by David Hamilton (November 2010)
A significant difference between contemporary art and traditional art is the split between form and meaning. This is a manifestation of the all pervasive Cartesian duality: the split between mind and body, subject and form. This split is in all the various forms and styles of the respective High Art forms. Contemporary artists try to destroy the forms. This practice in architecture makes contemporary buildings look silly. The buildings all look like objects they are not and usually something comic which is why they get nicknames like The Gerkhin or The Cheesegrater.
Traditional art develops within traditional forms and also develops the forms. In his Christian paintings of the fifties Dali adapted forms to his individual vision but they are recognisably traditional. Dali was a genius – contemporary artists are not. They have talent but need to shock to get recognition. Real Art grows out of tradition and provides sustenance, spiritual or worldly, for people rather than negative emotions like shock or offence.
To say something like Damian Hirst’s pickled shark is important is pretentious. It is supposed to make us think, to arrest us but by taking the shark out of context (the sea) it is rendered meaningless because it is deprived of its being which is its life, and its functions. Context however, does not confer the status of art on objects: Duchamps urinal is still a urinal wherever it is put. It might have pleasing curves but can only be admired for its design and not as an artistic object because it prompts no depth of feeling. Duchamp called it Fountain and straight away there are splits between the function of the object and its setting.
Neither context nor reasons make a work art. Art is defined by its intrinsic qualities and the artifice used. That last is: development from nature through human imagination and technical ability. The technical ability must be with the imagination or it is only skill. The artists organises the components to suggest meaning: the placing of the figures and their gestures say; this occurs in some photography like fashion photography but the disqualification of the latter as art is its shallowness: there is no deep or moving emotion conveyed.
Trying to shock people is petty and there are more important feelings and emotions to prompt. That is where the pretentiousness lies. The stated aim is to shock but that is a means to their end of making themselves rich because the elites reward these attacks on our culture. Its like having a brief to undermine our artistic traditions. They have minor imaginations which prompt only single responses whereas a work by a major artist like Dali prompts a sequence of emotional responses.
Avant-garde art begun around 1850 with the Realism of Gustave Courbet, who was influenced by early socialist ideas. This was followed by the successive anti-tradition movements of modern art and was synonymous with modern, but is now rather quaint.
There is a phenomenon in English art: a seven year-old boy Kieron Williamson. (1) He has an indefinable knack that is called genius. This is artistic judgement in the practice of painting when one just knows instinctively what to put or where. He has several natural qualities: perspective and “choice of colours.” He has them automatically but perspective is a technique for realising the vision and choice of colours is part of the expression of the vision.
This knack is the artistic eye, artistic judgement and it is a non rational process – it is intuition or instinct and it is this that technique realises. In Kieron’s case it was triggered by the Devon and Cornwall landscape and “sprung full-born into life” like Athena from Zeus’s head. It recalls Plato’s idea of all knowledge being born with the human mind: this was instantly realised, not slowly educed.
Commercial galleries need to appeal to a buying public and be more popular than avante gard painters yet they follow the fad of impressionistic landscapes that lose their meaning by a overusing technique over imaginative vision: the scene is obscured by splodges of paint! This obtrudes between the scene depicted and the viewer and causes a disjuncture in the meaning. This is technique over intuition or skill over the knack. By contrast the camera can elevate the knack over technique as one makes an artistic judgement on what to photograph. It gives a clear reproduction of the scene not splodgy brush strokes that could be anything from a cloud or wave or a sunbeam to just a slip of the brush. These smears festoon every commercial gallery in the country. The people who work in these commercial galleries keep drawing one’s attention to them. This effect is demonstrated by comparing these with photographs.
I recently took several photos of a sunrise in Penzance bay in the English county of Cornwall and sunset at Brighton. There is little technique involved and as long as you point the camera at the right thing you are away. The camera is recording natural phenomena but a meaning is conveyed from photographer to viewer. In the above examples it is natural beauty. When you look at a photograph of a landscape a chain of thought is triggered which moves from the inherent emotional state conveyed to personal and often unconscious thoughts and feelings.
A great paradox – modern music
Music was suffering the same culture war as painting but was saved from an unexpected quarter. What we know as the culture wars, political correctness etc, could not have made such progress if it had not been adopted by the great burgeoning of talent in popular music of the 1960s. For example, the words to The Beatles hit Get Back were developed from a spoof of British politician Enoch Powell’s Rivers of Blood speech that Paul McCartney later turned into a more conventional rock song.
Conversely, McCartney and John Lennon wrote deeply moving melodies and through harmony revived tonal music after modernists began destroying the traditional classical music with atonal, as composers Schoenburg and Stockhausen did and produced water gurgling down a drain noises. The Beatles natural musical genius was realised through the technique of their producer George Martin and they used harmony to create different moods. British composer Peter Maxwell Davies compares McCartney with Schubert as one of the great songwriters.
The paradox is that McCartney and Lennon revived the tonal tradition even though politically they supported the New Left. In fact McCartney had a single banned by the BBC for apparently supporting the IRA and Lennon was figurehead of the New Left-Politically Correct movement and his records especially the album “Sometime in New York City” promoted it.
Like artists, composers disdained their audiences. It was Lennon and McCartney who brought them back together by using classical techniques in pop songs through classically trained record producer George Martin. Martin’s skill at realising their meaning added to the realisation of the whole. That is the oblique meaning of the music helped the direct meaning of the words and triumphed over the split between form and meaning in contemporary music like the aforementioned “water gurgling down drain noises.”
Most of The Beatles’ orchestral arrangements and instrumentation were written or performed by Martin in collaboration with them. For example it was Martin’s idea to put a string quartet on “Yesterday“. To press his point he played the song in the style of Bach to show what type of “voicings” could be used. To realise “Penny Lane” McCartney hummed the melody he wanted, and Martin wrote it down in music notation and David Mason, the classically trained trumpeter played it in a piccolo trumpet solo. Eleanor Rigby was heightened by Martin who wrote and conducted a strings-only accompaniment inspired by Bernard Hermann’s score for Alfred Hitchcock’s film Psycho.
For “Strawberry Fields Forever“, Martin combined two different takes into one. For I Am the Walrus he provided an original arrangement for brass, violins, cellos, and vocal ensemble. He worked closely with McCartney to develop the orchestral ‘climax’ in A Day In the Life.
Bob Dylan was another paradox. An integral part of and spokesman for the 1960s American Civil Rights movement his songs used traditional folk forms to carry his contemporary message. His outstanding “A Hard Rains A-Gonna Fall” from 1962 used the structure of traditional Scottish Border Ballad “Lord Randall” to organise his anti nuclear-war message. His anthem for the new movement “The Times They Are A-Changin‘ “ used the tune of “Irish Rover” to carry the message. He did more to revive British folk tradition and diction than anyone in Britain.
Statues are stylised and used to convey various human qualities. Military heroes say, were shown in proud and honourable poses that suggested authority, fortitude, steadfastness. Lord Hill’s column in Shrewsbury is a case. He had been number two to the Duke of Wellington and his statue shows strength and authority. As do Nelson’s more famous column in Trafalgar Square and other authoritative figures along Whitehall. They were cast in forms that conveyed meaning but contemporary public art fails in that elementary intention and the meaning is disjunctured.
Shrewsbury has honoured its world famous local Charles Darwin by “public art” but does it succeed in its purpose? One known as Quantum Leap is dissociated meaning as the form is not directly linked to the subject so there is no representation. The title Quantum Leap actually refers to something in physics not evolutionary biology which was Darwin’s study. It is probably the contemporary informal term for making a major leap forward but applied to something celebrating Darwin confuses rather than elucidates. These contemporary artefacts arouse no curiosity and one does not feel inclined to enquire about them. They cannot be taken seriously as there is no spirit of genius behind them; rather, a commercial motive which are part of contemporary popular fashion and do not gain gravity from tradition. Quantum Leap looks like an armadillo crossed with a pack of cards and seems to be influenced by popular film Jurrasic Park rather than show the idiosyncracy and non-conformity of genius nor does it exemplify something from Darwin
The Darwin Gate when seen from a particular viewpoint, three separate structures combine to create an apparently solid structure. What does it mean? How does the form convey its import? The design of the sculpture apparently combines the form of a Saxon helmet with a Norman window which was inspired by features of St Mary’s Church which was attended by Charles Darwin as a boy. The sculpture uses “parallax phenomenon” as it appears as a single solid structure when seen from a certain angle. They claim that as darkness descends defused light shines through the columns suggesting stained glass windows and the tops of the posts mimic ecclesiastical arches. Although the elements of the structure never change, it looks different from every angle and when it all comes together it shows the shape of a church window. The connection with Darwin is tangential and the transmission of meaning to the public is split. It looks like The Eggbeater and conveys no meaning about Darwin.
Even ordinary works can, if in surprising places, prompt a myriad of responses. The historic Nags Head (2) pub on Wyle Cop, Shrewsbury has an unusual and mystifying painting in that no one knows what it is or where it comes from and it has an unusual context in being on the inside door of a cupboard in an upstairs room above the pub. Russell Preece, the landlord, is sometimes encouraged to take one to see it. There is a strange atmosphere up there in this legendary, haunted pub, where the temperature can plummet in seconds. Some think the painting depicts Neptune, others, the devil. It is thought to have been done by a prisoner of war during World War II. Even staff at the local Rowley’s House museum purvey a mystic tale but no accurate record. One told me it is of a woman who committed suicide by jumping from an upstairs window. In this legend it is said that the female figure will return if painted over. There is an ambiguity about the figure which has feminine legs which are disproportionately long and thick, with a short body. This painting prompts wonder, amusement, mystification, delight.
Rowley’s House museum holds the excellent Morning View of Coalbrookdale by William Williamse. (3) An important function of both painting and photography is to reflection a way of life or, as in this case, a defining historical era. There is too little representation of ways of life in contemporary art and fiction and people need this affirmation of themselves. These engaging paintings convey a powerful impression of the impact of early industrialisation on a still natural landscape. There are many forms of art which convey something important to people and prompt a variety of responses. Shock is just one: it is negative and it is unimportant.
Saint Alkmonds church in Shrewsbury has a beautiful and moving stained glass in the east window. This is The Assumption of the Virgin Mary by Francis Egington. In this the Virgin Mary at the end of her journey through life and about to ascend to heaven. She is standing on the firm ground of the cross; with the Bible as the word of god for guidance and the sacraments represented by the chalice. The struggles of life are symbolised by thistles on the path. She is looking up in faith at the symbolic crown with her arms outstretched and open to heavenly influence as if she were asking and waiting to be uplifted back home to heaven. These were developments by Egington the artist who based the work on The Assumption of Saint Mary by Guido Remi of 1638 which is a more conventional Assumption painting and has Mary being lifted by Cherubim.
As you enter the church you are transfixed by it and as you walk towards it in awe looking up it immediately begins to form an emotional response and the feeling of awe grows as you advance. This is not an intellectual proposition but a deep feeling, the stirring of noble emotions. This, like great art, operates on a deep level. It also opens the imagination transmitting holy or noble feelings in contrast to the degenerate contemporary art which spreads negative and evil thoughts. Old works have a quiet authority and the viewer is aware of being in the presence of the past and pauses to contemplate it with respect and, as when looking at old gravestones, to recreate the departed. This development of traditional form links us with our roots.
Williams is of particular interest to Americans as he wrote the earliest surviving novel written in America. The man who painted the first picture of the Iron Bridge should also have started the tradition of novels which include Moby Dick and The Great Gatsby.
To help New English Review continue to publish critical and informative articles such as this one, please click here.
If you enjoyed this article and would like to read more by David Hamilton, please click here.