is right there in the Qur'an, it is right there in the Hadith, it's been put into practice and it is being preached. And the people who are preaching it are taking advantage of the full array of freedoms that a liberal democratic society has. And we are not going to shut up and call it something else just because you are saying you are offended. I don't even believe they are offended. You should be more offended for the victims of 7/7, [who died] in the name of religion, than by a cartoon that is drawn of Muhammad."

In the new book, Hirsi Ali proposes an "enlightenment project" in which "critical thinking" be introduced to her former faith through various mediums, one of which, she suggests, is the Christian church. "That's probably going to be the most controversial," she says, smiling. I'll say. Even if it didn't ignore the baggage of 1,000 years of history – the Crusades, anyone? Colonialism? – what is an atheist doing promoting Christianity?

Hirsi Ali laughs. She decided to promote Christianity, she says, because of letters she received after Infidel was published, from Muslims who were sympathetic to her cause but were reluctant to abandon their faith altogether. "Some say, 'Oh, I have also become an atheist and I'm happy to have shed that cruel nonsense off.' But then some say, 'I don't want to become an atheist.' " Hirsi Ali dismisses the kind of Christians who picket abortion clinics as fringe elements within a faith that, generally, "talks about a concept of God that is different from the Muslim [concept], where you are required to submit your will completely and conform to what is in the Qur'an. I talk about a Christianity that is enlightened enough to separate spirituality from the rest of life. Not just church and state, but knowledge and church. Religious groups not telling you what you can and can't do, but religion becoming an inside thing. It's very hard for me to describe a thing that I don't have – that kind of spirituality."

The 11-minute film Hirsi Ali made with Theo Van Gogh, broadcaster and provocateur who publicly referred to Muslims as "goat-fuckers", was intended to symbolise what they saw as misogyny within Islam. In it, a half-naked woman is depicted with lash marks on her back while a voiceover reads passages from the Qur'an; elsewhere, Qur'anic excerpts relating to the submission of women are projected on to a woman's naked back. As Ian Buruma reported in his excellent book Murder In Amsterdam, when a  Dutch news programme aired Submission to Muslim women in a shelter for victims of domestic violence, they were by and large appalled. These were the very people Hirsi Ali was trying to help; but her style, and her choice of cohort, offended them. Three months after the film aired on Dutch TV, Van Gogh was murdered in the street by Mohammed Bouyeri, a Dutch-Moroccan who pinned a note to his chest, calling for holy war and naming Hirsi Ali as a target.

At the time, she was an MP in the Dutch parliament, an extraordinary ascent given that 12 years earlier she had entered the country with barely a suitcase. In 1992, Hirsi Ali was en route from Kenya to Canada to begin married life with a man for whom she had no respect. During a stopover in Germany, she gathered her courage and, on the advice of a relative with knowledge of the asylum system, took a train to Holland. (Her first choice was Britain, but she was told crossing the Channel would be too difficult.) Holland, she was assured, had one of the most liberal asylum policies in Europe. So began a decade during which she rose from a minimum wage job, to a degree in political science from the University of Leiden and up through the Dutch political establishment.

The uncompromising tone of Submission was inspired, in part, by Hirsi Ali's experiences in those early years as an interpreter for social services, hearing stories that took her back to her childhood. Her father was a political opponent of the Somali president Siad Barre. When she was two, he was jailed, forcing the family to flee, first to Saudi Arabia, then Ethiopia, then Kenya. Although there is in Hirsi Ali an almost aristocratic bearing, it was not an easy upbringing; she was beaten by a religious teacher until a rib broke; was, at her grandmother's insistence and in her father's absence, subjected to genital mutilation; and in later years would watch as her sister crumbled into mental illness after a secret abortion – all acts that she believed to be sanctioned by her faith and which, as she started work in Holland, she believed the Dutch authorities wilfully ignored. When Muslim women in the Hague were found to have high instances of vitamin D deficiency, health workers put it down to poverty and not, as Hirsi Ali says came out in the interviews, to the fact they were deprived of sunlight because they didn't have permission to leave the house until their husbands came home at night. She calls this "the twist and turn to avoid Islam". When she had a platform to speak, she resolved, she would not pussyfoot around in the same manner.

And she didn't. After gaining a masters degree, writing a series of pieces in the Dutch press and eventually standing for parliament, Hirsi Ali allied herself with the most unlikely and controversial figures in Dutch politics. As well as Van Gogh, she spoke admiringly of Pim Fortuyn, the Dutch anti-immigration politician who was himself murdered by an animal rights activist. At the end of Nomad, she paints a cosy picture of hanging out in New York with Oriana Fallaci, the late Italian journalist whose post-9/11 polemic, The Rage And The Pride, invokes a seething Muslim mass trying to get into Europe and is described even by Christopher Hitchens, a supporter of Hirsi Ali's, as "a primer in how not to write about Islam". Hirsi Ali says she met Fallaci socially and they didn't talk about Islam – they talked about babies. But to refer to Fallaci so warmly, given her reputation, is of course loaded.

"First of all," she says, "I don't feel that there is guilt by association. And I don't think that human beings are perfect. If Oriana Fallaci wrote – and I have to confess she gave me her books in Italian and I don't read Italian – but if she made these remarks that Christopher says cross the line, it still doesn't mean that she was wrong in her analysis of Islam. OK, she did make mistakes, but she is more of an ally than an enemy." She continues: "If I say, OK, from now I am only going to associate with people who I agree with 100%, that's a very small group of people."

She reserves her greatest disapproval not for writers such as Fallaci, but for intellectuals who she says have failed utterly in their responsibility towards non-white women. The decadence of western feminism is where Hirsi Ali is perhaps strongest. In the book, she attacks Germaine Greer for arguing that female genital mutilation needs to be considered "in context", as part of a "cultural identity" that western women don't understand. Greer, from the quotes Hirsi Ali cites, seems to be arguing merely that female circumcision is at the extreme end of a scale that starts with women wearing high heels for men's delectation – not condoning the former, but condemning the latter as part of a continuum. Hirsi Ali finds this inadequate; a strange, tangential take on the subject. Why, she asks, are voices such as Greer's not speaking out against the subjugation of women in the Muslim world? She calls for a new feminism, "that is going to focus on issues faced by non-western women, because they are the biggest issues. To own your own sexuality, as an adult woman; to choose your own lifestyle; to have access to education [when] what we see in the Muslim world is girls being pulled out of school and married off before they've completed their education. These things, I think, are more basic than the stuff that current feminists are concerning themselves with – like shattering the glass ceiling or finding a balance between work and home life. There was a long article in the New York Times that went on and on about who [in a couple] would load and unload the dishwasher. If you have a career and you're so intelligent, you can work that out. You don't have to have a manifesto. There is feminism that has evolved to a kind of luxury."

On that trip back to London to see her father for the last time, Hirsi Ali visited a cousin on a council estate in east London and saw, with horror, the life she might have led: "on welfare," she says, with hauteur, a virtual "prisoner", in need of her husband's permission to leave the house and then only if encased in a "black shroud". She says: "And I realised, oh my goodness, if I had done what my father wanted me to do in 1992, I would be leading a comparable life, but instead of Tower Hamlets, in Toronto." It is not a portrait she says her cousin would recognise. As far as the cousin is aware, she has made the right choices. How then does Hirsi Ali resolve the Enlightenment paradox of advocating freedom, then turning to other people and saying, I know what's best for you? "But it's not I know what is best for you. Classic liberalism was about the individual; [I am talking about] a denial of rights to an individual within a community: a girl's genitals were being cut; a girl was being denied education, forced into marriage; a gay guy has to hide from his parents that he's gay otherwise they're going to do something to him. That is what liberalism was all about. It is offensive to me if a group of people deny rights to an individual human being in the name of their religion – and they want the rest of us to leave them alone? No way."

Has she been radicalised by her experiences? How can she live with death threats and not, at some level, lose perspective? If she did not have a point, Hirsi Ali says, "there would be no angry Muslims plotting to kill me… people would just be shrugging their shoulders." In any case, she says, living in Washington with security is still better than living as a woman in Saudi Arabia without it. "Even with protection, even with death threats, I can publish, I can travel and I can live the life that I want, and not the one my parents want, or some imam somewhere thinks I should live."

She is not interested in going back into politics and believes she has more influence on the outside. She is sceptical of Obama, who, she thinks, in his speech to the Muslim world in Egypt last year was optimistic to the point of delusion. She says: "The idea that if people are just friendly and demonstrate they want peace, that will be answered with good will – that is really naive. If you have organisations in the US that are lobbying him and Congress to allow sharia, then being nice to them is not enough." In terms of British politics, she is more impressed with Labour than the Conservatives, for their suggested ban on the group Islam4UK. The Archbishop of Canterbury may be surprised to know she considers him an "appeaser" of Islam for considering limited introduction of sharia law.

The book ends with a letter to her unborn, and as yet unconceived, daughter. Hirsi Ali draws a line from her grandmother, a nomad who followed the tribal religious code, to her mother, caught between tribalism and modernity, to what she hopes would be her daughter's uncomplicated relationship with the west. "She would," she says, "not have to deal with the identity crisis that I and my mother had to deal with."

Hirsi Ali misses Dutch bread and cheese; but when she lands at JFK, these days, she thinks, "home". And Africa? She smiles. "I don't have much in me left for Somalia, because the country is so broken, it's not realistic to daydream about it." There is one thing, she says, that annoys her about the way her former faith is depicted. "There is this tendency to think that if you are a Muslim woman you are not strong." She repositions. "They," she says firmly, "are strong women."

• Nomad: A Personal Journey Through The Clash Of Civilisations, by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, is published by Simon & Schuster at £12.99. To order a copy for £9.99 (including UK mainland p&p), go to

Posted on 05/08/2010 2:37 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Saturday, 8 May 2010
Arab President Of U.N. General Assembly: "Siege Of Gaza "Worse Than Nazi Camps"

From MEMRI: 

Watch, and listen, here.

Though Israel keeps the people of Gaza  -- who are animated by hate and who wish to destroy Israell -- supplied with water, electicity, medicines and much else, not everything the Gazans want are going to be supplied across the border from Israel. . For those things,  more than 1,000 tunnels dug from Gaza to Egypt  have been dug, and those things - including DVDs, and even Mercedes automobiles --- are supplied, along with all the weaponry, in copious amounts, via Egypt's most porous barriers.

We all remember, do we not, how in the Nazi camps the inmates didn't have nearly as much trouble as the people of Gaza do -- why, to acquire the equvalent, in those days, of DVDs, that the latest 33s and Hollywood movies, and of course earlier models of the same good old Mercedes automobiles. Yes, compared to the people enduring the "siege" in Gaza, the inmates of Nazi concentration camps had it relatively easy.

Posted on 05/08/2010 8:24 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Saturday, 8 May 2010
A Musical Interlude: The Girlfriend (Savoy Orpheans)

Watch, and listen, here.

Posted on 05/08/2010 7:14 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Saturday, 8 May 2010
A Benchley Interlude: Market Wrap

Watch, and listen, here.

Posted on 05/08/2010 7:21 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Saturday, 8 May 2010

These days, if you phone up any large company, you get put through to a call centre, and increasingly the work of a call centre is outsourced to India. The Indians answer the phone with an implausible "My name's Freddie, terrible weather, how are you?" but they don't fool anyone, and you can smell the Ganges.

Rumour has it that The Samaritans are so hard up that they've had to outsource some of their work to Pakistan. This pissed me off so much that I wanted to end it all, so I phoned them and told them I was suicidal. "Great," came the answer. "Can you drive a truck?"

Posted on 05/08/2010 8:49 PM by Mary Jackson

Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31      

Via: email  RSS