Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications from New English Review Press
Unreading Shakespeare
by David P. Gontar
Islam Through the Looking Glass: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J. B. Kelly, Vol. 3
edited by S. B. Kelly
The Real Nature of Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
As Far As The Eye Can See
by Moshe Dann
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum

Saturday, 4 July 2015
In Nashville appearance, CUFI director seeks to allay Jewish concerns about Christian Zionism

The Jewish Observer:

David Brog, the leader of the world’s largest Christian Zionist organization, began a recent presentation in Nashville by assuring fellow Jews in the audience that he understood their suspicion of Christians who profess to love Jews and the state of Israel.

“For 2,000 years you try to kill us or convert us and now you expect us to believe you love us,” he recalled thinking when, as an aide to then-U.S. Senator Arlen Spector two decades ago, he first encountered vociferous support for Israel coming from conservative Christians in rural Pennsylvania. But after years spent researching the Christian Zionist movement and getting to know and understand its adherents, Brog says he now is “ashamed that I judged these people without knowing anything about them.”

Brog, the national director of Christians United for Israel (CUFI), was the featured speaker at a Feb. 25 forum at the Gordon Jewish Community Center called “Christian Zionism: Why Evangelicals Support Israel.” The event was hosted by the Community Relations Committee of the Jewish Federation of Nashville and Middle Tennessee as part of its ongoing Israel advocacy and education series, “Increasing Your Israel IQ.”

Speaking to a mixed audience of 120 Jews and Christians that included Ambassador Opher Aviran, the consul general of Israel to the southeastern United States; pastor Moses Rodriguez of Iglesia de Dios Pentecostal Church in Nashville; local CUFI leaders Mike McNally and Pastor Lyndon Allen, and Federation President Carol Hyatt as well as four of her predecessors, Brog said the Christian Zionist movement is an outgrowth of “a theological breakthrough of millennial proportions.”

Rejecting the traditional and inherently anti-Semitic theology that God abandoned the Jewish people in favor of the Christian church, Christian Zionists instead embrace a theology called dispensationalism, which holds that the Jewish people remain dear to God and will play a pivotal role in the divine plan for humankind. Brog said this theological view engenders genuine attitudes of love and appreciation toward Jews and the state of Israel.

“The verse most often quoted by Christian Zionists is Genesis 12:3 – “I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you,”’ he said.

Dispensationalism has been around for centuries, Brog said, and may help explain the actions of diverse historical figures ranging from Oliver Cromwell, the 17th Century English political leader under whom Jews were readmitted to England, to the ten Booms, a Dutch family who hid hundreds of Jews during World War II and helped them escape the Holocaust. Over the past century or so, the theology has become particularly prevalent – even if it is not yet the majority view – among evangelicals and other conservative Christians who read the Bible literally, Brog said.

CUFI itself was established in 2006 by Rev. John Hagee, the founder of a non-denominational Charismatic mega-Church based in San Antonio, whose own view, Brog said, is that “without Judaism, there would be no Christianity.”

Brog’s appearance was billed as a discussion, and he spent more than 20 minutes answering questions and then continued his conversation with members of the audience during a dessert reception that followed his remarks.

In response to one question, he acknowledged the Christian obligation to evangelize and win converts. But he said CUFI has a strict “non-conversionary” policy toward Jews and that Christian Zionists in general, because they are more familiar with Jews and their attitudes about conversion, are actually more likely to be sensitive to that concern and refrain from efforts aimed at converting Jews.

In response to another question, Brog addressed the concerns held by many Jews that, aside from their support for Israel, Christian Zionists hold views quite different from their own on many important social and political issues.

“A coalition on one issue doesn’t mean we have to agree on everything,” Brog said. “We can continue to have robust debates on other issues where we disagree.”

Posted on 07/04/2015 2:12 PM by Geoffrey Clarfield
Saturday, 4 July 2015
Pondering the Immigration Imponderables

The relationship between personal experience and public policy is not at all straightforward, and of no aspect of public policy is this more true than that of illegal immigration. In Europe, the question is daily put before us by newspapers, magazines, blogs, radio, and television, with dramatic pictures of desperate illegal immigrants trying to reach our shores across the Mediterranean, many of them drowning en route. Even without such media coverage, however, the change in the ethnic and cultural origins of the inhabitants of our towns and cities is so obvious that no one could possibly miss it. Some glory in the change, some detest it; it is difficult to be neutral, or even merely objective, about it.

Although Europe is mired, for the moment, in economic stagnation (how long for is a matter of speculation), it is vastly rich, prosperous and stable compared to the countries from which the immigrants generally come. Even Greece seems a promised land to them, though mainly as a jumping-off point from which to reach a richer country yet.

On the subject of illegal immigrants, and the wider one of the change in the ethic and cultural composition of our societies, I confess that my thoughts and feelings are inconsistent and contradictory. I am myself the son of a refugee, and in my work as a doctor in a hospital in an area that came to be inhabited by, if not exactly to welcome, many refugees and illegal immigrants I came to almost always to sympathize with, and often to admire, them as individuals.

The difference between political refugees and economic migrants did not seem to me as important as it seemed to our authorities, for even the economic migrants were fleeing conditions that were unimaginably hard. The people I came to know were brave and enterprising, and had no desire to sponge on the state, but rather to work and improve their lives. Although they had no legal right to anything but emergency medical care, I ended up being primary care physician to them because they had no one else to turn to.

Perhaps it helped that I had been to most of the countries from which they came: the Congo, Iran, Somalia, and so forth. For a native Briton to speak to them who knew even a little of their country must have come as some slight relief to them in a sea of strangeness, incomprehension, hostility, or indifference. I too enjoyed talking to them. It allowed me to feel benevolent at no great cost to myself.

It does seem to be the case that we need people to come to us from impoverished lands, and this is so despite the fact that we have a substantial fund of unemployed people. Why this should be I leave to labor economists to decide; I suspect it has something to do with the rent-seeking behavior of a very large percentage of our population (including me). But let me just describe the case of my mother-in-law living in Paris, now so infirm that she needs the assistance of three people working in shifts to allow her to remain at home.

These three are women who come from Cabo Verde, Mauritius, and Haiti. Whether they were ever illegal immigrants I do not know; but they are now legal residents of France and are paid in regular fashion, taxed normally and with all the rights of those who work in the official economy.

All three of them do far more for my mother-in-law than they are paid to do, not because of any attempt on our part to exploit them, but because they are extremely good people, whose warmth, kindness, humanity and mannerliness were obvious on first acquaintance. Indeed, these qualities induce a slight feeling of shame in belonging to a culture in which these qualities should seem exceptional rather than normal. It is we, not they, who are so often crude.

It so happened that when I first met the Haitian lady I had just been to an exhibition of Haitian art whose catalogue I showed her; moreover, my wife and I had been to Haiti (in my case more than once) and so were able to talk to her of Haitian history and literature. We discovered what is too easily overlooked in immigrants from poor countries, namely that she was a refined and educated person, though one who felt no shame in her work as caregiver to an old lady. Having made our acquaintance, she immediately brought us a present of a bottle of Haitian rum which, by the way, is by far the best that I know; its cost represented two and a half hours of her labor. She delights to cook Haitian dishes for us, doing this for the pleasure that our thanks give her. She is a woman who laughs at hardship, whose generosity of spirit is obvious.

The other two caregivers have different virtues, but are just as virtuous. And without the help of these women, we should either have to put my mother-in-law in a home or look after her ourselves, disrupting—not to say dominating—our lives entirely.

Having conveyed my personal experience, I musn’t shy from the question: is one’s personal experience sufficient to fashion a proper attitude or policy towards immigration, legal or illegal? I am not so unprejudiced a person that I view with delight the disappearance of the culture in which I grew up, which is being absorbed into a kind of cultural minestrone of no particular savor. Nor do I think that to know another culture is simply a matter of patronizing a restaurant of its cuisine from time to time. It is, rather, the work of years if not of a lifetime. Consider that multiculturalism therefore condemns us to be strangers to one another; and, while all cultures have their charms, they may not all be compatible in their conceptions.

The economic effects of mass immigration into European countries are disputed. Some claim that it leads to economic growth, but this is not the answer to the real economic question, which is whether it leads to age-adjusted per capita economic growth.

Even if this question could be answered affirmatively and beyond all doubt or debate, there would still remain the question of whether, for other reasons, it would be undesirable. The fact is that most people who support mass immigration are personally less keen on taking the social consequences of it. In France, for example, someone not long ago contacted more than 40 media personalities who publicly supported immigration and asked them whether they could assist personally with lodging an immigrant. Though each was rich, none said he could do so for more than a day or two, each finding a good excuse for his inability.

In summary, then:

  1. I sympathize personally with the immigrants;
  2. I like the majority of those whom I have met;
  3. I recognize that, along with many others, I benefit from their presence, though I do not know precisely what the size of that presence ought to be;
  4. I do not know what their overall economic effect is;
  5. I do not want to see my society changed irreversibly by their uncontrolled influx.

First published in the Library of Law and Liberty.

Posted on 07/04/2015 8:50 AM by Theodore Dalrymple
Saturday, 4 July 2015
Condell on Muslims in the Workplace

I hired a Muslim woman once, back before I knew any better. And guess what? It didn't work out.

Posted on 07/04/2015 8:35 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Saturday, 4 July 2015
Codevilla Is Very Wrong on Kissinger

The Claremont Review of Books requested my reply – in their pages — to Angelo Codevilla’s review of Henry Kissinger’s latest book, World Order, as part of an online exchange with the reviewer, to which he was to reply. The Claremont Review then wrote that Codevilla declined to reply to me and promised to publish an edited version of my response as a letter. Here is my reply:

Codevilla’s review is an astonishingly nasty farrago of insults. Apart from relentlessly dismissive comments on the book, Mr. Codevilla tries to hang on Kissinger, as “Kissinger’s views evolved in tandem with our ruling class’s,” every shortcoming of U.S. foreign policy and the foreign-policy establishment of the last 60 years, including many policies Kissinger had nothing to do with, and, in a number of cases, vocally opposed. I do not agree with Codevilla’s basic point, that Kissinger wrote that peoples pursue international order rather than “their own ambition, interests, or predilections.” He wrote that they pursue those goals, but that the protagonists are constantly forming countervailing arrangements to resist the supremacy of a single country or bloc.

Codevilla says that the U.S. foreign-policy establishment, with Kissinger complicit by membership in it or just by being contemporaneous with it in some decades, sought “order” and not the national interest — and that, as a result, it “lost the Vietnam war, discarded its defenses against air and missile attack; [sought] to keep together” the Soviet Union, having “wasted its superior forces in conflicts without end,” and now “cowers as terrorists surround it, and back peddles in the Pacific.” (I assume he means “pedals,” as I can’t imagine what even he might think Kissinger and the others are peddling.) In fact, Kissinger had nothing to do with the stoking up of the American effort in Vietnam and was quite critical of President Johnson’s strategy. He and President Nixon have acknowledged that bombing of North Vietnam should have been resumed in 1969, but they were concerned that the secretaries of state and defense, William Rogers and Melvin Laird, would resign and imperil the administration’s ability to get any war policy through the Congress (and Kissinger didn’t appoint Rogers and Laird). The Vietnamization policy enabled the U.S. to withdraw on land, and, with massive air support, assist the South Vietnamese in defeating the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong in the great offensive of April 1972. The same formula might well have worked again if the Democrats had not crucified the president over the mishandling of the trivial and tawdry Watergate affair.

It was the work of ten consecutive administrations that caused the USSR to implode, in the greatest and most bloodless strategic victory in the history of the nation-state, and Kissinger did his part. He opposed the Kennedy-Johnson-McNamara-Clifford policy of passively enabling the USSR to gain nuclear parity; worked with Nixon to regain superiority through multiple independently targeted warheads, in what was called “nuclear sufficiency” in the SALT I negotiations; and supported President Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative as an expert witness in Congress. He had nothing to do with George H. W. Bush’s ill-considered paean to the virtues of Russian federalism in Kiev in 1991. Kissinger was not a supporter of the recent futile conflicts as conducted, and he hasn’t countenanced whatever Codevilla thinks has been happening in the Pacific under Obama.

The snide claim that Kissinger’s “‘creatively ambiguous’ diplomacy produced pretend agreements that aggravated conflicts and helped lead his country to its only defeat in war” is an outrage; apart from whatever chance South Vietnam might have had without Watergate, the arrangements with China over Taiwan and with Syria over the Golan have held. There is a great deal in this review of gratuitous stylistic snobbery and pompous reflections on Kissinger’s alleged ignorance of such esoteric figures (in contemporary foreign-policy matters) as Saint Augustine and Hegel.

I don’t really agree with the reviewer (or, altogether, the author either) about the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648; it didn’t so much entrench the principle of the equal sovereignty of states as it enacted Cardinal Richelieu’s perception that, for France to be the greatest power in Europe, the Germans had to be severely divided. To this end, scores of German principalities and petty kingdoms were proclaimed as legitimate and inviolable, and Austria, ramshackle assemblage of fragments as it already was, was to be protected from the Russians, Prussians, and Turks, to help keep the German world divided. (Richelieu died in 1642, but left the outline of the peace after the Thirty Years’ War, which war he had largely masterminded, to his successor, Mazarin.)

For someone so quick to asperse Henry Kissinger’s grasp of history, Codevilla is pretty shaky himself. He seems not to understand that Britain’s manipulation of the European balance of power, which really began with Henry VIII and Wolsey, was interrupted in the periods 1625–49 and 1660–88, when Louis XIII and XIV were father-in-law, brother-in-law, and uncle to the English kings Charles I, Charles II, and James II, which explains some softening in British policy toward France. Contrary to what Codevilla wrote, Eugene of Savoy did play a prominent role in the relief of the Siege of Vienna in 1683, though he was junior to Sobieski. Also contrary to Codevilla’s account, there was no inconsistency between the Pitts and Disraeli: Chatham (Pitt the Elder) and his son opposed France because it was the strongest continental power, and Disraeli opposed Russia as the primary threat to the British Empire in the Middle East and India, and then Germany when it became the strongest continental power, and was the first important statesman in the world to recognize the full significance of Bismarck’s creation of the unified German Empire.

Codevilla’s view of the Congress of Vienna, Kissinger’s original academic specialty, is also skewed: Its significance was the immediate admission of post-Napoleonic France (represented by the imperishable and egregious Talleyrand) as one of the contracting powers of a Europe of static borders (apart from changes wrought by the unification of Germany and Italy) for the Great Powers until World War I.

I do agree with Codevilla’s high opinion of John Quincy Adams, and with his view that American statesmen prior to Theodore Roosevelt were almost entirely concerned in foreign affairs to prevent external meddling in the Americas (to this end, Adams and Monroe piggybacked on the Royal Navy while claiming that America was the protector of the hemisphere). After the Civil War, the posture matched the reality of American power. The founders of independent America had no ambitions internationally, except not to be bothered, and that continued to be American policy for over a century. Theodore Roosevelt did arrange with Japan the reciprocal recognition of the two countries’ occupations of Korea and the Philippines, and was more strategically involved and astute than Codevilla admits.

Britain did not push Europe into war in 1914, as Codevilla mistakenly claims that Kissinger wrote; it clung to peace until convinced (correctly) that, if it did not join France and Russia, Wilhelmine Germany would be as great a threat to Britain as was Napoleon, and with a much stronger navy. There is no inconsistency in this; Kissinger doesn’t claim that such world order as there may be is very durable or stable, and the heart of Codevilla’s essay is largely pedantry and pettifogging. Kissinger correctly recognized that Woodrow Wilson saw that the American public would not support substantial foreign involvement without a moral justification. He transformed World War I into a war to end war and make the world safe for democracy, and was one of history’s great prophets: the first person to inspire the masses of the world with the vision of enduring peace. Kissinger grasps his importance better than Codevilla does.

Franklin D. Roosevelt persuaded the American people that the U.S. had to act preemptively to prevent Western Europe and East Asia from getting into the hands of America’s enemies. The incompetence of the last two administrations — none of which can be laid at Kissinger’s door, either directly or through the spurious mud-slinging device of identifying him with “the ruling class” — has strained that consensus, but not irreparably. Henry Kissinger has always been very cautious about the U.S’s becoming over-extended, but has understood much better than his reviewer apparently has that the country will buy into onerous foreign involvements only if legitimate national-security interests require it. Codevilla seems not to understand that Henry Wallace and Cordell Hull had no influence whatever on American foreign policy, and he claims that Roosevelt “moved the American legation from the U.S. embassy to the Soviet compound, where every room had been bugged,” at the Tehran Conference. In fact, Roosevelt moved himself to the Soviet compound in perfect certainty that his rooms were bugged (the U.S. legation was in the suburbs and there were security concerns), so he could get Stalin to demand that the Western powers attack across the English Channel in 1944 and not undertake Churchill’s hare-brained plan to charge up the Adriatic and through the “Ljubljana Gap” (which Eisenhower claimed did not exist). It was a stroke of genius, as Stalin supported a Western strategy that kept him from control of Germany and France, by helping Roosevelt rebut Churchill’s fears of fighting the German army again in Northeast France and Flanders. Stalin was recruited against his own interests, because he assumed that the Germans would throw the Western armies into the sea again, as they had at Dunkirk, Greece, Crete, and Dieppe. Roosevelt was right and Stalin and Churchill were mistaken, and Codevilla obviously doesn’t know much about these momentous events.

It is also a bit rich for Codevilla to attack Truman and Acheson for not confronting Stalin over Berlin: The Berlin Airlift was a clear Western success. His complaints about the Nixon-Kissinger policy toward Russia and China are simply churlish. Both men explained that they sought better relations with both of those countries than they had with each other, and that this was attainable because the U.S. had less to dispute with them than they had with each other, as Communist rivals and the chief powers of the Eurasian land mass.

Codevilla asserts that, “as Nixon and Kissinger toasted in the Kremlin [that is, drank toasts, in May 1972], the flow of Soviet armaments to Ho Chi Minh increased.” Ho Chi Minh had died in 1969 and, while Nixon and Kissinger were in the USSR on that occasion, Nixon ensured that there were 1,200 American airstrikes on North Vietnam every day. Codevilla’s claim that now “there is no world order because nobody really wants one,” is not quite right either. The Russians wish to regain status and China wants to advance to the first rank of nations, and Europe is too enervated to do anything while errors deplored by Kissinger as they were made in the last 20 years have temporarily immobilized America.

This reviewer is overwrought and irrational, and basically blames Henry Kissinger for all American foreign-policy errors subsequent to Kissinger’s time in office. He generously admits that “no one can read Kissinger without noting elements of insight.” That is not something that can be confidently said about this scurrilous review. It is a shocking outburst from an often perceptive writer.

Posted on 07/04/2015 8:11 AM by Conrad Black
Saturday, 4 July 2015
Brzezinski on Russia: 'We Are Already In a Cold War'
Yesterday's men pine for a war they understand. Jihad is beyond their ken.
Posted on 07/04/2015 5:47 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Saturday, 4 July 2015
Nusra Front Fighters Killed in Mosque Bombing in Syria

Nothing says Ramadan like flying body parts. We won't shed any tears for these guys, though. NYTimes:

BEIRUT — Activists say a bomb has exploded inside a mosque where al-Qaida's branch in Syria was holding a fast-breaking meal, killing at least 14.

Activists say the bombing inside the Salem Mosque in the northern town of Ariha occurred shortly after sunset Friday when scores of Nusra Front members gathered to break their fast during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported Saturday that the explosion killed 31 Nusra Front members including five commanders.

Syria-based activist Ahmad al-Ahmad said 15 Nusra Front fighters were killed and more than 30 wounded.

The differences in casualty estimates could not be immediately explained since the Nusra Front cordoned off the area.

Posted on 07/04/2015 5:31 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Friday, 3 July 2015
Ivan Rioufol: The French State In Retreat Before Its Domestic Enemy

It is the Muslims who appear to be winning, for the French State doesn't dare take them on as it should and must. Along with the astonishing remarks of Federica Mogherini, the EU Minister who thinks Islam a part of Europe that should be welcomed -- and Muslims clearly to be seen only as victims of ISIS, never its supporters -- this article worries and depresses.


Posted on 07/03/2015 5:42 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Friday, 3 July 2015
Bethnal Green schoolgirls identified in Syria in covert video footage

The Telegraph has obtained video from Raqqa in Syria which purports to show at least two of the three British schoolgirls who left the UK in February to join Isil.

The footage - filmed by activists in the city - shows three women, one of whom is armed with a Kalashnikov automatic rifle, walking through the streets of the city.

Shamima Begum, 15, Kadiza Sultana, 16, and Amira Abase, 15, ran away from their homes in Bethnal Green, east London five months ago.

Credible sources have told The Telegraph's Ruth Sherlock that the video features at least two of the girls.

The third woman in the video is said to to be the girls' handler, Um Laith. A senior female member of Isil, Um Laith has reportedly been charged with looking after the girls, and, the activists report, she rarely lets them out of her sight.

At 9.30pm BST we will publish on this page the first full account of how, after escaping from Britain, the girls were smuggled into Syria and how they have spent their time with the extremists since.

The details have been supplied by anti-Isil activists in the city who have monitored the girls’ movements, and other knowledgeable sources.

The report is here. They were living in a compound for unmarried women and widows. They are being trained until their trustworthiness is beyond doubt. One or twice a week they are allowed out with a chaperone to carry the groceries back to the compound. It's heady stuff!

Posted on 07/03/2015 3:31 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Friday, 3 July 2015
Yankee Doodle Dandy

Posted on 07/03/2015 7:43 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Friday, 3 July 2015
Frost on NATO

Two roads diverge and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) cannot travel both. Unfortunately, instead of taking the right road, the path to overcoming Islamist terrorism, NATO is instead choosing to defend itself against supposed danger from the Russian Federation. It is not concentrating its attention and its forces on terrorism in general or on the group that glories in the name of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (IS), a name that British Prime Minister David Cameron says is a perversion of a great religion.

What is this thing called NATO, this funny thing called NATO? The North Atlantic Treaty was signed on April 4, 1949 by 12 countries resolved to unite their efforts for collective defense and for the preservation of peace and security. They pledged, in Article 3, to maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack. A plausible, if not wholly accurate, justification for this is that the security of the alliance was indivisible.

However, Article 5, the article known as “one for all and all for one,” limits the extent of that capacity. It states that the individual or collective self-defense will be considered against armed attack against one or more of the countries in Europe or North America. Why one might then ask, has it applied to Afghanistan, where there was no strategy for any mission, to Libya, and now in 2015 to the Russian Federation? And why does it not apply to the real enemy, Islamist terrorism?

NATO had one essential objective. It was created in the years of the Cold War as a defense against possible expansion westwards by the Stalinist Soviet Union. In the accepted joke, it was to keep Russia out, America in, and Germany down. The objective was clear -- to deter a Soviet military attack in Western Europe. However, from the beginning, the territorial, economic, and ideological boundaries and the minimum requirements for NATO membership were stretched to include Greece and non-democratic Turkey in 1952, and Eastern European countries from 1999 on until Albania and Croatia in 2009.

With the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, the end of the Soviet Union, and the reduction of its military presence by President Mikhail Gorbachev with his policies of glasnost and perestroika, the United States and the other NATO countries no longer appeared threatened by attack or invasion from the east. Logically, either NATO should have disbanded or some alternative reason found for its existence. Historical experience is that institutions rarely, if ever, seek their own termination. Now in a post-Cold War era, NATO, presently with 28 members, an international staff of 1,000 and a worldwide staff of 6,000 civilians in different agencies and commands, has had to redefine itself to remain relevant in some way.

One immediate response was the London Declaration of July 1990 with its objective to promote cooperation between the NATO countries and Russian and its associated countries. It was a recognition that NATO had to change to adapt to the evolving political landscape. To this end, the Partnership for Peace was launched in January 1994, a program aimed at creating trust between NATO and other countries in Europe and Russia.

NATO opted for military capacity to undertake crisis management operations, as in the case of Kosovo, either on the basis of Article 5 of the Treaty or under United Nations mandate, alone or in cooperation with other countries and international organizations.

It was understandable that NATO in the 1990s tried to stop the war in Bosnia and responded to the 1992 UN Security Council directive to use all measures necessary to end hunger and atrocities in Bosnia-Herzogovina. Indeed, NATO bombed Serbia for 78 days. But it is less understandable why the NATO countries considered Afghanistan to be vital to their security, and assumed command of southern Afghanistan in 2006. It is even less apparent why a chill has developed in relations between NATO and Russia because of differences over the Ukrainian issue, instead of international discussion of the issue.

The foremost question is does an external military threat to the NATO countries exist from Russia? NATO announced it is planning a 40,000 rapid, reaction force in Eastern Europe to contain Russia, and had military exercises with 2,000 soldiers, tanks, jets, and helicopters in Poland. On June 22, 2015 in remarks in Munster, Germany, U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said that the United States will contribute military assets, weapons, bombers and fighters, transport aircraft and special operations forces, although no ground troops, to this rapid reaction force. He argued that NATO must act against security threats, including Russia, which with its nuclear sabre rattling was a destabilizing influence seeking to undermine NATO from the east, though Carter also in passing did mention violent extremists from the south.

NATO looked down the wrong path. In the same week as Carter’s remarks, Islamist terrorists struck targets in the beach resort in Tunisia killing 38 innocent sunbathers, beheaded a civilian in Lyon, France, and exploded a bomb in a mosque in the capital of Kuwait. 

Both the U.S. and Russia have been reducing nuclear weaponry, though Russia still has an estimated 1,500 strategic warheads deployed on 515 missiles and bombers. Russia has also announced it will add 40 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). Yet, even if these weapons must be taken seriously, they are not part of a more assertive Russia, nor does this constitute a nuclear threat. Yet, perhaps as a precautionary measure, Ash Carter announced that the U.S. was supplying 250 tanks, armored vehicles, and artillery to be located in a number of eastern European countries, in effect up to the Russian border. This adds to the burden the U.S. is already bearing: it has been contributing to NATO more than $1 billion a year, 70 per cent of total NATO expenditure and 4.4 per cent of GDP. The U.S. still maintains a force of 40,000 troops in Germany.

Obviously, NATO has been concerned with the Russian victory over Georgia in August 2008, and its actions in Chechnya, with Russian unilateral recognition of the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and with the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in March 2014 and the support for pro-Russian insurgents in eastern Ukraine in a conflict that has caused 6,500 deaths. But this is not the most important item on its agenda.

NATO must recognize that the threat of Islamist terrorism, and now particularly of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (IS) is much more serious than that of Russia. NATO is interested in deploying its new rapid-fire reaction force in case of crisis on the eastern front against Russia. However, it is imperative that its main focus be on confronting the Islamic State now that the Iraqi army has been defeated in Mosul and in Ramadi, even after 5000 Iraqi officers have been trained and the U.S. has spent millions on training, organizing, and arming them.  NATO must take the right road, the fight against Islamist terrorism.

First published in the American Thinker.

Posted on 07/03/2015 7:28 AM by Michael Curtis
Friday, 3 July 2015
IS Says It Destroyed Archaeological Pieces from Palmyra


BEIRUT (AP) — The Islamic State group says it has destroyed six archaeological pieces from the historic town of Palmyra that were confiscated from a smuggler.

An IS statement says the six busts were found when the smuggler was stopped at a checkpoint. The issue was referred to an Islamic court, which ordered that they be destroyed and the man be whipped.

Photographs released by the group showed IS fighters destroying the busts with large hammers.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on Friday it was unclear if the busts were authentic or if the militants destroyed fake busts as a cover for the IS group's own antiquities smuggling.

In March, IS members in Iraq razed 3,000-year old Nimrod and bulldozed 2,000-year old Hatra — both UNESCO world heritage sites.

Posted on 07/03/2015 6:50 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Friday, 3 July 2015
Iran Violated Nuclear Deal Before it is Even Inked according to Latest IAEA Reports


Energy Secertary Moniz, Secretary of State Kerry and Undersecretary Wendy Sherman

Vienna, July 1, 2015

Source: Reuters

Amidst frenetic Administration efforts to spin a possible Iran deal comes evidence that it has already been violated given an IAEA Report and analysis by Washington, DC –nuclear watchdog, the Institute for Science and International Security.   Adam Kredo in today’s Washington Free Beacon  reported these last minute developments, Iran Violates Past Nuclear Promises on Eve of Deal”:

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) disclosed yesterday that Iran has failed to meet its commitments under the interim Joint Plan of Action to convert recently enriched uranium gas to powder.

While Iran has reduced the amount of enriched uranium gas in its stockpiles, it has failed to dispose of these materials in a way that satisfies the requirements of the nuclear accord struck with the United States and other powers in 2013.

Wednesday’s disclosure by the IAEA sent the State Department rushing to downplay the Iranian violation.

Obama administration officials insisted that despite Iran’s failure to meet its obligations, negotiations were still on track and that Tehran would face no repercussions.

One U.S. official who spoke with the Associated Press on Wednesday said that instead of converting its uranium gas into uranium dioxide powder as required, Iran had transformed it into another substance. The IAEA found that Iran had converted just 9 percent of the relevant stockpile into uranium dioxide.

The official went on to downplay concerns about Iran’s violation, claiming that Tehran was only having some “technical problems.”

The “technical problems by Iran had slowed the process but the United States was satisfied that Iran had met its commitments,” the AP reported the official as saying.

“Violations by Iran would complicate the Obama administration’s battle to persuade congressional opponents and other skeptics,” the AP continued.

David Albright, a nuclear expert and founder of the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), warned that the United States is weakening its requirements on Tehran as a final deal gets closer.

“The choosing of a weaker condition that must be met is not a good precedent for interpreting more important provisions in a final deal,” Albright wrote in an analysis published late Wednesday.

While Iran was not in compliance with the oxidation requirement, the IAEA found that it did get rid of uranium gas that surpassed a self-imposed benchmark of 7,650 kg.

The IAEA’s disclosures are in contrast to comments made by Kerry last summer when he assured observers that Iran would live up to the interim agreement.

“Iran has committed to take further nuclear-related steps in the next four months” and “these include a continued cap on the amount of 5 percent enriched uranium hexafluoride and a commitment to convert any material over that amount into oxide,” Kerry said.


The Israel Project (TIP), which has sent officials to Vienna to track the deal, wrote in an email to reporters that the administration looked like it was “playing Tehran’s lawyer” in a bid to defuse potential fallout from the IAEA’s report.

This is not the first time that Iran has been caught by the IAEA cheating on past nuclear arrangements.

As negotiations between the sides slip past their June 30 deadline and stretch into July, Iranian officials have become more insistent that the United States consent to demands on a range of sticking points.

President Hassan Rouhani also threatened to fully restart Iran’s nuclear program if negotiators fail to live up to any final agreement.

One Western source present in Vienna said the administration is scrambling to ensure that nothing interferes with a final deal.

“Once again, the White House will go to any length needed to preserve the Obama-Iran deal, even if it means covering up Iran’s failure to convert all of the nuclear material as promised,” said the source.

“If they had admitted Iran failed to live up to the letter of the JPOA—as is the case—this one-week extension period of the JPOA would be totally invalidated and the talks would be over,” the source added. “Like they have for months, the administration continues to hide violations and is acting more like Iran’s advocate than the honest broker the American people deserve. “

Will these IAEA/ISIS revelations upend the P5+1 Iran deliberations in Vienna?  We bet the Obama State Department and White House spokespersons will continue the charade of “don’t believe your lying eyes”. All while Iran ‘s Supreme Ruler stiff arms the talks in Vienna with new ‘red lines” trusting that greed by the P5+1 over billions of trade and development deals  will  lift $150 billion in sanctions relief upon inking a deal.  Both Israel and the US Congress are increasing wary of this deal that will provide a nuclear breakthrough by Iran. If achieved the deal  will vault Iran’s  state sponsorship of terrorism.  Iran could develop one bomb to wipe Israel off the map of the world and an ICBM to detonate an EMP over the US fulfilling their Mahdist apocalyptic dream and both Israel’s and our nightmares.  



Posted on 07/03/2015 5:47 AM by Jerry Gordon
Friday, 3 July 2015
Michael Oren, Obama, J Street and the American Jewish Divide

President Obama and former Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren, July 2009

Source: White House Photo

Former Israeli Ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren is a native of West Orange, New Jersey best   exemplifies the special relations between the two allies, Israel and the US.  With the publication of his memoir, Ally: My Journey Across the American-Israeli Divide (2015),  he has another best seller.  Previous ones were Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East (2003) and Power, Faith, and Fantasy: America in the Middle East, 1776 to the Present (2007)Having read Ally, I concur with  praise from two pundits: Bret Stephens, the Tuesday Wall Street  Journal columnist of note,  and Vic Rosenthal , a former resident of Fresno , California, now  a Jerusalem resident whose  Abu Yehuda blog  posts are a must read about an American  living in Israel. 

Bret Stephens' opening stanza in his June 29, 2015 WSJ column “The President Against the Historian explains why Oren's memoir is a must read:

Michael Oren, Israel’s former ambassador to the United States, has written the smartest and juiciest diplomatic memoir that I’ve read in years, and I’ve read my share. The book, called “Ally,” has the added virtues of being politically relevant and historically important. This has the Obama administration—which doesn’t come out looking too good in Mr. Oren’s account—in an epic snit.

Vic Rosenthal in his July 2, 2015, Abu Yehuda blog post, Michael Oren is tired of American Jews, and so am I, addresses  the yawning  divide between Israel and American Jews, another of Oren’s themes in Ally:

Rabbi Eric Yoffie is offended by Michael Oren, on behalf of (non-Orthodox) American Jews. These Jews, like America’s “first Jewish president,” turn out to be very easy to offend: just suggest that Israelis are more qualified than they are to decide the future of their country.

Oren’s new book has offended both Yoffie and the Obama Administration, which has launched an all-out media blitz against him (as far as I know, Obama spokespeople haven’t called him a ‘chickenshit’ yet, but give them time).

Yesterday morning, I dialed into an Israel Project  (TIP)sponsored presentation by Oren .  He told the listeners ,unlike the daylight between Obama and Netanyahu over the Iranian nuclear nightmare threat, that there is no daylight across the political divide in the  obsessive democratic cockpit of the Knesset.  As Oren tells it, whether Likud, Zionist Union and even Arab parties, all Israel is united that Iran achieving nuclear breakout is “a very bad deal”.   Further, he said while some  in the media, the Obama claque of  “senior officials’ and former aides have excoriated him for the early publication  of his memoir, he was heartened that they haven’t addressed the facts of what the Administration has perpetrated.  Listen to this recorded  TIP presentation by Oren and the following Q&A. 

Oren’s memoir has a lot to say about President Obama and his Administration acolytes isolating Israel over Iran and  Netanyahu’s vigorous defense of Israel  sovereign right of Israel to warn America and the  untrusting world about Iran’s nuclear  threat and the very bad P5+1  deal. Perhaps  a  deal about to be announced in Vienna in a few days. Or if not simply kicked down the road.  All while Iran's  Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei  and Mahdist acolytes of terrorism perfect the means of taking out the “little Satan”, Israel ,with one bomb and the “big Satan”, the  US, with a nuclear tipped ICBM.  

Oren clearly takes pride that his well honed skills as a Columbia and Princeton educated historian who earned his PhD in Middle East Studies with the venerable Bernard Lewis.   Not bad for a pudgy dyslexic , pigeon toed 15 year old who shook the hand of the late Israeli PM Yitzhak Rabin, when the latter was  Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to the US.  He exclaimed on that memorable occasion that some day he would be Israel’s Ambassador.  A late bloomer in high school Oren fulfilled his quest, slimed down hardened through rowing .  Equipped with his backpack he made aliyah to Israel to go through  grueling  paratrooper training  earn his coveted red beret along with an oath taken  to defend Israel on Masada with his IDF comrades.  He ends up in combat and later as a reserve officer during the Second Lebanon War as a military spokesperson to the foreign press.  Along the way he  meets his  American wife Sally Edelstein, a  Jersey girl, dancer and former San Francisco hippy groupie when she makes Aliyah to Israel and they ultimately form their Israeli family.

 Ally  depicts what it was like for an American-Israeli to fulfill his dream as his adopted country’s Ambassador in Washington  Israel’s  interests in the byzantine politics of the Obama era from 2009 to 2013. After leaving Washington, Oren turns home to Tel Aviv to lecture, teach at Harvard and Yale and write his memoir.   Oren is now a member of the Kulanu party headed by former  Likud Communications Commissioner and economic reformer Moshe Kahlon.  Oren is a thinking liberal and  both he and the family are members of a Reform synagogue.  His memoir culminates on a dramatic note when he  and Sally attend  a  Bar Mitzvah celebration for 13 year olds at  Kibbutz Na’an, with one of his former Washington Embassy aides, Lee Moser, mother of  one of the bar mitzvah candidates when a red alert sounds, sirens wail and they scurry for shelter. He writes:

I held Sally’s hand and glanced over my shoulder over my shoulder just as two Hamas rockets roared in. Then with twin booms that rattled the tin overhang  and shook the ground below, the missiles exploded. Iron Dome interceptors, developed by Israel and funded by the United States, scored perfect hits. For moment afterward, as we emerged into the uncertain night, the glow of those bursts hovered over us, beaming like kindred stars.

  All  of which brings  us to why he has frosted the J Street  fawning rabbinic leadership of the Reform Movement in America and  earned  both Vic Rosenthal’s and my admiration. This came on the cusp of having orchestrated a  recent viewing and panel discussion of the Americans for Peace and Tolerance documentary, J Street Challenge  with  Pensacola  pro-Israel colleagues; Rabbi Eric Tokajer of Brit Ahm synagogue, Mike Bates, 1330amWEBY general manger of “Your Turn host and Florida State Representative Mike Hill, a US Air Force Academy grad.

Vic Rosenthal notes a similar experience in his Fresno in his Abu Yehuda column:

We tried to bring the local Jewish community – the organizations, the synagogues and individual Jews – along with us. With a few exceptions, mostly people like us who had lived in Israel or had relatives there, we had to drag them kicking and screaming. Most of our pro-Israel events drew the same few supporters.

The local Reform temple was probably the most frustrating. A film critical of J Street, followed by a discussion? Absolutely not, it would be ‘divisive’! The Jewish Federation and Hadassah were better, but it was always easier to organize an event about Jewish culture than Israel.

Is Oren right that American Jews are more interested in helping others than their own? Certainly they were far more upset about terrorism in Charleston than Jerusalem, and far more ready to criticize our Prime Minister than their own Administration. The Reform rabbi threw himself into activities to help the poor and homeless. He is seen on TV on panels with the Imam of the Islamic Cultural Center. He is an outspoken advocate of liberal causes, but he did not give a sermon in favor of PM Netanyahu’s speech about Iran before the Congress.

In preparation for the recent J Street Challenge  Pensacola event, we culled excerpts from Oren’s Ally about his views on J Street  and its defenders inside the Obama Administration, illustrative of what  concerns Vic Rosenthal.

On J Street’s inclusion in Major American Jewish organizations meeting with Obama in 2009 p. 78

He promised to be more evenhanded in asking all parties, not just Israelis, to make sacrifices for peace. Yet the meeting would be remembered as a turning point in the administration’s approach toward the Jewish State.

Included for the first time with the mainstream Jewish leaders were the heads of Americans for Peace Now and the newly founded J Street, both organizations stridently critical of Israel and its traditional American supporters.  Their presence rattled the other participants, many of whom had been personally slighted by these parvenus. 

The President concluded, “When there is no daylight, Israel just sits on the sidelines and that erodes our credibility with the Arabs”.

Commenting on the discussion, J Street founder Jeremy Ben Ami cited Obama’s ability to connect with the Muslim World and his immense standing in America and the World. “He was very clear that this is a moment that has to be seized and he intends to seize it.  By contrast the other American Jewish leaders emerged from the meeting concerned about Obama’s departure from the long standing principle of “no daylight” in U.S. –Israel relations.

On J Street’s promotion of the Goldstone Report that Maligned Israel in Operation Cast Lead in 2008 – 2009 p. 102

Though J Street refrained from formally endorsing the [Goldstone Report], activists in the organization escorted Goldstone to Congress for meetings with progressive members.  Assistant Secretary of State Michael Posner told the UNHRC of America’s disappointment with the document’s double standards. But he also cited Goldstone’s ‘distinguished record of public service” and called on Palestinians to investigate Hamas abuses. This, for Israelis, was tantamount to asking al-Qaeda to investigate 9/11.

On the contretemps between the Israeli Embassy and J Street P. 107

Irksome was the embassy’s continued imbroglio with J Street. Unlike my predecessor, Sallai Meridor, who had shunned the lobby, I initially engaged it in a dialogue.  I had no illusions about the group, which received funds from anti-Israel contributors, supported every legislator critical of Israel, and stridently attacked mainstream American Jewish leaders. Though J Street defined itself as “pro-Israel” and “pro-peace”, its logo bore no connection to Israel whatsoever, not even the color blue, and portrayed other pro-Israel organizations as anti-Israel. Before becoming Ambassador, I chanced to meet one J Street board member and asked him why he had joined. “I’m uncomfortable with the special relationship,” he told me. “I want to normalize U.S.-Israel ties.”

Outrageously, J Street members hosted Goldstone in Congress and lobbied  against sanctions on Iran. These actions were deeply deleterious to Israel’s security – “they endangered seven million Israelis,” I said –and made interacting with J Street virtually impossible. Both the Prime Minister [Netanyahu] and the foreign minister [Avigdor Liberman] vetoed my participation in its annual conference.

On the Obama White House relations with J Street p. 108

J Street …fashioned itself as the Administration’s wing in the American Jewish Community. Obama acknowledged that fact by sending his National Security Advisor [former Marine General] Jim Jones, one of Washington’s most powerful officials to greet the organization. “I’m honored to represent President Obama at the first national J Street conference.  And you can be sure that this administration will be represented at all other J Street conferences…” Obama’s newly appointed advisor on anti-Semitism, Hannah Rosenthal, an early J Street supporter, issued her first denunciation not of anti-Semites, but rather of me for boycotting the summit.

Michael Oren’s Ally might be considered a 21st Century version of Emile Zola’s J’accuse.  Oren , like Zola in the fin de siècle  Dreyfus affair  ,  addresses the calumnies of President  Obama, nurtured  in Muslim Indonesia,  creating daylight isolating Israeli  PM Netanyahu over nuclear Iran and recognition of a Faux Palestinian State.  Daylight promised  to Obama’s  Chicago anti-Israel confreres, Rashid Khalidi, holder of the Edward Said Endowed Chair on Modern Arab Studies  at Columbia and Ali Abunimah , editor of The Electronic Intifada blog, that he wouldn’t forget them.  Oren chronicles how Obama delivered on that promise.

Posted on 07/03/2015 4:23 AM by Jerry Gordon
Friday, 3 July 2015
Primary school teacher struck off for praising Isil murder of Alan Henning

A primary school teacher has been banned from the classroom for life after praising Isil for beheading aid worker Alan Henning in string of offensive social media posts.

The Muslim teacher, Nargs Bibi, put up forty offensive and malicious messages immediately after the tragic Briton's murder by 'Jihadi John' urging Isil to kill all non believers.

Divorcee Bibi, 31, who had worked at Knowsley Junior School, Oldham, for three years before being fired over another matter, also hurled a diatribe of abuse at Mr Henning's wife.

In some of the comments Ms Bibi called his wife "a b****" and a "slag". She also referred to people aid workers in Syria as "barking dogs". She called on Muslim women to "stay at home" (she will be able to obey from now on) and called on Allah to "destroy" the UK and the US.

She admitted making the comments and accepted they amounted to unacceptable professional conduct and conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute.

Ms Bibi did not attend a disciplinary hearing of the National College for Teaching and Leadership in Coventry and was not represented. The professional conduct panel's written ruling redacted the tweets on its website because they were so offensive.

The messages began appearing on her Twitter account on the day of Mr Henning's death last October 3, and continued during the following day.

She was arrested by Greater Manchester Police but no further action was taken. Bibi said her action was out of character, and she was suffering poor mental health at the time. 

The panel recommended she be allowed to apply to have her position reviewed after five years, owing to her mental health problems but decision maker Alan Meyrick, on behalf of the Secretary of State, overruled this, meaning Bibi is prohibited from teaching in any school, sixth form college, relevant youth accommodation or children's home in England ever again. He said: "In my view this decision reflects the extreme nature of the material posted on Twitter and the regard with which the public will hold a teacher who has posted such material." 

Posted on 07/03/2015 3:17 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Friday, 3 July 2015
Muslim Country Sees 'Northern Lights'

It isn't how far south the Aurora Borealis is visible that makes this report from On Islam so interesting. It shows yet another example of the adage that territory once held for Islam is Islamic forever.

Rare sight as parts of the world's northernmost Muslim country, Sibir, marvel in the majestic sight of the Aurora Borealis.Siberian Muslim Tatars in parts of southern Siberia were treated to a spectacular, and rare, display of the Northern Lights

However the strong solar activity brought it to more southern latitudes, including Omsk city in the Muslim country of Sibir which lies under Russian occupation since 1598

Reporters and astronomers also confirmed that residents of Kazan, the capital city of the Muslim country of Tatarstan, watched the colorful display too.

Posted on 07/03/2015 2:48 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Friday, 3 July 2015
BBC South Today Special Report: Barrister giving extremist views to Muslim women
A BBC South Today investigation has revealed attempts by a speaker to influence Muslim women in Hampshire with a rhetoric that's been called 'dangerous' and 'destructive'. In this BBC South Today special report from Emma Vardy, we see undercover footage of a speech given, along with quotes from an Iman and an interview with a member of Hampshire Police's Counter-Terrorism team to see how they're attempting to deal with extremism in the county.

This is followed by a statement by Ibtihal Bsis's lawyers, the woman alleged to have given these speeches.
Posted on 07/03/2015 2:25 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Thursday, 2 July 2015
An Israeli Jew Examines the Puzzle of "Palestinian" Privilege, A Subset of Muslim Privilege

A timely Op Ed from "Israel National News", that deserves to be more widely known, for the phenomenon he is describing is not merely about "Palestinian" privilege but about Muslim privilege.

'Op-Ed: Confronting Palestinian Privilege'.

'How do heroic Palestinian freedom fighters get away with cold-blooded murder? How do they manage to legitimize attacks on ambulances and infants? Simple: Palestinian privilege.'

Which is, at bottom, an enactment of the principle of non-reciprocity at the heart of Islam, according to which Muslims, if they feel strong enough to get away with it, are fully entitled to do as they will to non-Muslims, to attack and abuse, in every imaginable way, any non-Muslims within their reach - whether dhimmis or harbis - but it is inconceivable, it is a capital offense, for those attacked non-Muslims to denounce, let alone resist or defend themselves against their Muslim attackers.  In the Pact of Omar it is stipulated that a dhimmi, a non-Muslim who has submitted to Muslim rule, cannot "strike" a matter what, not even if a Muslim attacks him first. - CM

'Malachi Rosenfeld was just driving home with three of his friends, on their way back from a basketball game, when it happened.   

'A car passed right next to theirs as the four unsuspecting friends - all of them residents of the village of Kochav Hashachar - laughed and joked together...

'And then the shots rang out. Again. And again.  And all that ended....

'A moment later Malachi lay dying...

'The car, severely damaged, ground to a halt, and one of Malachi's friends watched in horror as the terrorists considered whether to go back and "finish the job".  Thankfully they did not, opting to drive away and live to murder another day instead of running the risk of being intercepted by the Israeli army.

'After all, heroic Palestinian (sic: "Palestinian" Arab Muslim - CM) freedom fighters don't do nearly as well against soldiers as they do against unarmed civilians.

And whenever they do, the deeply-dhimmified Useful Idiots of the western world shriek with indignation at the very idea that a Poor Palestinian has been shot by an uppity non-dhimmi Jew daring to defend himself against Muslim assault...- CM

'Overhead that evening, as word spread of the attack, I heard the military helicopters pass over my home in Shiloh, just a few minutes' drive from the site of the murder, which occurred outside Shvut Rachel on the next hill.  I knew it was bad. A helicopter can only mean one thing - someone needs to make it to the hospital, right now, or they may well die.  And today, less than 24 hours after he was critically injured, Malachi Rosenfeld did die of his injuries.

'Malachi.  25 years old.  In the prime of his life. Gunned down (by Muslims - CM) purely because he was a Jew.  A Jew driving just a few kilometres away from the first capital of ancient Israel, Shiloh, where the sages of western journalism and the Storm-troopers of Arab-Islamic colonialism believe that Jews have no right to be.

'Malachi was only the latest victim of a recent spate of terror attacks by Muslim terrorists in Israel.

'Of course, even prior to this recent "spate", terrorism against Jews by Muslims is nothing new here; but this past Ramadan, which isn't even halfway gone, has been particularly violent (not just in Israel, of course - in France, Tunisia, Kuwait...and not only against Jews - CM).

'And amid the ongoing pattern of so-called 'lone wolf" attacks involving knives, cars, and occasionally guns, in the past two weeks a clear pattern has emerged here in the Binyamin region, in the hills of Samaria just north of Jerusalem.

'It began two weeks ago, when two Jewish hikers from the central Israeli city of Lod visited a natural spring, where their ancestors once walked.

'As they left to return home, a Palestinian Arab man (a "Palestinian" Arab Muslim man - CM) waved their car down, apparently in need of assistance.

'They stopped - Jews love to help people.

'He approached them and began asking for water, and then, having confirmed that the two men were indeed Israeli Jews (though any kind of Jew at all would have done as a sacrificial victim; Muslim Jew-hatred is hardwired into the texts of Islam, which were concocted during a time when Jews in eretz Israel were living under the dominion of the Byzantine Empire, the heir of the Roman Empire - CM) pulled out a gun and started shooting from point-blank range.

'Danny Gonen was killed and his friend, injured, left for dead. The terrorist, meanwhile, escaped to a nearby Arab (that is: Arab Muslim - CM) village.

'Four days earlier, I had been driving just a few miles from the scene of that attack, when a Palestinian (sic: 'Palestinian' Arab Muslim - CM) man attempted to flag me down.  My instinct, too, was to stop and help...but something held me back. Vague memories of stories from the Second Intifada in which well-intentioned Israelis (that is, Israeli Jews - CM) were murdered or carjacked after stopping to help an ostensibly-stranded Palestinian (that is, "Palestinian" Arab Muslim - CM) motorist.  So I drove on - why risk it?  I felt a little bit bad at the time - I don't any more.

There is a lesson in there, I think, for all those Infidel states that, today, are being besieged by neverending swarms of Muslims all tearfully claiming to be "refugees" in need of succour, in need of hospitality.  "We are suffering! Help us! Feed us, clothe us, take us in!"   Said Muslims may look like victims, and may tell very convincing sob stories...but are they? And what will they, or their children or grandchildren do, once they are well inside the door, not of your car, but of your home, your country? - CM

'In between those two deadly attacks was another attack, also in Binyamin, and with the same modus operandi but thankfully with a far less tragic outcome.

'As an Israeli ambulance drove towards the town of Bet El (that is, biblical Bethel - CM), next to Ramallah and less than half an hour north of Jerusalem, ambulance driver Shalom Galil noticed an Arab man (an Arab Muslim man - CM) standing by the side of the road.

'He recounted what happened next, to Arutz Sheva:

"I returned from Ofra, which is a few kilometres north of Beit El". Galil said.  "This was on a new highway that was recently opened. The terrorist was standing outside his vehicle, with the car's motor running.  Without shame, without trying to hide, and boldly looking at me, he drew his weapon, and began shooting."

'Shots fired, at point-blank range, by an Arab (an Arab Muslim - CM) terrorist who immediately sped away in his vehicle, in the Binyamin region.  Only this time, the target was an ambulance.

'After all, brave Palestinian (sic: "Palestinian" Arab Muslim - CM) freedom fighters stand a much better chance against Israeli ambulances than against military checkpoints.

'Thank God, Galil miraculously escaped unharmed, though his ambulance was peppered with bullets....

'The striking similar tactics - the brazenness, the cold-blooded nerve to approach a vehicle to make sure its occupants are Jewish and not Arab-Israelis (that is, "and not Muslims" - CM) and the fact that all of the attacks took place within a radius of just a few miles, has led the security services to believe all three are the act of an organized terrorist cell, not individual "lone wolves".

And both the so-called "lone wolves" and the "terrorist cells" are crystallising naturally out of the Ummah, the Muslim 'community' that teaches its children - from Quran, Sira and Hadith and their orthodox interpreters - to despise and hate the dirty unbelievers, and that believes firmly that Islam, alone, has the right to rule, to dominate, always and everywhere. - CM

'But regardless, the attacks are actually evidence of something much more fundamental to understanding the struggle here in the Middle East: Palestinian privilege.

"Palestinian" Muslim privilege. Which is a subset of 'Muslim privilege" that seems to have become - or is becoming - normalised all over the place. - CM

'Consider: All of this happened as the actions of the Israeli Defence Forces during last summer's 'Operation Protective Edge' were being scrutinized under a microscoope, and then inevitably condemned, by the UN's kangaroo-court of tyrants, the ironically-named UN Human Rights Council.

'Grim-faced, the protectors of human rights from (Muslim - CM) Algeria, (Muslim - CM) Bangladesh, (majority-Muslim - CM) Kazakhstan, (fanatically-Muslim - CM) Pakistan, (Muslim, and energetically jihad-financing-and-inciting - CM) Qatar, (historically deeply-antisemitic - CM) Russia, (fanatically-Muslim - CM) Saudi Arabia, the EAU (also Muslim - CM), and (Marxist-influenced and ever-more-influenced by Muslim Iran - CM) Venezuela passed their harsh judgement against the Jewish (but that's just incidental) state's actions to stop incessant rocket fire against its civilians, and to prevent cross-border assaults by terrorists emerging from tunnels dug with just one purpose: to kill, maim and kidnap as many Israelis (that is: as many Jews - CM) as possible.

'And standing by their side, the liberals  of Europe nodded their assent, sighing as they felt the yoke of guilt for the crimes of the twentieth century shift just slightly from their shoulders.

'Palestinian privilege (i.e Palestinian Muslim privilege - CM): when you can hide behind civilians, establish military bases and bunkers and rocket launchers in schools, mosques, hospitals and private homes - and still walk away guilt-free from the consequences of your actions.

'Palestinian (Muslim - CM) privilege: when your complaints about Jews building on land that was never yours in the first place elicit loud, vociferous headlines and cries of support - but if you shoot at an ambulance no-one bats an eyelid.

'Palestinian (Muslim - CM) privilege: when you can shoot up a car full of innocent, unarmed civilians, coldly execute an innocent nature-lover on a hike, cut off the heads of infant children or crush their little skulls with rocks, butcher innocent worshippers at prayer - and yet still your 'cause' remains whiter than white, a cause celebre among the chic and the liberal.

As I discovered recently in a baffling and frightening conversation with the nice, sweet wife of an Anglican vicar, who was much exercised about how mean the horrible Jews were (supposedly) being to the poor, poor 'Palestinians', but refused to listen and essentially put her hands over her ears when I tried to educate her about Islamic antisemitism - which long pre-dates the reestablishment of the sovereign Jewish state of Israel - and about the doctrine of Jihad that lies at the core of Islam.   When I tried to explain that the checkpoints and the fence and the recent military attack upon Jihad Fortress Gaza were merely Israel's attempt to defend itself against a genocidal Jihad that is a subset of the wider global Jihad. She absolutely refused to believe me. - CM

'Palestinian (Muslim - CM) privilege: when your towns and villages are built atop the ruins of an ancient, indigenous Jewish civilization - some still carrying their original Hebrew names  (Susyia, Hevron, Jerusalem, Bethlehem) or bastardized versions of them (Battir/ Betar; Anata/ Anatot; Beitin/ Bet El; Beit Jalla/ Gilo) and yet you are still able to claim that those who came before you are "occupiers" while you are the "natives".

'Palestinian (Muslim - CM) privilege: when massacres by your co-religionists committed against white Europeans (that is, against European non-Muslims - CM) or even other Muslims are called "terrorism" but your acts of brutality against the Jew are merely "militant".

In the case of Muslim attacks on non-Jewish infidels within western countries - and elsewhere, such as Thailand, China, India, Burma - Muslim privilege manifests in a different way.  Yes, the attack  may be identified as "terrorism".  Though not always; as we see from the recent murderous vehicular jihad attack carried out in Graz, Austria, which - despite its obvious similarity to previous murderous vehicular attacks carried out by Muslims against non-Muslims in both Israel and the USA - everyone is pretending could not possibly have anything to do with the fervently-held Muslim beliefs of the attacker.  But even when an act, by Muslims, is identified as "terrorism" everyone - reporters, government officials, pundits - falls over themselves to protect the ideology of Islam, and the Ummah colonies in the affected countries, from scrutiny. The Infidel public, at all costs, must be prevented from wondering whether acts of terror might be mandated by Islam and approved of by some - or even by many - run-of-the-mill Muslims.  These "terrorist" acts, even when carried out by self-identifying Muslims shouting allahu akbar, even when carried out - like the Lee Rigby murder - by Muslims who proudly quote the Quran chapter and verse while the blood is still warm, are all pronounced over and over to be "nothingtodowithIslam".  And if those attacked can be represented as having offended Muslims - by making a film critical of Islam, as Theo Van Gogh did, or by drawing cartoons, as Charlie Hebdo artists did, or by holding a Mohammed cartoons art exhibition, as was done by Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller (in their case they survived the attempted jihad attack, because their security screen included a cool-headed cop with deadly aim) then more and more the reporting seems to side with the attackers and blame the victims for having "provoked" the attack.  These days no-one in authority tells Muslims in general, within the West, that they need to grow thicker skins and get used to being criticised, questioned, and even laughed at, and that murdering or threatening to murder cartoonists and critics is just. not. on. - CM

'Without understanding Palestinian privilege (that is, Muslim privilege - CM) it is impossible to grasp the root of the conflict here in the Middle East (and pretty well everywhere else - CM), why it grinds on with such a grim inevitability, why all facts and figures displayed by Israeli advocates are ignored, to their utter incredulity.

'it must be confronted, by every Jew who cares about his or her people, indeed, by every decent human being who truly cares about human rights, honesty and justice.

'We owe it to Malachi, we owe it to Danny, and we owe it to ourselves.".

One hopes that someone, soon, will translate Rev Dr Mark Durie's lucid study of the dhimma, "The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude and Freedom" into modern Hebrew, and French, and Russian.  Because it would be very helpful to people such as the author of this Israel National News op-ed.  He would be able to recognise a dhimmi mindset both in the exculpation of and sympathy for the "Palestinian" Arab Muslim assault upon the Jews of Israel, and also in the frantic haste with which authority figures in the West rush to dissociate Islam as such - and the general Muslim 'community' - from the threatened, attempted, and more and more often achieved acts of Jihad terror that are taking place ever more frequently within the gates of every non-Muslim country that now has a resident Muslim colony on its soil.  Muslim attacks on Jews are not 'terrorism' but 'militancy'; while Muslim attacks on non-Muslims in the UK, or Tunisia, or Canada, or France, are 'terrorism', yes, but still have "nothingtodowithIslam".  Either way, Islam, and the Muslims who enact the jihad imperative hardwired into Islam, are being exempted from criticism; and that exemption from criticism is precisely what the sharia decrees. - CM


Posted on 07/02/2015 9:35 PM by Christina McIntosh
Thursday, 2 July 2015
Realism about Ramadan, and About Islam, From an Israeli Jewish Scholar Who has Figured Things Out

As published just this week by Israel National News, one Benny Toker reporting.  The headline doesn't beat about the bush.

"They Leave the Mosque With Hatred In Their Eyes.

"Middle East expert explains that Ramadan is "victory month" and is the wrong time for any gestures.

By 'gestures' he means appeasement and concessions offered by non-Muslims - in this case, the Jewish state of Israel - to Muslims. - CM

'Middle East expert Dr David Bokai explained on Tuesday on Arutz Sheva that Ramadan is traditionally a month of violence (i.e. of Jihad - CM) and is the wrong time to offer any kind of gestures to Muslims.

"Look at all of the terror attacks in Kuwait, France, and here in Israel", he explained.

"They carry out terror attacks against all the enemies of Islam.

"Ramadan is defined as the month of victory.  All of the great victories of Mohammed, and the expulsion of the Crusaders, took place on that month.  That is why Ramadan turns into a month of terror and violence worldwide."

'Dr Bokai noted that Israel (and not only Israel, these days! - CM) makes the same mistake every year regarding Ramadan.  "It's amazing that we don't learn, and we make gestures for Ramadan every year," he said. "It drives me mad and makes me nauseous. (You're not the only one, Dr Bokai. Me, too. - CM). 

"This is not a month for making gestures, but for placing limitations.  When you offer them gestures, you get terror and violence.  In this month one should toughen and harden policy."

Are you listening, O governments of Britain? France? Denmark? Germany? Canada? Australia? India?  Because this is what you should be doing.  Above all, during Ramadan; but  not only during Ramadan. It is the only way to deal with those aggressive, expanding, and vociferous Mohammedan colonies that have established themselves in our lands. -  CM

'The imam's sermons also inflame the spirits, the expert added.

"You see people from the middle class upward who are influenced by the sermons at the mosques during Ramadan.

"After a 20 minute Friday sermon, they leave with a will to slaughter and kill.

"That is what characterizes Islam - it's a religion of murder and not of peace.  Its culture says that the entire world must be conquered."

Dr Bokai is not exaggerating. In the plainest, simplest terms he is stating an observable fact about Muslim doctrine - core Muslim doctrine, not some weird fringe aberration or misinterpretation - and about a very great deal of contemporary and historic Muslim conduct.  - CM

Posted on 07/02/2015 8:31 PM by Christina McIntosh
Thursday, 2 July 2015
Aussie Cop Invited to Ramadan Dinner For a Heaping Dish of Dawa With a Side Serve of Soft Soap

And it doesn't sound as though Queensland's Acting Assistant Police Commissioner Brent Carter had his BS detector switched on.  If he had read about the core principle of al wala wa al bara, Loyalty (to Muslims only) and Enmity (toward non-Muslims qua non-Muslims), or had he read Quran 48.29, or any of the many verses that adamently condemn and forbid the forming of any sort of genuine friendship with unbelievers - although a feigned friendship, temporary and for Muslim advantage, is permitted (see Quran 3.28 and the orthodox commentaries thereupon) - if Muslims are currently weak vis a vis the surrounding non-Muslims, he might have been a little more wary of this smilingly-offered invitation.

Yet more dawa from Australia's ABC, with one Courtney Wilson breathlessly reporting on an oh-so-sweet Australia-resident Mohammedan family who are doing their bit for the Ummah by getting busy buttering up the local police chief.

"Logan Family (that is: Logan-resident Muslim family - CM) Invites Queensland Police Chief to Ramadan Feast in Bid to Break Down Cultural Barriers.

Ah yes, "cultural barriers".  It's actually all about getting rid of anything that gets in the way of Islamisation.  If a regional Infidel police chief can be fooled into thinking Muslims - and especially the local Muslim colony, steadily expanding - are nothing to worry about, as he accepts that plate of delicious dawa rom a doe-eyed Muslimah who looks like butter wouldn't melt in her mouth, then his - and our - guard will be down and the Jihad, the struggle to impose the total dominance of Islam, and of Muslims, everywhere, including Australia, will go on that much more swiftly and easily. - CM

'The daily family ritual of sitting down to dinner together has taken on a new significance for about half a million Australian Muslims observing the holy month of Ramadan.

Which is also the Month of Jihad, my dear Courtney Wilson. Did you know that? No, you've just been fed the usual disinformation intended to keep the wool over your, and our, eyes...until it is too late. - CM

'They must abstain from all food and drink during daylight hours (and lucky for them, here in the southern hemisphere, this year Ramadan falls during the period of shortest days and longest nights!, so, big deal, eat a big breakfast before dawn, spend the - short - daylight hours getting over it, then sit down to dinner the minute the sun drops below the horizon - CM) to purify the soul, refocus on God, and practice self-sacrifice.

Well, until the sun goes down. Then it's time for a frenzy of overeating. And beyond that, in various places it isn't self-sacrifice that's been going on, but various successful or less-successful attempts to sacrifice the dirty unbelievers...e.g. all those terrified British tourists in Tunisia, and that poor bloke in France. - CM

'The fast is broken every evening at sunset with special meals enjoyed together with family and friends.

"It's such a special thing for us, the Ramadan dinner", said mother-of-five Canan Coskun from Logan, south of Brisbane.

Mother of five. Demographic jihad in full swing, to outbreed and outnumber and overwhelm the dirty infidels.  - CM

"If you can imagine you haven't eaten all day (plenty of us know what that feels like; all of us have skipped lunch from time to time, my dear, for all kinds of reasons; so why are you trying to make out you're so speshul just because of eating breakfast early and then skipping lunch before eating dinner at sunset - 5.30 pm, right now in much of Australia? - CM) so you're really looking forward to that soup and that bread and everything just seems so delicious."

'Her family hosts the special dinners, or Iftars, where they invite non-Muslim guests to share in the evening meal at their home.

Dawa.  They are not allowed to eat with or befriend non-Muslims, unless it is for the protection and/ or promotion of Islam. Of late, there have been signs of resistance to Islam among some non-Muslim Aussies, even hints that some have been finding out all those things that Muslims don't like non-Muslims to know about Islam - except, of course, when it's too late, and the Muslims are strong enough locally or regionally to do exactly as they are instructed to do to non-Muslims - so some among the Ummah have obviously decided it's time to slather on the soft soap. - CM

'This year the Coskuns counted Queensland's Acting Assistant Police Commissioner Brent Carter among their guests.

"What better thing to do with someone than to sit down and have food with them?" said Mrs Coskun.

Fattening the sheep for slaughter...? - CM

"Especially when we're in my home and I'm serving them food.  To share that special moment with people from other faith backgrounds, it means a lot to us."

Suuuure.  I'll bet it does, so long as you think it may incline them to accept Islam, or at least to put up no resistance to the spread of Islam.  - CM

'Mrs Coskun said she believed having a meal together could also help to break down barriers.

To break down break down barriers against the spread of Islam and the imposition of Muslim dominance, by lulling unwary non-Muslims into thinking that Islam and Muslims are nothing to worry about...and therefore making those thus lulled, less inclined to listen to the warnings of other worried infidels who have read the Islamic texts, read a modicum of history, and have decided that there is something - rather a lot - to worry about.  And if the warnings of the worried and well-informed are not heeded, are pooh-poohed by those who have just had such a yummy dinner with such a sweeeet, sweeetly-smiling Muslim mama, then one day it will be too late. And then the smiling mask temporarily donned by such local representatives of the Ummah will come off. No more goodcop. Just the badcop.  Pure by-the-book strictly-according-to-the-Sunnah, Islam.  Like we are seeing in Syria and Iraq. - CM

"I've had many people over at my house who have never seen a Muslim person before, or maybe they've never seen a  woman in a hijab", she said.

Do you tell them that you believe that unless you're wearing the slave rag, your 'allah' can't or won't listen to your prayers?  Do you tell them that a woman who isn't wearing the slave rag is by definition a whore and a slut, uncovered meat? - CM

"They're sitting at my dinner table and just kind of looking at me serving them soup and serving them sweets and I can see them thinking, "Wow, they're pretty much like us and they're quite normal."

"Pretty much like us".  Nevertheless, the most recent surveys show that a very, very high proportion of Muslims in Europe are rabidly, luridly, screamingly antisemitic, far more so than the surrounding non-Muslims.  If that's the case in Europe, one may probably safely assume that things are similar in Australia and anywhere else that the ummah has established colonies.   I wonder what would happen if the subject of Jews, and of Israel, were to be raised at this lady's cosy dinner-table, by any of her Infidel guests?  What if someone were to openly express support - approval - of Israel's self-defence against the Jihad? -  CM

'The notion of going without food for thirty days (no, it isn't "going without food for thirty days", it's merely "skipping lunch and not drinking anything during daylight hours, for thirty days" - CM) also sparks plenty of questions from non-Muslim guests.

Which gives her lots of opportunities to pour on the dawa, hot and strong.   Of course, by now so many Aussies, not being familiar with their bibles any more, have forgotten what Jesus had to say about those who make a big show of ostentatious piety in public. - CM

"They just think we're refraining from food and water, but it's more than that," said 18 year old Seyma Coskun.  "It's about developing more spiritually, it's about doing more good (ah, yes, my dear girl; but do please define more precisely what you mean by "good", because it doesn't necessarily mean what we kuffar think of as "good" - CM), it's about making better habits".

About being an ever more pious, Mohammed-imitating, sharia-observant Muslim.  Like so many, many other Muslims who become visibly more observant, pray more often, go to Mosque more often..and then Go Jihad, either in places like Syria, France, or in Israel, or in the UK.  And chop off heads, or blow things up.  Some of us are noticing that interesting correlation between increasing Islamic piety and increasing violence. -  CM

'Her eight-year-old brother Huzeyfe is not obliged to fast until he reaches puberty, but he is trying to join his parents and older sisters.  He says his friends are very curious.  "They ask, 'Is it easy and do you get very hungry?" and I say, 'I don't eat much, so it's easy for me", he said.

'Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic lunar calendar, and this year runs from June 18 until July 17.

'Like his wife, Murat Coskun hoped breaking bread with other community members might help foster tolerance and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Yeah, lulling those circumambient infidels to sleep, or even suckering some of them into becoming Muslims, so that the Ummah can keep on expanding and advancing unhindered.  But when Islam dominates and Muslims rule there will be no tolerance - as Asia Bibi and countless others have experienced - and no cultural diversity (the Jews of Iraq and Syria are long gone and the indigenous Christians are also being killed or force-converted or driven out of the country).  - CM

"I think that whilst it's not an obligation for people to know about it, it would not take anything away from them, from knowing about Ramadan", he said.

What will you do,mate, if they do some homework on their own and find out it's also called "the Month of Jihad"? - CM

"It would just add to their depth and I think it would help them better understand people that they bump into at work, or maybe their neighbours or their friends."

"Friends". Suuure.  Then explain to me Quran 48.29, Mr Coskun. And 60.1, and 9.29 and 9.5. How do you, Mr Coskun, understand those? - CM

"We like to learn about Christmas and how our human brethren live and what they believe in."

My BS detector just went right off the chart. Because I know what orthodox Muslims think about the Christian doctrine that Jesus of Nazareth is the Son of God (which is what Christmas is all about). They view it as "shirk", assigning partners to god, and they view it with absolute disgust and contempt; 'shirk', so they are taught in orthodox Islam, is worse than murder. - CM

'He said the family looked forward to Ramadan. "It's like the spiritual pinnacle of our year", said Mr Coskun. "It's where we're closest to God, and consequently closest to people, as well."

'Acting Assistant Police Commissioner Carter described it as an educational experience.

No, it was the opposite.  You just got fed a huge pile of disinformation that will make you and the cops under your authority dangerously more likely to be blindsided by those who are working steadily to Islamise our society, and to Islamise the world. - CM

"You know, I've learned so much, meeting this family for the first time, sitting down and sharing a meal with them", he said.  "They're just like any other Australian family: hard working, very committed, and family-oriented."

Yeah, family-oriented.  But I bet you didn't inquire what might happen if that 18 year old daughter decided she didn't want to wear hijab. Or if she decided she wanted to convert to Christianity or Buddhism, or become an atheist. Of if she ran away with, and married - without demanding he become Muslim first -  a Christian or Buddhist or atheist Aussie guy.  - CM

 'The dinners are coordinated through the Queensland Intercultural Society to foster a better understanding of (translation: "to spread soothing nonsense and lies about" - CM) the Islamic faith."

Dawa dinners.

And now, having read this content-free Aussie media fluff piece about Ramadan, let's get a series of short, sharp reality checks about Ramadan from a front-line where the combat Jihad is slamming up hard against a resistant non-Muslim entity, namely, Israel.

Here's one.

"Terrorist Killed in Gun Battle with IDF Soldiers.

"The attack comes amid a recent upswing in terrorist attacks since the Muslim fast month of Ramadan began last Thursday...".

Here's another, from the astute Gil Ronen.

"Ramadan so Far - 12 Days of Terror'.

'The advent of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan has ushered in a month of daily terror against Israeli Jews by Muslim terrorists.  Terror attacks, which unfortunately have not been rare in Israel regardless of the Muslim fast month, have become even more frequent in recent days...".

And two blistering pieces from the equally Islamosavvy Israeli blogger, "A Soldier's Mother".


"Dear Palestinian (sic: Muslim - CM) Shooter (he had fired repeatedly at a Jewish ambulance driver - CM)

"Happy Ramadan.

"I can tell by the news each day that your people are having a wonderful month.

"Just days into it and already they've hit dozens of cars and buses, one man beaten to death, several stabbed, and repeated attacks on the light rail in Jerusalem...

"You have exploded bombs around the world that have killed a few hundred, and shot fireworks at a bunch of 18 and 19 year old unarmed kids (Jewish kids - CM) playing basketball. 

"Celebrated Jihad in France with the beheading of one man, dozens murdered in Tunisia...and here in little Israel, I have to hand it to you, you've tried very hard to murder and maim...".

Click on the link, read the rest of it.  And now for her second piece, "In the Name of Allah", that is even more scathingly accurate.

"In the Name of Allah.

"In the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, Palestinians (sic: Muslims - CM) stoned a bus filled with children (that is, with Jewish children - CM) yesterday.

"In the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, a Palestinian (sic: Muslim- CM) woman approached a young Israeli (Israeli Jewish- CM) woman and stabbed her in the neck.

Obeying the Quranic injunction - Surah 47.4 - to "strike at their necks" - CM

'Full disclosure: the young woman, aged 19, was wearing a uniform showing that she was serving her nation by protecting a holy site that is often attacked by neighbouring Arabs (that is, neighbouring Arab Muslims - CM) with rocks, firebombs, etc.

"In the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, four Israeli young men on their way home from a soccer game in Jerusalem were attacked (by Muslims - CM).  One is fighting for his life (and has since died - CM), three others were also injured but are expected to recover.

"In the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, dozens (that is, dozens of a/ non-Muslims and b/ deemed wrong-sect or insufficiently-sharia-compliant Muslims - CM) have been murdered in Tunis and Yemen.

"In the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, a man (a French Infidel - CM) was beheaded in Paris, and the murderer (a pious Muslim - CM) took a selfie with the body, to show his pride in his actions...

"In the name of allah, the most graciious, firebombs were thrown this morning at a Jewish neighbourhood in Jerusalem.

"In the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, Muslims around the world are showing neither graciousness nor mercy this holy (sic - CM) month of Ramadan.

'And what infuriates me most of all is two things. 

'The first is that no-one is surprised.

"It's this way every Ramadan, I am told. Every Ramadan, I tell new immigrants to Israel, who are shocked by the sudden spike in attacks, this is Ramadan...".

Click on the link. Read the whole thing.  And share her article around; it might help to dispel the sort of soothing nonsense that was being peddled to a dangerously-naive and ill-informed police chief in Logan, Queensland, and that the ABC was then peddling further, by interviewing that eager-to-be-fooled police chief and his smiling, smiling, smiling Muslim hosts who invited him in and greasily buttered him up. - CM


Posted on 07/02/2015 6:39 PM by Christina McIntosh
Thursday, 2 July 2015
He Just May Have a Chance
Posted on 07/02/2015 3:31 PM by Rebecca Bynum
Thursday, 2 July 2015
Why is Obama Blocking Weapons to Kurds Fighting ISIS?

Ari Soffer writes in INN:

Arab and European states have been unable to provide Kurdish fighters with badly-needed weapons to fight ISIS - because the US is blocking the weapons transfers.

According to the UK's Daily Telegraph, the Obama administration's hesitation and lack of clear strategy means that US commanders, who are directing the anti-ISIS coalition efforts, are not authorizing moves to directly arm Kurdish forces in Iraq and Syria. This, despite the fact that the Kurds have proven by far the most effective force in fighting ISIS, having taken and held territory from the jihadists in northern Iraq and Syria, despite being outgunned.

Citing "high level officials" from the Gulf Arab states involved in the fight against ISIS, the paper claimed some are becoming so frustrated with Washington's lack of leadership in the campaign that they are preparing to "go it alone" and directly arm the Kurds in spite of US opposition.

Backed by coalition airstrikes, both the Kurdish Peshmerga in northern Iraq and People's Protection Unit (YPG) in northern Syria have scored significant victories against the jihadists - in stark contrast to the relative ineffectiveness and disarray of Iranian-backed Shia Islamist militias in southern Iraq, and pro-regime forces in Syria.

But Kurdish commanders lament that while the collapse and surrender of the Iraqi army flooded ISIS arsenals with advanced US weaponry and armored vehicles, they themselves are largely forced to rely upon light, Soviet-era weapons and only a tiny number of anti-tank or heavy weapons.

Currently, several European states have spent millions in purchasing new weapons for the Kurds - but all of that much-needed equipment is currently sitting in storage due to the US blocking their transfer to Kurdish forces.

At least one Arab government is seriously considering bypassing US commanders and arming the Kurds, instead of transferring weapons via the government in Baghdad - which mostly distributes them to pro-government Shia militias.

Summing up the sense of frustration in some Middle Eastern capitals, one senior Arab official told the Telegraph: "If the Americans and the West are not prepared to do anything serious about defeating Isil [ISIS], then we will have to find new ways of dealing with the threat." 

The official suggested western states simply do not appreciate the scale of the threat posed by the Islamist group.

"With Isil making ground all the time we simply cannot afford to wait for Washington to wake up to the enormity of the threat we face," he said.

America's Arab allies - including Jordan, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states - have also expressed extreme frustration at the lack of a coherent strategy altogether.

"There is simply no strategic approach," another senior Arab official said. "There is a lack of coordination in selecting targets, and there is no overall plan for defeating Isil."

The report comes as the UK's new Defense Secretary criticized the current British policy of only participating in airstrikes against ISIS targets in Iraq as "illogical," and called for a new parliamentary vote on the issue.

"It is a new Parliament and I think new Members of Parliament will want to think very carefully about how we best deal with Isil, and the illogicality of Isil not respecting the borderlines," Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said.

"We’ve always been clear that Isil has to be defeated in both Syria and Iraq. We have plenty to do in Iraq," he told BBC Radio 4 Thursday.

But he noted that ISIS's de-facto capital, Raqqa, together with the majority of its command and control centers, are based in Syria. "Isil is organized and directed and administered from Syria. There is an illogicality about not being able to do it," he said.

Currently the UK only participates in airstrikes over Iraq, whose government has given permission for coalition aircraft to operate in its airspace, but not in Syria, where the Assad regime has not assented to the air campaign - which is going on regardless.

It is far from the first time US President Barack Obama has been criticized for a lack of strategy in fighting ISIS, or for underestimating the challenge.

He infamously referred to the vicious Islamist group as a "JV team," shortly before its lightening offensive through Iraq which saw it capture vast swathes of territory and brush aside the Iraqi army in a matter of weeks.

Just last month, the US president admitted he did not have a strategy to defeat the terror group.

Posted on 07/02/2015 2:12 PM by Geoffrey Clarfield
Thursday, 2 July 2015
They Killed Her in Good Faith - Death Sentences Overturned in Afghanistan Lynching

NY Times:

KABUL, Afghanistan — An Afghan court has overturned the death sentences of four men convicted in the lynching of a woman who had been falsely accused of burning the Quran, a lawyer connected to the case and a politician said on Thursday.

In a nation in which violence against women is commonplace and so-called honor killings often go unpunished, the death in March of the woman, named Farkhunda, managed to galvanize Afghanistan as no other case had. Videos of her final moments, taken by members of the mob that surrounded her, showed Farkhunda pleading as she was kicked and stomped, and later tied to the back of a car and dragged to the garbage-strewn banks of the Kabul River. There her attackers set fire to her body.

The violence unfolded at one of Kabul’s most historic shrines, where Farkhunda, a student of Islamic law, had come to preach against what she saw as the ignorant, superstitious and un-Islamic practices that prevailed there, like the sale of good luck amulets and veneration of the tomb of an early Muslim conqueror of Afghanistan. One of the shrine’s keepers, apparently threatened by her preaching and torrent of criticism, began to shout that she was an infidel who had burned the Quran. Summoned by the shouts, young men from nearby descended on the shrine, ready to lynch her.

In the immediate aftermath of the killing, it was easy to find Afghan men who supported the mob, saying that the woman deserved to die if the accusation was true and that even if she was innocent, her tormenters had killed her in good faith.

But Farkhunda was soon transformed from a pariah into a martyr as it emerged that she had been a pious student who had been trying to rid shrines of superstition. Officials at the Ministry of Religious Affairs declared her innocent and pledged an ambitious campaign to carry on her effort to rid shrines of fortune tellers. At her funeral, women, not men, carried her coffin to her grave. And young men staged a re-enactment of her murder, in a searing act of political demonstration intended to pressure the government to prosecute her actual killers.

Initially, at least, the case unfolded with an unusual degree of transparency. The courtroom proceedings were at first televised, a rarity for a court system built with Western support that has earned a reputation for being corrupt and opaque. In May, the court issued death sentences for four men: the shrinekeeper who appeared to have sealed Farkhunda’s fate with his accusation and three other men in the mob believed to have been among her most vicious assailants. That trial also resulted in eight other defendants receiving prison terms of 16 years.

But this week — most likely on Wednesday, although the timing is unclear — an appellate court overturned those death sentences in a proceeding that Farkhunda’s advocates have described as secret and possibly the result of political meddling. The appeals court’s decision “completely undermines the rule of law in Afghanistan, and it completely undermines women’s rights in Afghanistan,” said Kimberley Motley, the lawyer who represented Farkhunda’s family at the trial. “This case presented a wider issue than Farkhunda being murdered, as heinous as that was. This case was about the future of Afghanistan: whether it is going to be a country that accepts mob violence or a country that rejects it.” ...


Posted on 07/02/2015 8:56 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Thursday, 2 July 2015
For Egypt, avenging Sinai attack may include striking Gaza

Avi Issacharoff writes in the Times of Israel:

Throughout the night, the echoes of explosions from the Egyptian airstrikes on various targets in the northern Sinai Peninsula could be heard on the Israeli side of the border.

From the moment it began fighting back Wednesday, the Egyptian army, as is its wont, has not hesitated to use all the means at its disposal. After Wednesday morning’s multi-tiered attack in Sheikh Zuweid, the aggressiveness of its military response is likely to outstrip that of any previous operation.

Anything that moves in the coming days in Egypt’s Rafah, Sheikh Zuweid, and El-Arish will likely become a target of Egypt’s F-16s and Apache helicopters, in part in a bid to protect its ground forces from danger.

Right now, the Islamic State fighters and Muslim Brotherhood fighters are likely rubbing their hands together gleefully, despite the rivalry between them. These two rival organizations found a common enemy in the form of the Egyptian government and its chief, President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi.

But the public wants revenge for the attack on the soldiers, who enjoy a particularly high standing in Egypt.

And this revenge will come.

It began Wednesday when the Egyptian army assassinated nine Muslim Brotherhood officials, including a former parliament member who, Egypt claims, was involved in attacks.

And it will continue with the executions of mid-level members of the organization who have received death sentences. And of course, heavy airstrikes on populated areas in Sinai. It can be said definitively that some of the Bedouin tribes and residents of north Sinai are collaborating with terrorists, and the army will retaliate.

Hamas will also pay a price. Only a few days ago, Egypt opened the Rafah crossing, in part due to the improvement of the security situation in Sinai. This will soon end. The army knows that some senior officials of the Hamas military wing, who operate without the approval of its political wing, are collaborating with the Islamic State in Sinai, mostly for financial renumeration.

According to an Egyptian source, some 200 militants took part in the attack, utilizing a large number of anti-aircraft weapons in the first hours, which necessitated the use of F-16 fighter jets instead of Apache helicopters as the Egyptians responded.

Those weapons, according to the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, came in through the Gaza Strip.

Therefore, Egyptian airstrikes inside the Gaza Strip cannot be ruled out entirely.

But the heaviest price will be paid by Islamic State operatives in the Sinai, who carried out the brazen attack.

The terror operation carried out by the group (known as Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis up until a few months ago) on Wednesday morning was exceptional compared to previous attacks in the area.

The attack bore many similarities to assaults carried out by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria: a simultaneous attack on several fronts to generate confusion among the enemy’s troops with the use of suicide bombers, car bombs, anti-tank missiles, and of course ground troops, some of them dressed as Egyptian cops or soldiers.

The assault began around 7 a.m., when the soldiers were about to change guard, and many of them were likely still groggy after having only gone to sleep following a pre-dawn, pre-fast meal for the Muslim holiday of Ramadan.

The car bombs were set off first, sparking the initial melee. Next the armed fighters, dressed as soldiers or police officers, attacked with anti-tank missiles, anti-aircraft missile, machine guns, and lighter weapons.

At a certain stage of the attack, the IS fighters managed to capture Egyptian armored vehicles, sparking Israeli concerns that the militants could try to storm into Israeli territory, as they did during a similar attack three years ago, also during Ramadan.

This time, the terrorists did not attempt to infiltrate Israel, and were stopped after hours of clashes with the Egyptian army.

The number of losses on the Egyptian side is not clear. The official army statement said “only” 17 soldiers were killed, along with 100 IS fighters. Most reports, however, said 60-70 Egyptian soldiers were killed...

Posted on 07/02/2015 6:58 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Thursday, 2 July 2015
Rotherham paedophile gangs are still abusing young girls

From the Telegraph. Exclusive: Gangs of Asian paedophiles are still preying on underage girls in Rotherham, claims a survivor of the abuse

A survivor of Rotherham’s paedophile gangs claims that child exploitation is still common in the South Yorkshire town.

Sarah Wilson, 23, who was groomed from the age of 11, says that she often sees underage girls socialising with 30-year-old men and that the authorities are still not effectively protecting children from paedophilia. “You see younger girls chilling with older males. It’s there in front of your eyes. Just because the report has come out, they’re not going to stop. They’re just going to be more discreet about it,” she says. “In December I went back to the spots where I was groomed in Rotherham and there was similar activity still going on.” 

When Ms Wilson was being abused aged 12, her mother took her mobile phone to the police to point out the phone numbers of 177 Asian men. But the police refused to investigate, as they said it was a breach of the Data Protection Act.

Ms Wilson claims that police inaction continues today. “If you call the police, they’re not interested,” she says. In April, she says a friend pointed out a group of underage girls and middle-aged males to a police officer, who refused to take action. “The police turned around and said, ‘There’s nothing we can do, they’re not doing anything wrong’,” says Ms Wilson.

Last week, a National Crime Agency Investigation announced that around 300 new suspects had been identified, including two serving or former Rotherham councillors. Ms Wilson believes that her abusers could still be preying on young girls.

Councillor Chris Read, leader of Rotherham council, recognises that paedophilia is an ongoing problem in Rotherham. “We know that child sexual exploitation is still happening in communities up and down the country, including Rotherham. There will always be criminals who want to hurt vulnerable young people,” he says. “Rotherham Council is now working closely with South Yorkshire Police to do everything we can to prevent and disrupt this abuse, to protect those young people who are at risk and to bring the perpetrators to justice.”

South Yorkshire police also admits that the abuse is ongoing, and says that tackling the exploitation is a priority.

“It is unfortunately a sad and distressing reality that child sexual exploitation continues to happen in towns and cities across the country, and that this horrific crime is not just limited to the past,” says Assistant Chief Constable Ingrid Lee. "We appeal directly to victims to come forward in the confidence that you will be listened to, taken seriously, and offered whatever support and care is needed.” 

In her book, Violated, Ms Wilson writes that it’s still common to see young girls climbing into cars with Asian men. “I think some people mistakenly thought it was all over, that the grooming had stopped just like that and no other girls were being abused. They couldn’t have been more wrong,” she writes. “Things as serious as this don’t change overnight, even when the eyes of the whole country are upon you. These men had got away with abusing girls for so long that it was no longer they thought they could keep doing it.” 

Posted on 07/02/2015 5:59 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Thursday, 2 July 2015
EXCLUSIVE: Why We Need to Draw Mohammed And Challenge Islam

Anne Marie Waters writing in Breitbart

“Have you ever come across any Muslim that mocks swears or draws offensive pic for other religion”?

Somebody called Abdul asked me this rather grammatically challenged question on Twitter, when I announced I intend to organise a Mohammed Cartoon Exhibit in September – with Geert Wilders as my guest speaker.

I get asked a lot of questions in my line of work; people find it a mixture of fascinating, terrifying, and awkward when I tell them that I run a website called Sharia Watch. I anticipate several questions related to our Mohammed cartoon exhibit, so I’ll take this opportunity to prepare the answers in advance. Read more here.

The restrictions, the fear, and the misogyny that so characterise life within Islamic states is now a very potent reality in Western countries, and its having a real impact. Censorship is rife, gang-rape is widespread, and most people are too frightened to speak out about it. Taking all of this in to account, my feeling is that a cartoon exhibit, to reclaim our freedom, is the very least we can do.

Posted on 07/02/2015 12:10 PM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Showing 1-26 of 34 [Next 25]

Guns, Germs and Steel in Tanzania
The Thinking Person's Safari
Led by Geoffrey Clarfield
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:


The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31