Wednesday, 27 July 2016
by Michael Curtis
Everyone admires the intriguing puzzles and solutions in the stories of Sherlock Holmes. In the Adventures of Silver Blaze the curious incident of the dog that did nothing, did not bark, in the night was the clue towards solving the mystery. Sherlock is needed to solve the mystery why, on July 25, 2016 at the first day of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, the 61 speeches may have been full of bite but none uttered a whisper let alone a bark about the menace of ISIS and Islamist terrorism.
The mystery deepens with the appalling news a few hours after the end of that first day that two Islamist terrorists, armed with knives, had entered the Catholic Church in Saint-Etienne du Rouvray, a few miles from Rouen in Normandy, France during morning service on July 26, 2016. They forced the 86 year-old priest Father Jacques Hamel, to knell and filmed his death as they slit his throat. They took two nuns and others hostage before they were killed by French police. ISIS promptly called them “two soldiers of the Islamic State.”
Another terrorist referred in the incident by the French police is a 24 year old Algerian computer student named Sis Ahmed Ghlam was known to the authorities since he had been arrested in April 2015 after he had called for an ambulance after he shot himself in the leg. He was arrested on suspicion of planning “imminent” terror attacks. In his car, the police discovered weapons including Kalashnikovs, a police issued pistol, and bullet proof vests. Even more important they found plans for terrorist attacks on other churches, including the Sacre-Coeur Basilica in Paris. This terrorist is in prison charged with the murder of a 32 year old woman who was shot three times in the head.
The barbarity committed in the church in Normandy is now added to the list of horrors executed by Islamist terrorists and followers of ISIS. It does not take a Sherlock to remember them, in London, Toulouse, Paris, Brussels and the Maelbeek metro station, Nice, Munich, Cologne, Wurzburg and Ansbach.
The world, particularly the West, is facing a major threat to civilization and the way of life of democratic societies. British authorities have recently made it known that they disrupted seven plots to attack the UK in the last 18 months. French President Francois Hollande has again, after the murder in the church, declared that ISIS has declared war on the west and must be fought using all means possible. Indeed, ISIS is fomenting a war of religions, boldly announcing a major target was Christians across the world, and even aiming at the assassination of Pope Francis.
Presidential candidates and political party conventions in the U.S. as well as authorities in European countries must devote their attention to and prepare solutions for the continuing terrorism of contemporary barbarians who are now within our gates, not simply at them.
Western democratic systems are based on tolerance and respect for others and on honorable efforts to eliminate or at least limit prejudice in society. With societies based on free speech and expression this has always been difficult to sustain but it has become much more difficult with the prevalence of social media. Those defending the West recognize that new and changing technologies make it difficult for them to obtain sufficient accurate information to forestall planned terrorist attacks.
Nevertheless, strong immediate action by the west is crucial. At bottom Western leaders, especially those in the White House, must recognize the enemy, “Radical Islamist Terrorism,” not evade the truth by euphemisms or political correctness. This means the use of forceful methods, plainly speaking war, against the enemy so relentlessly anxious to destroy the West, and must ensure greater accuracy in security arrangements. War is being waged against the West.
That accuracy is essential to prevent terrorist plans from succeeding. It is disturbing that both of the murderers of the priest were on the French anti-terrorist watch list and were known to the authorities. In fact, one of them the 19 year-old Adel Kermich, had been arrested in 2015 after being expelled from Turkey for trying to join ISIS in Syria. He had become a potential jihadist after the Charlie Hebdo massacre in January 2015. He was jailed in France, but then freed by judges against the advice of prosecutors, fitted with an electronic tag and subject to a curfew. Nevertheless, he was able to commit the murder before the hour of the curfew began.
US Presidential candidates, like leaders everywhere, must now tackle a number of issues and propose solutions to overcome and stop not only hate speech but also all incitements to adhere to Islamist terrorist appeals that are prevalent especially on the Internet and social networks.
A few suggestions may be allowed. First is the difficult problem for democracies that must be tackled. Should expressions of hate and incidents to commit terrorism be limited by law and public policy, and by private agreement, in order to prevent future atrocities? Islamist extremism can be promoted not simply by Islamic authorities in mosques or madrassas, but now mainly in the home simply by looking at the screen.
Second, though the task for police and security personnel is understandably now increasingly formidable because of the number of potential jihadists and technological changes, intelligence must be improved and those thought likely to commit terrorist acts must be dealt with severely. The jihadists must be regarded less as criminals and more as enemy fighters and must be dealt with accordingly.
Third, Islamic clerics should not be allowed to preach hatred against the west or encourage violent action. Their rhetoric used in mosques must be observed and censored if it incites violence. Authorities might consider expulsion of irresponsible Imans.
Fourth, in connection with this previous point western leaders Muslim leaders who claim to be moderate, truly interested in harmonious relations with non-Muslims, and honestly opposed to Islamist terrorism must speak out forcefully and often against the perpetrators.
Above all and finally, the immigration issue that has disconcerted all European countries, and to a considerable degree accounts for the success of Brexit in the UK, must be confronted in the U.S. as it is being in Europe. Two problems arise. One is whether potential jihadists, and if so how many, are claiming refugee and asylum status in the west. The other is that it is an open and complex question, and one hotly disputed politically, whether the majority of would be immigrants can be successfully immigrated into western countries.
National Party Conventions in the US should discuss these issues.
Posted on 07/27/2016 4:30 AM by Michael Curtis
27 Jul 2016
Well said. The silence surrounding our overly politically correct "leader" in the Western world is deafening. There are too few voices willing to say what needs to be said - whether in the U.S., the UK, or Canada. One of those words is "NO." No to increased immigration, no to refugees, no to allowing even the hint of Sharia Law. May GOD help us all.
28 Jul 2016
"radical Islamist terrorism".
Or, in short, Jihad.
Jihad of the sword.
Other types or - as Hugh Fitzgerald has put it, "instruments" - of Jihad are also being deployed at the same time: the jihad of the purse, deploying those billions of petrodollars to corrupt academia and the media and politics and law, depending on the nature of the targeted country; the jihad of the pen and tongue (Islamic dawa, Islamic deception; Tariq Ramadan and , in his degree, a personage such as the slithery Waleed Aly, in Australia); demographic jihad, by means of the hijra ('migration') and by means of the womb (force-breeding, to outnumber the Infidels). There is 'love jihad', as the Indians have dubbed it: predatory Muslim males inveigling infidel females into marriages that always, always end up advantaging the ummah and damaging the camp of the infidels (and are usually very, very destructive for the female concerned and any resultant children); conversely, infidel males must convert to Islam if they fall for a delicious Muslimah, because Muslim females are forbidden to 'marry out'. Total war, with the aim being nothing less than total world domination, the reduction of the entire planet to a global sharia-crazed despotism.
And in tandem with the expansion of Muslim colonies within liberal democracies there is the 'jihad of the vote bank', with the corrupting lure of the Muslim bloc vote dangled enticingly before politicians and political parties of all descriptions. The Muslim 'vote bank' has corrupted politics in India and in the UK and is bidding fair to do it in many, many other places.