Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
As Far As The Eye Can See
by Moshe Dann
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky























clear
Wednesday, 21 May 2008
French Court Throws Out Libel in Al-Dura Case Bookmark and Share
clear

PARIS, May 21 (Reuters) - A French appeals court on Wednesday overturned a libel verdict won by France 2 television over a report about the killing of a Palestinian boy in 2000.

The Paris court ruled in favour of media critic Philippe Karsenty, who called into question the veracity of the report, but it also said that it did not rule out that journalists at France 2 had acted professionally.

Karsenty, head of an online media commentary site, had appealed a 2006 decision which found libellous his statement that the station's Israel correspondent had orchestrated images which later became a symbol for Palestinian militants.

In February, Karsenty presented judges with new evidence including a ballistics report and footage from other sources, which he said proved 12-year-old Mohammed al-Durra's death had been staged.

Philippe Karsenty gave the following statement regarding his victory (thanks to Brian of London):

"Today a French court ruled that I did not defame France 2 when I said that its news report was a staged hoax.  Because I refused to be brainwashed, I was sued for defamation.  

"Our victory today was a victory for freedom--the freedom to think and to speak one's mind; the freedom to question what one is told; and the freedom to disbelieve the solemn pronouncements of others when the individual concludes that his reasoning is correct and that the state and the state-run media--and all of the institutions they represent--are wrong.

"The Al Dura lie is an assault on our ability to think, to criticize, to evaluate, and, finally, to reject information--especially the right to reject information on which we base our most cherished assumptions.  One of Europe's most cherished assumptions is that Israel is a viscious Nazi-like entity that deliberately murders Palestinian Arab children.  Moreover, polls conducted in Europe have identified Israel as the greatest threat to world peace, greater than Iran and North Korea, Pakistan and Syria.  The Al Dura hoax is one of the pillars on which these assumptions rely.


"It is ironic that I, a private individual, had to lecture one of France's most influential TV stations in order to demonstrate that a child cannot move, lift his head, arm and leg, stare at the camera and still be considered "dead" a good 10 seconds after the newscaster tells us... 'the child is dead.'   One need only look at France 2's own footage to realize that the 'death' scene was faked.


"My only objective was to correct this error.  However, on the part of the French media, it turned into a titanic battle against critical thinking and freedom of thought and expression.  On my part, it became a battle for the right not to be brainwashed bythe French media.  Only a few weeks ago, a French television station produced a documentary 'proving' that the Al Durah story is authentic.  First, I was compared to a Holocaust denier, and then to the fringe elements that insist that 911 was an inside job.   I, and others who share my opinion about the story, including Richard Landes, were labeled dangerous extremists and fanatics.  All the while, viewers observed the 'dead' boy move exactly as I just described it.   I can only conclude that, in France, it is critical thinking that is either dead or dying.    Every French citizen should be complaining about this insult to our intelligence.  In fact, very few complain because mass brainwashing works.  Where are the angry letters to the station for its absurd documentary?  Do the citizens of France now believe that a "dead" boy can move?  Or have they merely forgotten how to think and draw their own conclusions?

"The right to think, to speak, to evaluate, to accept and reject the conclusions of others goes to the very heart of what it means to be free.  

"Now it is time for France 2 to acknowledge that it created and is continuing to perpetuate the worst anti-Semitic libel of our era. It's the responsibility of the French government and ultimately, the responsibility of the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, who is, for all practical purposes, the chief executive of French public television, to finally reveal the truth."

clear
Posted on 05/21/2008 1:51 PM by Rebecca Bynum
Comments
21 May 2008
Special Guest

From the original Reuters article:

The French public sector station has stood behind the correspondent and cameraman who made the report on Sept. 30, 2000.

France 2 may stand behind their reporters, but they refuse to release the full unedited tape that would either vindicate or condemn those reporters, and therefore the station itself.  We are left to ponder why that might be.  Hopefully France 2 will follow through on their  threat to appeal this to the French Supreme Court (la Cour de cassation), and this case will get even more attention.

Israel, or at least an informal Israeli commission who were allowed to examine the publicly available evidence, has taken back their apology, and said that the evidence was the "Palestinian" gunfire killed Al-Dura, not Israeli.  But we have seen no evidence that Al-Dura died, period.  There is no blood, no wounds, no scenes of him being shot, on any of the video yet released.  There is only the demonstrably false claims of the "Palestinian" French 2 "reporter", Talal Abu Rahma.

 





Guns, Germs and Steel in Tanzania
The Thinking Person's Safari
Led by Geoffrey Clarfield
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
clear
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31       
clear

Subscribe