If you see this text then you need to update your flash player.

Print this pagePrint this page.

Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
Saturday, 3 May 2008
Muslims 4 lorn

Not everyone is pleased to see Boris win. Muslims 4 Ken have been strangely silent.  The Muslim Public Affairs Committee, on the other hand, has plenty to say. Muslims, it seems, are the problem:

Boris Johnson called Islam “the problem” and has now been elected Mayor of London. Islam is not the problem. Boris Johnson is not the problem. Our Muslim leaders ARE the problem.

With nearly 1 million Muslim Londoners our leaders should have mobilised the Muslim vote to stop the rise to power of a Zionist Islamophobe. But they stood back and watched as Ken Livingstone, the most pro-Palestinian and pro-Muslim elected politician we’ve ever had, was hounded from power.

"Hounded from power"? This was a free and fair election. The people have spoken.

The Zionists and Islamophobes who hated him for sticking up for Muslims were not passive like our Muslim leaders.  

Under-funded volunteers can’t save the Ummah alone

MPACUK is under-funded and we rely on volunteers giving up their weekends and evenings to defend the Ummah. Yet our London branch distributed 60,000 leaflets, got hundreds of posters up in Muslim shops and used new technology to spread the message online, in the media and even in text alerts.

MPACUK wrote to every mosque in London about the election explaining what they could do to educate and mobilise voters. A few outstanding mosques explained the importance of voting in their Khutbahs and held talks and workshops about the elections. A few organized voter registration drives. Most mosques still did nothing.

Every mosque can reach thousands in their community. And many Muslim organizations MPACUK contacted also refused to take part in the campaign. Among the most prominent we put in calls to British Muslim Forum and local ISB branches – but they weren’t interested in doing the work.

Our Muslim leaders should have stopped this Zionist Islamophobe, but they refused to lift a finger.

Our Leaders have done nothing to stem the tide of hate.

The fact that so many of our fellow citizens have voted for a candidate who has openly spread hate against Islam should ring alarm bells! Our mosques could reach out to our non-Muslim neighbours and dispel the Islamophobic myths spread in the media and by the BNP. There are over 2000 mosques in the UK – if every mosque held regular Open Days it would go a long way toward stopping the rising tide of Islamophobia. Ignorance leads to fear – but surely it’s not too hard to just invite people in for a cup of tea and a chat with ordinary Muslims?

The Missing Islamic Obligation: Accountability

Abu Bakr, upon acceptance of the Khilafaat, gave a speech in which he called upon the Muslim community:

“So if I do the right thing, then help me and if I do wrong, then put me straight. Truthfulness is a sacred trust and lying is a betrayal.”

Will you hold your mosque committee accountable for failing to lift a finger to stop a racist Islamophobe becoming Mayor of London? Will you demand they now hold a voter registration drive? Will you demand they educate our community about the importance of empowering ourselves through voting and politics? Or will you allow them to leave it to the thugs outside the mosque who are hood-winking our youth to think it’s haram to vote?

How can we recite Qur'an everyday and yet not lift a finger to stop the rise to power of a man who said that Islamophobia is the natural reaction to our beloved Qur'an?

"And the Messenger will say (on the Day of Judgement), "O my Lord, indeed my people have taken this Qur'an as a thing abandoned"
(Surah 25: 30)

We must now redouble our efforts to empower the Muslim community!

Three words that I would ban: "diversity", "empower" and "community". That said, I suspect that, for a Muslim, "empowerment" means something other than fulfilling one's potential, as it does for the psychobabblers.

Posted on 9:12 AM by Mary Jackson
Comments
3 May 2008
Special Guest
Obviously, Allah willed Boris' win over redken.  Allah Ta'ala, Allah knows best, MPAC.

3 May 2008
Send an emailPali

Oh those wretched earnest little 'peaceful' jihadis.

These are the legacy of Maududi and Qutb, the offspring of 1989 and the Rushdie affair, the vassals of the vilest type of religious sectarianism, chauvinism and bigotry in our society today. It's because of these morons that the BNP has picked up a seat, because of their belliegerent, self-pitying, loathsome Islamism and Islamic supremacist rhetoric that our society is poisoned now. Go to hell MPAC you pathetic little rabble of bigoted obsessive racist pipsqueaks.

I'm not a Tory, but it felt good to see Livingstone kicked out. Good luck to Boris. I never want to see Ken's form of nasty petty tyrannical divisive sectarian politics and pandering to the communalists ever again.

 



3 May 2008
Pali

Oh, and as a man with Turkish and Jewish ancestry, as well as having a wife who is I believe half-Indian, Boris and his family represent the cosmopolitanism of London very well.

 



4 May 2008
John M. J.

I really hate citing myself but please see http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/19531/sec_id/19531 wherein I said:

The second point is this. Most, if not all, who would argue for a theocracy are opposed to democracy for, they argue, only God may decide things and man has no right to do so. It can be argued that this is obviously fallacious if one believes that God granted total freewill to mankind but is obviously in error on a more profound level. God, if He, She or It exists must be omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent and omni-temporal otherwise what one believes in is merely a secondary deity, a demiurge, in the Platonic mould. God being all-knowing, everywhere, all-powerful and not constrained by time can, therefore, influence the minds of voters in such a way that the outcome of any election in a democracy will always be exactly what God wanted. Even if God chooses not to do that then the outcome will be exactly as God wanted for God knows the outcome of His own non-interference. The processes of democracy are not anti-God, indeed, they are just as Godly as the processes of any theocracy – perhaps more so, some would argue, in that they leave more room for God to act. There is, therefore, no valid reason for a believer to prefer a theocracy to any other form of government. Everything will always be exactly as God wills it regardless of whether or not God interferes or permits the operation of our freewill. No matter what the outcome, it is God’s will. Establishing a theocracy merely limits God’s freedom to act and could curtail a gift from God – freewill – which, it is argued, we have no right to curtail. If that is the case then the Iranian theocracy, for example, is, in fact, running counter to God’s will and should immediately cease all activities.



Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
 
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31   

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed