Please Help New English Review
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff

Tuesday, 4 March 2008

"We scream, we swoon, how dumb can we get?" simpers Charlotte Allen:

Women 'Falling for Obama,' " the story's headline read. Elsewhere around the country, women were falling for the presidential candidate literally. Connecticut radio talk show host Jim Vicevich has counted five separate instances in which women fainted at Obama rallies since last September. And I thought that fainting was supposed to be a relic of the sexist past, when patriarchs forced their wives and daughters to lace themselves into corsets that cut off their oxygen.

I can't help it, but reading about such episodes of screaming, gushing and swooning makes me wonder whether women -- I should say "we women," of course -- aren't the weaker sex after all. Or even the stupid sex, our brains permanently occluded by random emotions, psychosomatic flailings and distraction by the superficial. Women "are only children of a larger growth," wrote the 18th-century Earl of Chesterfield. Could he have been right?

I'm not the only woman who's dumbfounded (as it were) by our sex, or rather, as we prefer to put it, by other members of our sex besides us. It's a frequent topic of lunch, phone and water-cooler conversations; even some feminists can't believe that there's this thing called "The Oprah Winfrey Show" or that Celine Dion actually sells CDs. A female friend of mine plans to write a horror novel titled "Office of Women," in which nothing ever gets done and everyone spends the day talking about Botox.

[...]

What is it about us women? Why do we always fall for the hysterical, the superficial and the gooily sentimental?

[...]

I am perfectly willing to admit that I myself am a classic case of female mental deficiencies. I can't add 2 and 2 (well, I can, but then what?). I don't even know how many pairs of shoes I own. I have coasted through life and academia on the basis of an excellent memory and superior verbal skills, two areas where, researchers agree, women consistently outpace men.

[...]

So I don't understand why more women don't relax, enjoy the innate abilities most of us possess (as well as the ones fewer of us possess) and revel in the things most important to life at which nearly all of us excel: tenderness toward children and men and the weak and the ability to make a house a home ...Then we could shriek and swoon and gossip and read chick lit to our hearts' content and not mind the fact that way down deep, we can be . . . kind of dim.

Who is this "we"? Speak for yourself. I'm not like this. None of my female friends or colleagues is like this. Some women are like this, but so what?

The author's faux self-deprecating, fluffy bunny act - does she dot her "i"s with little hearts? - is clearly aimed, not at women, but at men, who want their comforting stereotypes confirmed. Men, that is, who are threatened by strong women. This is the journalistic equivalent of running your hands through your hair, opening your eyes wide and saying to a man, "Ooh, you're so clever. How do you do it?"

I think it was Jane Austen who described a character as "one of those young ladies who seek to recommend themselves to the other sex by undervaluing their own". Nothing has changed.

Posted on 03/04/2008 4:48 AM by Mary Jackson
Comments
4 Mar 2008
Hugh Fitzgerald

This whole Obama madness will someday -- when that someday comes is the big question -- -- be recognized for the national embarrassment it is. It demonstrates a popular confusion between the aims of politics, and the pastime of self-improvement and self-validation. The degradation of the democratic dogma is, in the current case,  explained in part by a sense of desperation, fed by both the colossal fiasco of the war in Iraq (and that in turn has been prompted by the continuing inability to come to grips with the meaning, and menace, of Islam), and what is now rightly sensed as almost a  third-worldish maldistribution of wealth. Furthermore, while there is no doubt that the spectacle of the insensate money-making by the grasping Bill Clinton, with his Kazakhstan contacts, and his assorted Burkles, and his self-aggrandizing "charity" that only provides an excuse for him to piously rope still more billionaires into his orbit for his own purposes, has disgusted, that  is not sufficient reason to prefer, if one prefers Democrats, someone who has been in national office for exactly two years, has no legislation to his credit, at the state level was similarly undistinguished in what he accomplished (though good at claiming credit), who has here and there  -- the obvious plagiarism, which he made such light of, the dealings with an obviously louche character like Rezko, the reliance on such people as Zbigniew Brzezinski and other foreign policy advisers whose records offer every conceivable warning signal of being unable to come to grips with Islam -- including Islam as a vehicle for Arab supremacism, as in the Sudan, the special interest of Samantha Powers, and of being unable to recognize, much less join other Western countries in beginning to deal with, the Muslim threat within Western Europe. And the troubles that Israel faces, because of its own inability to articulate the nature of what it faces (a permanent Jihad, with enemies among the immediate, local Arabs -- those "Palestinians" -- divided, as the Fast Jihadists of  Hamas, and the Slow Jihadists of Fatah, as to tactics and timing, not as to the ultimate, permanent, demanded-by-Islam goal: an end to the Infidel nation-state of Israel.

The comical  and hollow talk about "change" and "Yes We Can" should, by this point, embarrass even the most ardent supporers of Citizen Obama. But apparently things are too far gone for that. It's a Tent Rally, a Revival Meeting, a renewal of Whitfield's Great Awakening. Yes We Can. Yes We Can. Yes We Can. If you like crowd psychology, and losing yourself in a mass of true believers, then this candidacy is just for you.



Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29    

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed