Palestinian Prisoners of Israel: Heroes or Cowardly Lions?
It is difficult to believe that the Palestinians really want peace with Israel. One excuse after another is given for their refusal to enter into or to continue peace negotiations. The latest excuse has come a result of Palestinian unilateral action after the delay in the release that had been expected on March 29, 2014, of 26 prisoners, including 14 Arab citizens of Israel from Israeli jails. This was to be the last batch of the 104 security prisoners that Israel had on July 28, 2013 agreed to release as a confidence-building goodwill gesture to encourage the Palestinian leadership to come to the negotiating table.
The Israeli Government had taken action to delay the release of this last group of prisoners because the Palestinians had refused to extend the negotiations beyond the April 29, 2014 deadline that clearly left insufficient time for final agreement. In response, Mahmoud Abbas, the non-elected “president” of the Palestinian Authority, in suspiciously unprecedented celerity, acted in unilateral fashion. He announced on April 1 that he had taken steps to sign and apply for membership in 15 international treaties and protocols, thus preempting the whole point of the negotiations.
The black comedy continues as the Palestinians refuse to take “yes” for an answer. The Palestinian Minister of Prisoners, Issa Karaka, has threatened to take the delayed prisoner release issue to the United Nations and other international organizations. At the same time, the 40th anniversary of Palestine Prisoners Day was held in London on April 17, 2014 to express solidarity with Palestinians “imprisoned by the Israeli occupation.”
Saeb Erekat, member of the PLO Executive Committee and so-called “negotiator,” is often the leading man in the spectacle of this non-stop comedy. He enacted his familiar fantasy that “Israel has oppressed millions, in many varying ways,” before his heartrending climax that the “plight of the prisoners reflects the plight of the Palestinian people as a whole.” Forgetting that 78 prisoners had already been released, his rapturous conclusion was that the release of the Palestinian prisoners (the remaining 26) would be the first signal that “freedom is on the way.”
Erekat’s role in the drama was upstaged by Hanan Ashrawi another familiar performer in the Palestinian drama, whose well-delivered utterances as a Palestinian spokesperson are still taken seriously by the Western mainstream media, especially the New York Times and the BBC. Like Erekat, she is also a member of the PLO Executive and one assumes she has inside knowledge of its functioning. Surprisingly, she has forgotten her lines in the comedy that concern the urgent need to deal with the corruption, internal feuding, and inefficiency of the Palestinian authorities. Instead, she has substituted the lines that the release of prisoners remains the PLO’s top priority. Ashrawi commended the bravery and determination of all Palestinian prisoners and “their continued steadfastness and commitment to freedom in the face of the belligerent occupier.” She ended her performance by calling on the audience, the members of the international community, to “expose Israel’s treatment of Palestinian prisoners.”
Through her rhetoric drawing attention to that treatment, Ashrawi gave the “international community” the opportunity to learn about these prisoners who she said had demonstrated “bravery and determination.” She omitted that these qualities had been displayed not in strikes against the Israeli military but in attacks on innocent Israeli civilians.
Courtesy of Ashrawi, the international community can now examine the bravery of those released from Israeli prisons. Of those in the first batch of 26 prisoners, released in August 2013, 20 were convicted of murder, four were accessory to murder, one was guilty of throwing explosives, and one of abduction. In all, these brave individuals murdered 38 innocent, unarmed people.
The longest serving prisoner, Fayez Mutawi al-Khur, former head of a Fatah terrorist cell, was jailed in November 1985 for one murder and another attempted murder in the Gaza City market. While in prison, he was also convicted of planning to kill then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir.
Another brave prisoner, Atiyeh Salem Musa, used an axe to murder a 67 year old Holocaust survivor during Passover 1994 in Petah Tikva. A third brave prisoner, Midhat Fayez Barbakh, ambushed his Israeli employer in Rishon Lezion in January 1994. He stabbed his 61 year old employer with a knife and a pair of pruning shears.
The list of the “brave” prisoners continues. Salah Ibrahim Ahmed Mugdad, was arrested in June 1993 for murdering a 72 year old security guard at a hotel in Netanya. He struck the victim on the head with an iron bar and then stole a television set from the hotel. Salameh Abdallah Musleh was convicted in 1993 of the murder of a grocery store owner in Petah Tikva. He bound the victim’s arms and legs, and beat him to death. Several other murders were committed by using an ax, one was against a 79 year old man sitting on a public bench in Kfar Saba, another on an 84 year old man in the Sharon region.
One looks forward to the international community’s verdict on these men who have demonstrated “their commitment to freedom” and their bravery and determination, although that bravery seems to be limited to murdering elderly Jewish civilians or innocent tourists, such as the French woman tourist stabbed to death in a restaurant in which she was dining. That community will judge if the action of these former prisoners constitutes what Ashrawi has called “a proactive method of nonviolent resistance that is essential to the Palestinian struggle for equality and freedom.”
What is so troubling about this issue is not simply learning of the murderous and brutal acts of the Palestinian prisoners. It is also witnessing the hypocrisy of Palestinian authorities and spokespersons in not disavowing that brutality. For some years the Palestinian Authority has granted a monthly salary to all Palestinian prisoners put in jail for security and terror-related offences. No salary is given to those imprisoned for theft, but only to those who have committed murder. Priority in funding is given to the families of “Martyrs,” the honored terrorists, or more disingenuously the “heroes and self-sacrificing fighters.”
The money comes out of the PA’s general budget, some of which comes from the international community. The European Union provides 11 million euros for Palestinian salaries and pensions. Even the PA felt uncomfortable on the issue. For public relations purposes it changed the name of the funding from “salary” to “assistance.”
The “freedom loving” Palestinian prisoners must have been startled by the freedom and the comfortable conditions to which they were “subjected” in Israeli jails. After all, Hanan Ashrawi had told them of Israel’s “criminal treatment… the flagrant breach of the rights of Palestinian prisoners… of the cruel and dehumanizing measures that constitute war crimes.” The prisoners must be annoyed at Ashrawi, who did not know that according to international reports conditions in those jails generally meet international standards. Prisoners have reasonable access to visitors, including relatives from the West Bank who can come into Israel for visits. They can participate in their religious observance. They can submit a petition to judicial authorities about prison conditions, and those petitions are then investigated.
Even more surprising, especially for bigoted boycotters of Israel, is that many prisoners in Israeli jails today have access to the Open University. Israel pays their tuition in full for extensive programs and allows students to do work towards their degrees on computers. Yet there are limits regarding those who have committed violent crimes. Until recently even those incarcerated for terrorism could participate in this program and receive free college education. But in December 2012 the Israeli High Court ruled that terrorist security prisoners were not eligible for free university education in Israeli schools. The Court refused the lawsuit by three of these particular terrorist prisoners who claimed discrimination because they were not allowed to enroll in an Open University program and have their tuition paid. No doubt, Erekat and Ashrawi will lose no time in pointing out that these restrictions are “human rights abuses,” and are violations of international law.
Palestinian spokespersons may enjoy playing their role in the comedy of the “brave” murderers who are prisoners in Israeli jails. They surely cannot enjoy the continuing tragedy caused by fellow Palestinians. On April 14, 2014 an Israeli man was killed and his wife and son were wounded while they were on the way to a Passover Seder, by a well-planned terrorist attack near Hebron. To his credit Mahmoud Abbas condemned the violence. However, the Hamas Prime Minister, Ismail Haniyeh, saluted the “heroes of Hebron” and said that the killing “brought back life to the path of resistance.” He warned of more attacks against Israel.
Yes, it is difficult to believe that the Palestinians really want peace. When will the “international community” recognize the true purpose of Palestinian roadblocks to the peace process?
Michael Curtis is author of Jews, Antisemitism, and the Middle East.
Even TIME magazine is beginning to get the picture. Will Senator McCain be next? And will those clamoring for more American military aid to be sent to the Sunnis in Syria have any doubts, any hesitation about helping to overthrow the Alawites (who keep the Sunnis under control), which is exactly the stated goal of Al-Qaeda?
Leave these countries to their own miseries and failures, with no Western aid, no Western military help, no Western presence, no Western doctors, no Western NGOs, because it is only when the West, when all Infidels, are un-involved, that Muslims themselves will be forced to confront the main source of their own political, economic, social, intellectual, and moral failures, which is Islam itself.Let them overhear people in the outside world expressing this thought, and some of them will in the hand have to admit its correctness. How they then deal with the Muslims who take Islam to heart, and believe that more Islam is the solution, is a matter for them to figure out. And the more the natural divisions, ethnic, sectarian, and economic, widen, and lead to the very "instability" that some in the West deplore, the better.
Meanwhile, everything should be done to make Western societies unwelcoming to the practice of Islam and the presence of Muslims. There are many ways to do this.
Denying the Truth of Islamic Terrorism in the National 9/11 Memorial Museum Film
Anyone who witnessed the events of 9/11, what we described as the “Pearl Harbor of the 21st Century”, that took the lives of 3000 innocent people, knows the truth about what motivated the 19 Al Qaeda perpetrators from Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. It was radical Islam or Islamist terrorism spawned by the Muslim Brotherhood rejectionist doctrine of Egyptian Sayyid Qutb grounded in doctrinal Islam. Over the 13 years since those horrific events on 9/11, that took down the iconic twin towers in lower Manhattan, there have been continuing efforts by Muslim and fringe groups to suggest otherwise. Even to the point of engaging in blood libel, accusing Israel of perpetrating the attack. Bizarre Truthers even suggested that the CIA might have been involved. Those untruths are reflective of a disturbing aspect of Islamic Doctrine, taqiyyah – religiously sanctioned dissimilitude and kitman, omission of facts. That is reflected in obfuscation and outright denial of Jihad, calling it the inner struggle, instead of warfare against non-believers in furtherance of conquest of Dar al Harb, the realm of war.
Benighted Muslim and non-Muslim interfaith groups have made these articles of dialog. They propound the view that it was Al Qaeda terrorism and not Islam that former President Bush declared on 9/12 in a tableau at the Washington Islamic Center was a religion of peace. Hardly the case with more than 23,000 attacks since 9/11 against non-Muslims and nominal Muslims across the Umma, the global community of believers. One only has to bring up the images of the radical Islamist group Boko Haram - rejecting the West - slaughtering thousands in the areas of Nigeria that divide the Islamic north from the Animist Christian South. Or the burning of Churches in Egypt and extrajudicial violence perpetrated by Muslim Brotherhood and Salafists against Coptic women. Or the beheading of Catholic priests in Syria by Al Qaeda affiliates, the Al Nusrah Front and the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant. Then there are the attacks on Christians in Pakistan. In both Canada and America we have witnessed the honor killings of Muslim wives and daughters by professing Muslim fathers and husbands.
Which brings us to the matter of the controversy over the 7 minute film, “The Rise of Al Qaeda” produced by the National September 11 Memorial Museum. The film endeavors to tell the truth about the motivation of the 19 Jihadists who perpetrated the deaths of thousands of innocents in Lower Manhattan, at the Pentagon in Northern Virginia and in Southwestern Pennsylvania. A fateful late summer day in 2001 that is forever riveted in the minds of all who witnessed the horror up close and from afar.
The New York Times in a report in today’s edition noted the controversy over the film’s imagery:
The film, “The Rise of Al Qaeda,” refers to the terrorists as Islamists who viewed their mission as a jihad. The NBC News anchor Brian Williams, who narrates the film, speaks over images of terrorist training camps and Qaeda attacks spanning decades. Interspersed are explanations of the ideology of the terrorists, from video clips in foreign-accented English translations
The controversy was created by a review of the film by a panel from the Interfaith Center in New York led by its executive director, Rev. Chloe Breyer, an Episcopal priest and daughter of US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. She who had ministered to the injured and families of survivors following 9/11. The controversy followed the comments in a letter to the Museum’s director by a panel member Sheik Mostafa Elazabawy of the Masjid Manhattan Mosque who wrote:
The screening of this film in its present state would greatly offend our local Muslim believers as well as any foreign Muslim visitor to the museum. Unsophisticated visitors who do not understand the difference between Al Qaeda and Muslims may come away with a prejudiced view of Islam, leading to antagonism and even confrontation toward Muslim believers near the site.
In a separate interview, Elazabawy was reported to have said:
Don’t tell me this is an Islamist or an Islamic group; that means they are part of us. We are all of us against that.
Joseph Daniels, President of the non-profit museum issued a statement in rebuttal to Sheik Elazabawy, noted by the New York Timesarticle on the controversy, saying:
From the very beginning, we had a very heavy responsibility to be true to the facts, to be objective, and in no way smear an entire religion when we are talking about a terrorist group.
What helps me sleep at night is I believe that the average visitor who comes through this museum will in no way leave this museum with the belief that the religion of Islam is responsible for what happened on 9/11. We have gone out of the way to tell the truth.
9/11 families had reviewed the film and expressed some disquiet over the content. But it was left to the Interfaith Center panel who reviewed the film and related exhibit at the Museum to create the controversy. As the New York Times report noted they were pleased with pictures of grieving Muslims and the comments of US Rep. Keith Ellison, a Muslim. However, what really disturbed the interfaith panel were the uses of the terms “Jihadists’ and “Islamism” that they conveyed in a letter on Monday to the Museum director and staff.
The Interfaith Center was previously involved in the support for the controversial Lower Manhattan Mosque, the so-called Cordoba Initiative championed by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf and former Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
Last night, Megyn Kelly, host of Fox News’, The Kelly Files, weighed into the controversy of the Museum 9/11 film, especially the obsessive public correctness of the Interfaith Center panel and its leader, Rev. Chloe Breyer. Kelly, who had previously tackled the Honor Diaries, a Clarion Project film, and the CAIR contretemps, brought back into the discussion Brooke Goldstein of The Lawfare Project. She ably contested the arguments by Breyer and Sheik Elazabawy of the Interfaith Center panel. The contrasts between the positions of Rev. Breyer and Goldstein were stark. Breyer supported the Interfaith panel and Elazabawy’s requests for redaction of the Museum film, while Goldstein vigorously and effectively argued that you cannot deny the truth of the extremist Islamic doctrine that motivated the 9/11 perpetrators to commit mass murder.
Watch this You Tube video of Fox News host of The Kelly Files, Megyn Kelly’s interview with Rev. Breyer of the Interfaith Center and Brooke Goldstein of The Lawfare project:
We will publish an interview with Ms. Goldstein about this and related issues of Lawfare in the May edition of the New English Review.
Up to 700 Britons could now be fighting in Syria and police are powerless to stop would-be jihadists heading there, the UK’s counter-terrorism chief has admitted.
But Helen Ball, the police senior national coordinator for counter-terrorism, warned anyone who takes part in any form of fighting, even for the Free Syrian Army, will face arrest on their return.
Metropolitan Deputy Assistant Commissioner Ball said it was likely the number of Brits in Syria is now in the “mid” rather than “low” hundreds as previously thought, including some as young as 16.
The warning came as police launched a national campaign to urge mothers, wives and sisters to report on their loved ones and stop them travelling to the war torn country.
However, DAC Ball accepted that even if individuals were brought to their attention, if they chose to ignore police warnings over the dangers, there was nothing police could do to stop them leaving the country. So far as I am concerned they can go, but they should never be allowed back. British citizenship revoked for those with dual nationality; charges of treason for the converts.
The appeal to women also faced widespread criticism that families and communities would not come forward because either they did not trust the police or may not know what their loved ones were planning.
Asked what the police "red line" was for Britons fighting in Syria, DAC Ball said: "Fighting full stop and training to fight is likely to lead to a police investigation."
Women are also going out to either fight or marry fighters.
According to him, Al-Sisi's mother is Jewish. And Gamal Abdel Nasser grew up playing with Moshe Dayan, which helps explain why the Egyptians lost their wars against Israel in 1948, 1956, and 1967. He's got it all figured out, and wants other Egyptians to know.
I don't know about you, but after I've watched and listened to several Muslim Arabs speaking in those MEMRITV excerpts, I begin to question Donald Davidson's Principle of Charity. I don't think Davidson lived to see an excerpt from MEMRITV. I don't think too many Western philosophers have.
"Rock Ambush Causes New Yorker to Miss Dad's Funeral.
"Tova Richler flew thousands of miles to her father's burial, but Arabs [that is: a Muslim mob - CM] at the Mount of Olives prevented her from attending.
'Tova Richler of New York flew to Israel to attend her father's funeral at the Mount of Olives [on] Friday, but an ambusy by local Arabs (that is: an attack by local Arab Muslims - CM) prevented her from attending it.
'Richler, 59, drove to the funeral [on] Friday afternoon in a car with her sister, her brother-in-law and her young nephew, reports Israel HaYom. Near the church of Gethsemane, however, about ten Arab youths (that is: ten Arab Muslim youths; I would bet my bottom dollar they were Muslims - CM) ambushed the car and pelted it with rocks and tinderblocks - an action that has become a favorite local Arab (Muslim - CM) pastime in recent years, as Israeli deterrence has weakened.
Israel's local police and local authorities, it seems, have been progressively "groomed" into a dhimmi submissiveness. This needs to be shucked off, pronto. I would suggest Sting Ops, so that these Muslim mobsters throwing rocks at mourners on or near the Mount of Olives may find themselves seized, and arrested, and investigated and background-checked for probable involvement in other sorts of nefarious activity; and then subjected to the maximum applicable punishment. Indeed, I see no reason why they should not be charged with Attempted Murder. A large rock or a tinder block can kill or permanently maim. Were the Israelis fully to grasp what they are up against, these Mohammedan mobsters, hurling rocks at Jewish funeral parties and mourners, would be stripped of their citizenship - if so be they hold Israeli passports - and deported. To Gaza. - CM
'Richler was in a state of shock following the attack, and the car was disabled for a long time. (Doubtless it required expensive repair work. The rock-throwers should be hunted down and arrested, and they or their families forced to pay for the repairs to the car. - CM).
'The funeral organisers were left with no choice but to conduct it without Richler and the other relatives who were with her, because the Sabbath was about to begin.
"I never dreamed that my father's funeral would look like this", she told Israel HaYom. "I came especially from New York, thousands of kilometres away, to take part in it.
"When the attack on us began, I was in a state of total shock. I heard shouting, booms and thuds on the car.
"I have heard sometimes that people were attacked with rocks on the way to the Mount of Olives, but I never thought something like this would happen to me."
'The My Israel movement intends to launch a media campaign this week, to pressure the Jerusalem Police and the Minister of Public Security to improve the security situation in Jerusalem. "The entire region has been completely forfeited and we intend to put pressure on the decision makers", said movement chair Sarah Haetzni Cohen.
'Jerusalem Councillor Yael Antabi told Arutz Sheva that cameras need to be installed wherever violence is rife. She said that cameras placed around the Mount Scopus university campus have helped female students there feel less threatened by the Arabs of Issawiya (that is: the Muslims of Issawiya - CM), but noted that another trouble spot is the Light Rail, where there is daily Arab-Jewish violence (correction: where there are daily Muslim attacks on Jews - CM) that goes unreported.
Forget about cameras...unless you have a rapid-response law enforcement team watching the image feeds and prepared to act the moment the harassment, the threats or the assault begins. Step up plainclothes police patrols and/ or arrange some sting ops. Arrest the Muslim attackers, all of them, every time. Subject them to the maximum punishment due to persons who threaten or assault others. - CM
'Hostile Arab residents of the Mount of Olives region (that is: hostile Muslims squatting on and around the Mount of Olives - CM)have turned the ancient cemetery (that is: the ancient and historic Jewish cemetery - CM) into a danger zone, and ongoing attempts by Jewish philanthropists and organisers to solve the problem have yet to put an end to the attacks.
'The matter has been repeatedly discussed in the Knesset, but to no avail, as the attacks continue unabated.
The attacks will continue until and unless a whole bunch of murder-minded Jew-hating Muslim rock-throwers are themselves ambushed by the police and/ or the army, arrested, tried, and punished...and, preferably, deported from Israel, sans their Israeli passports if so be they were holders of same. - CM
'Nor was Tovah Richler the first victim from New York: a few months back a hareidi-religious family from New York was seriously attacked by rioting Arabs (that is: rioting Muslims - CM), as they were making their way to pray on the Mount of Olives.
'One of the passengers in their rented car was taken to Hadassah Mt Scopus Hospital with wounds to the head and one of his hands.
Wounds to the head. You can bet that the Muslim rock-thrower was deliberately aiming for the head, knowing that a blow to the head, with a rock - and these are not pebbles, or even small stones, these are often fist-sized or larger, I have seen pictures - can kill. - CM
'The media's "political correctness" and the infiltration of the judicial and law-enforcement establishment by the ultra-leftists are seen by many as the main reason for the general loss of deterrence vis-a-vis Arab (sic: MUSLIM - CM) violence.
"Faced with a media cover-up of the situaiton, and police who are afraid to enter their villages, extremists in the Arab communities gain the upper hand (rather, "the Muslim mob as a whole has become emboldened" - CM) and stopgap measures like security cameras are of little use."
Yes. It's way past the time for cameras. It's time for the display and the deployment of overwhelming force. Before the Muslims achieve what they fully intend, and murder one or more Jews.
And now for the second Israel National news item, also describing a meant-to-be-murderous Muslim rock attack upon a Jew, in Jerusalem, on Wednesday this week.
What that headline should have been: "Jerusalem: Muslims Stone Jewish Woman, Fail to Kill Her". - CM
'A woman was lightly wounded on Wednesday evening after terorrists (hey, let's just cut to the chase and say - "Muslims" - CM) threw rocks at a bus (at Jews in a bus - CM) near the French Hill neighbourhood of Jerusalem.
'The woman received treatment from paramedics at the scene and was subsequently taken to the Hadassah Mount Scopus Hospital for further treatment...
That sounds like she sustained rather more injury than just scratches or bruises. - CM
'Arutz Sheva has reported on many occasions about rock attacks targeting Jews (that should be: "On many occasions Arutz Sheva has reported Muslim rock attacks which targeted Jews" - CM) in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria and other areas of Israel. Many of these attacks are not reported in the mainstream media outlets.
'Rock attacks can be lethal, as was the case in an attack in September of 2011, which targeted Asher Palmer and his infant son Yonatan. The two were killed when an Arab terrorist (a Jew-hating Muslim - CM) hurled large rocks at their car....
(and now there is a little more detail about the attack previously mentioned, on the New York woman - CM)
"Just last Friday, a woman from New York who flew to Israel to attend her father's funeral at the Mount of Olives was prevented from attending it due to a rock attack.
"As the woman drove to the funeral Friday afternoon in a car with her relatives, about ten Arab youths (that is: ten Arab Muslim youths - CM) ambushed the car and pelted it with rocks and cinderblocks."
Strikes me that from now on Jewish mourners' cars should be escorted, or tailed, by unmarked police or army vehicles containing special forces in plainclothes, with reinforcements ready to hand. The moment these murderous Muslim "youths" start throwing rocks... WHAM: out pop the police and/ or soldiers, ambush the ambushers, and whisk them away to be processed, interrogated at length, and, eventually, charged and punished. Unfortunately, even if this were done, the rock-throwers are unlikely to be stripped of their citizenship and deported, not until enough Jews in Israeli lose their illusions and realize that these "Arab youths" are bog-standard Muslims animated by Quranic Jew-hatred and comprising a Fifth Column that wages ceaseless Jihad against the state of Israel and against all Jews qua Jews. - CM
I have worked in the fields of biodiversity, community development and poverty alleviation for years, in the West and in the third world. I know very well that the UN is one of the world's most mismanaged and corrupt organization. On this basis alone, I cannot understand why environmentalists keep on working through its various branches. Yet the issues are important as we are in the midst of an as yet poorly understood environmental crisis with the loss of biodiversity, and the government subsidized suburbanization of North America.
Here is a quote from gifted British essayist, Roger Scruton on this issue:
The reason why the environmental movement has been captured by the left is that it lends itself to this ambition. It provides terrifying scenarios, which seem to justify the total overthrow of existing orders, while encouraging the kind of control from the top that would put enlightened leftists at last in charge of the endarkened middle class. But it could be that the middle class, with its plodding adherence to aesthetic norms, might have had the solution to the environmental problem all along, and that it was only the growth of the modern state, with its arrogant schemes and inability to respond to its own massive failures, that has jeopardized our future...
If you would like to read his magisterial essay on Conservatives and Conservation, and his solutions, now read this, and send it to your Congresspersons or MP.
Jihad Against the Jews: On the Temple Mount a Menacing Allahu-Akbaring Mob of Muslims Threatens Orthodox Jewish Families Who Were Peacefully Visiting
As reported by Arutz Sheva, "Israel National News".
Please click on the link, and watch the long - and deeply disturbing video of that mob as it forms, and swarms, and circles round the small party of Jews whose police escort just manages, with some difficulty, to keep them from being lynched. It is the audio - the continual rhythmic howl of the "allahu akhbar" in the background, as menacing as the escalating repetitions of the Heil Hitler! at a Nuremberg rally - that is even more disturbing than the visuals.
"Watch: Muslims Mob Terrified Jewish Children on Temple Mount".
Ten out of ten for you, Arutz Sheva. You said "Muslims" in the headline. And that is what it is. This is Muslims doing what their canonical texts, over and over, directly instruct them to do: express and enact murderous contempt and hatred toward Jews qua Jews. - CM
"Several dozen hareidi Jews, including children, ascended the Temple Mount, and were surrounded by an angry mob.
By a raging, hate-filled Muslim mob. Such mobs have attacked - and on other occasions robbed, and/ or raped, and/ or mass-murdered - Jews in other places and at other times, throughout the entire 1400 years since the inception of Islam. And in other places, at other times, similar Muslim mobs have attacked or are attacking and in future will attack Christians, or Hindus, or Sikhs, or Buddhists, or Confucians, or Taoists, or Zoroastrians... - CM
'Several dozen hareidi Jews, including children, ascended the Temple Mount (which is, let us all remind ourselves, that one place on earth that is holiest of all to Jews, and with which Jews - and more broadly, the Hebrews, the descendants of Jacob, the whole House of Israel - have historically been associated and on which they have worshipped and where they have focused their prayers and their dreams for over a thousand years before ever Islam was invented - CM) on Wednesday.
'In the course of the tour of the Mount, Muslims began hurling objects at the hareidim, spat at them, hurled shoes and sticks, and pulled the sidelocks of one of the children.
And the dhimmified Israeli police, who were escorting the haredim, did not - so far as I can see - arrest and charge even one of those vicious Mohammedan bullies. - CM
'The raging Muslim mob terrified some of the children, who began to panic.
That is when the IDF should have been called in, to summarily seize and remove from the Mount every single Muslim there present, and to arrest every one of them that had taken part in the chanting or who had engaged in any form of physical attack. - CM
'The Temple Movement blamed police for failing to disperse the Muslim attackers.
For failing to disperse them? That should have been "for failing to arrest and charge the Muslim attackers". - CM
"It's a miracle no-one was hurt", said a movement statement.
Like I said before, click on the link, and watch the video. Then, if you know anybody who is full of diseased sympathy for those poooor, poooor, pooor "Palestinians", make them watch the video and tell them what "allahu akhbar" means, and that it is chanted when beasts are being slaughtered, and that it is also chanted in beheading videos (as the terrified, screaming victim is torturously murdered), and on all other occasions when Muslims are wreaking horrors upon helpless non-Muslims, whether in open jihad warfare, or in swarming mob assaults upon unarmed dhimmi communities such as the Copts or the Syrian Christians, or the Hindus and Christians of Pakistan, or on Buddhists, Hindus and Christians in Bangladesh. That it is the functional equivalent of "Heil Hitler!" And if, after that, your acquaintance still insist on making excuses for those "Palestinian" Muslims, tell that person point-blank that he or she is siding with people who would, if they could, commit genocide upon the Jews...upon all Jews, everywhere. - CM
That is: Gazan Muslims Fire Rocket, Nearly Hit Sderot Synagogue. - CM
'Palestinian Arab terrorists in Gaza (that is: Gazan Muslims - CM) fired a salvo of seven rockets into southern Israel on Monday [14 April], one of which narrowly missed a synagogue packed with worshippers in the city of Sderot.
'Two of the rockets landed in Sderot, which lies on the border with the Hamas-controlled territory, as hundreds of worshippers were gathered for the final day of the Jewish festival of Pesach (Passover).
Did those who fired the rockets know in which direction the synagogue lay? Were they aiming for it? These days, when everybody has access to Google/earth, I wouldn't be at all surprised if that were the case. - CM
'Miraculously, however, no-one was hurt, although police said in a statement that a road in a residential neighbourhood was damaged.
'Israel responded [on] Monday by eliminating "two terror activity sites in the southern Gaza Strip and a third site in the central Gaza Strip, in response to the latest severe aggression emanating from Gaza", according to an IDF statement. "Direct hits were confirmed." Pictures confirm that at least one of the strikes was in or near Rafah.
'Sources in Gaza also claimed that the Israeli Navy had eliminated targets near Khan Younis, but the report remains unconfirmed.
'The IDF also stated that Hamas fired an anti-tank missile at IDF patrols near the border fence, earlier Monday. The missile caused no injuries or damage.
But not for want of trying. - CM
'Both attacks come on the final day of the Passover holiday, which has seen increased activity from Hamas.
Always and everywhere, Muslims are particularly wont to attack non-Muslims at the festive or the high holy seasons of said non-Muslims. Muslims attack and have attacked Jews at Passover, and at Yom Kippur; they attack and have attacked Christians at Christmas and Easter; this year in Pakistan there was an attack on Hindus during Holi. For one thing, large gatherings of people in churches, synagogues or temples, often unarmed and off their guard and with elderly, women and children present, represent a "soft target", which is the sort of thing that the cowardly and sadistic mohammedan bully-mind delights to hit, in order to exact the maximum amount of death, injury, and mental anguish. But there is more to it than just the will to hurt, kill and terrorise as many people as possible; Muslims by targeting the festival or holy seasons of other faiths are signalling their intention of destroying those faiths. - CM
'Hamas terrorists rioted and occupied the Temple mount, Judaism's holiest site, just prior to Passover last week, sparking outrage from several public officials.
There should have been not angry words but grimly determined and forceful action, without warning beforehand nor apology nor explanation after. The moment the first riot took place, every rioter should have been arrested and jailed, and all Muslims removed from the Temple Mount, to then be denied all further access throughout the season of Passover..and for good measure, throughout the Christian Easter season, as well. It would make sense to deny them access all the way through until after Shavuot/ Pentecost. And if the Muslims anywhere within Israel rioted and set off explosions, they would have to be suppressed with overwhelming force instantly deployed. And if the Muslims and their bleating, Jew-hating enablers elsewhere threw tantrums and whined and wailed "persecution!", the proper response would be a flat statement that the Muslims were suffering far less than they themselves had inflicted on Jews in the past; for a strict application of "bedonebyasyoudid" would require Muslims to be excluded from the Mount for a cool 700 years, corresponding to the period - from 1267 until 1967 - during which Muslim dogs-in-the-manger (or jackals-in-the-manger) absolutely excluded Jews not only from their (the Jews') most holy place, the Temple Mount, but also from entering the Cave of Machpelah in Hebron, the traditional burial site of Abraham, Sarah, Leah, and Isaac. - CM
"We shall continue to act forcefuly against our enemies", Netanyahu wrote on his official Twitter account. "Today, the Israel Defense Forces attacked in the Gaza Strip those who sought to harm the citizens of Israel and disturb the calm of the holiday".
Mr Netanyahu, it isn't just the jihad gang bosses in Gaza who need a thrashing; it's the Muslim Mobsters who are squatting on the Temple Mount and rioting every time Jews go anywhere near it.
Whatever was done to Gaza doesn't seem to have had much effect, for just one week later, the Muslim mobsters there were at it again, firing rockets into Israel with intent to murder and maim. As reported by Jerusalem Post.
'7 Gaza Rockets Land in Israel; light damage caused".
'Light damage caused to neighbourhood in southern city from rockets; IDF reports RPG launched toward border forces, warning shots fired in return.
'Terrorists in Gaza (Muslim jihad terror-raiders in Gaza - CM) fired 5 rockets into Israel (translation: fired 5 rockets at Jews in Israel - CM) on Monday morning, the IDF spokesperson's office said.
'The first 3 projectiles struck uninhabited areas in the Sha'ar Hanegev Regional Council, and set off sirens, and caused no damage.
'Another two rockets were launched and caused light damage in Sderot.
"Light damage". But it all adds up, day after day, week after week, month after month. Because even "light damage" to a road, a farm, a house, a car, costs money to repair. And then there is the fear, as the sirens wail, and people interrupt their daily routine and rush to a shelter. This is a war of attrition, with the jihadis - pickled in Jew-hatred and murderous hubris from their toddlerhood on up - grinding away at Israel, hoping to impoverish, to demoralise, to weaken the will and break down resistance. - CM
'In additon, the IDF reported that early Monday morning an RPG was launched toward IDF forces on the border, but caused no injuries.
'IDF later shot warning shots into Gaza. The shots caused no reported injuries inside Gaza.
'Last week, Israel Air Force jets struck five terror targets in the Gaza Strip, following rocket attacks on southern Israel the previous night. The IAF hit sites in northern and central Gaza, including two Hamas posts, Palestinian media reported.
Not that anything "Palestinian" media "reports" should be trusted, unless it can be verified from independent non-Muslim sources of information, because...Muslims lie. - CM
'Also last week, a rocket siren went off in the Sha'ar Hanegev region, but an army spokeswoman later said no projectiles were detected in Israeli territory.
'Last month, the air force struck 29 targets across the Gaza Strip in response to Islamic Jihad rocket attack on the south.
Note: "Islamic Jihad" in the sentence I have just reproduced from 'Jerusalem Post' refers to a specific and thoroughly-orthodox Muslim groupuscule, recently formed in Gaza, which calls itself by that name. But in reality, every rocket fired from Gaza is an act of Jihad by the Muslims there, and is therefore an act of Islamic, or Muslim, Jihad; whether the people doing the firing actually belong to a group that is honest enough to call itself "Islamic Jihad", or not. - CM
'More than 30 rockets - fired in simultaneous barrages from northern and southern Gaza - exploded in Israeli territory.
'The Iron Dome anti-rocket battery stationed in Sderot shot down three projectiles over the town.
'The bombardment of the western Negev in March marked the largest flare-up of Gazan terrorism since 2012.'
Those rockets fired from Gaza, fired - by Jew-hating Gazan Muslims - at civilian targets, at homes, businesses, synagogues, roads and farms within the Jewish state of Israel, are all part of the Jihad, the neverending war that pious by-the-book Muslims are supposed to wage against all non-Muslims until said non-Muslims have been absorbed into Islam, or subjugated as wretched and exploited dhimmis, or killed. The fact that there has been an intensification of this rocket fire, after a period in which fewer were fired, suggests that the jihad gangsters in Gaza have regrouped and rearmed. Israel, if she wants a resumption of relative quiet, had better respond suddenly and devastatingly. - CM
He murdered three Americans who worked in a hospital for Afghan children.
He's described as a "rogue" member of the Afghan security services. There have been quite a few such "rogues." How would you determine which Muslim member of the army or police is going to, or is likely to, or might at some point for any reason or non-reason whatsoever, become a "rogue" member of that society? Is there a way to predict? Is it safe to predict that it will happen much too often, for any Muslim to be trusted with, for example, the responsibility of piloting a plane, running a tank, holding a submachine gun, holding a rifle?
Greedy opportunist Tony Blair, with his Tony Blair Faith Foundation (as his American analogue, Bill Clinton, has his Cliinton Global Initiative, staffed by his, and by his wife's, Lady Macbeth's, political apparatchiks), knows there is something dangerous about Islam. But he can't say exactly what, so he sticks to this business of "Islamic extremists" or "Islamic radicals." It was the policy of his government to admit, in ever-larger numbers, so many of the Muslims whose presence in the West has "created a situation for the native non-Muslims, and for other, non-Muslim, immigrants, that is far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous" than would be the case without such a large-scale Muslim presence. It was the policy of his government to participate in the Tarbaby Iraq fiasco, intended keep Sunnis and Shi'a from fighting (why?), and to make Iraq "prosperous" by handing out tens of billions of dollars in aid that was stolen or misspent by its Iraqi recipients. How a unified and prosperous Iraq would further the interests of the West, which is in a divided and demoralized Camp of Islam, was never made clear.
Even when he starts to make a little more sense, Blair misrepresents things, and communicates his state of confusion. He's not intelligent enought to sit still, think about Islam -- the ideology of Islam, the texts of Islam -- or under what conditions those texts are taken or might be taken to heart (answer: no one can say because a "moderate" can become "extremist" for all kinds of reasons, some having nothing to do with the outside world), nor does he understand the blend of self-interest, filial piety, and embarrassment that causes Muslims to protect and defend their faith, and to refuse to admit to what it inculcates.
He's useful now for one reason: to hold up his words and thoughts to inspection, as a representative of many others. But certainly not to heed him.
I wonder how much he pocketed from Bloomberg London for his confusions.
Tir'd with all these, for restful death I cry,
As, to behold desert a beggar born,
And needy nothing trimm'd in jollity,
And purest faith unhappily forsworn,
And guilded honour shamefully misplaced,
And maiden virtue rudely strumpeted,
And right perfection wrongfully disgraced,
And strength by limping sway disabled,
And art made tongue-tied by authority,
And folly (doctor-like) controlling skill,
And simple truth miscall'd simplicity,
And captive good attending captain ill:
Tired with all these, from these would I be gone,
Save that, to die, I leave my love alone.
Let me not to the marriage of true minds
Admit impediments. Love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove:
O no; it is an ever-fixed mark,
That looks on tempests, and is never shaken;
It is the star to every wandering bark,
Whose worth's unknown, although his height be taken.
Love's not Time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks
Within his bending sickle's compass come;
Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
If this be error and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.
Th' expense of spirit in a waste of shame
Is lust in action; and till action, lust
Is perjured, murd'rous, bloody, full of blame,
Savage, extreme, rude, cruel, not to trust,
Enjoyed no sooner but despisèd straight,
Past reason hunted; and, no sooner had
Past reason hated as a swallowed bait
On purpose laid to make the taker mad;
Mad in pursuit and in possession so,
Had, having, and in quest to have, extreme;
A bliss in proof and proved, a very woe;
Before, a joy proposed; behind, a dream.
All this the world well knows; yet none knows well
To shun the heaven that leads men to this hell.
My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun;
Coral is far more red than her lips' red;
If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun;
If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head.
I have seen roses damask'd, red and white,
But no such roses see I in her cheeks;
And in some perfumes is there more delight
Than in the breath that from my mistress reeks.
I love to hear her speak, yet well I know
That music hath a far more pleasing sound;
I grant I never saw a goddess go;
My mistress, when she walks, treads on the ground:
And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare
As any she belied with false compare
Those lips that Love's own hand did make
Breathed forth the sound that said 'I hate,'
To me that languish'd for her sake:
But when she saw my woeful state,
Straight in her heart did mercy come,
Chiding that tongue that ever sweet
Was used in giving gentle doom,
And taught it thus anew to greet:
'I hate' she alter'd with an end,
That follow'd it as gentle day
Doth follow night, who like a fiend
From heaven to hell is flown away;
'I hate' from hate away she threw,
And saved my life, saying -- 'not you.'
My father loved to walk. It was his great ritual, his idea of prayer and work. Every morning at four, the house would echo with the thump of his shoes, the tumbler of coffee, as he hurried out. My dachshund, a wise ten-year-old would wait impatiently, grumbling melodramatically about any delay. Whoever talked of walking a dog never understood man or beast. Walking was an act of companionship, a way of saying hello to the world, sniffing, grumbling, greeting every morsel, smell, object, sight and human being. To add to the excitement, my neighbour’s dog, an oversized young Doberman called Marcus would join them. It was a strange troop — a dachshund striding in front, Doberman casually behind, each attentive to every signal from my father. As the years went by, the Dachshund got older and more tired but he refused to miss his walk. My father would carry Fritz around the lake and release him just as he reached home so he could stride the last lap with dignity, the Lord of all he surveyed.
My childhood memories are full of walks. It left me convinced that, without a walk, friendship was impossible and old age insufferable. As one walked, one remembered, one talked of worlds far away. Walking becomes a way of mapping the world. Philosophy, I felt, began with walking. Think of Thoreau, Emerson, Certeau, Heidegger, Patrick Geddes. Because they literally walked the talk, their philosophies were richer and more concrete.
The many messages of walking
There is something about walking as a ritual, elegant in its routineness that we must grasp. Walking is a great equaliser, democracies’ greatest act, more primordial than the vote. Walking is the act of the body exploring itself as it traces the world. It could be in an alley in a street, a meandering amble by a river, an act of communing in the forest or merely marking turf in a neighbourhood. Walking is exploration, discovery, conversation, companionship, meditation, reflection, prayer , even a constitutional, unlimbering the stiffness of a tired body. I cannot think of any one act that combines so many messages in the routineness of its being.
It was play and pain as you challenged the body to do that last mile as sweat raced its rivulets down your body. No conqueror was more triumphant than an individual who walked that extra mile as he collapsed for his tea and Parle-G at a welcoming dhabba. When you walk, you talk to your deepest self, even as you listen to the silence of the body and its rhythms. Walking is therapeutic, curative, even an act of exorcism. Walking beats psychoanalysis as it lets you live with yourself. It is, as a wise man told me, a way of living with the world.
One wishes there was a history of walking. Yet a walk is one of the celebratory movements of life. When a baby first walks, after all the tentative painful experiments, the joy of parents is indescribable. It is a toast to life. Even the child has that unbelievable look of heroism, of achievement. No medal or prize can beat the poetry of the moment. Parents and grandparents break into echolalic storytelling, merely watching the moment. The first step is history in the making.
Walking invites the sensorium, the collective repertoire of the senses. You see, you touch, you pause, you remember: a flower here, a face there. Walking is always an act of memory. In retracing your world, you remember it, sense the presence of the familiar, savour silences and absences. It is the beginning of civics and citizenship. I always felt curiosity begins with walking and so does science. In walking you not only converse with the world but question it, seeking a deeper understanding. Walking and time go fascinatingly together. In a way, the space of walking creates a sociology, while the time of walking creates a philosophy. Walking is the body in rhythm; each step a statement of presence.
People often talk of walks in nature but today walking defines the nature of the city and its politics. Gandhi argued that a locality should be defined by a day’s walk. Walking is the drama of enacting a public space and cities have become hostile to walking. Pedestrians are seen as a threat. Walking is biology but a vehicle is seen as intrinsic to the history of city. I feel great cities and neighbourhoods survive because of walkers. Their rituals defined the city, created zones of familiarity, symbolic markers which gave meaning to a city. A bicycle is still human, but with the car you begin the dehumanisation of the city.
I believe city planning has to begin with the walk. When you walk a city, you live a city, you embody it. When you survey a city, you abstract it as a grid. It is geometry or space without life. A survey is space without a sense of place. Walking curbs your sense of power and domination, provides you with a sense of modesty and locality. I remember Patrick Geddes, the great urban sociologist, believed that urban planning should begin with a walk. When you walk a city, you treat it as a friendly organism. Demolitions, grids begin when the walker is no longer the prime citizen of a city. The footpath as a way of life, as home to the hawker, the peddler, disappears when walking dies as the megalopolis is born. Walking loses its poetics and literally becomes pedestrian at that moment. Without walking, one cannot understand or care for the informal economy where 70 per cent of our citizens live. In fact, walking defines the informal rhythms of a city because when you stop walking, cities die. The bazaar, the roadside café disappear because these are but punctuation marks in the everyday travelogue we call walking. Imagine Marina beach without its walkers, or Connaught place without its flâneurs walking lazily around the circle, peanuts in hand. Walking creates the affordable city. Chaat wala, chai wala, bhel puri man, peanut seller, paan wala, hawker, scavenger, peddler… they can only belong to a city which understands walking. Food, sound, entertainment, and the familiarity of strangers all make walking the everyday adventure of the city.
I remember many older people talk of walking as a form of ethics, of character building. When they talk of their friends they often add that they walked everyday. It was as if walking was almost spiritual, a substitute for the act of prayer.
It may not be coming. But it may. Why wait until September to be sure? So in addition to laying in a stock of McVitie's, I've just bought a second copy of The Oxford Book of Scottish Verse just in case the vote is for independence. And though, when you read through the promiscuous list of Oxford anthologies -- conveniently collected in the just-published Oxford Book of Oxford Books -- it seems unlikely, could it not be that in a pique of post-independence resentment, the Syndics of Oxford University Press might refuse to republish that particular florilegium, its fairest flowers gathered for the Clarendon Press, for the last time, in 1966, by John MacQueen and Tom Scott?
And it is both a mild disappointment and a great relief to discover that the poem I had first come across in that anthology, and had wanted to post at this site -- "The Young Man and the Young Nun," by A.D. Mackie -- is not to be found among the decumans of data, the tsunamis of fact, available on the Internet. If you want to read it, you must get hold of your own copy of The Oxford Book of Scottish Verse, and turn to page 528. Independence or no independence, lay up that store of riches now.