Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky





















Thursday, 24 July 2014
After Cruz Warning to White House, FAA Lifts Israel Travel Ban
clear

Daniel Greenfield writes in Frontpage:

After Senator Ted Cruz’s warning that he would hold all State Department nominees until questions were answered about the political motive behind the FAA’s travel ban on Israel… the FAA suddenly reversed itself.

On the same day that the FAA had announced a 24 hour extension of the ban, the FAA turned around and reversed itself.

These were the 5 questions that Senator Cruz wanted answered.

Was this decision a political decision driven by the White House? For instance, who was this decision made by – a career official, a political appointee, or someone else (at the FAA, State Department or White House?)

If the FAA’s decision was based on airline safety, why was Israel singled out, when flights would be permitted into Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen?

What was the FAA’s ‘safety’ analysis that led to prohibiting flights to Israel, while still permitting flights to Ukraine—where a commercial airline flight was just shot down with a BUK missile?

What specific communications occurred between the FAA and the White House?  And the State Department?  Why were any such communications necessary, if this was purely about airline safety?

Was this a safety issue, or was it using a federal regulatory agency to punish Israel to try to force them to comply with Secretary Kerry’s demand that Israel stop their military effort to take out Hamas’s rocket capacity?

Instead of providing answers, the FAA lifted the ban.

clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 7:48 AM by Geoffrey Clarfield
clear
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Death knell for J Street
clear

Alan Dershowitz writes in the Jerusalem Post:

J Street has whined about being excluded from the mainstream Jewish community, but it is J Street that has excluded itself from joining in community activities such as a solidarity rally for Israel.

AIPAC and J Street

AIPAC and J Street Photo: Courtesy
Any pretense that J Street is a pro-Israel organization has been destroyed by that organization’s refusal to participate in a solidarity rally for Israel during the recent crisis in Gaza. 

The Boston Jewish Federation worked hard to create a rally that included all elements of its diverse community. Its goal was to send a single and simple message: at a time when so many in the world are united against Israel’s efforts at defending itself from Hamas rockets and terrorist tunnels, the Boston Jewish community stands in solidarity with the nation state of the Jewish people. In order to assure that this message of unity was sent, no signs were permitted except for the unity message that was intended to be sent. That message was: Stand With Israel. Simple and straight forward.

Speakers were limited to those who were part of the broad Jewish consensus including Rabbis, political and business leaders and the highly regarded head of the Federation, Barry Shrage, whose commitment to peace and the two state solution is well known.

Initially J Street agreed to be a co-sponsor of this unity event, but then—presumably after receiving pressure from its hard left constituency, which is always looking to bash Israel and never to support it—J Street was forced to withdraw its sponsorship. The phony excuse it offered was that the rally offered “no voice for [J Street] concerns about the loss of human life on both sides” and no recognition of the “complexity” of the issues or the need for a “political solution.”

This is total nonsense and an insult to those who spoke at the rally. The executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council spoke of the “suffering” of the people of Gaza and how “painful” it is “to see innocent people dying, including children.” 

Barry Shrage spoke of the “tragedy” of innocent Palestinians being killed. All the speakers acknowledged the “complexity” of the issues and want to see a political solution to the conflict. Yet J Street refused to be part of this unified show of support for Israel.

J Street has whined about being excluded from the mainstream Jewish community, but it is J Street that has excluded itself from joining in community activities such as this rally. It was J Street that decided not to participate in a unity event that was jointly sponsored by the Jewish Federation and the Jewish Community Relations Council. 

J Street has sought and received membership in these sponsoring organizations but then made a decision to withdraw its own sponsorship from this community-wide event, precisely at a time when unity was most needed. J Street has always insisted on a double standard. On the one hand, it wants to be part of the Jewish community’s Big Tent, but on the other hand, it refuses to allow dissenters into its own narrow, ideological tent. I know, because I have personally asked to speak to its members at its convention. 

J Street has adamantly refused to allow its members to hear my centrist point of view—I support the two state solution and oppose Israel’s settlement policies—while welcoming extremists speakers who support boycotts of Israel and who refuse to recognize Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people. 

Its own tent flap is open only on the left side, not in the center. J Street’s decision to refuse to sponsor this community-wide Stand With Israel rally during so critical a time has drawn a line in the sand. If you can’t support Israel now, how can you call yourself a pro-Israel organization? How can any member of J Street now look at themselves in the mirror and say, “I belong to a pro-Israel organization.”

I call on members of J Street who are truly pro-Israel to leave that divisive organization and to join with us who truly support Israel during times of crisis, while remaining critical of some of its policies. If you are pro-Israel, you do not belong in J Street, because J Street can no long credibly claim to be pro-Israel.

If there was ever any doubt about that, J Street’s actions in refusing to join the Stand With Israel Rally should resolve them. So if you want to stand with Israel, stand up against J Street and stand with organizations that support Israel during times of crisis. 
clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 7:34 AM by Geoffrey Clarfield
clear
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Gaza-Israel Dateline Paris: Dispatch No.3 by Nidra Poller
clear

The Christians of Mosul had 24 hours, the infidels of the West have a bit more time.

The just and merciful caliph gave the Christians of Mosul 24 hours to convert, leave, or die. The payment of the jizya (= dhimmitude) option, initially included in the multiple choice injunction, was withdrawn. A church dating back 1800 years, before the advent of Islam, was burned to the ground before the Christians left. The infidels of the West were too busy decrying the “massacre” in Gaza to ask for whom the bell tolls.

Ali Khamenei proposes the elimination of Israel by referendum. Former French MFA Dominique de Villepin thinks an imposed peace plan enforced by UN peacekeepers would do the trick. Hamas leaders, safely hunkered down in tunnels or abroad, exult in victory. Western media launch lethal narratives from morning to night and Jews look for the nearest shelter. Israel’s bosom buddy, the United States of America, wants an imposed ceasefire, presumably before joining in on an imposed peace plan, while slapping a brief but telling blockade on air travel to and from Israel. Did you get the message, haverim? Do unto the blockaders as they do unto Gaza.

In the aftermath of the shocking violence unleashed last weekend in Barbès and Sarcelles, benevolent French judges smiled upon the meager handful of culprits who were arrested after the Barbès operation. Suspended sentences of 4, 6, or 10 months were handed down like feeding candy to the wolves. The justice ministry has exercised its right to appeal these lenient sentences. Those arrested for mayhem in Sarcelles will theoretically go to jail, but perhaps not. Short sentences rarely lead to actual imprisonment here. It’s hard to prove that a given actor in an enraged mob actually committed this or that infraction. And it’s hard to have confidence in the government when thousands of punk jihadis show up for a banned demonstration and are not immediately dispersed. All the more so when a political party, the anti-capitalist NPA formerly led by the phony mailman Besancenot, brazenly maintains its call to demonstrate.

62% of French people polled said the pro-Palestinian demonstrations should be banned. But who’s listening?

Under pressure from interested parties, the Hollande government decided to authorize demonstrations on the 23rd and 26th of July… because every possible guarantee had been given by the organizers that there would be no débordements [literally, “overflow”]. The Communists had by then joined the NPA in fronting for the Brotherhood. Jean-Luc Mélenchon was there under the banner of the Front de Gauche that is part of the governing coalition, along with a handful of Socialist deputies. PM Manuel Valls had tried to stick to his guns. All last week he defended the ban, refuting claims that the ban was the cause of the violence. Note the lethal narrative: An authorized demonstration on July 13th replete with Death to the Jews culminates in attacks on synagogues. Therefore, demonstrations banned the following weekend yield 50 times more incitement and violence. Logical, n’est-ce pas? If I park in a no-parking zone and you tow my car away, it’s only to be expected that I will burn down the city hall and invite the assassination of the mayor.

Lethal narrative, cont’d. The authorized pro-Palestinian demonstration, majestically escorted by riot police, marched from Place Denfert-Rochereau to les Invalides—in the shadow of Napoleon’s tomb-- via Montparnasse  where artists and intellectuals, refugees from tyrannical regimes, used to gather and enrich Parisian life.

Lo and behold, it worked. All, these 14,000 blessed souls needed was the freedom to wrap themselves in Hamas keffiehs, brandish Israel-assassin posters, and confide to complaisant microphones their heartfelt concern for Palestinian victims of a massacre. “They’re killing Palestinians for no reason, for the fun of it.” “We see the images every day, it’s unbearable, we had to do something.”

Print and audiovisual media fell over themselves oohing and ahing over the concerned darlings. No anti-Semitic slogans, no threats, no destruction. When a few punks moved in on a France 2 correspondent doing his stand-up routine in the field, and covered his face with a big Palestinian flag, the incident was packaged as “demonstrators (nicely) interrupt a France 2 newscast.” A few years ago, near Cairo’s revolutionary Tahrir Square, a similar maneuver ended with a sexual assault on the French journalist that had been (nicely) interrupted during her newscast.

Nothing objectionable in this bon enfant  demonstration where the good-natured, friendly citizens of France expressed (nicely) their grievances against “Israel Assassin, Hollande complice,” some dressed in soft green BDS t-shirts, others holding up horrible photos of massacred children and shouting in unison “Palestine vaincra [will triumph].

Last night, Le Monde Juif Info filled in some of the missing details. Fine-tuned ears picked up Death to the Jews that had escaped the attention of mainstream media. A camera filmed the burning of an Israeli flag. A BFM TV correspondent had proudly claimed that a woman immediately went over and stopped the unruly gesture. Monde Juif Info says she told them not to do it because it would be all over the evening news. In fact, it wasn’t. And the cameraman noticed a group of men clearly saying “Let’s go to the Marias Jewish Quarter and fight the Jewish defense League.” For these experienced stone-throwers, the Marais is NOT a stone’s throw from les Invalides You have to really be motivated to make the detour!

This morning a Jewish radio station reported that some 40 individuals had tried to attack a restaurant in the Marais.

Riposte Laïque has an eloquent photo gallery of posters the mass media didn’t see. The restaurant that was attacked, the Pitzman, is on rue Pavée next door to the synagogue and across the street from the yeshiva. Just a half block away from a main thoroughfare, rue de Rivoli, it was probably easier to hit than the shops and restaurants on rue des Rosiers.

Breaking news: a plane flying from Ouagadougou to Algiers disappeared from radar screens somewhere near northern Mali. Many, perhaps the majority of the passengers were French.

Flashback: the day the French troops landed in Bangui, the capital of the Central African Republic, 1,000 people were killed in what is described as “ethnic conflict” between Muslims and Christians. French forces gradually imposed relative calm. Remember Sabra and Chatilla?

clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 7:17 AM by Nidra Poller
clear
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Christian Meriam Ibrahim Arrives in Italy After Escaping Sudan
clear

ROME - A mother put on death row for refusing to reject Christianity fled Sudan on Thursday, ending an almost year-long ordeal that triggered outrage around the world.

Meriam Ibrahim, her American husband and two young children, arrived at Rome's Ciampino airport accompanied by Italy’s vice minister of foreign affairs, officials told NBC News. 

The State Department has been negotiating with Sudanese officials to secure the family’s safe passage out of the country. It was not immediately clear how or why her flight to Italy was secured. 

Wani was born in what is now South Sudan -- but later moved to the U.S. He and Ibrahim met after he traveled to Khartoum in 2011. After her release, Wani said he wanted to build a new life for his family in America. 

clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 6:01 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Ivan Rioufol, With The Latest Comments
clear

I posted this article by Rioufol a few days ago but am re-posting it so that the latest comments -- several hundred of them -- can be read, by those interested. 

Here.

clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 5:56 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Muslim youths vandalise east London studio because 'street art on its shutters depicts the devil'
clear

From the London Evening Standard

A leading human rights film-maker today vowed to stand up to Muslim youths who vandalised his east London studio because they claim street art on its shutters depicts “the devil”. Shafiur Rahman said the gang had threatened further attacks on the office, off Brick Lane, unless the mural of two eyes, a nose and a mouth is removed.The mural was commissioned to celebrate the area’s diversity.

But a group of young Bengalis living on the nearby Chicksand estate claim  the face represents dajjal, a one-eyed Islamic devil. (Yes, I can't work out how a mural with two eyes shows a one-eyed devil either - but I'm not a Muslim youth)

The studio has been attacked repeatedly over the past month, with the group throwing eggs into the office on one occasion and causing £500 worth of damage to equipment. Staff say they have been intimidated when leaving work, approached by the group and told to “throw away the key and not to come back”.

Mr Rahman spoke to leaders at the Brick Lane Mosque to ask them to step in. But he claims an imam said while the mosque did not condone violence, the painting would not be accepted in Islam because it depicted a face. Mr Rahman said: “Mosques should be careful what they teach kids … We need to stand up to this kind of thing.”

The police are now involved and the case has also been referred to Tower Hamlet’s anti-social behaviour unit.

Watch the video - the proprietor and the reporter are pelted with eggs while they talk. 

clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 5:35 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Watch Paul Adams Try To Blame Israel For Gazan Arabs Attacking A Red Cross Ambulance
clear

The story itself is the predictable "deploring" by this or that  U.N. official of Israel continuing to protect itself-- as rockets still rain done as far as Tel Aviv -- by finding and destroying as many tunnels as it can. What is of note is the  bit of video, where Gazan Arabs bang on a Red Cross ambulance, and express their dreamy belief -- which decades of coddling by Arab-run UNRHWA, and indeed by every conceivable international organization -- that the Red Cross must surely do their bidding. They deem the Red Cross insufficiently attentive in this case -- they think it, the Red Cross (or is it here the Red Crescent?) -- has a duty to take their side, to protect them. After all, haven't Gazan Arabs, just like the PLO and Hezbollah, freely used ambulances to shuttle its fighters around? 

Look at Paul Adams, and how he interprets, for the BBC, the Gazan Arab behavior.

And look beyond Paul Adams, too, at how unscathed appear to be those streets, in the very part of Gaza City that were supposedly subject to devastation by the diabolical Israelis. Does the city look like Homs or Aleppo or neighborhoods of Damasdcus,  or a thousand other places in Syria? Does it look like Tikrit? Parts of Baghdad?

 

 

clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 5:37 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 24 July 2014
The Sermon At Friday Prayers In Kuwait
clear

A little  taste of Islam, just for you.

Here.
 

clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 5:24 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Interfaith Healing Sponsored By The Anti-Defamation League
clear

The latest travesty, the result of the kind of personnel places like the ADL now  hire and promote -- those who remain unwary, unimaginative, and ignorant of Islam. .

Here.

clear
Posted on 07/24/2014 7:14 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
A Turkish Cafe In Belgium: "Dogs Allowed, Jews Forbidden"
clear
clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 10:35 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
A Musical Interlude: You've Got Me Crying Again (Ambrose Orch., voc. Elsie Carlisle)
clear

Listen here.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 10:18 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Matt Gurney: Hamas, Ben Gurion Airport, And Israeli Resolve
clear
clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 10:11 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Lacrimae Rerum
clear

That means: "The Internet Of Things."

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 10:05 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
It's Not Just That He Plagiarized, It's That What He Lifted Was So Stupid
clear

The usual babbitt-banalities about democracy, reaching out to a wider group of locals, and so on, and not a word about Islam. A dope lifting from dopes.

Here.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 9:04 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Emirate, Caliphate -- I Say It's Spinach And I Say The Hell With It
clear

Jabhat Al-Nusra has just now declared its emirate; Al-Baghdadi of ISIS has already declared his caliphate. And when the hurlyburly's done, when the battle's lost and one, go and and identify, if you care to, the remains of those on both, essentially identical, sides.

Here.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 8:57 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Hezbollah Otherwise Preoccupied, And For A Long Time To Come
clear

Hezbollah is a terrorist organization, but  less dangerous than ISIS, a kind of collective Mussolini to ISIS"s Hitler.  So its help to Assad, and its losses in helping him against Uber-Suinnis, in Syria, are both welcome. Eventually Hezbollah may find itself fighting for its life, as Sunnisfrom Syria and not only from Syria, decide to get their revenge inside Lebanon. And it may be that Israel, already the guarantor of King Abdullah's reign in Jordan, will have to worry about an ISIS advance in Lebanon and root, privately, for Hezbollah,though at the same time hoping to take away, somehow, Hezbollah's 100,000 rockets unless they can be turned away from Israel and aimed at ISIS. Oh. It's not just politics that makes strange bedfellows. It's also wars, and the hospital corners that sometimes have to be cut.

Here.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 5:14 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
A Musical Interlude: Ma Le Gambe (Enzo Aita, Trio Lescano)
clear

Listen here.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 4:13 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Missing The Point
clear
clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 4:04 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Bomb attacks leave scores dead in north Nigeria
clear

From France 24 and AP via Yahoo News

At least 82 people were killed on Wednesday in two bombings in the northern Nigerian city of Kaduna targeting an opposition leader and a moderate Muslim cleric.

The first blast, which killed at least 32 people, occurred after a bomb was tossed off of the back of a motorcycle at Sheikh Dahiru Bauchi, a prominent Muslim cleric in Nigeria. The explosion scattered debris and dead bodies along the Alkali Road in central Kaduna, but missed Bauchi. Police Commissioner Umar Usman Shehu said the first blast came after Sheik Dahiru Bauchi gave an annual Ramadan speech for thousands of faithful in an outdoor service. Sheik Bauchi is known for preaching against the violent extremism of Nigeria's Islamic militants, Boko Haram.

Shortly afterwards, a second, deadlier blast went off in the city’s bustling Kawo market. Nigerian officials said the target was Muhammadu Bahari, a prominent opposition leader and former president.

A Red Cross official said at least 50 people were killed in the second blast. Buhari, who challenged President Goodluck Jonathan in the 2011 election, was riding in an armour-plated sports utility vehicle and was not wounded.

There were no immediate claims of responsibility, but Islamist militant group Boko Haram has been staging attacks, especially with explosives, outside its northeastern heartlands over the past three months.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 12:57 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Wallace Shawn, A Political Naif As Self-Satisfied As Podsnap
clear

I heard Wallace Shawn on NPR, a program in which he expressed his utter disgust with the United States and "the rich" (all of them, apparently, and I hope he included Hillary Clinton, and Glenn Greenwald -- who just sold to Sony his story of being the conduit for Edward Snowden's leaks, so it can be made into a movie, and, for that matter, all of the Hollyood moguls who've employed him) and then, just before the end of the hour, denouncing the American government yet again and, first among its co-evils, the country of Israel for "what it is doing to the 'Palestinians."

Shawn has a line in moral superiority, and his cultural criticism is at the level of such obviousness as "once upon a time everyone could listen to Bach unselfconsciously" but now we've all got to show we know about and admire "popular culture" -- the "popular culture" of the very movies, and some television, that has made Wallace Shawn rich and, despite his claims of being different from "the rich," as self-satisfied as any deep-pocketed Podsnap.

I was not surprised when I discovered he's a deep admirer of Glenn Greenwald (who, in turn, is deeply admired by Omid Somebody or other, the billionaire founder of eBay who has shown his gratitude to America, for rescuing him from the Islamic Republic of Iran,by backing Greenwald and his ilk in a new media venture.

Here's a  bit from the pink-cheeked complacencies of the  Financial Times:

Lunch with the FT: Glenn Greenwald

The journalist who collaborated with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden talks about his abrasive approach and his new online venture
 

It is after 3pm on a Friday when I walk into Bar do Beto, an old-fashioned Ipanema restaurant, but the place is full of diners enjoying a long, languid lunch. Glenn Greenwald is sitting in the corner, squinting crossly at his laptop. He is dressed in a T-shirt, long striped swimming shorts and flip-flops, which is something of a relief because, in the hottest Rio de Janeiro summer in decades, I am also wearing shorts.

Since the day last June when he first met Edward Snowden, a National Security Agency (NSA) analyst-turned-whistleblower Greenwald has kept up a regime of 16-hour workdays, combing through thousands of documents passed on by Snowden, writing dozens of stories for the Guardian and other papers, sniping at his critics on Twitter, and setting up a media venture with a billionaire backer. In the process, Greenwald has become, perhaps, the most famous journalist of his generation. His reputation in the US is somewhat mixed, in part as a result of his abrasive approach to political debate, but in parts of Europe and Latin America he is considered the new incarnation of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.

 

Greenwald, 46, has lived in Rio for almost a decade, since he met his soon-to-be husband David Miranda on a holiday to the Brazilian city. “This was our place when we first met eight or nine years ago,” Greenwald says of the restaurant. “We lived a couple of blocks away and we always came here. Then they did this massive renovation and we kind of gave up on it for a few years. But we came back and the food was fantastic.”

Greenwald tells me he was in here a few nights earlier. In an event that underlines his new status as an international leftwing celebrity, the actor and playwright Wallace Shawn had invited Greenwald to see The Designated Mourner, his play about shrinking political space in a once-liberal land, when it was showing in New York last year. As Greenwald has not travelled to the US since the Snowden story broke, Shawn came to Rio to put on a performance for him. “Incredibly riveting and thought-provoking,” Greenwald says of the play, which was performed in a theatre rented for the occasion. Afterwards, Greenwald brought cast and crew to Bar do Beto to thank them.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 11:06 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Islamic State tells Mosul shopkeepers to cover up naked mannequins
clear

From the Telegraph

Islamic extremists have sought to entrench their strict religious regime in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul by banning naked mannequins, just days after imposing orders to convert, pay taxes or die rules on the city's Christians.

Islamic State instructions said clothing outlets must cover the faces of mannequins in line with Muslim tenets of covering up the human former.

The orders which apply to both male and female mannequins are in line with strict interpretations of sharia law that forbid statues or artwork depicting the human form are part of a growing web of rules and commercial regulations emanating from the Islamic militant group.

Its schedule of Jizyah or taxes on Christians and other non-Muslims, breaks down into $715 a year for the rich, $375 a year for the middle class and $178 for the poorest.

Ahmed Younis, a Baghdad expert on armed groups, said the Islamists were in effect establishing an economic state based on the increasing resources and infrastructure under their command.

Considering its spread across the Syria-Iraq border, its grip over oilfields there and its growing economic activity, Islamic State will "transform into an economic giant with assets of billions of dollars," he said. 

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 9:36 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Gaza conflict: France jails pro-Palestinian rioters
clear

From the BBC

A French court has jailed three men for rioting after a pro-Palestinian rally in a mixed suburb of Paris degenerated into anti-Semitic violence. The three men, aged 21 and 28, were given sentences of between six and 10 months for their part in the rioting in Sarcelles on Sunday.

A fourth man was given a suspended sentence while a minor received a fine. Three men convicted of rioting on the same day in the Parisian district of Barbes were given suspended sentences on Tuesday.

Prime Minister Manuel Valls condemned the violence, which erupted at a protest over Israel's actions in Gaza. 

A new, legal pro-Palestinian rally is due to be held in the French capital on Wednesday evening, organised by leftist groups. About 30 MPs from the ruling Socialist Party are due to attend, according to Le Parisien daily.

Mr Valls said he had been given security guarantees by the organisers.

Interestingly the politically correct, left leaning BBC calls the defendants 'pro-Palestinian' while the Kuwait News agency calls them 'anti-Israeli'. 

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 9:16 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Kamal Al-Khatib Screams His Head Off
clear

Gaza, he says, is where the Mongols and the Tartars were defeated by true-blue Muslims, And Gaza will be the burying ground of the Jews who, just like those Mongols and those Tartars, have no connection to or claim on  any land; the world belongs, always and everyhere, but especially in the Middle East, to Allah and to Muslims.

Here, a bit worse or rather hoarse for wear, he screams his head off. He can do no other.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 7:52 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
Navi Pillay, A Human Type
clear

Navi Pillay, a U.N. muck-a-muck, has just issued a report on the fighting in Gaza that, unsurprisingly, comes down hard -- grotesquely hard -- on Israel, and concludes that "both sides" may be guilty of "war crimes." What kind of person rises high in the U.N. bureaucracy? Could it be someone who might dare to recognize the nature of Islam, and of Jihad? Could it every conceivably be someone sympathetic to the Jews of Israel, understanding that they are under a permanent siege, because Jihad is permanent, and Islam is permanent, and there are no "two-state solutions" or "one-state solutions" or "n-state solutions" because there is no "solution" at all, only a constant state of credible deterrence and, intermittently now and forever, the need to "mow the lawn" (as the Israelis, perhaps a bit too drily, but they need to keep their sanity after all, call it) by destroying arms allowed (idiotically) to build up, to the north, and to the south, and if ISIS has its way in Jordan, to the east as well.

Navi Pillay is deeply solicitous of Islam. Why? She's a type, a human type. This is the type that joins and rises high at the U.N., at The Guardian, at France Inter, at the BBC. They all think what one another thinks. And you know perfectly well -- they don't have to open their mouths -- what they think about everything.

Here's Navi Pillay a few years ago, deploring the Swiss referendum that led to the banning of minarets:

December 1, 2009
UN Slams 'Discriminatory' Swiss Minaret Ban
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/12/01/world/AP-EU-Switzerland-Minaret-Ban.html?pagewanted=print

Filed at 6:21 a.m. ET

GENEVA (AP) -- The United Nations called Switzerland's ban on new minarets 'clearly discriminatory' and deeply divisive, and the Swiss foreign minister acknowledged Tuesday the government was very concerned about how the vote would affect the country's image.

U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay said Sunday's referendum to outlaw the construction of minarets in Switzerland was the product of 'anti-foreigner scare-mongering.'

The criticism from Pillay, whose office is based in the Swiss city of Geneva, comes after an outcry from Muslim countries, Switzerland's European neighbors and human rights watchdogs since 57.5 percent of the Swiss population ratified the ban.

The Swiss government opposed the initiative but has sought to defend it as an action not against Islam or Muslims, but one aimed at improving integration and fighting extremism.

'These are extraordinary claims when the symbol of one religion is targeted,' Pillay said in a statement. She said she was saddened to see xenophobic arguments gain such traction with Swiss voters despite their 'long-standing support of fundamental human rights.'

 

She's not demented, Navi Pillay, so she's not Richard Falk. But she's bad, very bad, and the U.,N. is a place where the Muslim group is the only one left standing-- no more grouping of NATO nations, or of Warsaw Pact nations -- and its power is on display everywhere.

 

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 7:30 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
Wednesday, 23 July 2014
The West And Its Suicidal Immigration Policy
clear

A French commentator:

"Et sur ce blog, pouvez-vous m'assurer que chacun est tolérant, ouvert, honnête et respectueux des autres ?"

Quand ceux que l on reçoit avec générosité se conduiront avec tolérance, ouverture, honnêteté et respect on en reparlera.

Depuis 50 ans jamais, non jamais, une civilisation n a été aussi accueillante et accorte envers l étranger et notamment envers cet étranger venant des 4 coins de la planète dont nous sommes si différents. Il peut même venir sans papiers, sans argent, sans diplôme, sans rien, nos pays occidentaux lui fourniront tout. En contrepartie nous récoltons la haine, le mépris, la jalousie,...
Je crois que les limites ont été dépassées depuis longtemps. Nos pouvoirs politiques sont embourbés dans leur carcan idéologique gauchiste car changer de politique reviendrait a dire qu ils se sont trompé et cela ils ne l accepteront pas. Ils iront donc jusqu au bout de leur folie destructrice tant que le système tient.
Je suis plutôt généreux dans la vie, je l ai prouvé plusieurs fois mais je ne l étale pas comme ce piètre genefou mais ce que nous vivons n est pas de la générosité, c est de la bêtise tout court. On donne on reçoit une gifle, on donne encore on en reçoit deux, on donne encore et on reçoit un coup de boule.....etc.
C est un phénomène psychologique qui me dépasse car la vie apprend qu il faut partager a condition de ne pas empiéter sur le devenir des siens. Donner ce que l on a pas ou donner en sachant que les siens n auront rien n a pas de sens. La raison nous enseigne de ne pas outrepasser nos capacités fussent elles dans le domaine de la charité, du partage. On donne trop, on accueille trop, nous sommes dans le too much. La réciprocité n est pas la tout simplement parce que ces partages, ces dons, cet accueil jamais vu auparavant, ils les considèrent toutes comme des preuves de faiblesse. Plus nous donnerons, plus nous serons des faibles, plus ils nous enfonceront.

Pour la Remigration.

clear
Posted on 07/23/2014 7:17 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
clear
clear
Showing 1-26 of 324 [Next 25]
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
clear
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31   
clear

Subscribe