Please Help New English Review
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff

Wednesday, 19 July 2006

It has become very fashionable to denigrate the British. Our tradition of self-mockery makes it easy. There are Brit-Bashers on the Left (Galloway, The Guardian, The BBC), and on the Right (some Americans who should look in the mirror). And the French, obviously - it would be rude of them not to. So I was pleased to see a post by somebody called Rule Britannia, here, of all places. I've no idea who he or she is, but he (or she) makes a good case:

You want to debate the British Empire? Then a debate you shall have...

At the beginning of the 20th century, Great Britain was at the pinnacle of its strength, and controlled the greatest empire ever seen. The Empire dominated trade and held control over more than one quarter of the world’s population, yet in modern times it is commonly thought of as a source of shame and dishonour. However, despite the counter-arguments, factors supporting the Empire, and British Imperialism, easily outweigh those that oppose it.

Unlike most empires, the British Empire was one built almost entirely upon commerce, rather than the simple desire to lay claim to land, as some definitions of Imperial, “Arrogant, commanding, obnoxious” may suggest. It is these definitions that are so regularly used by critics, but also under the classification of Imperialism come “Majestic” and “Commanding” – words far more befitting of the British Empire and its beneficial influence across the world. The historian Niall Ferguson supports the view that trade was the chief factor, ‘Though [Britain’s] imperialism was not wholly absent-minded, Britain did not set out to rule a quarter of the world’s land surface… but real and perceived threats to their commercial interests constantly tempted the British to progress from informal to formal imperialism’.

The period from 1815 to 1854 is commonly known as Pax Britannica and was free of any major European wars. Although it is argued that this gave Britain a chance to bully unchallenged other “lesser” countries, the period was in fact a time that established present and future stability. Britain gave her colonies and dominions a better future than they could have hoped for – a future with its foundations built upon trade with Britain. Allegiance to the Crown gave countries the protection of the Royal Navy and increased trade with Britain exempt from the trade tariffs imposed upon other countries. The powerful entrepreneurial spirit that was rife in 1800s Britain allowed her to gain the unofficial title of the ‘Workshop of the World’. As the first country to fully industrialise, Britain was the sole exporter of new labour-saving machinery such as the loom and steam engine (importing raw materials in return) – global trade gave exporters the open market, and the protection of the Royal Navy to fall back on, meaning that even the smallest idea could make a man rich.

Continue reading Rule Britannia.

Posted on 07/19/2006 4:47 PM by Mary Jackson
Comments
20 Jul 2006
Esmerelda Weatherwax
(entry tests to the colonial civil services were notoriously difficult, especially those of India) Entry to the Home Civil Service was difficult even 30 years ago when I was making my application, but not any more.

The other thing I want to link to is this report of comments of Dr John Sentamu the Ugandan born Archbishop of York. I must emphasise that "British" includes more than "English" but that Dr Sentamu was being installed as an English Archbishop and started on the subject of St George.

The Ugandan-born Archbishop, who fled Idi Amin�s regime in 1974, said he would not be where he was today were it not for the British Empire and the English teachers and missionaries who worked in Africa. . . "I speak as a foreigner really. The English are somehow embarrassed about some of the good things they have done. They have done some terrible things but not all the Empire was a bad idea. . ."



Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31   

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed