Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
As Far As The Eye Can See
by Moshe Dann
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky























clear
Sunday, 29 July 2007
Flush To Judgment ? Bookmark and Share
clear

Dr. Andrew G. Bostom writes:

Twenty-three year old Stanislav Shmulevich awaits arraignment on hate crime charges for “criminal mischief and aggravated harassment,” accused of having hurled Korans into toilets at Pace University’s Manhattan campus, 10 months ago. This past October 13, according to police, a teacher discovered a paperback Koran in a second-floor bathroom toilet, while on November 21, a student found another submerged Koran in the same bathroom.

The now disproven  Guantanamo Bay Koran flushing incident of May, 2005—reported errantly by Michael Isikoff, a veteran Newsweek journalist—was a distressingly stupid spectacle, accompanied by a tragic outcome—the loss of human life. Rioting which originated in Afghanistan, spread throughout much of the Muslim world, from Gaza to Indonesia. Rancorous Muslim mobs shouting “Protect our Holy Book!” burned down government buildings and ransacked the offices of relief organizations in several Afghan provinces. This senseless violence caused at least 15 deaths, and injured scores of others.

Another false accusation of Koran desecration by non-Muslim infidels—with even more horrifying consequences—a brutal pogrom against the defenseless dhimmi Jews of Shiraz, Iran—took place in October, 1910. David Littman has provided the full translation of an Alliance Israélite Universale report of the 1910 Shiraz pogrom which was precipitated, in large part, by a mendacious allegation against the Jewish community: desecrating copies of the Koran by placing them in cesspools (latrines).

…about three weeks ago, some scavengers were busy cleaning out the cesspools of a Jewish house when they brought to light an old book, a few pages of which were unsoiled and which was recognized as a Koran…On the first day of the festival of Succoth, some Jews were returning home from synagogue in the morning when they noticed at the entrance of their house a veiled Muslim woman holding a parcel under her arm. As soon as she saw them approaching, she hurriedly threw her parcel into the cesspool…then she ran away. The parcel was hastily pulled out. Once again, it was a Koran…not sure, in effect, that other Korans had not been thrown, likewise as the first ones, into Jewish houses without the knowledge of their inhabitants…it was  [deemed] prudent for this dignitary [the leading Muslim religious leader of the city] to be informed, in case one of these books should be discovered and seized on as a pretext to molest the Jews. [emphasis added]

This appeal was to no avail, and in the ensuing carnage and destruction,

Not a single one of the Jewish quarter’s 260 houses was spared. [emphasis added] Soldiery, …sayyids [descendants of the prophet and/or Muslim dignitaries], even women and children, driven and excited, less by religious fanaticism than by a frenetic need to plunder and appropriate the Jews’ possessions, engaged in a tremendous rush for the spoils. At one point, about a hundred men from the Kashgaīs tribe, who were in town to sell some livestock, joined the first assailants, thereby completing the work of destruction. 

But these fanatics weren’t satisfied to rob the Jews of their possessions. They engaged in all sorts of violence against their persons. As soon as their quarter was stormed, the Jews fled in all directions, some to the houses of Muslim friends, others to the British Consulate, on to the terraces, and even into mosques. A few remained to try and defend their property. They paid for it with their lives or a serious injury. Twelve of them were killed in this way in the mêlée. Another fifteen were stabbed or hit with bludgeons or bullets from rifles or revolvers; they are in an alarming condition. A further forty sustained light injuries. An unlucky woman was wearing gold rings in her ears. A soldier ordered her to surrender them. She made haste to comply and had taken off one of the rings and was trying to remove the other when the impatient fanatic found it more expeditious to tear off the ear lobe together with the ring. Another woman was wearing around her neck a big silk braid to which was attached a small silver case containing some amulets…[an assailant] tried to snatch it from her and, seeing that the braid held, cut it with his knife, making at the same time a deep gash in the flesh of the unfortunate Jewess. How many more such atrocious scenes have occurred, of which I have not yet heard!

In short the outcome of yesterday’s events is as follows: 12 people dead and about 50 more or less seriously injured, whilst the five to six thousand people comprising Shiraz community now possess nothing in the world but the few tatters they were wearing when their quarter was invaded. [emphasis added]

While there appears to be solid evidence that Stanislav Shmulevich did in fact subject a Koran (or Korans) to “toilet trauma”—including a surveillance photo of the defendant leaving a Pace University meditation room where Korans were stored, and his reported “admitting statements” to police—“Muslim activists”, i.e., the ubiquitous unindicted co-conspirators of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), admonished the university to “crack down on hate crimes” following the original incidents. But as Robert Spencer observed, aptly,

No one, of course, is calling upon those “Muslim activists” to take a strong stand against those Muslims who are justifying violence on the basis of the Koran and thereby [may] lead people [like Stanislav Shmulevich] to come to despise the book.

As described by the late Indian scholar Sita Ram Goel, Koranic sanctioning of violence and hatred was the subject of a formal Petition filed in the Calcutta High Court on March 29, 1985.  The plaintiffs maintained that the Koran, in violation of the Indian Penal Code, incited violence, disturbed the public tranquility, promoted feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities, and insulted other religions or the religious beliefs of other communities in India.  Their request for proscription of the Koran included three “annexures” documenting such Koranic injunctions, and divided into the following three categories: 

  • verses which preached cruelty, incited violence and disturbed public tranquility (i.e., 2:193; 8:39; 2:216; 9:41; 9:123; 66:9; 9:73; 8:65; 8:66; 47:4—15; 8:12; 69:30—33; 8:15—18; 25:52; 9:39; 9:111; 3: 169—171; 4:100; 48:29; 49:15; 2:154; 3:157—158; 8:59—60; 9:2—3; 9:29; 8:67; 4:84; 29:6; 29:69; 61:9—13; 9:36; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20—22; 4:95—96; 8:72—74; 3:142)
  • verses which promoted, on grounds of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities in India (i.e., 4:101; 60:4; 58:23; 9:7; 8:13—14; 8:55; 25:55; 5:72; 9:23; 9:28; 3:28; 3:118; 4:144; 5:14; 5:64; 5:18; 5:51)
  • verses which insulted other religions as well as the religious beliefs of other communities in India (i.e., 5:17; 4:157; 5:116—118; 98:6; 68:8—13; 38:55—57; 22:19—21; 22:56—57; 5:36; 15:2; 72:14—15;41:33; 4:125; 25:27—29; 26:96—99; 3:85; 8:38; 31:13; 29:41—42; 37:22—25; 37:26—32; 25:17—19; 7:173; 21:66—67; 21:98—100; 16:20—21; 6:22—23; 6:40—41; 6:148; 2;221; 24:3)

The Indian plaintiff’s “Calcutta Koran Petition” was ultimately dismissed on a legal technicality June 21, 1985, but the intervening 22-years make clear that such Koranic motifs continue to pervade Muslim discourse across the globe, from major jihad terror organizations (like Hamas, Hizbollah, and Al Qaeda), to the leading Sunni and Shi’ite institutions of religious training, and even within the public school systems (both religious madrassas, and even more “secular” learning environments) of Arab and non-Arab Muslim countries. Perhaps the most salient and disturbing illustration of these ominous trends is found in the writings and pronouncements of Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, who wrote in his 700 page treatise rationalizing Muslim Jew hatred (Banu Isra’il fi al-Qur’an wa al-Sunna [Jews in the Qur’an and the Traditions], originally published in the 1970s, and then re-issued in 1986/87):

[The] Qur’an describes the Jews with their own particular degenerate characteristics, i.e. killing the prophets of Allah (2:61/3:112), corrupting His words by putting them in the wrong places (3:69/3:78), consuming the people’s wealth frivolously (9:30), refusal to distance themselves from the evil they do (4:156/4:151/3:110), and other ugly characteristics caused by their deep-rooted lasciviousness (2:96)…only a minority of the Jews keep their word (2:78/3:24)….[A]ll Jews are not the same. The good ones become Muslims, the bad ones do not. (Qur’an 3:113)

Tantawi was apparently rewarded for this scholarly effort by being named Grand Imam of Al-Azhar University in 1996, a position he still holds. These are the expressed, “carefully researched” views on Jews held by the nearest Muslim equivalent to a Pope—the head of the most prestigious center of Muslim learning in Sunni Islam, Sunnis representing some 85% of the world’s Muslims. And Sheikh Tantawi has not mollified such hatemongering beliefs since becoming the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar as his statements on the Jews as “enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs”, the legitimacy of homicide bombing of Jews, or “dialogue” with Jews (just below), make clear.  

…anyone who avoids meeting with the enemies in order to counter their dubious claims and stick fingers into their eyes, is a coward.  My stance stems from Allah’s book [the Qur’an], more than one-third of which deals with the Jews…[I] wrote a dissertation dealing with them [the Jews], all their false claims and their punishment by Allah.  I still believe in everything written in that dissertation. [i.e., from above, in Banu Isra’il fi al-Qur’an wa al-Sunna]

Western discourse must move well beyond condemnation of clumsy acts of disapproval, such as Koran flushing, and their aggressive prosecution under pressure by Muslim avatars of real hatred, and abettors of murderous jihad terrorism, such as CAIR—to more fundamental and unnerving questions: What role do Koranic injunctions themselves—eternal and beyond criticism (least of all by non-Muslims)—play in inciting “criminal mischief and aggravated mischief”, and much more heinous crimes against humanity, including jihad genocide, and the destruction of non-Muslim religious, cultural, and political institutions?

clear
Posted on 07/29/2007 1:22 PM by Andy Bostom
Comments
29 Jul 2007
Sita - Action
Action : letters to governor, judges and school administration. You just need a printer (or some postcards) some stamps and few minutes. Click on my name to know more

29 Jul 2007
Pat

In my fathers generation with was the Nazi's with their code of hate and superiority, in mine it is Muslims with their code of hate and superiority.

Pat



29 Jul 2007
Luke

Lots of Christians in Pakistan also face murder and accusations of blasphemy (as good as a death sentence) and mob violence for allegedly desecrating the Koran. Often it is as simple as wrapping some food or garbage in a newspaper that features suras or Koranic writing in it. Usually it's just a ruse by Muslims to persecute, marginalise, or seize land of Christians, or to just plain bully them or coerce them into converting to Islam.

 

 

 



29 Jul 2007
Andy Gill
The Koran should be prosecuted as a hate crime.

30 Jul 2007
Send an emailReactionry
From Aumurath to Murad
Or: One Cheer For Charles Merrill  - Three For Charles Martel
 
I think the West would be better off without any "hate speech" or "hate crimes" laws altogether.  Many of our judges and prosecutors would prefer to prosecute someone who quoted verses of the Koran disapprovingly, rather than the Koran itself or its adherents.  As Derb notes we aren't doing much to deport our enemies who are not even citizens, so it seems improbable that we'll deport entire ethnies( as in "ethny", arguably one of his signature words -and I'm sure he'd favor exceptions for the Hirsi Aliies[Alis? Alii?]).  If we ever do rise to some Benes Decree, it might be best to do so without regard to how "principled" or "peaceful" are those enemies.
Deep Thoughts for Charles Merrill and the Words of the Stanislav "Shmoo" *Schmulevich: classic Men's Room graffiti  - Please don't toss cigarettes [or Korans] in the urinal; it makes them soggy and hard to relight
(I'm not sure about the relative sizes of various and smoky carbon footprints resulting from butt disposal in landfills or lungs, particularly when trying to calculate effects of some eventual release via cremation or suttee.)
While I've mixed feelings about CM's book-burning, I hope that he refuses any "invitation" to revert. The thought of say, "Merrill's Muraders"** is unnerving, and besides, it probably wouldn't cut-the-Muslim on Burma Shave road signs. (-sorry -can't help it -voice of MJ on my shoulder: "try harder")
And of course, "burning books leads to burning people" - best avoided - Well, OK, maybe not if they really deserve it -and even then, not up close and personal -bad for the soul an' all that -but instead in the manner of Dresden or Hiroshima.(ht to Derb's "We Have Ways")
Sounds of Muslim Slums & Saracens
And the words of the Prophet are spoken in tenement halls....and flushed in toilet stalls......and whispered in the sounds of sluicing....
*See Gogol & Nabokov style of first and last names.
**ht to the National Lampoon Radio Hour's "public disservice message" regarding "marauding bulldozers" -long before Stephen King thought of it.
 
 


30 Jul 2007
Send an emaildavod
Is there a historical comparison between the acquiessance of the local or state police in this case and actions of the police in European countries before they were taken over by the NAZIS.

30 Jul 2007
sheik yer'mami
Hi Andrew,

You might be aware that I have been cited before a defamation tribunal for objecting to a Wahabite mosque in a quite street in Cairns on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.

A local ratbag from the Cairns fishwrap has put my name in the paper, listed my properties including my business and where I live, and thus made me and my family a target for violent reprisals by the lunatic fringe of the Muhammedan movement.

Please get in touch if you are interested in the case and I will keep you posted.

You can find info on my blog at www.sheikyermami.com

30 Jul 2007
Send an emailReactionry
FWIW, INHO, sheikyermami.com seems worth a read. (Sadly, sheikyerbooty seems to be held by some parasitic group -not sure about sheikitlikapolaroid.)  The courage of Buddhist monks in southern Thailand and the cowardice of German censors are striking in contrast. Now I'm wondering about the role of Buddhism with respect to the Tamil of Sri Lanka and the Karen (I've run across several in Minnesota) of Myanmar(the Karen still prefer "Burma" -btw., I apologize if the reference to Merrill's Marauders was obscure to those more familiar with Wingate's Chindits)
Errata: I neglected to delete all of "the words of the Prophet Flusher" when pasting in Shmulevich's name, and while Derb was once taken to task for using the word, "ethny" yielded about 14,000 Google hits. 




Guns, Germs and Steel in Tanzania
The Thinking Person's Safari
Led by Geoffrey Clarfield
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
clear
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31       
clear

Subscribe