Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff





Monday, 4 June 2012

Bergman: Understanding the Iran talks

               

P5+! Delegation Arriving in Baghdad                                                           Munich 1938

Editor's Note:

Jay Bergman is a Professor of Russian History at Connecticut Central State University.  Bergman is a friend of long standing  in Connecticut.  The Jerusalem Post  published an opinion article today by him, "Understanding the Iran talks". It is about something that we have written about frequently, appeasement of the Islamic Republic of Iran and  the Czechoslovakization of Israel by Obama. Professor  Berhman connects the dots in this article between the patent appeasment of the P5+1 talks with Iran and the history of patent appeasement of the West with Hitler and the destruction of pre-war Czechoslovakia.

Jerry Gordon

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Understanding the Iran Talks

by

Professor Jay Bergman

Asa professional historian, I normally do not place much stock in historical analogies. They usually obscure and confuse more than they clarify.

But in the case of the recent P5 + 1 talks in Baghdad that will resume in Moscow later this month -- when the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, plus Germany, will try again to negotiate an agreement with Iran that will prevent its nuclear program being used to develop nuclear weapons -- an analogy comes to mind that suggests what the results of these negotiations are likely to be.

The analogy is with the Munich conference at the end of September 1938, at which Nazi Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain forced Czechoslovakia to cede to Germany the so-called Sudetenland, in the western part of the country, where some (but by no means all) of the three million ethnic Germans living there were demanding, in the name of self-determination, that it become part of Germany.

Hitler favored this because it made easier the destruction of Czechoslovakia, which in turn would facilitate the acquisition of lebensraum (living space) in Russia for the Aryan race. Additionally, the Czech government was required by the Munich agreement to cede to Poland all parts of Czechoslovakia where the population was more than 50% Polish, and to Hungary all territory where the population was more than 50% Magyar.

THAT THE agreement was negotiated by the four heads of state -- Hitler, Mussolini, Edouard Daladier for France, and Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister -- rather than by their foreign ministers underscored its significance. Hitler had scheduled an invasion of Czechoslovakia for October 1 - a fact known to the British and the French -- if it did not meet the Sudeten Germans' demand, and for that reason the Munich agreement seemed to preclude a European war. In reality it merely postponed it.

Conspicuously absent from the conference were the United States, the Soviet Union, and Czechoslovakia itself, whose vital national interests the participants at Munich did not consider legitimate enough for the Czechs to be present to protect. The closest any representatives of the Czech government got to the negotiating table was a room adjacent to it, where two lowlevel functionaries sat in silence, forbidden to participate in the negotiations.

For good reason Munich has become code for the appeasement of regimes that cannot be appeased because there is no limit to the demands they will make.

The obvious analogue of Czechoslovakia in the P5 + 1 talks is Israel. Like Czechoslovakia in 1938, it is the only country whose existence is deemed illegitimate by a participant in the talks, namely Iran. The Iranian government has repeatedly, and with increasing vehemence, threatened to annihilate Israel -- most recently by Major General Hassan Firouzabadi in a speech in Tehran this past Sunday. Nonetheless, Israel is not represented at the talks; there are not even any Israelis in an adjacent room. And like Nazi Germany in 1938, Iran will not be deterred by any agreement it signs from its longstanding intention of acquiring nuclear weapons for the purpose of annihilating Israel and dominating the entire Middle East. Like Hitler, who six months after Munich ordered German troops to occupy the rump that remained of Czechoslovakia, the Iranians several times have agreed to limits on their actions, for example on the percentage to which they will enrich low-grade uranium, only to ignore these limits when it became possible politically to do so.

By consenting to America's participation in these talks, President Obama is acquiescing in a process that can only jeopardize the lives of the six million Jews (and the one million Arabs) who live in Israel. That he is doing so while claiming "to have Israel's back" is an act of cynical calculation worthy of the appeasers at Munich.
-------------------
The writer is a Professor of History at Central Connecticut State University and the author, most recently, of Meeting the Demands of Reason: The Life and Thought of Andrei Sakharov.

Posted on 06/04/2012 7:54 PM by Jerry Gordon
Comments
6 Jun 2012
Christina McIntosh

 Fifty years ago, the redoubtable American reporter Martha Gellhorn saw and stated in trenchant language the parallel between Israel and pre-World-War-II Czechoslovakia, and the parallel between the Ummah and the ascendant Third Reich.

From her classic article, 'The Arabs of Palestine', which appeared in the Atlantic Monthly in October 1961, six years before the Six Day War.

www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1969/12/the-arabs-of-palestine/4203/

All one has to do is modify the terminology slightly: she speaks of 'Arabs' but it is 'Arab Muslims', and indeed 'Muslims of any kind' to which her remarks apply.

"...Arabs [that is, Muslims, whether Arab or non-Arab - CM] gorge on hate, they roll in it, they breathe it.  Jews top the hate list, but any foreigners [that is, all non-Muslims, all najis kuffar - CM] are hateful enough.  Arabs [that is, Muslims - CM] also hate each other, separately and en masse.  Their politicians change the direction of their hate as they would change their shirts.  Their press is vulgarly base with hate-filled cartoons; their reporting describes whatever hate is now uppermost and convenient.  Their radio is a long scream of hate, a call to hate.  They teach their children hate in schools.  They must love the taste of hate; it is their daily bread.  And what good has it done them?"

"There is no future in spending UN money [via UNRWA, etc - CM] to breed hate {but, alas, that is just what was done, and is still being done, in spades - CM].

"There is no future in nagging or bullying Israel to commit suicide by the admission of a fatal locust swarm of enemies. [That is, the so-called 'right of return' of the pooooor 'Palestinians' [TM] - CM]  There is no future in Nasser's [or the Ikhwan's, or Iran's - CM] solution, the Holy War [that is, the Jihad - CM] against Israel; and we had better make this very clear, very quickly.

"Long bleak memories will recall the Sudetendeutsch and Czechoslovakia.  In a new setting, Palestinian refugees [sic: 'Palestinian' 'refugees' - CM] assume the role of the Sudetendeutsch.  Israel becomes Czechoslovakia.

'Propaganda prepares the war for liberation of "our brothers".

'Victory over a minor near enemy is planned as the essential first step on a long triumphant road of conquest.

'A thousand-year Muslim Reich, the African continent (and, today, Western Europe, the Americas, India, the World - CM) ruled by Egypt (or by Persia, or by whichever part of the Ummah can ultimately seize dominance - CM) may be a mad dream, but we have experience of mad dreams, and mad dreamers.  

"We cannot be too careful.  The echo of Hitler's voice is heard again in the land, now speaking Arabic (as it is today; and today, too, it speaks Farsi - CM)."

That was Martha Gellhorn, in the Atlantic Monthly, in 1961; wiser than many then, and many today.






Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Subscribe