Please Help New English Review
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff

The Bible Code

Enigma, God’s Prophecies, Soothsaying, or the Peculiarities of the Hebrew Language?

by Norman Berdichevsky (January 2010)


For more than a decade, Biblical scholarship, archaeological research and theological speculations have been put on hold or eclipsed by the world-wide popularity of The Bible Code, launched by Michael Drosnin that was a runaway best seller. Published in 1997, it asserted that the Old Testament contains a secret code based on the equidistant spaces of Hebrew letters arrayed as a continuous chain. It is indeed amazing that diverse people in many different cultures and traditions, some with a profound understanding and appreciation of the Old Testament,  have accepted the validity of the code.

It has been responsible for a significant increase in the number of people studying Biblical Hebrew on line as well as the formation of many websites catering to various discoveries by newfound converts. The range of astounding predictions and claims assert that the Code has discovered messages hinting at everything from the belief that Jesus of Nazareth was the long expected messiah to the imminent catastrophe of the swine flu epidemic.

The book contained “probable” predictions only of catastrophes and disasters (but apparently no good news) destined to occur between 1998 and 2006 with the proviso, however that these events could perhaps be averted thereby making any absolute test of the validity of the predictions impossible. Drosnin wrote a second book named The Bible Code II:The Countdown in 2002, that was not as successful.

Another book comprising a critical analysis of the theory, The Truth Behind the Bible Code” by Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, remains the best treatment for a readership unfamiliar with the peculiarities of the Hebrew language involved in ascertaining the sophisticated statistical analyses used by Drosnin and some statisticians to “prove” that the “predictions” or “significant relationships” could not be the result of random chance.

Why God apparently has not left us any encoded predictions of peace, prosperity, good will towards our fellow man or how to achieve them does not provoke any thoughtful reaction on the part of Drosnin’s followers. I guess this information is already abundantly clear in the “naked” surface uncoded text, and so should be easy to follow.

The ELS technique requires that all words in the Old Testament be arranged in a matrix without spaces between the letters, or exactly specifying the number of words in a horizontal line and beginning from a pre-determined point, and then count an equidistant number of spaces to search for letters “spelling” meaningful words, either horizontally, vertically, or diagonally, either forward or backward.

The diagram below taken from an explanation of ELS on “Wikipedia” represents a a portion of the Bible in English translation taken from Genesis (26:5-10) and arrayed so that all the letters are joined together with no spaces and then projected on a matrix of 33 letters in the horizontal direction and 15  letters long in the vertical dimension. By choosing an ELS of 100 letters from the letter E towards the top of the matrix and proceeding we find the word BIBLE is spelled out (backwards and diagonally)  and with and ELS of 36 we also find the word CODE spelled out (backwards and diagonally).

What Code believers claim to have found are significant words that are in close proximity to one another at minimal ELSs and within an original “surface” biblical verse that relates to the “encoded words.”

Often, to highlight the “dramatic coincidence” of close proximity between the surface text and some “encoded prophecy”, a smaller rectangle is drawn thus intensifying the intended “significance” so that the ELS appears to be shorter than in actuality.

center Arrange the letters from Genesis 26:5–10 in a 33 column grid and you get a word search with "Bible" and "code". Myriad other arrangements can yield other words.
In the example chosen above, an argument might be made that since it is a text dealing with Isaac pretending that Rebecca was his sister and not his wife, that this trick was a kind of pretense or “code.”    

Although such a claim might be rejected as immediately fantastic and unbelievable, the modern computer has allowed Code supporters to order the ELS and matrix arrays of displaying the Hebrew words in such an infinite variety of ways that critics claim it is possible to find many “significant” and “hidden” coincidences.

The publication of a paper on the principles of the Code, "Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis" in 1994 in the scientific journal Statistical Science caused an uproar and major controversy. Authors Doron Witztum, Eliyahu Rips and Yoav Rosenberg claimed to present strong statistical evidence that biographical information (names, dates and places of birth) about famous rabbis was “encoded” in the text of the Bible, many centuries before those rabbis lived.

However, the great controversy over a “secret code” exploded into a world-wide phenomenon with the “prediction” by Michael Drosnin of the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin after he had written to the Israeli government warning of the event, revealing “facts” that he “discovered” to be “encoded” in the “appropriate places.” His subsequent best-selling book “The Bible Code” became a runaway hit whose devoted readers fast became a cult. Since then, many devotees have learned Biblical Hebrew and use special high powered search engines to locate ELSs of other potential “events” to make further awesome and startling predictions.  

Who is Michael Drosnin? He is an American journalist and author, who worked as a journalist for the Washington Post (1966-1968) and The Wall Street Journal (1969-1970). Drosnin began researching the Bible Code in 1992 after meeting the mathematician Eliyahu Rips in Israel. Although not an observant Jew like Rips, Drosnin became convinced of the validity of the Code after finding what he believed was a reference to the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin and duly “warning him.”
 
In his book, Drosnin implies that “extraterrestrials” delivered the message of the Bible encoded with the prophesies revealed by the Code. All the original investigators, Witzum, Rips and Rosenberg distanced themselves from Drosnin’s claims and still conduct research into finding encoded messages but reject any ability to “predict the future.” Strong support for Drosnin’s theories characterizes various non-conformist or non-traditional religious groups including messianic Jews, some Evangelicals and the Orthodox Jewish outreach group Aish-HaTorah.

As a translator and teacher of Hebrew, I am all too aware of the general lack of familiarity with the language of the Old Testament by most Jews in the Diaspora. If the providential hand of God is indeed behind the Bible Code, the reason must be the encouragement of an interest in learning the language and restoring it to its past exalted status (see Hebrew’s Exalted Status, New English Review, October, 2009). A more sober analysis is certainly necessary to better understand and appreciate how Biblical Hebrew has lent itself to the statistical manipulations of would be modern day soothsayers.

As any advanced student of Hebrew can confirm, the probability of generating meaningful words and even full sentences on the basis of randomly generated ELSs is infinitely greater in Hebrew than in English or other Indo-European languages. This is due both to the paucity of the Biblical vocabulary and the omission of letters that serve as vowels, the freedom to unite many prepositions represented by a single letter with the following words, the regularity of verb conjugations and special grammatical constructions that make only a few letters potentially significant.

As a former translator of foreign language films for which I provided Hebrew subtitles, I was always capable of expressing much more in the limited 32 character set of letters and spaces that comprised the subtitles. A full sentence with subject, verb and object can be represented in Hebrew with three or two or even one word. For example, in the sentenced, “I bought it”, one could translate this as Ani kaniti oto, or Kaniti oto or simply Kanitiv. For these reasons, English language translations of Hebrew texts usually emerge from 30 to 40% longer in length.

Without the aid of the special vowel symbols known as nikud, many words in Hebrew can have various translations indicating the active, passive or reflexive cases. Drosnin makes a case for the prediction he “found” that President Nixon would resign. He rests his interpretation on the Hebrew letters that are the consonants ”G-R-SH”. This three letter root signifies to separate, expel, or exile in the active case with the vowel pattern known as the “pual” representing the passive case (the pronunciation of which is GuRaSH). He indeed translated word this as “was expelled” (i.e. was forced to resign) but, had he decided instead that the vowels should represent the “piel” active case, pronounced GiReSH, it would have signified that Richard Nixon forced someone else (his wife Pat for instance) to separate or be expelled by him  (i.e. he would divorce her).

Imagine if the English language had a few of the same properties as Hebrew and we decided to search for “prophecies regarding President Bush and selected some every combination of the Letters bet (B) followed by shin (SH) spelling “Bush” (i.e. President Bush) and it turned out that of the many thousands of ELS possibilities of B followed by SH, we found this name embedded vertically in the surface text (without vowels).
 
In the original Old Testament text, vowels called nikud which are represented by dot and dash symbols below, above or within certain letters were not originally written but were only added more than a thousand years after the original text by learned scholars.
 
 ………….……..…….B……………………………....
……..thewndnhsSHhusdtthbttrtrp………..  

A follower of an English variant of the Bible Code might decide that the surface text should be read either as …..

The wind in his soul was due to the bitter trip OR…

The wound in his seal was due to the butter trap OR…

The wand in his soil was due to the better troop

This “encoded message” (BUSH) might be interpreted to relate to his presidency, life, certain events and interpreted so that for example ….. “the wind in his soul” was a metaphor for his being depressed and that this was the result of a “bitter trip” he made and a new search would begin to find destinations as spelled in Hebrew and “encoded “ in near proximity to the text.

All this may begin to resemble sheer nonsense but given enough will to search for Biblical parables and allusions, some ultimate sense might be read into them.

Moreover, Drosnin made no attempt to explain the liberties he took with his translations of Hebrew terms, including modern day abbreviations such as the letters rosh heh mem (R H M – the accepted abbreviation today for the Hebrew term “Rosh HaMemshala” (Head of State), thus straining credulity even further that whoever implanted the code also knew the direction that modern day journalistic Hebrew would take.

The same applies to modern day terms invented during the past few decades such as hallalit (spaceship), based on the Biblical word hallal for outer space. When it suits Drosnin, he uses a word derived from a non-Hebrew source, for example the name of the planet Jupiter we derived from Latin, rather than the ancient Hebrew term for the planet (Tzedek).

Drosnin’s  most spectacular claim of predicting the assassination of Prime Minister Rabin fails to explain that the prediction was based on a very long ELS resulting in resh-bet-yod-nun R-B-Y-N (Rabin’s name in Hebrew – see matrix below with Yitzhak Rabin’s full name in Hebrew letters spelled out as indicated by the circles). The surface text in the matrix upon which the letters of spelling YTZHK RBYN is displayed is Deutoronomy 4:41-43 that reads in the authorized King James version…..

Then Moses severed three cities on this side of the Jordan toward the sunrising: That the slayer might flee thither, which should kill his neighbor unawares, and hated him not in times past and that fleeing unto one of these cities he might live:

This is translated according to Drosnin ….”The assassin will assassinate”  (this is the surface text shown by the letters marked by squares) although the meaning indicates that the slayer (assassin according to Drosnin) is one who has “unintentionally killed his neighbor” and that such individuals had the right to seek shelter in three protected Levite cities on this side of the Jordan River. The crime referred to is therefore, one of manslaughter, and not assassination (murder) and the circumstances considerably lessen the impact of the implied prediction. The name of the assassin (Amir) was found encoded backwards by an ELS computation (letters marked by the diamond shape) and found “in proximity” to the phrase about the killer. It was determined to be “encoded” AFTER the fact of the crime and the alleged killer’s name were known.

The very long skip of 4,722 letters arranged diagonally (encircled in the chart below) to spell out Y-TZ-H-K-R-B-Y-N (in Hebrew, the letter Y is both a vowel and consonant) is masked by truncating the matrix to make it look much more compact.
 
 
Other non-Jewish astrologers, seers and soothsayers have in the past also made accurate predictions regarding the assassination of a famous personality, notably Jean Dixon who predicted (without the help of the Bible Code) Kennedy’s death alongside of two false predictions in which she imagined  that assassins would also kill President Nixon and Fidel Castro. Names, places, numbers and dates (all represented in Hebrew) fall much more easily into several letter combinations that are much shorter in length in Hebrew than in European languages.

Even Drosnin himself continually avoids going too far out on a limb by claiming that the predictions found are “warnings” that may yet be avoided by righteous action and admits that even with the limited data base of the Five First Books of the Old Testament, there are 304,805 letters and these can be arrayed in an almost infinite number with an …”endless number of combinations and permutations” (p.45 of the Bible Code). He quotes Ripps who limits himself to at least 10 to 20 billion.” By this time, the intelligent reader is ready to conclude that the code is all humbug.
 
Other statisticians such as Professor Brendan McKay, professor of mathematics at Australia’s National University has claimed the ability to find similarly astounding predictions using English language material and the same ELS formula to treat the novel Moby Dick.  Others have done the same with Tolstoy’s War and Peace.

Dr. Jeffrey Satinover in his aptly named book, The Truth behind the Bible Code, offers the sober analysis: “There is a powerful debunking current that runs through all of science, and not without reason – the damage caused by religious enthusiasms run amok is all too evident…..It is not so much that the skeptical scientist dismisses the possibility of anything new and revolutionary and astounding ever; or that he is inevitably  opposed to religion…but the attentive scientist sees time and again the huge numbers of enthusiasms that promise so much, make great claims as to their scientific vale, and then sooner or later dissolve in the solvent of really rigorous scrutiny. Having done their damage, they fade away and are soon forgotten, something new is always ready to take their place.” (p.218).
Nevertheless, there is still a respected body of opinion of skilled statisticians who are fluent in Hebrew and who maintain that the Bible Code “findings” are statistically “amazing” and so far beyond the level of random chance that the Code deserves further research. Satinover believes they are all at fault for neglecting to take into account and that in order for ELS combinations to have evidentiary value at all, ….it cannot be picked out from a string of unimpressive combinations and then presented in isolation. Both its content and location (within quantifiable parameters) MUST HAVE BEEN COMMITTED TO BEFORE the searching process begins.  (p.293) Otherwise, the computer can spin an infinite number of combinations to search out “meaningful” encoded messages that it then seeks to align with a dramatic event.

The fascination of the Bible Code has exerted is to use a much overused current term “awesome.” Several internet Bible Code websites make use of the following language to remind contributors that they should be wary of attempting to use the Bible and consider it a divine tool ……….... 

We do not believe that Bible codes were intended to be used as a basis for foretelling the future. Any comments about the codes in this article that we say may refer to the End Times are simply our opinions. God reserves the future for Himself because He desires mankind to trust Him concerning the unknown. The Bible clearly forbids attempting to foretell the future……..

“But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die…
Deuteronomy 18:20

 

To comment on this article, please click here.

To help New English Review continue to publish interesting and informative articles such as this one, please click here.  

If you enjoyed this article and want to read more by Norman Berdichevsky, click here. 

Norman Berdichevsky contributes regularly to The Iconoclast, our Community Blog. Click here to see all his contributions, on which comments are welcome. 

 

Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29    

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed