If you see this text then you need to update your flash player.

Print this pagePrint this page.

Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
Saturday, 26 April 2008
Boris Goodunov

Boris - he needs no surname - is not perfect. But he has his good points:

  1. He is not Ken Livingstone.
  2. He is intelligent and well-educated.
  3. He likes a laugh.
  4. He invented the word "bemerded".
  5. He puts his foot in it. I can sympathise.
  6. He helped save Ancient History A-Level.
  7. He has a nice voice.
  8. He knows what is wrong with Islam and has said so, although he recently backtracked for electoral purposes.
  9. He is unpredictable.
  10. He hates bendy buses.

He also admires Pericles. Red Ken probably thinks Pericles rhymes with clericals. From The Telegraph:

By next weekend, Boris Johnson could be the new Mayor of London. It is a prospect that astonishes the many people who wrote him off as a clown, prompting them to ask in a bewildered tone whether Boris has suddenly become "serious".

As his biographer, and someone who has known him for 20 years, I would argue that Boris always has been serious. He has made people laugh more, perhaps, than any politician of our times (not much competition there, you may say). But this does not mean his Merry England conservatism is shallow or lacking in intellectual roots.

His jokes owe much to his father, Stanley, but on whom will Boris model himself if he becomes mayor?

With most of our politicians, confined as they are by their knowledge of only one language and only one time - the present - the best one could hope for would be an admiring reference to what Rudy Giuliani or Michael Bloomberg have done in New York.

Instead, this classicist takes us back to the first flowering of democratic politics in Athens: his hero is Pericles, leader of that city state in its golden age in the fifth century BC.

As far as I can see, none of the politicians and pundits who wonder whether Boris is "serious" has troubled to glance at Pericles.

[...]

Like the ancient Athenians, Boris is uncensorious about what people get up to in private, but determined that the law must be respected.

His plan to stamp out rowdy behaviour by hooligan children on the top deck of buses is not just some shoot-from-the-hip wheeze, but an expression of his deep understanding that liberty and civilisation depend on the rule of law.

Since Boris has shown that he is both willing and able to learn from the past, perhaps he should turn his sharp brain to the history of Islam. For someone who can read Greek, William St Clair Tisdall's clear, precise English should be a doddle.

Posted on 10:28 AM by Mary Jackson
Comments
26 Apr 2008
Special Guest

This is one thing I find perplexing about the perception of Islam in the West.  It would seem that the intelligentsia, or at least university professors, would be the ones most likely to speak out against Islam.  The people who are familar with history, whether of the Middle East, or Far East, or South East, or Africa, or Balkans, or even of the U.S., would be pointing out that Islam has never been peaceful since its inception.  It has been at war with non-Muslims, everywhere it exists in sufficient numbers, for the past 1400 years.  The history of Islam is one long list of offensive (in every sense of the word) military campaigns.

And those who are interested in womens' rights, and children's rights, and civil rights, should likewise be speaking out against spousal abuse, female genital mutilation, arranged marriages between young girls and grown men, slavery, lack of educational opportunities, and so on, in Dar al-Islam, today, as we speak.

And those who are  familiar with the tenets of their religion (Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Taoism, Buddhism), and who have the slightest inkling of knowledge of Islamic teachings, should be screaming "No! All religions are not the same!".

But we saw the Pope bending down and kissing a Qur'an, N.O.W. sitting silently, and scholars such as Bernard Lewis being the biggest apologists for Islamic behavior.

I can't help but think that the day will come when these people open up a Qur'an, or read a hadith, and recoil in horror at what they've been defending all these years.

[On an unrelated note: The Authentication we have to enter is quite frustrating.  Is that a letter "Oh", or a number "Zero"?  Is that a small "Ell", or a capitol "Aye", or the number "One"?  I guess wrong every time.  My code to enter this time: I0000. I kid you not. Your authentication system is mocking me.]



Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
 
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31   

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed