|
|
|
|
For our donors from the UK:
|
|
|
|
| Recent Publications by New English Review Authors |
.jpg) |
The Literary Culture of France by J. E. G. Dixon |
 |
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays by David P. Gontar |
 |
Farewell Fear by Theodore Dalrymple |
.jpg) |
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ by Kenneth Hanson |
 |
The West Speaks interviews by Jerry Gordon |
%20(2).jpg) |
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy Emmet Scott |
 |
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy Ibn Warraq |
 |
Anything Goes by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Karimi Hotel De Nidra Poller |
 |
The Left is Seldom Right by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion by Rebecca Bynum |
 |
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays by Ibn Warraq |
 |
An Introduction to Danish Culture by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
The New Vichy Syndrome: by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Jihad and Genocide by Richard L. Rubenstein |
 |
Second Opinion by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Defending The West: by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Nations, Language and Citizenship: by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
Romancing Opiates by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Which Koran? by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
What The Koran Really Says by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Life at the Bottom by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
The Origins of the Koran by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Why I Am Not Muslim by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
Leaving Islam Edited by Ibn Warraq |
 |
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs by Thomas J. Scheff |
.jpg)


.jpg)
.jpg)

|

Monday, 26 March 2012
Israel is Scapegoat of Norwegian Media

Norwegian media is obsessed with Israel over the failed Oslo Accords. In Norway, Israel's alleged obdurance to make peace with what passes for the Palestinians tops all other news stemming from the Middle East, and elsewhere, even topping news of the Arab Spring and Syrian strongman Assad 's brutal oppression and slaughter of his own people. That is the major finding in a study of media report by an independent pro-Israel group in Norway. Israel, as this independent media analysis reports has become a major domestic issue in Norway. Gates of Vienna (GOV) has a partial translation of the report in a post released yesterday, In Norway, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is a Domestic Political Issue . A Norwegian contingent will be among the protesters in the Global March to Jerusalem this Friday, that threatens a major confrontation on Israel's border by Palestinians and supporters in the region and the West. The occasion is the annual Palestinian Land Day commemorating alleged Israeli land seizures and deaths of Palestinians in 1976, according to The Daily Star in Beirut.
GOV writes:
The following article from VG.no concerns the treatment of Israeli issues in the Norwegian media. The original piece was quite long, so our Norwegian correspondent The Observer has sent a partial translation:
Israel is made into scapegoats by the Norwegian media
(VG Nett) The Israeli-Palestinian conflict receives more media attention in Norway than all other conflicts, even those that are far bloodier. The organization MIFF (With Israel for Peace) believes that this creates a skewed picture of the situation and the warring factions involved.
MIFF [a non-religious Israeli advocacy organization] has gone through all the articles published by the Norwegian news agency NTB between 2008 and 2011 dealing with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and compared them with articles about Egypt, Syria and Sri Lanka during the same period.
The figures show that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict received a lot more coverage even though the civil war in Sri Lanka and Syria claimed far more lives.
“The mother of all conflicts”
“This creates a disproportionate picture in which Norwegians are made to believe that the situation in the Middle East is worse than everywhere else. Israel is made into a scapegoat and the Middle East conflict is viewed as the mother of all conflicts,” says Conrad Myrland, the leader of MIFF.
Approximately 2,000 people were killed between 2008-2011 in hostilities between Israel and the Palestinians. In comparison, 8,000 people were killed in Syria since March last year, according to figures released by the UN. The death toll in Sri Lanka is uncertain, but UN envoy, Gordon Weiss estimates that approximately 40,000 Tamils were slaughtered in 2009.
In January 2009, while wars were raging in both Gaza and Sri Lanka, Israel was mentioned 566 times in NTB news reports, while Syria and Sri Lanka were mentioned only 52 times.
“As a result of this disproportionate reporting an impression was created that the war in Gaza was much worse than the war in Sri Lanka. The actual death toll shows quite the opposite,” Myrland says.
“What about Congo and Sudan?”
Myrland emphasizes that MIFF’s research is only quantitative and that it doesn’t deal with the content of the NTB reports, which are distributed to most Norwegian media outlets, including VG.
“It’s paradoxical that the wars in Sudan and Congo, which in the last decade have resulted in the loss of millions of lives, don’t receive the same media coverage, in fact the coverage doesn’t even come close,” Myrland says.
“Norway is involved politically”
NTB admits that they tend to focus more on the conflict in the Middle East, because they believe Norwegian readers find it more interesting than other international conflicts.
“Norwegians tend to be more interested in the situation in the Middle East because of Norway’s involvement in the political process, previously through the Oslo accords and now as the head of the donor nations for the Palestinians. Many Norwegians also have a close relationship with Israel as numerous Norwegians have spent time at kibbutzim in the country and because many Christians in Norway follow the religious aspects of the conflict. We abide by the journalistic principle of covering issues that Norwegian readers find interesting,” says Ane Haavardsdatter Lunde, the head of NTB’s foreign desk.
“Doesn’t this have a self-reinforcing effect, in which readers tend to become more interested in what they read about?”
“We follow the mainstream and don’t tend to focus that much on the lesser-known conflicts, and in that aspect I guess you could say that our coverage has a self-reinforcing effect.”
“Is it NTB’s responsibility to inform readers about lesser-known conflicts?”
“No, our obligation is to deliver the news that our customers want. If we had been a left-wing newspaper, we would have written more about lesser known conflicts in South America.”
“Israel is almost considered a Norwegian domestic issue”
Ervin Kohn, leader of the Jewish community in Norway, explains the intense media focus on Israel with strong Norwegian sentiments to the area.
“Many people in Norway have a strong emotional relationship with Israel, and Norwegian politicians position themselves accordingly. The conflict between Israel and the Palestinians is almost considered a domestic political issue in Norway,” he says.
He believes that Israel is given the role of the big bad wolf in Norwegian public discourse.
“In the Norwegian news coverage, someone is strong and ugly, a role which has been given to Israel and the Jews; others are weak and considered victims, a role which has been given to the Palestinians. Norway will always support the weaker party,” he says.
Kohn goes through all the major Norwegian national newspapers. He believes that Dagbladet, Klassekampen and some Christian newspapers fail to ask critical questions of both parties.
“Dagbladet and Klassekampen write favorably about the Palestinians, and Dagen and Norge Idag write favorably about Israel, and they all forget to ask critical questions of the parties they support,” he says.
As a whole Kohn believes that Norwegian media coverage of the Middle East conflict is far more balanced today than it was a just a few years ago.
Posted on 03/26/2012 7:34 AM by Jerry Gordon
Comments
No comments yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
Subscribe
|
|