Print this pagePrint this page.

Please Help New English Review
Search by author:

by Title:

by Keyword or ISBN:


Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
The New English Review Symposium 2009 Booklet - Understanding the Jihad in Israel, Europe and America
Geert Wilders: Why I Am In America Fighting For Free Speech
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
Saturday, 20 December 2008
“Bubba Sheik-ing the Money Tree": Troubles Ahead for Hillary

Madame Secretary of State designee Hillary Clinton has some big time headaches with yesterday’s disclosure about the fountain of tens of millions of dollars of contributions from Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia to the William J. Clinton, Presidential Library Foundation . There were other conflicts, as well; however, these were the most egregious among the approximately 205,000 contributors identified in the disclosure report released yesterday. These looks like conflicts of interests that even a Democratic majority in the US Senate might choke on.

Besides this New York Post news article with the tag line “Desert Despots Give Charity Millions Headache for Hillary’s Cabinet Bid” today’s New York Post has an editorial, “Bill’s Pals, Hill’s Problems” and Dick Morris and Eileen McGann commentary, “500 M problems for Madame Secretary” on this troublesome disclosure.

Question is will these conflicts of interest raise problems about what Hillary Clinton would do vis a vis making a decision about possible US attendance at Durban II in April, 2009 and “scope-locking” Israel to implement UNSC resolution 1850 imposing a ‘peace’ agreement on the next Israeli government, barely 50 days away from a general election on February 10th?

Here’s what the New York Post news article disclosed:

Desert-dwelling donors, including Gulf states, billionaire Saudis and Arab-focused charities, gave big to his William J. Clinton Foundation in what could be called the world’s biggest sheik shakedown.

The oil-rich kingdom of Saudi Arabia alone gave between $15 million and $35 million to the nonprofit.

In all, more than 200,000 individuals and entities gave to Clinton - for a total of nearly $500 million. And that means 200,000 possible conflict-of-interest headaches for wife Hillary, President-elect Barack Obama’s pick for secretary of state.

Friends of Saudi Arabia, a government-sponsored agency that fosters ties between the kingdom and the United States, gave an additional $1 million to $5 million on top of the direct $10 million to $25 million from the kingdom itself.

And Saudi billionaires Sheik Mohammed H. al-Amoudi and Nasser al-Rashid donated in the $5 million-to-$10 million range. Hamza B. al Kholi, a Saudi construction titan, gave between $100,000 and $250,000.

The Persian Gulf governments of Kuwait, Qatar and Oman and the Far Eastern sultanate of Brunei each gave between $1 million and $5 million, and another $250,000 to $500,000 came from the US Islamic World Conference.

The United Arab Emirates-based Dubai Foundation, which aims to promote education in the Middle East, gave between $1 million to $5 million, as did the Zayed family, that country’s ruling family.

Note these comments from the New York Post editorial:

The donations from Arab countries could complicate Secretary Clinton’s efforts - particularly those from the Saudis, who are looking to become key players in Middle East negotiations.

And the possible conflicts don’t just involve foreign governments and interests.

None of this should automatically disqualify Hillary Clinton from serving as secretary of state.

But it’s worth noting that the list was made public only as a precondition of her nomination. Clearly, the names raise many questions - and the confirmation process is a perfect time for Congress to get the answers.

Morris and McGann, no fans of Bill and Hillary hit the proverbial nail on the head with this comment:

How could a US senator possibly serve dispassionately while her husband was collecting money from these donors on this kind of scale? And how could we have almost elected a president without realizing these conflicts existed? And how on earth can a secretary of state function with these conflicts hanging over her head?

Posted on 12/20/2008 1:32 PM by Jerry Gordon
Comments
No comments yet.
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28       

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed