Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications from New English Review Press
Easy Meat
by Peter McLoughlin
The Tongue is Also a Fire
by James Como
Out Into The Beautiful World
by Theodore Dalrymple
Unreading Shakespeare
by David P. Gontar
Islam Through the Looking Glass: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J. B. Kelly, Vol. 3
edited by S. B. Kelly
The Real Nature of Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
As Far As The Eye Can See
by Moshe Dann
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum

Monday, 30 April 2007
Note to self
Imagine the Weatherwax/Ridcully household at 12.50 pm last Thursday. We have had our lunch. I’m due at the baby and toddler club shortly after 1pm. Today’s Bible story is Jesus cooks breakfast for his disciples (John 21) and I know that Jean who does our crafts has prepared fish to colour and stick on a paper plate.
All I need is the Scripture Union bible story book to read the story from.
I had it last Thursday. It’s not on the far end of the kitchen table where almost everything else is – homework, paperwork, books, mending, the only reason it doesn’t all fall on the floor is the careful positioning of the sewing machine. 
It isn’t in any of the other usual places, the side of my favourite armchair or under the cat. It must be at church in our cupboard.
It isn’t. “No, you took it home last week, you had it in a carrier bag with the lift-the-flap Easter Story that you lent Jean for her granddaughter. Remember?”
Er yes. It will turn up. I tell the story using a couple of toy fish from the play food box.
Onwards to Saturday morning and I’m rushing to go out again. I’m wearing a brown skirt and automatically push my feet into the red sandals. Hold on, I have a pair of dark brown and another pair of light brown sandals, either of which would go better with this skirt. Where are they? Most of the winter they were in a bag down by the side of the computer, between the scanner and the cat basket. I pull out a bag from down the side of said computer. It contains a Big Bible Storybook and a lift-the-flap Easter Story. That’s a result. I keep the red sandals on and go out.
Sunday morning. Brown skirt still clean from Saturday and smart enough for church, time to spare to look for the 2 pairs of brown sandals last seen in November down by the side of the computer.
And where did I find them? At the bottom of the wardrobe, in a shoebox, next to the shoe rack. How did they get into a proper place?
We are off to Rochester next weekend and our neighbour will be coming in to feed the cats. Her bungalow is immaculate. If I am not posting here on NER much this week you will know why.
I will be tidying my house.
Posted on 04/30/2007 6:39 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Monday, 30 April 2007
Hadley Seeks War Czar

National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley was the person who recommended the surge. Here's what New Duranty has to say about his latest initiative:

“What we need,” [Hadley] said in a recent interview, “is someone with a lot of stature within the government who can make things happen.”

Even so, the idea that the national security adviser is subcontracting responsibility for the nation’s most pressing foreign policy crisis — and must recruit someone of stature to get the attention of the cabinet — is provoking criticism of Mr. Hadley himself, and how he has navigated the delicate internal politics of a White House famous for its feuding.

“Steve Hadley is an intelligent, capable guy, but I don’t think this reflects very well on him,” said David J. Rothkopf, author of “Running the World,” a book about the National Security Council. “I wouldn’t even call it a Hail Mary pass. It’s kind of a desperation move.”

Mr. Rothkopf sees the new position as “a tactic to separate the national security adviser from Iraq” — a way to save Mr. Hadley’s reputation...

Posted on 04/30/2007 6:39 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Monday, 30 April 2007
Some borders aren't worth protecting

Time to attend to ours and leave the denizens of Iraq to fend for themselves, says Alan Caruba at ESR:

The U.S. has been "defeated", not by al-Qaida or the "insurgents", but by the ancient tribalism of the Middle East, the vast religious schism between Sunni and Shiite, and by having no insight whatever regarding the role corruption plays in all areas of Middle East governance.

Posted on 04/30/2007 5:33 AM by Robert Bove
Monday, 30 April 2007
Defender of the wrong faith
The Telegraph correspondent Damian Thompson (editor-in-chief of the Catholic Herald and once described by the Anglican Church Times as a "blood-crazed ferret".) writes here (in his blog Holy Smoke) about the barking mad Karen Armstrong’s review of Robert Spencer, and Robert Spencer’s response.
Karen Armstrong is a comically conceited feminist ex-nun who has assumed the duty of defending Islam from its critics. Yesterday’s Financial Times carried her review of an unflattering biography of Mohammed by the American Catholic scholar Robert Spencer.
She accused Spencer of “writing in hatred” and said he “deliberately manipulates the evidence”. By the end of the day, Spencer had hit back online. Very hard. We have the beginnings of a mighty feud here, and I know whose side I am on.
Writing on his website Jihadwatch yesterday, Spencer challenged his readers to find the relevant verse. Someone did. It’s 2:217, and it refers specifically to warfare in the “sacred month”, and then only to say that the prohibition can be set aside. So who is manipulating evidence here?
Armstrong reckons that descriptions of Islam that focus on its warlike origins are like “a description of Christianity based on the bellicose Book of Revelation that failed to mention the Sermon on the Mount.”
That is an unbelievably fatuous and sloppy analogy. The violence of Revelation springs from the imagination: it’s a literary apocalypse. It doesn’t describe any real events. Mohammed was a general whose army beheaded its captives: that’s a fact. The Muslim scriptures urge warfare against unbelievers and apostates; the Christian scriptures preach non-violence.
I really think it’s time someone challenged Karen Armstrong’s credentials as an expert on Islam. How good is her classical Arabic, I wonder? If I was a Muslim, I’d be sick to death of this preachy autodidact constantly representing Islam as a touchy-feely encounter group.
But perhaps the Muslims like her. In which case, please persuade her to convert to Islam, as “a gift to the Christian people”. It would be good to see Karen back in the veil – only, this time, one that covers her mouth.
I like ferrets, engaging intelligent little creatures so long as one doesn’t find them stuffed down ones trousers. The comments so far (8 at time of writing) are also excellent.
Posted on 04/30/2007 4:23 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Sunday, 29 April 2007
The Sunday Mirror updates last week's story.
AN Iranian judge has rejected the appeal of a young woman who faces public hanging for a murder she did not commit.
The Sunday Mirror has told how Delara Darabi, 20, confessed to a killing by her boyfriend during a burglary three years ago because she had been told she was too young to hang.
To sign Amnesty's petition go to For more info go to 
Posted on 04/29/2007 4:30 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Sunday, 29 April 2007
From the Sunday Mirror.
A BRITISH National Party activist who claims he is a respectable businessman is really a Nazi fanatic who dresses in German uniform and flies a swastika flag.
Window firm boss Karl Newman, 47, a candidate for the far-right BNP in Thursday's local elections, denies he is a racist or Nazi sympathiser in campaign leaflets.
But, in fact, he dresses in World War Two Wehrmacht uniforms and has a sick fascination with Hitler.
He has spent years restoring two wartime troop carriers built by Jewish concentration camp labour. One has a giant swastika on the bonnet and he flies another of the Nazi flags from the back. Newman even takes out six-year-old son William in the vehicle at weekends.
Pictures on his website show him in Nazi uniform. In one a cardboard cut-out of Hitler is driving one of the vehicles, called Kubelwagens.
Confronted by the Sunday Mirror, he said: "I am aware they were built by slave labour - but I can't do anything about that." Newman, standing in Greenlands ward of Redditch Council in the West Midlands, added: "OK - so the BNP is only for white people, but that does not mean I am a racist."
The Sunday Mirror rarely put the photos on their website - these are scanned in from the newsprint. That's my excuse for the poor quality.
Posted on 04/29/2007 4:00 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Another Turkish rally - this weekend in Istanbul
The Australian reports on today’s rally for democracy in Istanbul. To read some reports of the protests in Turkey one would think it was a struggle between a secular military and democratic Islamics. The inference being military bad, democratic good.
This report brings out a different facet.
More than a million Turks took part last night in a mass rally in Istanbul in support of secularism and democracy, amid a tense standoff between the moderate Islamist Government and the army over presidential elections.
The crowd, carrying red and white Turkish flags and portraits of founding father Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, filled Istanbul's sprawling Caglayan Square in a demonstration organised by 600 non-governmental organisations.
"Turkey is secular and will remain secular", "Neither sharia, nor coup d'etat, democratic Turkey", they chanted.
Police said there were well in excess of a million demonstrators. Organisers said the rally drew people from all over Turkey and abroad. The Istanbul demonstration followed a similar one in Ankara on April 14 that attracted up to 1.5million people.
The rest is here. 
Posted on 04/29/2007 3:40 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Sunday, 29 April 2007
McCain & Coercive Interrogation

Chris Wallace also asked Senator McCain about coercive interrogation in light of the contention by former CIA Director George Tenet that the interrogation methods used by the CIA on high-value al Qaeda detainees saved countless American lives.  (It must be noted, Tenet insists these methods did not rise to the level of torture regardless of how cavalierly the public discussion suggests otherwise.)

Here is the McCain/Wallace exchange (from a transcript of the entire McCain interview, available at

WALLACE: Senator, you talked about torture. Former CIA Director Tenet now says that the intelligence that they got from harsh interrogation techniques against some of these big Al Qaida types, like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed — the intelligence they got from them using, reportedly, things like water-boarding, extreme temperatures, was more valuable than all the other CIA and FBI programs.  Were you wrong? I mean, this is the CIA, former CIA director, saying this. Were you wrong to limit what CIA interrogators could do?

McCAIN: A man I admire more than anyone else, General Jack Vessey, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, battlefield commission, told me once — he said, "John, any intelligence information we might gain through the use of torture could never, ever counterbalance the image that it does — the damage that it does to our image in the world."  I agree with him. Look at the war in Algeria. Look, the fact is if you torture someone, they're going to tell you anything they think you want to know. It is an affront to everything we stand for and believe in.  It's interesting to me that every retired military officer, whether it be Colin Powell or whether it be former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — everybody who's been in war doesn't want to torture people and think that it's the wrong thing to do. And history shows that.  We cannot torture people and maintain our moral superiority in the world....

WALLACE: But when George Tenet says...

McCAIN: I don't care what George Tenet says. I know what's right. I know what's morally right as far as America's behavior.

WALLACE: But if I may, sir... when George Tenet says we saved live through some of these techniques...

J. MCCAIN: I don't accept it. I don't accept that fundamental thesis, because it's never worked throughout history.  And so again, I know this for a fact, and anyone who's had experience with this, I think, that's — well, the people I respect will tell you that if you inflect enough physical pain on someone, they will tell you anything they think you want to know in order to relieve that pain.  That's just a fundamental fact. And we've gotten a huge amount of misinformation as well as other information from these techniques.

Sure, except now here is McCain in the 2005 essay he penned for Newsweek, addressing the "ticking bomb" scenario (italics is mine):

Those who argue the necessity of some abuses raise an important dilemma as their most compelling rationale: the ticking-time-bomb scenario. What do we do if we capture a terrorist who we have sound reasons to believe possesses specific knowledge of an imminent terrorist attack?

In such an urgent and rare instance, an interrogator might well try extreme measures to extract information that could save lives. Should he do so, and thereby save an American city or prevent another 9/11, authorities and the public would surely take this into account when judging his actions and recognize the extremely dire situation which he confronted. But I don't believe this scenario requires us to write into law an exception to our treaty and moral obligations that would permit cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment. To carve out legal exemptions to this basic principle of human rights risks opening the door to abuse as a matter of course, rather than a standard violated truly in extremis. It is far better to embrace a standard that might be violated in extraordinary circumstances than to lower our standards to accommodate a remote contingency, confusing personnel in the field and sending precisely the wrong message abroad about America's purposes and practices.

So, confronted by the do-or-die starkness of a ticking-bomb, McCain acknowledged in 2005 that it "might well" be necessary to use "extreme measures," and that so doing might in fact "save an American city or prevent another 9/11."  Was his bottom-line position that coercive interrogation doesn't work?  Of course not.  It was that such interrogation might very well work but that it would be a mistake to write an exception permitting it into our law because the exception would be abused. 

That is a perfectly respectable position — there is a serious (though beneath-the-radar) debate about whether the best way to minimize the use of coercion is (a) to regulate it tightly and prosecute all violations, or (b) categorically ban it and assume that interrogators would know enough to ignore the ban in true emergencies.  But, it is just plain bluster to argue, as McCain continues to insist, that coercion never works and he doesn't care what anyone else says.  As his answer on the ticking-bomb demonstrates, even he doesn't believe that.

Common sense tells us it is preposterous to claim that an interrogee will always just tell his interrogator whatever the latter wants to hear.  That claim might have some validity if the purpose of interrogation was to wrangle a confession to be used in some sort of show-trial.  But the point of interrogation for intelligence purposes is to find out what is going on, not to fix blame.  Usually, the interrogator won't know what he wants to hear, and will be asking open-ended questions.  The interrogee will have no way of knowing the "right" answer; if he does not resist, his choice will be to provide true information or false information, and sorting that out is a matter of corroboration. 

Sometimes the information will, indeed, be false — just as criminals who testify in exchange for leniency sometimes provide false information because they know the value of their cooperation to prosecutors (which determines how much leniency they get) calls for them to inculpate other people.  But very often, the information from such criminals proves to be true.  That, of course, is why we permit the government to offer incentives (like generous plea deals, money, relocation, etc.) to get people to cooperate.  Our experience tells us that just because people have an incentive to lie — even a powerful one — does not mean the information they provide will be false.  Often it is true.  That is not an argument for widely permitting coercive interrogation; but it does underscore that McCain and others should stop making the silly claim that coercion never works.

Posted on 04/29/2007 2:43 PM by Andy McCarthy
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Trevor banged to rights
Just heard this on Planet Rock news from Sky.
Radical Muslim Abu Izzadeen will appear in court tomorrow on charges of inciting terrorism and fundraising.
The 32-year-old from east London is one of six men charged under the Terrorism Act 2000 after they were arrested on Tuesday, Scotland Yard said.
Four of the six, including Izzadeen, (His name is really Trevor) were also charged with inciting terrorism overseas.
They will appear in custody at City of Westminster Magistrates Court tomorrow.
Posted on 04/29/2007 2:08 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Islam's coming renaissance will rise in the West
A wave of rationalism is spreading from emigre Muslim intellectuals
This is Ameer Ali,a former chairman of the Muslim Community Reference Group, and visiting fellow at the business school at Murdoch University in Perth writing in The Australian. Unlike Ayaan Hirsi Ali he thinks that Islam can be reformed within the freedom of thought found in the west.
He believes that “A new era of ijtihad (independent thinking) rooted in scientific, objective reasoning is spreading from the West and is beginning to make its mark in the Muslim mind-set.”
Read it all here. If he is sincere I hope that he does not come to a sticky end.
Posted on 04/29/2007 11:19 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Protest calls for Darfur action
Our Hugh Fitzgerald has been saying for a long time that the effort being spent in Iraq would be more effective if spent in the Sudan protecting Christians, animists and black Muslims from the Janjaweed.
He is ceasing to be a lone voice, although I,m not sure that Hugh Grant is quite the companion he hoped for. Mariella Frostrup may be a different kettle of fish? From The BBC.
Thousands of protesters in London have demanded protection for civilians in Darfur on the fourth anniversary of the start of conflict in the Sudan region. At the event in Whitehall, fake blood flowed from a two-metre hourglass to represent the bloodshed.
Protest in LondonDuring a global day of action 10,000 hourglasses will be turned under the slogan: "Time is up..protect Darfur." . . . the fake blood was to highlight that "in certain parts of Darfur blood is running like water".
Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Hain said the world was "looking away as genocide is committed" in Darfur.
An estimated 200,000 people have been killed in the four-year conflict.
Darfur survivor Ismael Jarbo told the protest the situation in the region "has gone from bad to worse. Genocide is really going on today, so we really need to do something now today," he said.  
Mr Jarbo called for the international community to act, possibly with military intervention.  People are relying on aid agencies. "Aid agencies can't operate as it's not safe. I'm here to raise awareness to the international community," he said.  "Women and girls are being raped, young boys are being forced to become child soldiers."
The conflict has led to 16 un-enforced UN resolutions and provoked 60 statements of concern from the EU but, according to campaigners, "zero action". The African Union (AU) peacekeeping force is struggling to halt widespread abuses and violence, but Sudan is rejecting plans for it to hand over to a larger, stronger UN mission.
Sudan's government and the pro-government Arab militias are accused of war crimes against the region's black African population, although the UN has stopped short of calling it genocide.
More than two million people are living in camps after fleeing fighting in the region. 
Posted on 04/29/2007 10:55 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Sunday, 29 April 2007
McCain: "I would close Guantanamo Bay"

This was the Senator's answer, moments ago, when asked by Chris Wallace on Fox how he would fight the war on terror differently.  He added that he would bring the detainees into the U.S., probably someplace such as Ft. Leavenworth.

Posted on 04/29/2007 10:30 AM by Andy McCarthy
Sunday, 29 April 2007
If You Are Reading This, You Are Probably A Die-Hard Geopolitical Fantacist

So says Michael Scheuer, former head of CIA's bin Laden unit — see today's Washington Post review of the Tenet book.

Happily for you, what Scheuer says today is likely to have little bearing on what he says tomorrow.

Posted on 04/29/2007 10:29 AM by Andy McCarthy
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Funny names at NER

Remember Dr Kevin de Cock, World Health Organisation expert on the effect of male circumcision on the rate of HIV infection in heterosexual men?

Perhaps you had momentarily forgotten him, but if I have anything to do with it, nobody will be allowed to forget this man and his very funny name.

Nor should we forget that the Marketing Director of Damart, a company that makes thermal underwear, is the aptly named John Bottomley.

Make a space in your memory for Professor John Studd, consultant gynaecologist at Chelsea and Westminster hospital in London.

More recently we have paid tribute to the late Alan Ball, who played ball, and scoffed at Ed Balls, who talks it.

Today, a writer sniggers at a theatre director, whose name is Tim Supple. The name of the writer-sniggerer is Ferdinand Mount. Perhaps he would have done better to hold his tongue.

Posted on 04/29/2007 9:53 AM by Mary Jackson
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Special offer, with 100% satisfaction guarantee:
They take the course advertised on line next to another Independent Book Review, that of Iris and Ruby by Rosie Thomas. This is a tale of love in Cairo named romantic novel of the year, described by the chair of the judges' panel as a "stomach-wrenching" read.  Dame Tanni Grey-Thompson may be our finest paralympian and I am sure her opinion on wheelchair athletics is incomparable, but I feel her definition of what makes a good romantic novel leaves a little to be desired if she thinks “stomach-wrenching” is a Good Thing for that genre.
Do you want to...
ü       Write FICTION books, non-fiction books, and screenplays  in just hours?
ü       Become the "FAMOUS" author everyone wants to know?
ü       Rocket your job prospects by becoming the GURU for your industry

Rocket, a noun used as a verb. Already I’m suspicious.

ü       How to only EVER write in FIVE MINUTE segments, so you'll never get bored.
ü       Exactly where to purchase a best selling plot for just FIFTY CENTS!
ü       How to instantly develop an in-depth and interesting character,
     using “mega quick character creation”.
ü       An ingenious method of injecting instant scene setting into your books, using just two extra words. This one is REALLYclever!
... if so, keep reading. In fact, if you're serious about writing that manuscript FAST, you'd better not take your eyes off this page!
Special offer, with 100% satisfaction guarantee: As seen at MENSA, and as purchased by content writers at AT&T, Intel, IBM, the US Army, the Discovery Channel, British Telecom and dozens of other companies. Price reduced, and bonus parcel included, on orders BEFORE midnight, Sunday, April 29th 2007. 
British Telecom? That explains a lot.
I know quite a few good writers did have to work quickly. Even Shakespeare and Dickens had deadlines. Alexandre Dumas was paid by the line (and unfortunately it shows in some books) but still managed to tell a good yarn. But somehow I don’t think I will shell out $49.95. 
Posted on 04/29/2007 8:49 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Cute pidgin pie

Over-hyped, over-written and overrated as Zadie Zmith’s novels may be, at least they are written in proper English. Proper English is a necessary, if not a sufficient condition of a good English novel, you might suppose. Not anymore. The latest piece of ethnic chick lit to be fêted by the critics is written in Chinglish. From The Independent:

A Chinese author who deliberately wrote in "bad English” [has] been shortlisted for the prestigious Orange Broadband Prize for Fiction.

Except it wasn’t “deliberate”, was it? She just couldn’t speak English properly:

Xiaolu Guo, 33, a Chinese writer whose romantic comedy A Concise Chinese-English Dictionary for Lovers is written in deliberately incorrect English and is based partly on her own experiences, has been nominated for the £30,000 award, which recognises international women's writing.

The book's central character is a Chinese woman who calls herself Z after she finds that no one in England can pronounce her name.

Guo, who was born in a Chinese village and wrote her first novel in English only five years after moving to London, based the book on a diary she had written when she first arrived in Britain.

"The English I spoke four years ago was different and much more basic than the English I speak now," said Guo. "I wanted to use my broken English to write a novel. It was a natural process. It's not intellectual."

You don’t say. Jonathan Mirsky, whose review in The Spectator has the same title as this blog piece, is suitably dismissive:

Slight. A slight story, slightly poignant, slightly drawn characters, occasionally slightly funny. It also has a grating aspect that is not slight: its language. The central character, a young Chinese woman in London, tells this story, I don't know why, in fractured English. So there is a lot of this: 'Patty Surly' for Patisserie, 'Queue Gardens' (get it? ) and when she is in Italy talking to a lawyer, he is described as an 'Avocado'.

Enough already. In 50 years of listening to Chinese learning to speak English I never heard this kind of thing: 'I not meet you yet. You in future.' Astoundingly, half way through this book there is a passage in a different typeface, signed 'Editor's translation'. It confesses, 'I am sick of speaking English like this. I am sick of writing English like this.' This is a misdirected torpedo below the waterlines of readers trying to suspend disbelief while coping with the cutesy narrative.

Ethnicity and foreignness do not make a dull work interesting. But they get many a dull and mediocre work published. Conversely, if an author lacks an interesting ethnicity, he may not get published unless he pretends to have one, as Theodore Dalrymple argues in his excellent article An Imaginary Scandal.  Perhaps before long even Shakespeare's work will be given an ethnic makeover to make it less elitist. No? Sorry to say this has already happened. Here is Ferdinand Mount in The Spectator:

In the production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream at the Roundhouse, the play is performed in seven Indian languages plus English (mostly rather broken). The actors flit up and round scaffolding, swirl and swaddle themselves in brightly coloured scarves and burst through paper screens to a rapturous reception from the audience. Now and then fragments of Shakespeare’s words break through. The programme says rather severely that Indian audiences, let alone English ones, are not to mind if they cannot understand three-quarters of what the actors are saying, because

their unreasonable expectation of mono- lingual drama arises not only from habituation to that mode, but also from the tyranny of literary studies dependent on the reading of books printed necessarily in one, ‘pure’ language, even more so when that language is the revered Bard’s very own English.

I like those inverted commas round ‘pure’, suggesting that those who prefer to hear stuff in their own lingo are imperialist racist fascists. The director of the production, the gloriously named Tim Supple, concedes that ‘the original text has a special quality, whether Shakespeare or Schiller.’ That’s nice of him. But, the Supple One continues, ‘on the other hand, I can’t accept the superiority of any language’. Not even a language you can understand? Ah well, these insubstantial pageants do fade. Still, the punters loved it.

Posted on 04/29/2007 7:26 AM by Mary Jackson
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Egyptian Sandmonkey Quits
Posted on 04/29/2007 7:15 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Sunday, 29 April 2007
NBC's "Dateline" + Cho Seung-Hui = ?

Perhaps it's nothing, perhaps it is something.  Phil Mushnick speculates on the connection here.

Posted on 04/29/2007 6:26 AM by Robert Bove
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Grossly out of context? So sue me.

From Mark C. Taylor, a religious studies professor:

For many years, I have begun my classes by telling my students that if they are not more confused and uncertain at the end of the course than they are at the beginning, I will have failed.

From author Alberto Manguel, in his recent New York Public Library speech requoted in the current Public Square (Manguel was one of the blind Jorge Luis Borges' readers):

We come into this world as readers with the impulse to decipher, to find narratives.  Stupidity is something that has to be learned.

Posted on 04/29/2007 5:42 AM by Robert Bove
Sunday, 29 April 2007
Islamic insurgents regroup and vow to 'fight to the death' for Somalia
THE Somali government has declared victory over its rivals, but the most extreme elements of the Islamic insurgency remain intact, with fresh recruits, new funding, and intent on turning the country into a haven for al-Qaeda.
More than 1,400 people have been killed in the last month, 400 of them last week, in violence caused, in part, by the militants. The government, supported by Ethiopian troops, declared victory on Thursday, but the extremists appear to be infiltrating towns across the country.
At stake is the most strategically-located nation in the Horn of Africa; a lawless country at a crossroads between the Middle East and Africa and dominating important sea lanes. A UN-supported government has tried to exert control, but has influence over only a tiny part of the territory.
The government's failure has opened the door for a new takeover by radical Islamic elements who grabbed power for six months last year, filling the country's power vacuum with a strict religious government. Like the Taliban, former rulers in Afghanistan and hosts to Osama bin Laden, the Somali radicals, called the radical wing of the Council of Islamic Courts, harbour al-Qaeda terrorists, according to US officials.
Posted on 04/29/2007 3:09 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Saturday, 28 April 2007
World's Smallest Dog

Dogs, like urine, feces, pigs and NON-MUSLIMS are considred "unclean" in Islam, which is probably why the black be-hijabbed check-out clerk at Offiice Depot today was very careful not to touch my hand when giving change or handing me the receipt.

This little fellow's name is Dancer and he's only 4 inches tall and weighs just 18 ounces.

Posted on 04/28/2007 4:12 PM by Rebecca Bynum
Saturday, 28 April 2007
Takfir Ideology, They Say

The case for overthrow of an existing Muslim government is always based on its not being Islamic enough. New Duranty reports on the 172 arrests in Saudi Arabia:

...General Turki said the investigation was an continuing operation in the kingdom’s battle against an entrenched ideology that promotes terrorism and seeks to recruit young people. The official statement repeatedly referred to “takfir ideology,” a view that effectively allows one Muslim to declare another Muslim an apostate, or nonbeliever, and then kill him.

“We have never actually said we have reached an end,” General Turki said in an interview. “We always confirm that security forces’ efforts are not enough. Not unless you really tackle the ideology that is inspiring these people in order to be involved in these activities.”

The Saudi leadership was forced to address the rise of radical, violent Islamic thinking within its borders after the 9/11 attacks, where 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi.

But the kingdom has had its own history of violence and at one time — after the seizure of the Grand Mosque in Mecca by militants in 1979 — found security in supporting some of the most radical Sunni Muslim religious voices. At the time, Saudi officials were also concerned about the Islamic revolution in Iran, which brought a Shiite government to power.

But in recent years, the ideology promoted by Al Qaeda has called for bringing down the royal family, saying it is un-Islamic. Security was stepped up markedly here after the American Consulate in Jidda was attacked and a housing complex for foreigners was bombed.

In recent months there has been a failed attempt to blow up an oil installation, the murder of three French citizens and the beheading of a state security officer, all actions that the authorities here link to the struggle with the most radical ideology. Officials have decided that in addition to relying on the security forces, they will try to “re-educate” those suspected of terrorist links.

The approach has led to a joke going around Riyadh that says the best way to get a job and a new house is to join Al Qaeda — and then repent to the government. General Turki said that when officials change the minds of those caught, the prisoners also end up as useful informers.

“If they change their view, they work against the ideology, they help you, they tell you things,” he said. “They tell you how you can improve your actions to prevent the continuation of the ideology.”

The case announced Friday showed just how much of a challenge the government faced. The number of people was large, officials acknowledged, and came just six months after another 136 people were arrested in a similar sweep and charged with plotting similar crimes, the general said...

“Al Qaeda is no longer an organized structure,” said Mr. Qassim, the retired judge. “It became an ideology and a system of work. This is Al Qaeda now.”

Posted on 04/28/2007 3:58 PM by Rebecca Bynum
Saturday, 28 April 2007
Catering to Muslims, American Style

From the International Herald Tribune

...Companies in the Detroit area, where there is a dense population of Muslims, are leading the change. A McDonald's there serves halal Chicken McNuggets; Walgreens has Arabic signs in its aisles. And now, Ikea, which recently opened a store in the suburb of Canton that has had trouble attracting as many Muslim customers as hoped, has been touring local homes and talking to Muslims to figure out their needs.

The store there plans to sell decorations for Ramadan next fall and is adding halal meat to its restaurant menu. Catalogues will be offered in Arabic, and female Muslim employees will be given an Ikea-branded hijab, to wear over their head if they wish.

Marketing to Muslims is, of course, mostly intended to increase the companies' sales. But advertising has also long been a mirror of changes in society...

Posted on 04/28/2007 1:35 PM by Rebecca Bynum
Saturday, 28 April 2007
Is Obama For Comparable Worth Compensation?

Subscribing to an idea so mind-bogglingly dumb and unnecessary should be disqualifying.  Michael Barone and Mickey Kaus discuss.

Posted on 04/28/2007 1:00 PM by Andy McCarthy
Saturday, 28 April 2007
Iraqi group vows to kidnap Harry
This is from icSouth London
A Shia commander in Iraq has claimed that the Mahdi army has people inside British bases who will leak information about Prince Harry's arrival in the country.
"One of our aims is to capture Harry, we have people inside the British bases to inform us on when he will arrive," Abu Mujtaba, a commander in the Mahdi army, the Shia militia loyal to radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, told the Guardian.
He added: "Not only us, the Mahdi army, that will try to capture him, but every person who hates the British and the Americans will try to get him, all the mujahideens in Iraq, the al Qaida, the Iranians all will try to get him."
His comments will provoke further debate about whether the Prince should be sent to Iraq, for his own safety and that of his comrades.
After one of the bloodiest months so far for British troops in Iraq, speculation has continued about whether Prince Harry's arrival there would increase the risk of attacks on his colleagues in the Blues and Royals.
Friends of the 22-year-old Prince told the BBC he would be "very disappointed" if he was not allowed to go but would stay with the Army.
He has told people he is not afraid to die (at 22 we are all going to live for ever) but is anxious about the risk to his comrades.
The Prince's heart has always been set on being a long-term career soldier but he could find himself having to reassess his position within the Army if he is prevented from going to Iraq or confined to a less risky desk job in the region.
He is caught in a cleft stick here. If he doesn’t go there will be the suggestion of one rule for the rich, and the children of privilege being protected. If he does go, and the men of his unit do suffer because of it then there will be the suggestion of the child of privilege having to have his own way.
The most sensible comment I read was the one that pointed out that a soldier is bound by discipline to obey orders. (although that is not an excuse to commit war crimes)
Therefore the decision should be taken by senior command and Prince Harry should obey it, whatever it is. My personal opinion is that he ought to be deployed on active service. That is what a soldier is for and traditionally kings and princes have led their countrymen into battle. Of course the enemy want to capture him – that’s the downside of being a prince. So far as the risk to his men is concerned I suggest that a troop of volunteers is formed.
But the decision should be his commanding officer’s, not his family, not the politicians, not the press, and he should obey.
I hope that the Ministry of Defence have taken note of the claim that there are spies within British Army bases who report to the Mahdi Army, and presumably other organisations. I don't doubt this, although how efficient and widespread they are is something else.
Posted on 04/28/2007 10:49 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Showing 26-51 of 699 [Previous 25] [Next 25]

Guns, Germs and Steel in Tanzania
The Thinking Person's Safari
Led by Geoffrey Clarfield
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30