Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
As Far As The Eye Can See
by Moshe Dann
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky














Thursday, 31 December 2009
Auld Lang Syne
clear

Watch, and listen, here.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 9:26 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Veglione Di Capodanno (Fantozzi)
clear

Watch, and listen here.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 9:20 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Wahid And Israel
clear

From an article here:

Abdurrahman Wahid

Arguably the most signi?cant development after Rabin's visit to Jakarta in October 1993 was the visit of Indonesia's most in?uential Islamic leader, Abdurrahman Wahid, to Jerusalem one year later. As leader of NU, Indonesia's-and the world's-largest Islamic mass organization, Abdurrahman's acceptance of an invitation from Shimon Peres to witness the peace-accord ceremony between Israel and Jordan on 25 October 1994 was highly signi?cant. Of course, the visit looks even more signi?cant in light of Abdurrahman becoming Indonesia's ?rst democratically elected president ?ve years later. But even apart from Abdurrahman's public prominence, his relationship with Israel and with Judaism warrants attention for what it tells us about the development of Islamic thought in Indonesia and about the potential of Islam generally to contribute to building understanding and consol­idating respect and tolerance between peoples.13

 As we have seen, one of the key factors militating against devel­oping relations between Israel and Muslim-majority nations in Asia, home to most of the world's Muslims, is the fear of agitation by conservative and reactionary Islamist groups protesting closer ties with a nation long demonized in their internal discourses. Con­sequently, the impression is given that Islam is a source of problems and that Muslim leaders will invariably play a spoiling role. The example of Abdurrahman Wahid is a valuable reminder that this need not be so.

Born in 1940, Abdurrahman Wahid is the eldest son of the much-admired nationalist leader Wahid Hasyim, an o?cial national hero, leading light in NU, minister of religious a?airs, and friend of Sukarno. Both of Wahid's grandfathers, Hasyim Asy'ari on his father's side and Bisri Syansuri on his mother's, were founders of NU and respected leaders of the nationalist movement. Although not quite as progressive as the remarkable Wahid Hasyim, both of the older men were regarded as innovative and enlightened ulama, or religious scholars, who pion­eered new approaches to teaching in their East Java pesantren (residen­tial madrasah, or traditional religious schools). After Abdurrahman Wahid graduated from his pesantren educa­tion in Central and East Java, he was sent to study at the venerable Al Azhar Islamic University in Cairo. Quickly tiring of the rote-learning approach he encountered at Al Azhar, Abdurrahman spent most of his time in Cairo reading Western literature in the American University library, watching French cinema, and engaging in long discussions in the city's co?ee shops. It made for a great informal education but did nothing for his studies at Al Azhar. In 1966 he transferred to the University of Baghdad, then regarded as the best modern university in the Arab world, where he completed a four-year degree in Arabic literature and Islamic history.

While studying in Baghdad, Abdurrahman worked part-time as a translator cum letter-writer at a textile export company, side by side with an Iraqi Jew named Ramin. Abdurrahman knew very little about Judaism and Jewish history when he arrived in Baghdad, but after four years of daily conversations with Ramin he had developed a deep respect for Jewish religious thought and culture. Upon returning to Indonesia, Abdurrahman fell in love with the novels of the American Jewish writer Chaim Potok, seeing parallels with his own community in the conservative religious community described in works such as My Name Is Asher Lev.

Always an idiosyncratic and original thinker, Abdurrahman's per­sonal engagement with Jewish thought caused him to react critically to the simplistic and prejudicial notions about Israel and the Jews that he encountered in Muslim society. Consequently, for the past thirty years he has made a point of speaking out against anti-Semitic thinking and ignorance about Israel and Judaism. And he has made numerous visits to Israel, the earliest taking place in 1980. It is not surprising, then, that he was quick to accept Peres's invitation to visit Israel in October 1994 and then in March 1997 to join the Board of Governors of the Shimon Peres Peace Center. Nor is it remarkable that criticism about being pro-Zionist by Amien Rais, his longtime nemesis and leader of Muhammadiyah, or negative comments by Foreign Minister Ali Alatas, did not stop Abdurrahman from traveling to Israel in October 1997 to speak at the Peres Peace Center.

What is remarkable is that despite the controversy that erupted after his October 1994 visit, Abdurrahman was elected to a third ?ve-year term as executive chairman of NU just weeks after returning from Israel. Although in the 1980s Abdurrahman had enjoyed a reasonable working relationship with Suharto, since 1990 the relationship had turned increasingly antagonistic. Abdurrahman was particularly crit­ical of Suharto's new ploy of co-opting and appeasing both social-conservative and radical Islamists and warned of the dangers of grow­ing sectarian sentiment. But he was also generally critical of the Suharto regime's record of human rights abuses and rampant corrup­tion. He made full use of the measure of protection conferred by his status as NU leader to boldly confront Suharto in a manner that few others dared attempt. So when Abdurrahman announced after returning from Israel that he had decided to reverse his previous decision to retire from leadership after a decade at the helm of NU, and that he was running for a third ?ve-year term at the November ?ve-yearly congress of NU, Suharto was infuriated.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 8:25 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Wahid, An Easygoing, Relaxed, Syncretistic, Not Terribly Observant Muslim, Dies
clear

From The Wall Street Journal: 

Indonesian Leader Resisted Extremists

By TOM WRIGHT

Former Indonesian President Abdurrahman Wahid was a key religious moderate and spiritual leader of one of the world's largest Muslim organizations.

Mr. Wahid, an almost-blind and wheelchair-bound cleric whose health had deteriorated in recent years, died in Jakarta on Wednesday at age 69.

As head of the Nahdlatul Ulama, an Islamic organization with 40 million members founded in 1926 by his paternal grandfather, Mr. Wahid came to be seen as a key ally of the West in its ideological struggle against Islamic radicalism.

A witty, charismatic speaker, Mr. Wahid fought to keep the NU out of politics in the 1980s and 1990s at a time when Muslim organizations across the Middle East and Asia were agitating to implement Islamic Shariah laws.

"He was against political Islam as a concept," said Robin Bush, the Indonesia country representative for the Asia Foundation, a San Francisco think tank.

[Wahid] Getty Images

Abdurrahman Wahid

In the late 1990s, as Indonesia experienced political ferment in the wake of a financial crisis and the resignation of its longtime president, Suharto, Mr. Wahid entered politics as head of a formally nonsectarian party. After elections in 1999, the nation's highest legislative body appointed him president of Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim-majority nation.

In recent years, Indonesia has experienced a rise in more-conservative forms of Islam. But a majority of Indonesia's 240 million people remain moderates who lean toward Mr. Wahid's vision, and his death is unlikely to open the door to more radical Islamists, analysts say.

Mr. Wahid, who was widely known by his nickname "Gus Dur," embodied the nation's varied religious traditions that meld more austere Middle Eastern strands of Islam with older Hindu and animist strains.

The descendent of an old Hindu royal family, Mr. Wahid enjoyed being irreverent about Islamic traditions. He said he disliked his time in the 1960s studying at Cairo's Al-Azhar University, Sunni Islam's premier seat of learning, because of the dull rote-learning of verses from the Quran, Islam's holy book.

Mr. Wahid's term as president between 1999 and 2001 disappointed many followers. Although he worked to roll back the role of the military in political life and to decentralize power to Indonesia's far-flung provinces, his administration was characterized by unpredictable cabinet reshuffles and allegations of nepotism.

His term ended with his impeachment for alleged corruption for misappropriation of state funds. Mr. Wahid stepped down but denied wrongdoing. He was never tried on criminal charges.

More recently, he founded the Wahid Institute, which promotes moderate Islam and is headed by his daughter, Yenni Wahid.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 8:18 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Abdolkarim Sorroush Deserted The Sinking Ship of Theocracy, But The Makeover Is Not Complete
clear

Those who understand Farsi can watch, and listen here.

But evreyone who knows English can  read the many comments critical of Abdolkarim Sorroush, in his new guise, and critical, too, of his being allowed to enter, and speak, in the U.S., like a great many other former Iranian revolutionaries who are not to be trusted, for even if they dislike the current regime, they are still supporters of Islam and not of a Persian version of Kemalism. The criticisms, too, of the clerics, even of the dissident ones such as Montazeri, who never issued a fatwa against Khamenei, the clerics who continue apparently to support the notion of clerically-guided rule, are instructive.

I agree with those Iranian commentators who are not charitably disposed toward Sorroush, despite his abandonment, or repudiation, of his earlier enthusiasm for the Islamic Republic of Iran, when he helped to ferret out "socialists" and other leftists from universities. He has been a lecturer at Harvard and Yale, and made much of in the West, among those who keep being hailed as "one of those former enthusaists for the Islamic Republic -- just like that "co-founder of the Revolutionary Guards" or that apparently inexhaustible supply of "students who took over the American Embassy" who have now  changed their minds, and who get a lot of play for their mind-changing. The problem is that few of these people turn out to have fought their way mentally all the way to complete secularism, and to  an understanding of how Islam, by stunting moral and mental growth, is the cause of so much of what ails Iran, and it is not so easily assigned a role, pace Sorroush, that will divorce "state and religion." It was to be tied in knots (see Ataturk), and even then, eternal vigilance, and an endless chipping away at its legitimacy in the minds and hearts of its supporters, is necessary if Iran is to have a reasonable future.

The comments of the Iranians in the link, below Soroush's speech, show their own doubts about him, which some will regard as too unforgiviing, as uncharitable. So be it. These are  doubts which a non-Iranian should share. When did Abdolkarim Soroush  turn on the regime,, and before he turned on it, how much damage did he do? And did he turn on it wholeheartedly, or in a less convincing way, full of the kind of ostentatious moderation" that doesn't really fit the bill, that doesn't really show a full understanding of the nature and function of Islam, and why, when a state is full of Muslims, only Kemalist or Destour-Party restraints, ruthlessly imposed, on the political and social power of Islam, gives the people a chance to escape the usual Lords of Misrule and the baleful effects of Islam, Islam, Islam.

[An "akhoond" is a Muslim cleric.]

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 7:33 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
A Musical Interlude: Time On My Hands (Lee Wiley)
clear

Listen here.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 6:07 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
The Fourth Wise Man
clear

by Esmerelda Weatherwax (January 2010)


One Christmas when I was a child I watched a television programme where a kindly looking man told the story of the Fourth Wise Man. We were living in Stoke Newington at the time and as we left there in 1963 this must have been Christmas 1961 or 1962.  

I remembered parts of the story clearly. That the Fourth Wise Man left late carrying three great jewels, a pearl (of great price) a ruby (big as a pigeons egg, or red as a pigeons blood) and another (couldn’t remember). He was late arriving in Bethlehem, and late to the crucifixion, by which time he was jewel-less. I remembered what he did with the first and last jewels but not what he did with the second and how he spent the 30 odd years in-between. more>>>

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 5:03 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Going to Hell
clear

by Ares Demertzis (January 2010)

 
(i)
It was an arranged marriage. His father having died when he was three, a solicitous uncle performed the obligatory function of proposing for his nephew to the father of a singularly attractive young woman; her complexion was as unblemished alabaster, her hair black as a raven´s wing, and her eyes, her eyes, the pale, ethereal softness of a vaporous, illusory gray. Surprisingly, notwithstanding her exceptional beauty she was unwed, the direct consequence of what was referred to by her relatives as a “spirited personality.” She had consistently elected to reject all previous suitors as trivial, and appeared undaunted by that approaching statistical age after which matrimony was considered unattainable within the steadfastly hermetic society to which she belonged. The uncle´s choice was motivated not so much by the young woman´s comeliness, but by a financial consideration: the prospect of a lucrative dowry for his nephew; the solicited bride was the daughter of an affluent family in that small, isolated mountain village where the probable future groom had also been born thirty eight years ago.  more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:58 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Di-vision - Div-ision - Divi-sion - Divis-ion
clear

by Jack Dixon (January 2009)


My topic is simply the question of word division-- mostly in English, but with a diplomatic glance at French. My title has been devised, not to prognosticate dire social chaos in the future, but to suggest both the simplicity and the difficulty of word-division. To begin with, the term 'word-division' means different things to different linguists. more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:50 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Aspiration through Art
clear

by David Hamilton (January 2010)



Our high traditions of sacred and imaginative Art have nearly died with the decline of religion and the spiritual uplift it brings to the artistic imagination and our higher natures. Religiously inspired art has been replaced by a negative attempt to destroy those traditions. The benefits of a firm common religion to art is the transforming of creative imagination into something higher and raising it above the base and the mundane. The driving force of our civilisation has always been creative imagination and the sense of striving for something higher while rooted in the human and everyday. Western civilization has largely sprung from a sense of piety and holiness and reverence for God and his creation and not just the need to secure one’s position in life. As, George Frederick Handel put it: “If I merely entertain them, then I have failed. I wish to make them better.”  more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:47 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Saul Alinsky and the Rise of Amorality in American Politics
clear

by D. L. Adams (January 2010)


Saul Alinsky and his "community organizing" methods and philosophy have had a profound influence on the politics of the United States. Recent history would suggest that this influence is just short of catastrophic.

Alinsky's book, "Rules for Radicals," published in 1971 still has enormous effects on our country today. Hillary Clinton wrote her Wellesley College thesis on Alinsky, interviewing him personally for her research. After her graduation Alinsky offered her a job with his organization, which she refused to pursue other opportunities. President Obama worked for Alinsky organizations and taught seminars in Alinsky tactics and methodology during his "community organizing" period in Chicago.  more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:43 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
On the Seventh Day of Christmas
clear

The Seven Stars Carey Street London and Seven Swans loitering with intend.
The Seven Stars is a very old pub opposite the back entrance to the Royal Courts of Justice. The pub (1602)  is nearly 300 years older than the court (1875). Carey Street used to be the entrance to the Bankruptcy Court (the sign remained into my day, although hearings in London are now done in the new Thomas More Building). The warning to a foolhardy business venture "He'll end up on Carey Street" is no longer current. Next door to the pub is an exquisite jewellers called The Silver Mousetrap, founded in 1690, although no longer run by the original family.
The Swans are, from top to bottom, and left to right, The Swan Wells Somerset, the White Swan and Cockoo in Wapping, the Black Swan in Harrowgate. I'll put my hands up, I didn't take that one as so far I have not passed a Black Swan pub with a decent sign. That picture is the work of Alexander Kapp on the
PubsGalore website. As the pub is closed and according to the CAMRA website will reopen shortly after considerable building work as the Swan on the Stray I felt able to use his photograph as it is now a historical document.
Next is the White Swan in Fetter Lane London, the White Swam Pimlico, then the Swan holding the clock of Dipplers the Jewellers in Norwich. Not a pub sign but lets not be pedantic, its all part of the historic charm of our cities. The final swan is The Swan in Leadenhall. Leadenhall Market does duty as Diagon Alley in the Harry Potter films.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:18 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Kreisky�s Children
clear

by Dexter Van Zile (January 2010)

 

Bruno Kreisky, the first (and only) Jew elected to serve as head of government of a German speaking country, had a problem.[1]Soon after Kreisky was elected chancellor of Austria in 1970, renowned Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal reported that Hans Ollinger, a newly appointed cabinet member, had been a member of the Nazi party in the 1930s. Kriesky, who had lost 20 members of his family in the death camps during the Holocaust, needed to send a message to the people of Austria about how they should deal with their country’s Nazi past.[2]
 
Kreisky sent a message, that’s for sure. more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:39 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
The Bible Code
clear

Enigma, God’s Prophecies, Soothsaying, or the Peculiarities of the Hebrew Language?

by Norman Berdichevsky (January 2010)


For more than a decade, Biblical scholarship, archaeological research and theological speculations have been put on hold or eclipsed by the world-wide popularity of The Bible Code, launched by Michael Drosnin that was a runaway best seller. Published in 1997, it asserted that the Old Testament contains a secret code based on the equidistant spaces of Hebrew letters arrayed as a continuous chain. It is indeed amazing that diverse people in many different cultures and traditions, some with a profound understanding and appreciation of the Old Testament,  have accepted the validity of the code. more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:36 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
How Many Lone Wolves Does It Take To Make A Pack?
clear

by Nidra Poller (January 2010)


How many lone wolves does it take to make a pack? How many packs make a battalion? How many battalions make a full-fledged enemy in a genuine war?
President Obama copped out on another grave security threat with disingenuous promises and heartfelt finger pointing. Slow on the uptake as usual he finally got around to blaming the CIA—the one G.W. Bush left him-- for missing the red flags that should have kept the Jock Bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, from boarding Northwest Airlines flight 253 bound for Detroit—in the minds of unsuspecting passengers—and bound for destruction by the will of Abdulmutallab’s Allah. At first glance Obama’s accusation is plausible. It will reinforce the illusions of softening critics fooled by the Oslo Peace Prize speech and too willing to believe that the American president is finally catching on. more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:32 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Arts & Sciences
clear

by Rebecca Bynum (January 2010)


Throughout the twentieth century and into the first decade of the twenty-first, the life sciences have increasingly been devoted to examining the traits and characteristics man shares with other animals. The trend has been toward minimizing man’s unique qualities and magnifying man’s animal nature. The theory of natural selection, coupled with sexual selection is now being stretched to explain all aspects of human behavior and psychology. This has the effect of diluting the concept of will, and ultimately, of denying the non-material aspects of human experience entirely, including the reality of mind itself. more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:28 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Richard Rubenstein: Jihad and Genocide
clear

a review by Bat Ye'or (January 2010)

I
n Jihad and Genocide, Richard Rubenstein discusses and clarifies the most important issues of this century. Having written a number of books on the political and cultural processes that led to the genocide of the Jews in World War II, he now detects in jihad the same dynamic targeting Israel.

Most Westerners ignore the meaning of dhimmitude and Islam’s dichotomous division of the world into dar al-Islam (the land of Islam) and dar al-Harb (the land of war). Yet those concepts are fundamental pillars of jihad and encompass the entire Islamic worldview. They affect both everyday life and the future of the West, as is evident every time an airline passenger submits to an intrusive search before boarding a flight. In our nuclear age, these concepts will determine the preservation of our freedom and ultimately of humanity’s survival. In reality, today’s jihadist genocidal rage targets more than Israel. It targets the entire civilized world.  more>>>
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 4:24 PM by NER
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Flight 253 passenger Kurt Haskell Claims Abdulmutallab had Accomplices
clear

And he fears this is being covered up.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 3:00 PM by Rebecca Bynum
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Only Bangladeshi welcome - or Indian.
clear

I had business in London Borough of Newham today - the area served by Stratford and Plaistow Stations.
Ethnically very mixed, but certain sections not keen to mix more.
These are a sample of the adverts for accomodation available in three newsagents/general stores in Plaistow High Street and Stratford Broadway. I have croppped them and hidden the telephone numbers but retain the full sized and untouched originals.
Whenever racism crops up as a topic of conversation among the chattering classes someone may mention the phrase used by Johnny Lydon (Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols) and Lord Taylor of Warwick the most senior black politician as the title of their respective biographies "No blacks, No Dogs, No Irish". This, it is claimed, was the sign placed in the windows of racist landladies in the 1950s and 1960s. But while there was racism then I never saw such a sign myself, nor have I met anyone who did. It was always someone's mother, or cousin, who saw it, or something similar in London, or Birmingham or Liverpool. The photgraphic eveidence is always the same photograph used in Johnny Lydon's book which has found its way onto all the Hope not Hate and Stop the BNP websites. I am not the only person who believes this to be an urban myth.
Two wrongs do not make a right, of course. But can you imagine an advert for a bedsit saying only English girls need apply? Only Welsh boys will be welcome? There would be a furore.
Hope not Hate would picket the shop. Questions would be asked in Parliament.
Stop the BNP would be phoning the number in relays t express their displeasure.

And before you say, "but these are shared facilities" the facilities were nearly always shared in working class homes in the 50s and 60s.

Photographs E Weatherwax - LB Newham 31 December 2009

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 2:13 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
US Releases Iranian-backed Terrorist Behind murder of US Troops
clear

Bill Roggio writes at the Weekly Standard:

The British are all smiles over the release of Peter Moore, a British citizen who was held hostage by an Iranian-backed Shia terror group in Iraq. But there is little talk about the price paid to secure Moore's release. The US military has freed Qais Qazali, the leader of the Asaib al Haq, or League of the Righteous, as well as his brother Laith, several Qods Force officers, and more than 100 members of the terror group, in exchange for Moore. And that isn't all. The British also received the corpses of three security contractors who were working to protect Moore when he was kidnapped at the Finance Ministry in Baghdad in May 2007. The three contractors were executed by the Asaib al Haq; another is also thought to have been killed.

Qais Qazli wasn't just some run of the mill Shia thug; his group is backed by Iran. Qazali's men were trained by Iranian Qods Force to infiltrate and assault the Provincial Joint Coordination Center in Karbala in January 2007. Five US soldiers were killed during the kidnapping attempt. The US soldiers were executed after US and Iraqi security forces closed in on the assault team.

The attack on the Karbala Provincial Joint Coordination Center was a complex, sophisticated operation. The assault team, led by tactical commander Azhar al Dulaimi (who was later killed by the US military), was trained in a mock-up of the center that was built in Iran. The unit had excellent intelligence and received equipment that made them appear to be US soldiers. Some of the members of the assault team are said to have spoken English. They drove SUVs that looked like ones used by US contractors.

Andy McCarthy is not amused:

Back in the early summer, I wrote about how, even as the Iranian regime continued killing American troops, the Obama administration had engaged in shameful negotiations with an Iran-backed terror network (the League of the Righteous) in Iraq — negotiations that resulted in the release of Laith Qazali, one of the terrorists responsible for the murders of five American soldiers in Karbala, in exchange for the remains of two British hostages.

Shortly thereafter, the Obama administration released the "Irbil Five," commanders from the Iranian IRGC's elite "Quds Force" who had been captured by our military after coordinating terrorist attacks in Iraq that have killed hundreds of American soldiers and Marines. 

Today, New Year's Eve, while everyone's attention is understandably on family and friends, we learn (thanks to the ever alert Bill Roggio, reporting on the Standard's blog) that the administration has now released Qais Qazali, Laith's brother, who is the head of the Iran-backed terror network, in addition to a hundred other terrorists. In violation of the long-standing, commonsense policy against capitulating to kidnappers and terrorists because it just encourages more hostage-taking and murder, the terrorists were released in exchange for a British hostage and the remains of his three contract guards (whom the terrorists had murdered).

So, as the mullahs, America's incorrigible enemies, struggle to hang on, we're giving them accommodations and legitimacy. And the messages we send? Terrorize us and we'll negotiate with you. Kill American troops or kidnap civilians and win valuable concessions — including the release of an army of jihadists, and its leaders, who can now go back to targeting American troops.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 2:01 PM by Rebecca Bynum
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Bomber Who Hit U.S. Base Wore Afghan Uniform
clear

We're finally starting to see questions being asked about these gunman/bombers in uniform who seem to attack our troops with remarkable regularity. The Muslim world-view, however, is not discussed. Rather, the Afghan "National" army  is described as possibly "infiltrated by insurgents." These attacks are never described simply as Muslims awakening to their duty as Muslims, which is how they see it. This is from the NYTimes:

KABUL, Afghanistan — A suicide bomber wearing an explosive vest and an Afghan National Army uniform killed at least eight Americans, most of them C.I.A. officers, at a remote base in southeastern Afghanistan on Wednesday, according to NATO officials and former American intelligence officials.

The bomber who struck the base in Khost Province was wearing an Afghan National Army uniform, said two NATO sources on Thursday. Both of them asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the subject. A Taliban spokesman claimed responsibility for the attack.

The use of an official army uniform could mean any one of three things: that the raid was carried out by the Taliban and the bomber was using a stolen uniform; that he was an army officer assigned to the base who had snapped; or that the Afghan National Army ranks are infiltrated by insurgents. The third possibility would be the most serious concern because it indicates a potentially more pervasive problem.

The attack happened close to dusk, when some people on the base were finishing their daily work and relaxing or taking a break before dinner before returning to their offices for the evening.

The attack at the C.I.A. base, Forward Operating Base Chapman, in Khost Province appeared to be the single deadliest episode for the spy agency in the eight years since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. It also dealt a significant blow to the often insular, tight-knit organization, which has lost only 90 officers in the line of duty since its founding in 1947.

One former C.I.A. official said that eight agency employees had been killed but cautioned that early reports from the field were often incorrect. The official, who spoke anonymously because the agency had not commented publicly on the attack, said the final number of dead could be higher because at least six American civilians were wounded. It was unclear how many of the dead were full-time officers and how many were contract employees...

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 10:17 AM by Rebecca Bynum
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Bring back Thatcher
clear

2010 will bring a new Prime Minister, who can't possibly be worse than Gordon Brown. How I wish it were Margaret Thatcher, the greatest PM since Churchill. I am confident that she would have tackled Islam head on. Damian Thompson sings her praises:

Wasn’t she brilliant? As the release of documents under the 30-year rule demonstrates, no sooner had Margaret Thatcher arrived in Downing Street than she started blazing away at this country’s enemies – many of them ostensible allies.

She told the wretched Giscard d’Estaing that Britain would henceforth decline to be ripped off by the EEC.

She laid in to “President” Jimmy Carter for handicapping Britain’s attempts to control terrorism in Northern Ireland.

She condemned the American public’s disgusting support for the IRA.

She attacked the Republic of Ireland for failing to protect Lord Mountbatten from his murderers.

And when Kosygyn told her that the Soviet Union was a peace-loving country, she laughed in his face.

In short, she was magnificent – and the last British prime minister worthy of the office.

She was hated by lefties, partly because lefties are stupid, but mainly because they are snobbish. There is no snob like a left-wing snob. Julie Burchill:

Arguing was a delight to her ("Be constructive, Enoch!"), contradicting the accepted wisdom that she was no sort of intellectual. Oh, and her philo-Semitism, always the mark of excellence in a Gentile. Not for Margaret Thatcher the sly, shameful sneers of Labour’s Old Etonian Tendency about the hidden powers of Jewish "cabals" or of the slimeball who said of her Jew-heavy Cabinet that it owed more to Lithuania than Leeds. Oh, and her sheer bloody-mindedness — a fine and rare thing in a woman.

OK, so I liked quite a lot of things about her. But what I liked more than anything was what she brought out in other people; how she just had to stand there being herself and they’d divest themselves of their civilised veneer, unbidden. A whole host of characters who had previously passed for decent revealed themselves as sneering snobs when they applied themselves to Thatcher. Mary Warnock said it made her feel sick to hear that Mrs T bought her a pussy-bow blouse at Marks & Spencer; Jonathan Miller whipped himself into a self-righteous frenzy over "her odious suburban gentility". A few years later, of course, he would be banging on about the ghastly "feral", ie working-class, children disturbing the peace of his precious N W Twee neighbourhood, as suburban as any retired colonel.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 10:08 AM by Mary Jackson
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Of Cauliflowers And Kings
clear

Esmerelda’s excellent and highly amusing post for the Sixth Day of Christmas is here. It has more of her photographs of wonderful English Inn signs and is well worth a look, as well as being very relevant indeed to this sixth day of Christmas.

Although Esme’s tavern keeper probably didn’t know this when he had his cauliflower Inn sign painted afresh, the cauliflower is a deeply ancient symbol in Christianity. Its pure white curd is a symbol of Mary the Mother of Christ and also of the huge white star which hovered over Bethlehem and guided the first worshippers (the Shepherds, and the animals, and the Kings) to Christ’s crib. Quite apart from the white curd symbolising the purity of Christ’s conception and birth, the cauliflower is also enmeshed in the traditions of Christmas Eve.
 
Cauliflower is one of the traditional ‘seven lean dishes’ served at the ‘great supper’ traditionally eaten by Christians on Christmas Eve and the tradition of this great supper persists in many rural parts of Europe to this very day, most notably in Provence in France, and one can also find its echo in some rural parts of Italy and Romania and amongst some traditionalists in the Anglican Communion as well as amongst some of the faithful strands amongst the Old Catholics. The great supper traditionally consists of seven small main dishes, eaten before the midnight service made up from white vegetables, one of which is always, but always, cauliflower, white fishes, and eggs and they symbolise the seven sufferings of the Virgin, followed by thirteen desserts which are eaten after the midnight service and which must contain the nuts and fruits which symbolise the mendicant orders (figs for the Franciscans, almonds for the Carmelites, raisins for the Dominicans and hazelnuts for the Augustinians), as well as dates, which symbolise Christ, wine for the Holy Blood of Life, cream for the purity of the thoughts and the actions of the true Christians, olive oil for the light (and continuity) of Christ, and bread for the Staff of Life which Christ is, and fresh winter fruits for the bounty of God. The last dessert course is always to be sour for the thirteen desserts symbolise the Last Supper eaten by Christ with his twelve Apostles and an echo of that tradition is with us today in the British practise of serving a final cheese (soured milk) and biscuit (bread) course at dinner frequently removed with nuts and fruits. Under no circumstances is meat ever served at the great supper on Christmas Eve.
 
Many orders of Monks and Nuns wear white habits and it is very interesting to note that many of them feature the cauliflower as an important Christmas vegetable in their histories and practises, and occasionally in their heraldic devices. Until very recently Christmas cauliflower receipts (recipes) were well known and widely used. It’s only over the last fifty or so years that the traditions surrounding the humble cauliflower have almost died out. Traditional Christmas cauliflower is boiled, to taste, cauliflower served with a cheese enriched white sauce spiced with nutmeg, black pepper and salt, but there are many modern variants which are very tasty that have become traditional outside Europe and one of my favorite receipts for Christmas cauliflower can be found here.
 
Anciently, before Christ that is, the white cauliflower curd, surrounded by its green leafs, represented the moon and was a pagan symbol, and sometimes rudely associated with the generative force at that – so it’s easy to see why it became associated with Christ’s birth and the purity of the Immaculate Conception. However, it is still a moon symbol in some Christian art for the date of at least one of our major festivals is calculated using the moon’s phases (Easter).
 
It’s Christmastide (4th. of December to Candlemas on the 2nd. of February), which must not be confused with the Christmastime (which runs from Christmas Eve to the first Sunday after the Epiphany on January, 6th.), and much of our ancient symbolism and imagery is so complicated and confused that it’s almost impossible to decipher and render into coherent form. This festival of Christmas is not just some simple Christian take on some Roman pagan festival – it’s far more complicated and ancient than that and for many of us it contains its own truths. As it should!
 
The simple cauliflower is just one example of how complicated our Christian symbolism, and imagery, actually is and how Esme’s innocent Inn-keeper’s newly painted sign will confuse, and no doubt fool, future historians.
 
Still, it’s interesting that he chose to continue to use a cauliflower for his sign, isn’t it?
clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 7:57 AM by John M. Joyce
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Revealed: Iran's involvement in Britons' Baghdad kidnapping
clear

Guardian reveals Peter Moore, who has been released after two years, was targeted because of his role in tracking international aid money that was being diverted to Iran-backed militias.
The five British men kidnapped in Iraq were taken in an operation led and masterminded by Iran's Revolutionary Guard, according to evidence uncovered during an extensive investigation by the Guardian.
The men – including Peter Moore, who was released yesterday after more than two years in captivity – were taken to Iran within a day of their kidnapping from a government ministry building in Baghdad in 2007, several senior sources in Iraq and Iran have told the Guardian.
They were held in prisons run by al-Quds Force, a Revolutionary Guard unit that specialises in foreign operations on behalf of the Iranian government.
The United States' former commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus, told the BBC he was "90% certain" Moore was held in Iran for some of his two and a half years in captivity.
One of the kidnappers has told the Guardian that three of the Britons – Jason Creswell, Jason Swindlehurst and Alec Maclachlan – were killed after the British government refused to take ransom demands seriously.
The Guardian can also reveal after a year-long investigation that:

• Moore was targeted because he was installing a system that would show how a vast amount of international aid was diverted to Iran's militia groups in Iraq.

• The bodyguards' bodies were eventually traded for the release of Iraqi prisoners.

• They had probably been dead for at least 18 months before three of their bodies were handed over this year.

A former Iranian Revolutionary Guard member, speaking to the Guardian under condition of anonymity, said the extraordinary kidnapping was masterminded by Iran. The man – a former major who worked for 14 years inside the Iranian organisation and claims to have taken part in kidnap operations himself – said he believed the hostages were held in two al-Quds camps in Iran: one known as Qasser Shiereen military camp, close to the Iraqi border crossing with Mehran, and a second camp known as the Tehran Pars, located near a salt lake north-east of Qom.
"It was an Iranian kidnap, led by the Revolutionary Guard, carried out by the al-Quds Force," he said. "My contact works for al-Quds. He took part in the planning of the kidnap and he watched the kidnapping as it was taking place. He told me that they spent two days at the Qasser Shiereen camp. They then took them deep inside Iran."
This claim is backed up by a serving Iraqi minister with close links to Iran. "This was an IRG [Iranian Revolutionary Guard] operation," he said. "You don't think for a moment that those militia groups from Sadr City could have carried out a high-level kidnapping like this one."
A former intelligence chief at the Iraqi ministry of defence has described to the Guardian how intelligence operatives followed the kidnappers as they took the hostages from a mosque in Baghdad's Sadr City to the Iranian border. "They were hooded and handcuffed, then the cars drove off in a new direction – they were headed towards the Iranian border," he said.
While the hostages were in Iran the kidnappers made sure those who took care of them were Iraqi nationals. "At all times they were surrounded by Iraqi voices. Everything was done to make sure they had no idea they were in Iran," said an Iranian source with knowledge of the kidnapping.
The other Britons captured with Moore were all security guards. The bodies of Swindlehurst and Creswell were identified in June, followed by Maclachlan in September. McMenemy is believed dead, although his body has not been returned. It is not clear where the men were killed. Their bodies were buried inside Iraq and information about their locations was traded for prisoner releases.
A Guardian report in July revealed evidence that Iraqi officials colluded in the kidnapping of the five, and that one motive was to prevent millions of dollars of aid money from being tracked – including an estimated $18bn (£11bn) that had gone missing.
A former senior Iraqi intelligence chief claims the project Moore was working on would have laid bare exactly where all Iraq's money was going. He claims there was an Iranian link to the alleged financial cover-up.
I do wonder if the Grauniad knows all this why they didn't hand the information over so that the men could be rescued, or if it was too late, at least their poor families could be told the truth and put out of their mental torment earlier.
Perhaps they did. I am sure the Foreign Office had their own agenda.

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 3:46 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Memphis - Man charged with terrorism
clear

From the Commercial Appeal of Memphis
A man who allegedly claimed he wanted to start a holy war in Memphis will return to court Jan. 11 on charges of threatening to blow up several businesses on Christmas Day.
Mohamed Ibrahim, 35, is charged with commission of a terrorist act, false reporting and disorderly conduct. He is in the Shelby County Jail on a $50,000 bond.
The case has been referred to the FBI in Memphis for further investigation, according to the charges.
Friday afternoon, Memphis police dispatchers issued an alert that a man driving a black Chrysler PT Cruiser had threatened to "blow up the business" at 300 Poplar, a BP gas station.
After Ibrahim was arrested and placed in a police cruiser, he began cursing police and attempting to kick out the windows, according to the charges.
Police determined that Ibrahim had earlier that day made threats to blow up seven other businesses around town, according to the charges.
An FBI agent called to the scene recovered three cassette tapes described as "Islamic" in a police affidavit, and took the GPS from the vehicle.
Court records show that Ibrahim had been arrested two days earlier with a 10-inch butcher knife concealed in his jacket sleeve and charged with unlawful possession of a weapon. He was released on $100 bond.
That day, Ibrahim had threatened other businesses and "stated he was a Muslim, and wanted to start jihad here in Memphis,"

clear
Posted on 12/31/2009 3:17 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
clear
Showing 1-26 of 457 [Next 25]


Guns, Germs and Steel in Tanzania
The Thinking Person's Safari
Led by Geoffrey Clarfield
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
clear

 

The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31   
clear

Subscribe