by Michael Rectenwald
The former employee's battle against the Massachusetts based school is a sign of the times and, hopefully, of things to come. It’s long past time this pernicious ideology got the scrutiny and repudiation it so richly deserves.
After over a year of combating Critical Race Theory (CRT) at Smith, Jodi Shaw finally submitted her letter of resignation to President Kathleen McCartney. She thereby relinquished her position as a Student Support Coordinator in Student Affairs, which earned her a whopping $45,000 per year.
But, you see, Jodi Shaw is “privileged,” and, according to the CRT experts at Smith College and elsewhere, her privilege needs to be eradicated. She needs to be subjected to CRT’s racial profiling, struggle sessions, and shaming routines in order to root out her secret disease. Seeing no end in sight, Shaw finally decided she’d had enough.
The ins and outs of Shaw’s battles with Smith follow a predictable pattern. I’m not surprised that the college has attempted to discredit her. In fact, having been the subject of NYU’s attempts to discredit me after I criticized social justice ideology at NYU and across academia at large, I’d be surprised if they hadn’t launched their campaign of administrative gaslighting.
But the intricacies of Shaw’s case at Smith College are less important than the war it represents. The war is with a regime bent on silencing dissent and forcing submission to its essentialist, racist, totalitarian worldview. The objective of this ideology is to shame the majority into accepting that their way of life has come at the expense of racial injustice, and they must forfeit its benefits. They must scrutinize and humiliate themselves, forever.
Racism, this ideology holds, is everywhere. It is present in inscrutable ways in every aspect of society. And racism and white supremacism are permanent, short of the vicious cleansing routines administered by those who wield their identities as weapons.
According to CRT, every aspect of society is racially inflected, and every dominant attitude is based in white supremacy. Expecting people to be on time: racist. Professionalism: white supremacism. Believing in meritocracy: white supremacy. Perfectionism, a sense of urgency, a preference for the written word, binary thinking: white supremacist.
Being white: racist.
Any resistance to the tenets of CRT on the part of white people is “white fragility” and a sure sign of racism. Any denial on the part of black people, on the other hand, is evidence of internalized racism or false consciousness, a result of being socialized into a white supremacist culture. The only acceptable position is to concede and consent to the premises of CRT. Anything less is racism and white supremacism.
Thus, while racism itself may not be omnipresent in America and beyond, the consciousness of racism surely is.
This is the theory that Jodi Shaw faced at Smith College, and to which she rightly objected. Her resistance to “racial sensitivity training,” a phrase that CRT uses to mask its racial fundamentalism, was taken as evidence of her own racism. Once she admitted to her discomfort during a training session, her fate was sealed.
Shaw launched her campaign in a widely viewed video in which she requests that Smith College end its adherence to CRT. “I ask that Smith College stop reducing my personhood to a racial category… Stop telling me what I must think and feel about myself… Stop presuming to know who I am or that my culture is based upon my skin color… Stop asking me to project stereotypes and assumptions based upon their skin color...”
Turning the tables on CRT, Shaw denounced it as racist, as a way of reducing people to their phenotypes. Shaw asked that Smith cease its campaign of racial essentialism and treat its students and staff as individuals. This is the classical liberal viewpoint that Shaw apparently learned as a student at Smith, and which is under assault there and throughout the entire Western world.
Jodi Shaw is a David in a David and Goliath tale—until more warriors join the fray. It’s time to eradicate this pernicious ideology, before it’s too late.
First published in RT.
In the ancient and immortal words of W.C. Fields, “It’s time to take the bull by the tail and face the situation.” ///. The ‘situation’ is the farce as hoax as mirage of baseless, fog-filled, bog-birthed CRT. Where has Race been defined in measurable quantitative reproducible terms? Who is White, given that white pigmentation is absent from natural human skin? Who is Black (black is the absence of color)? Thus, no people of color are black, although covering the range of dark to light brown, and pale pinkish to darkish wheat hue. Thus, people of color in reality (and not in asinine banality) means everyone. Since a shame-filled segment of our population has eschewed, as insulting, the designation ‘colored people/person’ I suggest it be honorably taken on, adopted as a description category of pale pinkish people who are not colorful but, in reality, color-some. Of course, naturally and humanely, we need to ostracize all freckled-skin people who are confusing to the essential issue of human stupidity. ///. As a quantitative measure of skin color I suggest the commonly used Pantone color charts (also applicable to hirsute and scaly ETs of the non-striped variant). ///. Next on the slog through bog of quantification, is the cause-and-effect relation among the universe of factors predicting significant accomplishments and Pantone color and DNA distribution and gene expression across the accomplisher’s lifespan. ///. Now, it’s a simple step to demonstrate racial superiorities for various types/classes of accomplishments. When variables defining social, economic, psychological, educational , ... influences are enmeshed in the calculations we will be able to specifically and scientifically adapt the amorphous CRT to CRL, Cockeyed Reprehensible Law, fully justifying the illogical and immoral elimination of dissenters.