Please Help New English Review
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff

Tuesday, 24 April 2007
Thanks to Drunkenblogger for alerting me to this decision which I missed earlier this evening. I am working from The Times legal section as I consider them more reliable than the BBC.
Senior judges who examined whether Muslim women should be allowed to wear the full facial covering, known as the niqab, said it should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
Muslim women should be permitted to wear the garment providing it did not interfere with the administration of justice, the Judicial Studies Board’s Equal Treatment Advisory Committee said.
The guidelines said: “Each situation should be considered individually in order to find the best solution in each case.”
“If a person’s face is almost fully covered, a judge may have to consider if any steps are required to ensure effective participation and a fair hearing - both for the woman wearing a niqab and for other parties in the proceedings.
When the question arose in February the Lord Chief Justice said that “ the preference is for full veils not to be worn in courts and tribunals.” Most Judges do not want the full veil worn in court.
Turn this emphasis round and today’s guidelines are not so gloomy as the press is reporting. Judges are independent and these are guidelines. What I said in February is still valid. As most Judges do not want the veil in their court they still have authority to require its removal. It is a matter of judicial decision whether or not a witness or lawyer can be seen, heard, understood and theconstitutional principle of judicial independence means that no minister can challenge or interfere with that decision.  If a judge's decision is wrong only a higher court can correct it, not the executive.
They also have discretion to allow if it they think it necessary. The circumstances that spring to mind would be the testimony of a woman scarred with acid for not wearing the veil, who is now too traumatised both by the attack and her scars to remove it.
But on balance I preferred the emphasis of the interim guidelines.
Posted on 04/24/2007 3:42 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Comments
No comments yet.


Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31   

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed