If you see this text then you need to update your flash player.
Saturday, 10 May 2008
Islam in U.S. Public School Textbooks

WND has another good report on what is in the approved textbooks in U.S. schools concerning Islam.

..."In a passage meant to explain jihad, they encountered this: 'Muslims should fulfill jihad with the heart, tongue, and hand. Muslims use the heart in their struggle to resist evil. The tongue may convince others to take up worthy causes, such as funding medical research. Hands may perform good works and correct wrongs,'" the new report said.

The ATC report noted a complicating factor is a ban in California, to whose standards most textbook publishers align their work, on "adverse reflection" on religion in school.

"Whatever 'adverse reflection' is, such a mandate may be conceptually at odds with historical and geopolitical actuality," the study said.

"None of this is accidental. Islamic organizations, willing to [provide] misinformation, are active in curriculum politics. These activists are eager to expunge any critical thought about Islam from textbook and all public discourse. They are succeeding, assisted by partisan scholars and associations… It is alarming that so many individuals with the power to shape the curriculum are willfully blind to or openly sympathetic to these efforts," the report said.

Regarding the TCI book, the report said its lessons contain "stilted language that seem scripted or borrowed from devotional, not historical, material." Also, the "Medieval to Early Modern Times" book features a two-page prayer to Allah "the Merciful."

"Among the textbooks examined, the editorial caution that marks coverage of Christian and Jewish beliefs vanishes in presenting Islam's foundations. With materials laden with angels, revelations, miracles, prayers, and sacred exclamations; the story of the Zamzam well; and the titles 'Messenger of God' and 'Prophet of Islam' the seventh-grade textbooks cross the line into something other than history, that is, scripture or myth."

Among the lessons public school students must learn from the various books:

  • Muhammad "taught equality"

  • Fasting reminds Muslims of people who struggle to get enough food

  • Muhammad told his followers to make sure guests never left a table hungry

  • Arab traditions include being kind to strangers and helping needy

"These effusive formulations stop just short of invention and raise questions about the sources of information," the report said.

The books' praises of Islam continues, the report said. "TCI devotes 13 text-heavy pages to textiles, calligraphy, design, books, city building, architecture, mathematics, medicine, polo, and chess, some of it spun like cotton candy," the report said.

For example, the book reports: "Singing was an essential part of Muslim Spain's musical culture. … Although this music is lost today, it undoubtedly influenced later musical forms in Europe and North Africa."

"Undoubtedly, the TCI volume declares. Yet the book acknowledges the music is lost and the claims are speculative. Empty text dilates Islamic achievements," the report said.

Glossing over the actual physical conquering of some peoples, the "World History: Medieval and Early Modern Times" says people were converted to Islam because they were "attracted by Islam's message of equality and hope for salvation," the report said.

Another book teaches: "Q: How did the caliphs who expanded the Muslim Empire treat those they conquered? A: They treated them with tolerance."

"At a time when intolerance marks Islamic cultures worldwide and multiculturalism is a ruling idea in U.S. schools, these 'wonderland-of-tolerance' tropes constitute a major content distortion," the report said.

The books teach the Crusades were "religious wars launched against Muslims by European Christians."

"When … Muslims groups attack Christian peoples, kill them, and take their lands, the process is referred to as 'building' an empire. Christian attempts to restore those lands are labeled as 'violent attacks' or 'massacres,'" the report said.

Some of the books are rife with other errors. In the TCI book, it says the Crusaders wore red crosses. "No. Only Templars did," said the report.

"While Christian belligerence is magnified, Islamic inequality, subjugation, and enslavement get the airbrush," said the report, which also found inaccuracies in teaching about sharia religious law, women's rights and terrorism, especially the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania, which killed nearly 3,000.

"The Modern World" says, "On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, teams of terrorists hijacked four airplanes on the East Coast. Passengers challenged the hijackers on one flight, which they crashed on the way to its target. But one plane plunged into the Pentagon in Virginia, and two others slammed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York…"

"The flatness and brevity of this passage are dismaying. In terms of content, so much is left unanswered. Who were the teams of terrorists and what did they want to do? What were their political ends? Since 'The Modern World' avoids any hint of the connection between this unnamed terrorism and jihad, why September 11 happened is hard to understand," the report said.

Posted on 10:15 AM by Rebecca Bynum
Comments
10 May 2008
Send an emailPali

Muhammad "taught equality"

Biggest lie ever told.

Muhammad may have taught that those in the brotherhood of Islam are 'equal' to each other (although in reality, Arabs are always supreme amongst the ummah), but he also taught that non Muslims are inferior to Muslims.

In other words Muhammad taught a form of supremacism and in-equality.

Liars, liars, shameless liars.



11 May 2008
Tina Trent

Here is the way the required textbook in a public community college in Florida describes "The Age of Terror, 2001-": "[u]nlike the cold war, which was a by-product of twentieth-century events, this conflict is deeply rooted in history, going back to the twelfth-century Crusades (see Chapter 9). After the flowering of Islamic civilization (see Chapter 8), the Muslims experienced centuries of humiliation as they fell victims to European power." (_The Western Humanities_, Matthews and Platt) There is a great deal of mentioning the Crusades throughout.

But oddly, in the chapter on Islam itself, the effects of the Crusades are dismissed: "[a]lthough the Crusades disrupted life in parts of the Muslim world, they proved to be more a nuisance than a danger." The occupation of Spain is also given a fascinating twist in a section titled: "Fears of Assimilation in a Multicultural Society," in which the authors describe the religious tolerance extended to Christians and Jews by the "Umayyad rulers in Cordoba" while suggesting that tensions nonetheless arose as ninth-century Christians resisted assimilating into the dominant (yet somehow also multicultural) Arabic culture.

After paying lip service to the mysterious unknowingness of the Qu'ran, which according to the authors must be experienced but also cannot possibly be understood by people so shallow as western humanities students, Matthews and Platt are far less uncomfortable relentlessly summarizing the Medieval Age as some Ken Russellesque orgy and all subsequent history as a battle between scientific progress and Christian anachronism. Like Mormons, they reach back in time to baptize as atheist anyone with whom they happen to agree.

And they even dismiss Seamus Heaney (along with all other modern poets except Derek Walcott), which is apropos to nothing here but just seems at one with the soggily politically correct rest of it.

For this highly subjective tour of western civilization, students pay $140. And then another $140 for book two.