|
|
|
|
For our donors from the UK:
|
|
|
|
| Recent Publications by New English Review Authors |
.jpg) |
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon |
 |
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar |
 |
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple |
.jpg) |
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson |
 |
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon |
%20(2).jpg) |
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott |
 |
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq |
 |
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller |
 |
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum |
 |
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq |
 |
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein |
 |
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple |
 |
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq |
 |
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq |
 |
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky |
 |
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff |
.jpg)   .jpg) .jpg) 
|
Wednesday, 16 January 2013
Mahmoud Abbas, Leader Of The Slow Jihad Against Israel
 Mahmoud Abbas, for decades henchman to Yassir Arafat, and like Arafat, but wearing a suit and with the outward aspect of a chartered accountant, Mahmoud Abbas remains every bit as "Perjur'd, Murderous, Bloody, Full Of Blame, Savage, Extreme, Rude, Cruel, Not To Trust" as Arafat himself, or Saddam Hussein, or Muammar Ahmedinajad, or Muammar Qaddafy, or Ayman Al-Zawahiri, or the late Osama Bin Laden, or dozens of other Muslims, some of them juset as adept as Mahmoud Abbas, the corrupt and grasping Slow Jihadist, at the tried-and-true no-one-here-but-us-accountants look.
Abbas Is Part of the Problem, Not the Solution
by Prof. Efraim Inbar
BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 195, January 15, 2013
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Though much of the international community sees Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas as a serious partner for peace, Abbas’ words and actions prove that he is interested in nothing less than the ruin of the State of Israel. Instead of preparing his people for painful concessions and peaceful coexistence with Israel, Abbas glorifies armed struggle, insists on Palestinian refugees’ “right of return” to Israel, and acts to criminalize and demonize Israel.
A version of this Perspectives Paper appears in today's Jerusalem Post (January 16, 2013).
A little-noticed Reuters story on January 10, 2013, reports that Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of the Palestinian Authority (PA), rejected a conditional Israeli offer to let Palestinian refugees in war-torn Syria resettle in the West Bank and Gaza. Abbas rejected Israel’s offer because he thought it would compromise the claims of these refugees to return to their homes in Israel lost during the 1948 war. According to this report, Israel agreed to the resettlement on the condition the refugees sign a statement relinquishing claims of return to Israel. Yet Abbas rejected this condition and said “it is better they die in Syria than give up their right of return.”
Instead of helping his people in distress, Abbas prefers to cling to “the right of return” – a demand that no Israeli government will ever accept. Palestinian leaders have for years rejected attempts to alleviate the condition of their refugees by resettling them in proper housing in Gaza and the West Bank, instead preferring to keep the refugees and millions of their descendants in shanty towns and camps, as political pawns in the struggle against Israel. These refugees constitute an important element in the Palestinian self-image of victimhood and martyrdom.
Most of the international community rejects this Palestinian demand, understanding that a mass influx of Palestinians could destroy Israel’s Jewish character, and that this is a deal-breaker issue. No Israeli-Palestinian peace can develop if the PA insists on the “right” of return. Yet nobody in the international community spoke out against Abbas’ obstinate and radical refusal to take up Israel’s offer to resettle Syrian refugees in the West Bank and Gaza.
The Palestinian leadership missed another opportunity to demonstrate that it can behave in a constructive fashion and be of help to its people. Instead of pragmatic politics, we once again see Palestinian adherence to radical goals that prolongs Palestinian suffering and produces obstacles to peace.
Another recent display of this typical Palestinian preference for intransigence was provided by the so-called “moderate” Abbas when he addressed his countrymen on a Fatah movement anniversary on January 4, 2013. Abbas avoided mentioning the land-for-peace formula or the establishment of a Palestinian state beside Israel that could bring an end to the conflict and the suffering of his people. He did not prepare his people for the need to make concessions for the sake of peace. Instead, Abbas stressed the perennial need to adhere to the path of armed struggle in order to realize “the dream of return” of the Palestinian refugees and their descendants.
The only explanation for this behavior is that the Palestinian national movement is very serious about the “right of return.” Despite attempts of pundits who suggest that goodwill and Israeli territorial concessions can bring about a Palestinian flexibility on this issue, there is no evidence that the PA is ready to put aside its long-term goal of “return.”
Dismissing Palestinian behavior and rhetoric, or belittling its importance with regard to the refugees, amounts to ostrich-type behavior of sticking one’s head in the sand. The international community, either due to naïveté or wishful thinking, has never recognized that so long as Palestinians insist that refugees have a right to settle in Israel, they are not prepared for meaningful negotiations nor will Israelis believe that they are. People do not easily give up their dreams, and over the past twenty years since the Oslo accords were signed, the PA has not moderated its demands one bit.
The insistence on a “right of return” complements Abbas’ refusal to acknowledge that Israel is a Jewish state and his denial of any links of the Jews to their ancestral homeland. Moreover, Abbas is conducting a campaign at home and abroad to demonize Israel and to portray Israelis as colonialists and war criminals. These acts do not indicate moderation or a quest for coexistence with Israel.
Abbas is also taking measures to encourage armed struggle against Israel, even if these measures undermine the state-building efforts of the PA. He supported several December 2012 parades of armed members of the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, the militia of Fatah, in honor of the anniversary of the founding of the Fatah movement. Tolerant attitudes toward Palestinian militias run counter to the main litmus test of a state, which is the monopoly over the use of force. Turning a blind eye to the reemergence of armed groups in Palestinian society erodes the main achievement of the PA in recent years – the restoration of law and order, following the formal dismantlement of militias.
The Palestinian armed groups may be tempted to engage in violent clashes with Israel, which will turn out to be disastrous for Palestinian self-determination and peaceful coexistence. While declaring his preference for non-violence, Israeli leaders suspect that Abbas is hoping that a third Intifada will bring better results than the second.
Abbas promised negotiations and moderation after the winning by “Palestine” of an upgraded status at the UN as an “observer state.” However, since that November 2012 vote, Abbas has only ramped up his inflammatory rhetoric and irresponsible policies. The Palestinians continue to be in urgent need of better political leadership to extricate themselves from pathological patterns of self-destructive behavior.Posted on 01/16/2013 10:39 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Comments
16 Jan 2013
pr126
If Abbas were negotiating peace with Israel, his life expectancy could be measured in hours, not days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
25-May-2013
After Muslims Ritually Murder an Unarmed Non-Muslim British Soldier in London, Muslims in Australia Try to Play Victim, Whine About Fear of 'Backlash'
25-May-2013
In The Times Of India, Readers Have Their Say
25-May-2013
Abdallah Ben Mansour, A Leader Of Muslims In France: France Owes Us Everything
25-May-2013
Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei Denounces Barbaric Europeans, And Their Treatment Of Women
25-May-2013
An Exchange Of Views At The Iraqi Embassy In Amman
25-May-2013
Stockholm riots spread west on sixth night
25-May-2013
In Iran, Meet The Candidates
25-May-2013
Hezbollah Goes All-Out For Assad, And Uber-Sunnis Everywhere Will Never Forget
25-May-2013
French Soldier Stabbed At La Defense By A North African With Beard And Wearing A Djellaba
25-May-2013
Swedes Trying Manfully To Blame Themselves, And Islam, Of Course, Is Not To Be Mentioned
25-May-2013
What The Burmese Are Thinking
25-May-2013
Burma Puts Two-Child Limit On Muslims To Attempt To Stem Demographic Conquest
25-May-2013
At Friday Prayers For The Faith "Of Peace And Love" (Clegg) -- A Work Accident
25-May-2013
David Axe On Naive And Trusting American Soldiers, And The Muslim Afghans Who Deceive Them
25-May-2013
Charles Freilich On Patrick Tyler's Nasty Little Book On How Israel Defends Itself Against Jihad
Search The Iconoclast
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
Subscribe
|
|
.jpg)
