Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff





Tuesday, 25 December 2012

Merry Evolution & a Happy New Species

Like everyone else, I suppose, I receive unwanted advertisements by e-mail; of late, with the approach of Christmas, the advertisers have wished me, ‘Happy Holidays,’ addressing me by name.

The combination of personal tone and impersonal means strikes me as sinister. It makes me feel as if I am some kind of game bird under the observation of a gamekeeper, waiting to be shot, plucked and trussed.

Even worse, of course, is the locution ‘Happy Holidays.’ The justification for the avoidance of all reference to Christmas would no doubt be that we now live in a multi-religious society and it is important to avoid giving offence to adherents of a minority religion. This is absurd, of course, as well as dishonest: I know of no Jew, Moslem, Hindu, Sikh or Confucian who would object to being wished a Merry Christmas: and if I did, I would tell him not to be so silly.

Whose intolerance, exactly, is being appeased by the wretched locution? Not that of the religious: in the town in which I live, the Moslem-owned Indian restaurants are festooned with Christmas decorations, and the staff hand round little presents to the regular customers and wish them a Merry Christmas. The notion that every person with the slightest religious faith is a fanatic waiting to explode with rage at the first  indication that someone else has a different tradition or believes something different from him is absurd.

The people appeased by ‘Happy Holidays’ are not ordinary secularists, that is to say those people who do not want to live in a theocracy or see jobs allocated according to a religious test, but the new breed of militant atheist, who would probably prefer the winter holiday season (if we really must have one at all) moved to a date such as February 12, the date of Darwin’s birth. We could then all wish each other ‘Merry Evolution & a Happy New Species,’ and send out Evolution cards with maps of our own genome. This would serve simultaneously to satisfy or reconcile our need to be both rational and egotistical.

Far from being a sign of superior sensitivity, the locution ‘Happy Holidays’ is a sign of an increasing intellectual shrillness and intolerance. In genuinely cosmopolitan societies people could unselfconsciously participate in the festivals of others without having to subscribe to any of their beliefs. The militant atheists want doctrinal purity, with practice consistent with doctrine.  

First published in Salisbury Review.

Posted on 12/25/2012 6:02 AM by Theodore Dalrymple
Comments
No comments yet.



Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Subscribe