Kashmir: India resists jihad; 9 jihad raiders, 1 Muslim rioter killed
Like Israel, India is a majority non-Muslim state facing a Jihad waged both from without (cross-border raids launched by jihad terror gangs based in neighbouring Muslim countries) and from within (a large aggressive Muslim minority who refuse to accept the authority of the non-Muslim state within which they live).
This story, via one of AFP's Muslim reporters - Izhar Wani - gives an update on both fronts. Unable to wage all-out conventional war, Pakistan and the Muslims within India wage a war of attrition through acts of low-level aggression: raids and riots.
'Border firefight, violence leaves ten dead in Indian Kashmir'.
Srinagar, India - Indian troops killed nine suspected militants as they tried to cross the de facto border with Pakistan that divides the volatile region of Kashmir, the army said Monday.
('Volatile' is one of AFP's favourite words for jihad-racked Muslim-majority parts of the world - CM).
Elsewhere in Indian-controlled Kashmir fresh violence left a boy dead and 12 injured when police opened fire on anti-India protesters in separate clashes.
"The army has foiled a major infiltration attempt killing nine militants who were trying to infiltrate into (Indian) Kashmir from across the Line of Control (LoC)", army spokesman J S Brar told AFP. He said a gun battle erupted late Sunday in western Uri sector and continued throughout the night after troops noticed a group of militants trying to sneak in under the cover of darkness."...
India has in the past accused the Pakistani army of providing covering fire for infiltrating militants. Islamabad denies the charge.
India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire along the LoC in 2003 and began a peace process in 2004. ('Peace process', eh? Just like that other 'peace process' we hear so much about, in the Middle East, that never goes anywhere, because Muslims can never make a permanent peace with non-Muslims - CM).
'A young Muslim boy was killed and four others injured when police opened fire to disperse stone-throwing protesters during an anti-India demonstration in southern Anantnag town Monday evening, police said. In Srinagar..six people were injured when police opened fire. Police said the incident occurred when a group of protesters (i.e. a Muslim mob - CM) hurled stones at police and shouted slogans...Two more stone-hurling protesters were injured in southern Pulwama district when police opened fire at violent demonstrators, police said. Tensions have been threatening to boil over during 11 weeks of demonstrations.."....
11 weeks of Muslim riots and rock-throwing (punctuated by Muslim terror raids into Indian Kashmir from across the border)? Call it the Kashmir Intifada.
I passed my driving test in 1978. I was living at the time in Leyton, East London. I took my driving lessons locally and once I bought my own car later that year I regularly drove across and around east London and into the countryside. more>>>
Beneath a gloomy square of the sky
in the shadow of awesome, looming walls,
a crowd of kids met day after day
to test and learn in that well of twilight
which boys in the block were destined to die. more>>>
“Sacrificing Survivors” - A New Film about 9/11 and the Ground Zero Mosque
by Jerry Gordon (September 2010)
Nine years ago on a brilliant late summer day on September 11, 2001 I witnessed the murders of 2700 innocent victims of Muslim terrorism and the destruction of an icon on the lower Manhattan skyline, the twin towers of the World Trade center. "This is the Pearl Harbor of the 21st Century," I commented to my son and his partners in a midtown law firm as we witnessed their collapse into plumes and incalculable carnage in lives lost. Not unlike the Japanese Shinto militarist pilots who took the lives of American sailors, marines, soldiers and airmen on December 7, 1941, the shaheeds, martyrs in Arabic were xenophobic Arab Muslim jihadis from Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. They were schooled in hate against us as infidels for occupying their holy lands. more>>>
I lay in my clean, but spartan hospital bed, a legacy of British imperialism, where I suppose comfort in a hospital would have then been considered a luxury by the crisply attired and no nonsense nurses of yesteryear. However, this was the beginning of a new century and the fact that this was still the only fully functional modern hospital in the entire East African region explained a certain accidental, cultural continuity. more>>>
American Jews’ Paradoxical Allegiance to the Democratic Party
by Norman Berdichevsky (September 2010)
Time and time again, I read in websites and blogs around the internet the question and puzzling paradox posed by Gentiles who strongly support Israel, how can it be that so many Jews continue to blindly vote for ultra-liberal causes that are inherently ultra-critical of Israel and even subliminally of Jews. more>>>
Anyone who has paid any attention to media coverage regarding the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s General Assembly which took place in Minneapolis in early July has good reason to scratch his head in bewilderment. more>>>
The Good Letters: The Decline of Literary Education and its Consequences
by Mark Anthony Signorelli (September 2010)
In his most recent State of the Union address, our President decried the lagging state of our educational system, warning in particular of the superiority of mathematical and scientific instruction among our international competitors. In his emphasis on the importance of these two subjects, and his implicit assumption of the link between these disciplines and economic prosperity, he certainly displayed no singularity of belief. These are the convictions of the age. more>>>
Tired of the cliché "that's wrong on so many levels," I hoped to explore the meaning of level. Or the level of meaning. Or indeed the meaning of meaning, or of of or of the. These questions, and possibly others, were answered by a Brian Massumi - or possibly the Brian Massumi, for how could there be more than one translator of Deleuze called Brian anything, let alone Brian Massumi? Thanks to reader Ole Sandberg for drawing attention to the New Criterion article in which the following passage is quoted, not, I should add, with approval:
Just as higher functions are fed back - all the way to the subatomic (that is position and momentum) - quantum indeterminacy is fed forward.
It rises through the fractal bifurcations leading to and between each of the superposed levels of reality. On each level, it appears in a unique mode adequate to that level. On the level of physical macrosystems analysed by Simondon, its mode is potential energy and the margin of "play" it introduces into deterministic systems (epitomised by the "three body system" so dear to chaos theory). On the biological level, it is the margin of undecidability accompanying every perception, which is one with a perception's transmissibility from one sense to another. On the human level, it is that same undecidability fed forward into thought, as evidenced in the deconstructability of every structure of ideas (as expressed, for example in Gödel's incompleteness theorem and in Derrida's différance). Each individual and collective human level has its own peculiar "quantum" mode; various forms of undecidability in logical and signifying systems are joined by emotion on the psychological level, resistance on the political level, the spectre of crisis haunting capitalist economies. . . . The use of the concept of the quantum outside quantum mechanics, even as applied to human psychology, is not a metaphor.
Oh yes it is.
On a more mundane level, with so many undecidabilities, how do you tell the différance? Answers on descartes postales, s'il vous plaît.
The Orlando Hamas fundraiser featured as its keynote speakers former UK parliamentarian George Galloway and Mahdi Bray of the Muslim American Society-Freedom, and was intended to raise money for Galloway's Viva Palestina organization.
That Galloway and Viva Palestina have provided material support for Hamas through the funds they have raised across the U.S. and elsewhere is hardly a secret. In March 2009, Galloway was videotaped by Al-Jazeera giving a duffel bag full of cash to Hamas social minister Ahmad Kurd, who called Galloway "a hero." Kurd was designated a global terrorist by the U.S. government in August 2007.
In presenting Kurd with the cash, Galloway flaunted his violations of US and UK sanctions:
We are giving you now 100 vehicles and all of the contents, and we make no apology for what I am about to say: We are giving them to the elected government of Palestine. Just in case the British government or the European Union want to face me in any court, let me tell them live on television: I personally am about to break the sanctions on the elected government of Palestine... But I, now, here, on behalf of myself, my sister Yvonne Ridley, and the two Respect councilors - Muhammad Ishtiaq and Naim Khan - are giving three cars and 25,000 pounds in cash to Prime Minister Ismail Haniya. Here is the money. This is not charity. This is politics.
As a result of Galloway's open funding of the terrorist group, he was banned from entering Canada later that month. So Galloway turned to his Florida friend Muhammad Musri to help take up the fundraising slack.
As the video taken by ACT for America shows, Galloway and Bray raised $55,000 at Musri's fundraiser. During the event, Bray promised that the cash and materials collected from the Orlando event would be sent straight to Gaza:
Well we've got the equipment. We're going to send it Insha'Allah. We're going to go with your movement Viva Palestina... We'll ship it here from Florida to New York, and from New York to Egypt, and from Egypt we will put it into Gaza.
According to a July 26, 2009 article posted on the Muslim American Society website authored by Aishah Schwartz (now since scrubbed from their site), documents how Bray was true to his word, with the supplies shipped by container from Orlando.
In December 2007, federal prosecutors identified Bray's Muslim American Society as "the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America," and a 2004 Chicago Tribune exposé details the Society's founding by the Muslim Brotherhood, the oldest and largest Islamist group in the world that has given birth to Al-Qaeda, Hamas and virtually every other Islamic terrorist group in the world today.
With such a tight U.S. Senate race in Florida, it's doubtful that a Hamas fundraiser sponsored by Charlie Crist's good friend Muhammad Musri at Musri's own mosque, and the money and supplies raised in Orlando being given to designated terrorists on international TV, is going to help his election prospects. But Hamas fundraisers being conducted across the U.S. without any action by federal authorities should concern us all.
The investigative video produced by Jerry Gordon in conjuction with Tom Trento at the Florida Security Council, ACT! for America in Florida, and the superb videographer J. Mark Campbell is rapidly climbing the viral video chart. It came in at number 16 and has climbed to number 9 already this morning. The video will grace our front page later today, but if you haven't seen it, watch it now:
The Guardia Civil have arrested a man for his alleged relationship with groups associated with Islamic terrorism. The arrest took place at midday on Friday in Poble Nou de Benitachell (Alicante) as part of an operation run by Criminal Investigation Court Number 2 of the Spanish Central Criminal Court.
The individual arrested, Faical Errai, is a 26-year-old Moroccan citizen resident in Spain who is accused of using the Internet to undertake activities in support of Jihadist terrorism.
According to investigations carried out by the Guardia Civil [Spanish Civil Guard], Faical Errai is allegedly the person who registered and paid for the hosting of an Internet website with explicitly Jihadist content which, besides being set up as a platform for the spread of propaganda material, is aimed at attracting, indoctrinating and recruiting sympathisers in order to ultimately promote the most extreme and violent interpretation of the Jihad.
Furthermore, the man in question could have acted as the facilitator on transit routes for possible Jihadists to areas of conflict (Waziristan, Afghanistan, Chechnya, etc.), and as a coordinator for the dispatch of volunteers to those same areas. Similarly, Faical Errai would have performed a supporting role in the collection of funds to help both the volunteers travel and finance the propaganda activity itself, all in favour of the "Global Jihad Movement".
Following the arrest, the Guardia Civil carried out a search of two homes and one rural property, during which several computers and electromagnetic data storage devices were seized. The material seized is now being examined by the officers in charge of the investigation, so the possibility of further action has not been discarded.
WASHINGTON - Two men on a United Airlines flight from Chicago to Amsterdam were questioned by Dutch authorities after U.S. officials found a cell phone taped to a Pepto Bismol bottle and a knife and box cutter in checked luggage connected with the men, a law enforcement official said.
The official identified the men as Ahmed Mohamed Nasser al Soofi and Hezam al Murisi. Al Soofi had a Michigan address, the official said, but it was not immediately clear where the two men were from.
As of Monday night, FBI agents had visited the southwest Detroit neighborhood where several addresses were found for variations of al Soofi's name, according to neighbors who declined to give their names to The Associated Press.
ABC News, which first reported the incident Monday, said al Soofi was from Detroit and that both he and al Murisi were charged in the Netherlands with "preparation of a terrorist attack," but U.S. officials would not confirm that.
Another law enforcement official said, as of Monday night, the men had not been charged with anything in the U.S.
The law enforcement officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the ongoing investigation and sensitive security issues.
Al Soofi was questioned as he went through security in Birmingham, Ala., on his way to Chicago, according to one of the officials. He told the Transportation Security Administration authorities he was carrying a lot of cash. Screeners found $7,000 on him, but he was not breaking any law by carrying that much money. Officials also found multiple cell phones taped together and multiple watches taped together in his checked baggage.
Al Soofi was supposed to fly from Chicago to Washington Dulles International Airport in Virginia, and then on to Amsterdam, the official said. But when he got to Chicago, he changed his travel plans to take a direct flight from Chicago to Amsterdam. Al Murisi also changed his travel plans in Chicago to take a direct flight to Amsterdam, raising suspicion among U.S. officials. Federal Air marshals were on the flight from Chicago to Amsterdam, a law enforcement official said.
Homeland Security spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said once officials found suspicious items in luggage associated with two passengers on Sunday night's flight, they notified the Dutch authorities.
"The items were not deemed to be dangerous in and of themselves," Kudwa said. She would not identify the two passengers.
It is not illegal to carry knives or taped cell phones and watches in checked baggage.
No, it's not. It's also not illegal to stand up during a flight and start praying loudly in Arabic; to order seatbelt extenders when they are not needed; switch seats back and forth among a group travelling together; pack a brick of cheese with wires stuck in it into checked luggage; make frequent trips back and forth to the washroom; and take pictures of the flight crew with a cellphone after the crew has told passengers to turn off all electronic devices; all of which Muslims have done in the last few years.
It's also not illegal to start screaming in mock terror in the darkness of an overnight overseas flight; to shine a flashlight into the eyes of your sleeping neighbor on a flight; to urinate into a jar in the restroom and then pour it on the floor and seats of the plane; to scream at the top of your lungs that the elderly woman sitting next to you is a disgusting pig; play electric guitar at full volume; or any of a million other annoying and disturbing things one COULD do that are not technically illegal.
It's not illegal, but we shouldn't do them. We should act with respect towards our fellow passengers, and in cooperation with airline and security personnel who are tasked with ensuring the safety of all passengers. We should loudly and clearly criticize those who intentionally disrupt flights, and take actions to ensure that they cannot disrupt future flights.
You know and I know these are not just rowdy passengers. These are "dry runs", intended to test the boundaries of our security systems, to probe for weaknesses that can be exploited. These are intended to habitualize airline crews to their bizarre behavior, and to cow airline crews into submission with threats of discrimination lawsuits. They are meant to divert attention and resources to monitoring airline flights, while other methods and routes are being used to prepare for future jihad attacks.
Their behavior may not be illegal, but it is unacceptable, and it must stop.
A housing association with homes for the elderly in Copenhagen's Nørrebro district is in the process of constructing a barbed wire fence to protect its clients against young people from the adjacent Mjølnerparken housing estate, reports Berlingske Tidende newspaper.
The Mjølnerparken youths have for some time been unwelcome visitors to the garden area that belongs to the Lejerbo Association and is exclusively for the residents in the Hothers Plads senior housing complex. In addition, the buildings have been plagued by burglary, vandalism, theft and rock throwing from the nearby housing estate occupants.
Construction of the fence, which will be 2.5 metres high with barbed wire on top, has so far been sabotaged by the youths, and the workers have expressed fears for their safety.
Copenhagen's deputy mayor of social affairs, Mikkel Warming, is now calling on the city's street workers to deal with the unruly young people. The fence, along with a few security cameras that will also be set up, will reportedly cost the housing association and its clients around 1.5 million kroner.
Thats $255,000 or £165,000. A lot of money to deal with the children of this small estate. What the article doesn't say about the Mjølnerparken housing estate is that it is home to 2,500 people, 98% are immigrants (including second generation) of 38 different nationalities, mostly Arabs and Africans, the majority under 18 years old. The area is known for its high crime rate.
One of the comments suggests it would be preferable to put a lid on the estate to contain the hooligans.
Terrorist network al-Qaeda has released an official death list, naming nine people who have mocked the prophet Mohammed - three of whom are Danish. The list was published in Inspire, the organisation's first ever English language magazine.
It is now five years since Jyllands-Posten newspaper published their now notorious cartoons of the prophet, but it would seem the terrorist network has not forgotten the incident, as the three people on the list were all involved in the drawings.They are the newspaper's former editor-in-chief Carsten Juste, its culture editor Flemming Rose, and the cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, who drew the now infamous picture of the prophet Mohammed with a bomb in his turban.
Terrorist experts have confirmed that the magazine and the list has definitely been compiled by al-Qaeda and, according to Swedish terrorist expert Magnus Ranstorp, it should be taken seriously. He said that it is worrying that three Danes appear on the list and that it is somewhat surprising that Juste is named.
Freedom of Religion is NOT Absolutely Guaranteed by the Constitution
Obama and all the "expertise" of the Foggy Bottom State Department, scores of academics and ultra-liberal no nothings among inane/insane politicians such as Mayor Bloomberg and radio/television "journalists" do not, cannot acknowledge and prefer to remain willfully deaf, dumb and blind by regarding the current dispute over the proposed community center and mosque at Ground Zero as an issue that is a clear cut case of Freedom of Religion. In their view those who oppose it MUST be guilty of Islamophobia, and worse, bigotry of every sort that includes racism, homophobia, greed, and of course, INTOLERANCE and IGNORANCE.
The truth is that the shoe is on the other foot. Not one of these paragons of virtue who claim sophistication and Ivy league degrees can even explain that the American Constitution does NOT ABSOLUTELY guarantee Freedom of Religion and that both Federal and State Law have taken action against the practices (not the beliefs) and consequences of dangerous and immoral behavior. This was the issue that forced the confrontation of the government against Brigham Young and the elders of the Church of the Latter day Saints (Mormons) to alter their "religion" and accept that American law and citizenship were not congruent with plural marriage or the exploitation of young teenage girls. The Utah territory would not have entered the Union without this confrontation when state power forced a "religion" to change its practices.
The same has been true in many Appalachian states, especially Tennessee, Kentucky, Georgia, Arkansas, West Virginia and North Carolina where state authorities forbade the practice of the so called serpent churches among several Pentecostal denominations after the deaths of numerous individuals handing venomous snakes. The states forced churches and church members to accept that the state had a priority to protect individuals from reckless behavior and protect human life in spite of the claims of "religious freedom."
Had the government moved earlier, the absurd and grotesque suicidal deaths of more than 900 people, most of whom were American citizens, might have been prevented. These naïve followers of the Reverend James Jones ended their lives in the greatest act of mass suicide in American history. This occurred on Oct. 18, 1978 in Georgetown, capital of Guyana. His "Peoples Temple" was a Church - i.e. a Religion, whom these same Leftwing and Liberal advocates of tolerance for Islam believe is protected by the Constitution ABSOLUTELY without any qualifications. His "religion" led to the greatest SINGLE LOSS of AMERICAN CIVILIAN LIFE IN A NON-NATURAL DISASTER BEFORE 9/11. The fact that it happened in Guyana was due to the real fear of Jones that he would not be able to continue his church in the United States because he knew that his cult was not permitted ABSOLUTELY by the Constitution to practice acts that could endanger human life.
Yet, the self appointed Liberal, Tolerant Intellectuals who are shedding tears over the possible need to move the Islamic "Cultural Center/mosque" from Ground Zero have undoubtedly never read any part of the Koran or any part of the Sira and Sunnah or done any research on the use of Jihad to expand the Dar al-Islam, yet stridently label anyone as a bigot or intolerant who has, and is aware of the potential danger.
The existing partially-free press in Lebanon, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Morocco, Jordan, Tunisia, Pakistan and Egypt and the Arabic press in Great Britain admitted in numerous editorials that the conflict in Iraq following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein has not been a civil war but that jihadi terrorists convinced that theirs is the pure form of Islam have flocked there from as far away as Indonesia and Chechnia to sow death, destruction and mayhem to intimidate all those who oppose the extremist Islamist view of the world. The editorial in the April 15th, 2007 issue of the London based Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, the leading Arabic International Daily Newspaper, repeated essentially the same message and had this to say:
"To make the picture clearer... This religious war has nothing to do even with the major issues, slogans related towhich are raised in the terrorists' literature itself, like Palestine, Iraq, the U.S., etc. These are people who want martyrdom, that is, they want to fight war, anywhere in the world, and for any cause that has a religious angle.
They are not fighting for money, public reform, or for... the environment, and they are not nationalists, pan-Arabists, or communists... They are not jokers, hippies, or oppositionists. They are seekers of martyrdom, meaning that they are in a hurry to go to Paradise. They are not interested in the life of this world, and they want to take with them to the grave the greatest number of people possible.
I know that this is an issue that is difficult for the Westerner to understand. It is also difficult for many of the Muslims themselves to accept this, and they always try to justify it with issues that they consider legitimate and comprehensible. But the truth is that these terrorists want death for the sake of Allah... That is, even if the Americans left Iraq tonight, and the Jews fled Palestine, and extremist religious governments were established in Morocco, Algeria, and Egypt - this would not satisfy them... They want Paradise, and for this they will travel to the ends of the earth, to the North Pole and the South Pole, "to fight the infidels."
It is incumbent on all of us to make certain that no connection whatsoever exists between this view of Islam and any request to establish a mosque anywhere.
KHAN BANI SAAD, Iraq - A $40 million prison sits in the desert north of Baghdad, empty. A $165 million children's hospital goes unused in the south. A $100 million waste water treatment system in Fallujah has cost three times more than projected, yet sewage still runs through the streets.
As the U.S. draws down in Iraq, it is leaving behind hundreds of abandoned or incomplete projects. More than $5 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds has been wasted on these projects - more than 10 percent of the $53.7 billion the US has spent on reconstruction in Iraq, according to audits from a U.S. watchdog agency.
That amount is likely an underestimate, based on an analysis of more than 300 reports by auditors with the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction. And it does not take into account security costs, which have run almost 17 percent for some projects.
There are success stories. Hundreds of police stations, border forts and government buildings have been built, Iraqi security forces have improved after years of training, and a deepwater port at the southern oil hub of Umm Qasr has been restored.
Define "success". Is it truly a "success story" if the U.S. builds police stations, border forts, and government buildings in Iraq at U.S. expense, for the ungrateful Iraqi people? Is it a "success" to train and arm the Iraqi army and police who are currently in a state of near-war with each other, and who, as soon as we extract our troops, will begin terrorizing and torturing "The Iraqi People"? Or rather, Sunni police and soldiers will terrorize and torture Shi'a, and vice versa. And it will all be the fault of the Evil Empire, the U.S., for having trained and armed them.
But even completed projects for the most part fell far short of original goals, according to an Associated Press review of hundreds of audits and investigations and visits to several sites. And the verdict is still out on whether the program reached its goal of generating Iraqi good will toward the United States instead of the insurgents.
Actually, the jury came back years ago with their verdict, as is made clear later in this article, which we continue to steadfastly ignore.
Col. Jon Christensen, who took over as head of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in Iraq this summer, said it has completed more than 4,800 projects and is rushing to finish 233 more. Some 595 projects have been terminated, mostly for security reasons.
Christensen acknowledged that mistakes have been made. But he said steps have been taken to fix them, and the success of the program will depend ultimately on the Iraqis who have complained that they were not consulted on projects to start with.
When the "success" of our strategy depends on the Iraqi people, we are doomed to failure. We should have never gotten ourselves in this position, and we should do everything in our power to get out of this situation as soon as possible.
Another problem was coordination with the Iraqis, who have been left with health facilities that would cost at least as much as the Americans spent to complete. One clinic was handed over to local authorities without a staircase, said Shaymaa Mohammed Amin, the head of the Diyala provincial reconstruction and development committee.
"We were almost forced to take them," she said during an interview at the heavily fortified local government building in the provincial capital of Baqouba. "Generally speaking, they were below our expectations. Huge funds were wasted and they would not have been wasted if plans had been clear from the beginning."
As an example, she cited a date honey factory that was started despite a more pressing need for schools and vital infrastructure. She said some schools were left without paint or chalkboards, and needed renovations.
"We ended up paying twice," she said.
No, the Iraqis ended up paying nothing. It was U.S. taxpayers' money that was wasted twice. First, by sending it to a people who hate us and who hate each other, to try to improve the horrific lives they have built for themselves, and secondly, by giving that money to Iraqi contractors who built hospitals without staircases, and generally did substandard work while siphoning off funds for their personal use via corruption, mismanagement, and outright theft.
The Americans committed to rebuilding the former Sunni insurgent stronghold of Fallujah after it was destroyed in major offensives in 2004. The U.S. awarded an initial contract for a new waste water treatment system to FluorAMEC of Greenville, S.C. - just three months after four American private security contractors were savagely attacked. The charred and mutilated remains of two of them were strung from a bridge in the city.
An audit concluded that it was unrealistic for the U.S. "to believe FluorAMEC could even begin construction, let alone complete the project, while fierce fighting occurred daily."
That sounds like a good summary of the entire Iraqi intervention.
In an acknowledgment that they weren't getting exactly what they hoped for, Iraqi officials insisted the label "state of the art" be removed from a memorandum of understanding giving them the facility. It was described as a "modern pediatric hospital."
The hospital's director, Kadhim Fahad, said construction has been completed and the electricity issue resolved. "The opening will take place soon, God [Allah] willing," he said.
Allah didn't provide their new "modern pediatric hospital", it was the United States of Naïve, Misguided Benevolence.
Residents are pleased with the outcome. One, Ghassan Kadhim, said: "It is the duty of the Americans to do such projects because they were the ones who inflicted harm on people."
We got rid of Saddam Hussein and the Baathists, stopped the Shi'ite militias such as Muqtada al Sadr's Mahdi Army from killing Sunnis, stopped the Sunni militias such as Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia from killing Shi'a, and gave the Iraqi people the opportunity to create a democratic government of their own choosing. For that, we owe them.
There is a Chinese proverb, "He who saves a man's life is forever responsible for it." The moral being, I suppose, to be careful who you help; it may be better for a bystander to simply walk away and let the person in trouble perish. That is not a Judaeo-Christian principle, it is not a Western principle. All belief systems are not equivalent, and this is not a proverb that we live by.
Whatever the wisdom of it, we helped the Iraqis. Our obligation to them ended at that point. We didn't "break it," and we don't need to "fix it". The Iraqis are responsible for their own decisions and for the society that they have built for themselves.
This entire article is listing a few individual projects that wasted a few paltry tens or hundreds of million dollars here and there, without questioning the entire TRILLION dollars we have spent during our occupation of Iraq. These few billion "wasted" dollars are insignificant compared to the waste of the entire Iraqi project. Eight years on, we are still not ready to question the reason we are there (to protect the Saudi, Kuwaiti, and Emirati royal families from Saddam's forces), and do the requisite cost-benefit analysis from our point of view. We're just nibbling around the edges, fretting over some empty prison or hospital, when the entire project was a fool's errand from the start.
Over 15,000 domestic workers leave their families to come to Britain every year. Charities claim that many are not only badly treated but that they are living as slaves.
This report investigates the plight of overseas domestic workers brought to the UK, and enslaved behind closed doors by rich and powerful employers in the upper levels of British society.
Dispatches goes undercover as some of the employers accused of modern-day slavery are confronted on camera about how they have treated their workers.
Many workers make the sacrifice to leave their country for the UK in order to better provide for their families back home. But lobby groups and charities communicate that a worrying proportion of domestic workers have their passports taken away from them, are kept locked up and subjected to sexual, physical and psychological abuse.
Many are paid less than £50 a week for 20 hour days and some wages are withheld completely.
This is followed, also on Channel 4, by a drama, I Am Slave, inspired by the true story of a woman called Mende Nazer, who was taken from her home in the Nuba mountains of Sudan to be a slave, first in Khartoum, then London, before managing to escape.
If neither the documentary, nor the drama, mention Islam, it will be a deliberate distortion of the truth. In London it is mainly rich Arabs who have slaves, just as they do in Saudi Arabia, and with full Islamic sanction. In particular, Arabs have enslaved Christians and black Muslims in Sudan.
While I have yet to embrace the Kindle, mainly because I like the smell of paper, I believe it makes perfect sense for reference books to be online, or on CD-Rom. I am not too worried about the Oxford English Dictionary being online only, nor by the greater capacity for more ephemeral words that this, according to Times columnist Ross Clarke, will bring in its wake:
The 80 or so lexicographers who have spent the past 20 years beavering away on the third edition of the Oxford English Dictionary won't be short of words to describe their disappointment at learning that their life's work will never appear in printed form, only in online format. I know how I would feel: peeved, piqued, embittered, spleenful, miffed.
It was probably inevitable that the paper edition of the OED was eventually going to be discontinued. Few learned sorts nowadays have pockets deep enough or a study cavernous enough for the entire 20 volume, £750 dictionary. But we are going to lose something with the paper edition of the OED. The trouble with the online edition is that it is too tempting for the editors to update it constantly, inserting frivolous and ephemeral words.
Words used to have to be well established before achieving the honour of entering the OED. My dog-eared Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, revised in 1990, does not even find room for the word "hoover" in the main body of the text: it appears only in the addenda, with a note saying that it first appeared in 1927. Of fashionable words from the 1980s there is no mention at all: no mullet hairdo, no sloanes, no yuppies. Since the online edition of the OED was introduced, however, there has been a steady acceleration in its acceptance of new words. The verb "google" was included in 2006. "Hoodie" and "dogging" both entered in 2007.
One hates to sound like a fogey but the problem with accepting new words too quickly is that the OED then becomes hostage to marketing operations. Words such as twitter and tweet have already made the Oxford Dictionary of English, an offshoot of the full OED, which tracks current usage. It may not sound so very different from the entry of hoover, but there is a fundamental difference: the latter was accepted only after it became clear that it was being used by people as a generic term, regardless of their brand of vacuum cleaner. You can't twitter without using a product devised by one company.
What about google? I think people google even if they don't use Google, although most people google with Google. In due course they'll find something else to twitter with.
It isn't just the OED that risks losing authority from going wholly online. Purely electronic archives are too easy to "correct", "update" and generally fiddle with. I don't know who has access, for example, to recent Cabinet papers awaiting release under the 30 year rule. But I know that, as long as they are kept in paper form, no one can easily change them without making it obvious.
I'll never forget the GP who was an early advocate, in the 1980s, of computerising his patients' medical records, something that seemed frightfully modern and progressive then. His name? Harold Shipman.
Unlike Ross Clarke, I love to sound like an old fogey. Nevertheless, there are one or two recent additions to the English lexicon which I would like to see in the OED: dhimmi, jihad, jizya, hudud and taqiyya. And if we have to google and twitter them, so be it.
Moazzam Begg is the British jihadist and traitor who was, rightly, held as an enemy combatant in the much maligned but relatively comfortable Guantanamo Bay. He has since milked his "suffering" for fame and fortune, aided by the useful idiot lawyer Gareth Pierce (a woman). This week Begg and his doting father ("He was such a nice boy, just wanting to do the right thing") were interviewed by the BBC. The interview itself was reasonably challenging, but Kate Chisholm's review of it, in The Spectator, betrays an ignorance and gullibility that, while disappointing, should no longer surprise:
British Muslims, Father and Son (Radio 4, Monday) gave us a refreshingly frank account of Begg's life before and after his 'extrajudicial' imprisonment. He was seized one night in Islamabad, where he was living with his young family, after he answered the door to a group of men who pushed a gun to his head, forced him to his knees, shackled his hands and legs, 'hooded his head' and carried him off to three years of incarceration in a converted sea container. He was under suspicion as a British Muslim whose passport revealed he had visited all the major war zones in which the Muslim world had been under attack - Bosnia, Afghanistan, Chechnya - and on several occasions. Yet if MI5 had looked further back in his family records, they would have discovered that generations of Beggs had fought in the British army as Indian Muslims and that he had considered joining up himself before the first invasion of Iraq in 1991 made him realise that as a British soldier he would be involved in fighting against other Muslims.
What a fatuous observation. Chisholm writes of Begg's decision not to join the British army and "fight against other Muslims" as some kind of mitigating circumstance. On the contrary, his overarching, treasonous loyalty to fellow Muslims is all of a piece with his predilection for war zones in which Muslims are waging jihad, or "under attack" as Chisholm dutifully puts it. As for the "generations of Beggs" who "fought in the British army as Indian Muslims", so what? It is Moazzam's generation of Beggs - and Ahmeds, and Khans - that matter, and this generation, discovering Islam without the dilution of Indian culture, is as belligerent as Mohammed and his henchmen intended. Indeed this Begg, for whom family loyalty is as nothing compared with Islam, dismisses his ancestors as agents of "a colonial power".
Chisholm continues in the same uncritical, ignorant vein:
Nothing is straightforward in Begg's life. As a young boy his parents (who emigrated from the subcontinent to Britain in 1966, having as children been forced to flee to Pakistan from the anti-Muslim riots which followed Partition) sent him to a Jewish school because they thought he would get the best education there. As a father himself, he moved his family to Afghanistan and settled in Kabul because he wanted his children to grow up in a broader cultural context than was possible in 'arrogant Britain'. He felt they should be brought up in a Muslim society, where they could be protected from the kind of Paki-bashing he had suffered as a teenager in the Midlands.
Weep for him. A victim of "Paki-bashing" in "arrogant Britain". How could he not wish for the diversity and "broad cultural context" of Kabul? After all, we arrogant, narrow-contexted Britons only use our football stadiums for football. And how could he not be "radicalised", what with all that racism? Hindus and Sikhs, who, in the UK, are the same race, were never "radicalised", but let's not talk about that.
Today is Bank Holiday Monday. I hope no Great People are working. William Waldegrave argues that Great People must take proper holidays. From The Times:
At Dorney Wood, the official house now occupied by George Osborne, there is a bagatelle board. When I was 17 and Alec Douglas-Home lived there as Foreign Secretary, I spent hours and hours trying to achieve a score high enough to allow me to write my name in the ancient book of record that went with the board. When I had finally wasted enough time and won a score high enough to allow me my page, I found that a titanic name from the past had gone before me. Winston Churchill had done the same thing, presumably spending similar hours winning the same right to be recorded in the bagatelle book of fame. When had he found the leisure to do this? June 1940.
Alongside all his other genius, Churchill had the genius for switching off. Painting, wall building, bagatelle. That is the sort of man you want to be led by. Harold Macmillan was famously found with his feet up reading Trollope during some crisis. Drake finished his game of bowls. Alexander the Great took Aristotle with him for light entertainment when he set off to conquer the world, and took time on the way to solve the Gordian knot and visit Diogenes in his barrel.
Imagine the frustration of the Macedonian staff: "The bloody man is arguing about the nature of happiness with that damned philosopher again . . ." All the evidence is that the very great have curiosity, other interests, hinterland, culture - call it what you will - and though they may single-handedly rally the free world against Nazism or lead an army on foot from Greece to Afghanistan and back to Babylon, their minds have more than one track.
That means that they know how to take real holidays. Busybodies who regard holidays as a matter of merely working somewhere else are not the people you want in charge: Sidney and Beatrice Webb chose to waste not a minute on their honeymoon and so were accompanied by suitcases full of Blue Books on social policy. It is no surprise that no aspect of our lives would have been left unregulated in the world they wanted to create.
I'm all for leaders backing off and butting out - it's generally the best thing Government can do. And certainly, politicians should take a break from politics. What do they know of politics, who only politics know? But such a break should not be purely recreational. One leader in particular, if David Cameron can be called a leader, should take time off from his PR trips to Turkey and India to study Islam. Churchill studied Islam and understood it. Cameron could never be a Churchill, but he could at least try to learn from him. He could learn from this site, as could Tony Blair, whose donation would be felt in our coffers more than missed in his.