Friday, 7 December 2007
Time for jihad

This week has been one of light posting, and the next few will be too. This is partly because of Christmas, but mainly because December and January are two of our busiest months at work. I would spend far more time doing my bit for the counterjihad, were I not constrained by the necessity of earning a living.
Muslims who receive the jizyah, whether in the form of aid, unearned oil money, or, in the UK and Europe, the dole, are under no such constraints. They can plot jihad, and engage in da'wa and even demographic conquest with no economic consequences. In the UK, because of our over-generous welfare state, they do not need to conform and adapt, even outwardly, in order to earn a living. They can have all the children they want - children who, but for that welfare state, would starve, or would not have been born in the first place, but who must now be supported by hard-working taxpayers, forced to deny and indeed limit their own families. Time is money, and unearned money - jizyah - means that time can be made for jihad.
I recently wrote a piece for Pajamas Media entitled Jihad Made in Britain, in which I touch on the relationship between welfare payments and jihad. Commenting on this piece, Rusty Shackleford says:
It's not just that Europeans bend over backwards to accommodate the demands of Muslims, it's that they subsidize the very people making those demands.
Why assimilate when the government will pay you to sit on your ass and make YouTube videos all day about how unjust and oppressive that very government is to Muslims?
Think I'm wrong? Recall that even though Omar Bakri Mohammed has been barred from coming back to Britain, that his wife and kids still live in London off government welfare. It's one thing to sit at home wearing a burka, but try to go get a job wearing one and let's see where that gets you. Or how about starting a business wearing the attire of choice for young Islamists in the U.K., M. C. Hammer pants?
Hell, if Uncle Sam would provide free food, shelter, clothing, and health insurance to my wife and kids I might grow a beard and start a death cult myself!
Of course, without Islam, all the welfare payments in the world would not produce jihad. But the converse, that the necessity of struggling for survival, can inhibit jihadist tendencies, is almost certainly true. This is a very good reason for cutting off all aid to Muslim countries, reducing oil consumption and reforming welfare. There are other reasons for doing these things: aid is bad for non-Muslim countries too (look at the billions wasted on Africa); excessive fuel consumption is ruining the planet; and welfare is unfair on taxpayers. But above all, let's stop paying for jihad. Can there be many, if any, examples of a civilisation paying for its own destruction?

Posted on 12/07/2007 1:03 PM by Mary Jackson
Comments
7 Dec 2007
M
Mary,
There is one anti-jihad measure you neglect to mention: Ending Muslim immigration and taking measures to encourage those Muslims now in the West to leave. For reasons I can't fathom, this idea has virtually no advocates among the mainstream anti-jihadi blogs; One exception being Lawrence Auster. Whatever your differences may be with its main proponent, certainly the idea itself merits discussion. Far beyond being a mere religion or "belief system", and notwithstanding its billion adherents, Islam is a dangerous political movement every bit as repugnant and sinister as the Nazi Party or the Ku Klux Klan. That membership in those organizations probably gave their devotees a feeling of "community" and some sense of "peace" or something, never made either the groups or the people in them remotely tolerable in decent societies. Nor should any similar appeal be allowed to mitigate the menace that Islam <em>and Muslims</em> pose to all free societies.
7 Dec 2007
Mary Jackson
Speaking for the UK, I would definitely be in favour of ending all Muslim immigration.
For the present, rather than a matter of long-term policy, I would end all third world immigration, except for apostates of Islam who could claim asylum. In fact I would call a temporary halt to all immigration. The UK is a tiny, crowded island, full to bursting. Americans don't understand this - America is huge, and even the poorest of you have more square feet to call their own than we can dream of over here. We are chocka block full.
Immigrants, mainly Eastern European rather than Asian or African, do jobs that natives won't do. But that's because natives are allowed to laze around on the dole, or the farce that is sickness benefit. In all but extreme cases, this should be stopped immediately. Most claimants are working on the side anyway, and if they have to, if there's no safety net, they'll get off their lazy arse and work. And they'll use a condom rather than breed like rabbits if hardworking taxpayers will no longer support their multiple feral offspring.
Regarding immigration, as well as apostates, I would make an exception for Jews, who are nearly all extraordinarily gifted and hard working and persecuted everywhere, especially where there are Muslims.
|