by Mordechai Nisan (September 2025)
Following Likud’s victory in the 1996 elections, the Left released its war against Netanyahu. He was a formidable political rival—a native-born Israeli and American-educated, radiating youth, charisma, confidence, and sporting a highly commendable military record in the IDF. Netanyahu’s biography and attributes were ostensibly a perfect fit for the ideological and political Left, but Bibi, considering his family and his views, belonged to the nationalist camp on the Right. Stunned by Netanyahu’s hairbreadth victory over Labor Party candidate Shimon Peres, the Left launched its campaign of de-legitimization and defamation. Tens of Hebrew University professors signed a letter in 1997 to oppose inviting the prime minister to the graduation ceremony on Mount Scopus. They considered his rhetoric divisive and damaging to democracy, and a threat to future peace negotiations with the Palestinians. This incident portended that the war against Netanyahu would take a toxic turn.
The rise of Binyamin Netanyahu to the pinnacle of politics and the extent of his extraordinary success is an exceptional Israeli story. As of 2025, he served as prime minister for a total of 18 years. The democratic election process in the parliamentary system does not impose term limits. Based on the practice of coalition governments, Netanyahu was deftly able to assure Likud rule with the collaboration of smaller parties. Over time, Leftist aversion to Bibi turned into hatred.
***
The Leftist smear campaign against the Right and Likud, and mercilessly targeting Netanyahu, reached an explosive point in recent years. Controversy and confrontation touched on issues that tore the public fabric of Israeli society, sowing tension and animosity. The judicial machinery, including the Attorney General/Judicial Adviser, and the State Prosecution Office, filed charges in 2000 against Prime Minister Netanyahu for a breach of trust, bribery, and fraud. The Right considered the trumped-up accusations as an exercise in manufactured political manipulation. The Left remained adamant to paint Netanyahu as a villain squirming to escape the legal ramifications of his political and personal conduct. Court deliberations alternated between legalisms and trivia as the trial dragged past five years.
The high point on the political precipice concerned the judicial reform package proposed by Likud and its allies in early 2023. Minister of Justice Yariv Levin sought to overhaul the judicial apparatus suffering from leftist politicization and manifold systemic ailments. The reform package included a number of steps: revamping the selection mechanism for judicial appointments to the Supreme Court; curtailing Supreme Court intervention to invalidate government policy and legislation; and confining the practice of the government’s Judicial Adviser from arrogating authority to block policy. The citizens elected the Knesset, the Knesset voted confidence in the government, and then the Court gagged the government and sent the people adrift in the uncharted waters of political chaos.
One of the more outrageous interventions by the Attorney General and the Supreme Court was in March 2025 when Netanyahu decided to fire Ronen Bar, the director of SHABAK (the Shin Bet security agency). After the security failure of October 7, Bibi wanted a new man in this most critical position. Although the law gave the prime minister full authority to choose and dismiss the SHABAK head, the judges and lawyers acted to override the law. They demanded a reconsideration while suspecting Netanyahu’s motives. This case was tantamount to a constitutional crisis with rebellion by Ronen Bar lurking in the shadows. He refused to leave and that he would choose his successor. Here was the making of a judicial and security coup in broad daylight.
***
For many years, the public impression solidified that the police, the prosecution, and the High Court chose partiality and selectivity in investigating potential lawbreakers. Public and political figures—Reuven Rivlin, Yehuda Neeman, Silvan Shalom, Rafael Eitan, Avigdor Lieberman, Avigdor Kahalani—were among the many on the Right who were arbitrarily detained, whose names were tarnished, suspected of criminal behavior—later none were found guilty. The Left insisted that judges are politically detached and objective professionals who do not succumb to their personal views. Perhaps angels in human form.
How fitting in Israel is the iconic sentence by Franz Kafka in The Trial: “For without having done anything wrong he was arrested one fine morning.” This is a procedure designed to spread fear and force submission. In connection with Netanyahu’s trial, two confidants and associates of the Prime Minister, Shlomo Filber and Nir Chefetz, suffered humiliation and intimidation under police interrogation in ways that a functioning civil democracy would never condone.
The case of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2005 was sensationalist and showed the power of the Deep State. The Leftist compulsion for territorial withdrawal from Gush Katif in the Gaza area led Sharon to capitulate, and he ruthlessly expelled over 8,500 Israelis and destroyed a flourishing settlement zone. This political blackmail technique sufficed to close the file on his involvement in the Greek island scandal.
Another case of legal selectivity was the refusal of the Attorney General to investigate the murky NSO cyber-espionage affair that suspiciously implicated prominent individuals affiliated with the political Left. Members of the elitist cabal enjoyed shady privileges, like engaging in secretive surveillance of private persons, and with impunity.
When Netanyahu governments sought to expel illegal African residents, whose presence in southern Tel Aviv neighborhoods spread insecurity for Jewish residents, the court said NO. When Netanyahu governments wanted to protect the Zionist integrity of Israeli communities based on a singular Jewish population, the court said NO. When the government wanted to use Palestinian terrorists as bargaining chips against the Arab enemy, the court said NO. However when Arabs claimed proprietorship over land in Judea-Samaria with flimsy undocumented evidence, the court said YES, and ordered state authorities to destroy Jewish homes in Ofra, Amona, and Derech Ha-Avot.
Chief Justice Aharon Barak was president of the Supreme Court from 1995 until 2006, and he who injected progressive activism as the court’s DNA. He rejected law professor Ruth Gavison as a nominee for a seat on the bench because, he said, “she has an agenda.” He nixed her appointment, as simple and authoritarian as that. Barak referred to the superiority of “the enlightened camp” (liberal, secular, leftist…) which controlled the High Court under his stewardship and that of his successors. Religious and Mizrahi Jews were likely to feel unwelcome interlopers unless they towed Barak’s line.
Judge Yoram Broza in the magistrate’s court in Beersheba repeatedly made offensive remarks against the religious public. He once told a religious judge: “Once we’re done with Hamas, we’ll deal with the religious Zionists … They are the greatest threat to the country.” Broza gave voice to an odious agenda without paying a price for his hateful comments.
***
Since 2003, when an authorized Knesset committee voted to disqualify Arab candidates in a general election, because their party platform rejected the definition of the state of Israel as a Jewish state, the Arabs’ appeal to the Supreme Court bore political fruit. The court overturned a Knesset decision and ignored the law, and permitted Arab citizens to compete in elections in a country whose Jewish existence they rejected. The Supreme Court unhinged Israel from its national ethos while replacing the Knesset as the highest authority in Israel.
The height of absurdity concerned Palestinian terrorists from the territories, non-citizens and murderous enemies of Israel, who enjoyed legal standing before the High Court of Justice to appeal cases adjudicated by the Military Government in Judea and Samaria. In December 2024, the Court accepted an appeal from the Association for Civil Rights on behalf of Palestinian terrorists—the nuchba who committed the massacre of October 7—euphemistically called “security prisoners.” The Court ordered the state authorities to supply terrorists with a reasonable quantity and quality of food. Masochism and buffoonery combined in this display of Aharon Barak’s principle that “everything is justiciable” —including the diet of Islamo-Nazis held in Israeli detention.
***
The Left opposed judicial reform with all means possible. It chose confrontation and scorned dialogue with Member of Knesset Simcha Rothman, the Chairman of the Knesset Judicial Committee. From January 2023 until October 6 that year, Israel was embroiled in the most violent and destructive challenge from within to the stability of the country and the very existence of the state. With exceptional resources, financial and logistical, organizational skill and media sophistication, the Left mounted a militant protest against the Netanyahu government and coopted leading Israeli institutions—commercial and corporate, academic and medical—to join forces and paralyze normal life in the country. They closed down the Ben-Gurion airport, Israel’s primary transportation link with the world, and used the weapon of the strike to close down the economy. They called on the wealthy elites to send their money abroad and bring the domestic economy to a halt. They hounded, threatened, and physically attacked government ministers and Members of the Knesset. Roads were blocked and tires burnt evoking fear and chaos. Mobocracy was threatening the democracy that the anarchists claimed they came to save. An enigmatic mass psychosis spread throughout the country. On one occasion, the Netanyahu-haters laid siege to a hair salon in Tel Aviv with Sarah Netanyahu trapped inside, chanting hostile slogans and creating a frenzied atmosphere. The police rescued her from danger and a possible violent end.
A judicial reform plan that included a procedural alteration to facilitate diversity of views on the Supreme Court, and unchain the government from the stranglehold of bureaucrats and lawyers, became inexplicably a catalyst for violence and hatred.
***
The most radical aspect of the mass opposition was the call for soldiers to refuse to serve and abandon their posts. Leading protesters warned the prime minister: “Soon you won’t have an army, and you won’t have an air force…” The clamor of rebellion brewed throughout the land. Toppling the Netanyahu government had become a sacred cause. Former ministers of defense and retired army generals protested in the streets and spewed wrath in television studios. Past heads of the General Security Services (SHABAK) – Ami Ayalon, Yoram Cohen, and Nadav Argaman—joined the anti-Netanyahu campaign. Some accused Netanyahu of planning a coup. Their public opposition to reform was seemingly without context, but consider Max Weber’s argument in the Israeli case that “the conquest of political power by the strata on whose shoulders the military burden rested” became bureaucratically fixed. The only rational explanation was a personal power motive propelling the subversive behavior of retired military and security elites.
The lawless campaign was not civil disobedience, but as former Prime Minister Ehud Barak screamed, a civil rebellion. He called for physically blocking the Knesset in Jerusalem until the government falls. The language of war became current in mobilizing tens of thousands in the streets of Tel Aviv, and thousands in other Israeli cities and towns. The Left’s pathological hatred of Netanyahu metastasized into an uncontrollable political malaise as the protest abandoned any sign of restraint.
Avner Netanyahu, the son of Bibi and Sarah, was to marry his fiancée in 2025, and twice the date was postponed because of an explicit Leftist security threat to physically prevent and disrupt the wedding. We wondered: was all this really happening?
In an intricate assault, the Brothers in Arms agitprop force wired up and obstructed the entrance to the Kohelet Policy Forum that had advised the government on the reform proposals. This trespass of private property magnified the mind-set of Leftist law-breakers. In all instances of illegal actions, the State Prosecution and Attorney General did not file charges not even once.
During 2023, the anti-Netanyahu campaign assumed international dimensions as protest demonstrations hit the streets in Europe and America. The Left was unchained in engaging in political sabotage against the elected government in Jerusalem, and the playing field was global. On September 22, Jewish and Israeli protesters demonstrated outside the United Nations building in New York, where Netanyahu was to address the General Assembly. The protesters called for foreign intervention by turning to President Biden “to save democracy in Israel.” We now know from Congressional investigation that under Biden, many millions of dollars helped finance the protest movement. Wearing the mask of democracy the Left was relentless on all fronts.
It is important to recall that Leftist hatred of Netanyahu and the Right was not born on Balfour Street in Jerusalem (beginning in 2000) or Kaplan Street in Tel-Aviv (beginning 2023), where chaos and anarchy, punctured by noisy megaphones and ear-shattering drumming, caused disruptions of traffic and public order. The vitriolic accusations against Netanyahu regarding the submarine affair or later the Qatar-gate affair—unproven—suggest further that a hidden force was behind these repeated distractions for the purpose of sapping Netanyahu’s strength and deluding the public.
***
After the judicial affair came the hostage imbroglio. The barbaric Hamas massacre of 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023, which partially brought the judicial reform chaos to a stop, provided the Left with another opportunity to thrash Netanyahu politically. Signs and sounds broadcast: “You are the head, you are guilty.” The fact that the IDF and ancillary security services failed to foresee and prevent the Islamic assault made transparent the military’s responsibility and guilt.
The “hostage square” in Tel Aviv became a popular site for protests against the government’s handling of the war and calling for negotiations for the release of 251 hostages. By late June 2025, 148 returned alive along with 56 bodies. Hamas held the Israeli (and other) captives suffering torture and starvation in deep underground tunnels, subject to emotional stress and cut off from the world. Hamas refused to allow the International Red Cross to visit and succor the hostages–children, women, men, the elderly, and the sick. In glaring contrast, the United Nations and later the United States organized hundreds of truckloads of daily supplies, termed “humanitarian aid,” for the Palestinian population. Even Israel provided aid nourishment while her own hostages subsisted on half a pita a day.
Targeting Netanyahu for October 7 revitalized the Left, adding to his guilt for the security failure his guilt for not bringing all the hostages home. Hamas demanded Israel stop the fighting, withdraw from all of the Gaza Strip, and thus capitulate and accept a searing defeat. The government declared victory, ending threats to the ‘Gaza Envelope’ Israeli communities, and the exit of Gazans altogether, as the goals of the war. The Left’s war against Netanyahu was fiendish in accusing him “of killing the hostages.” Netanyahu was strapped in an excruciating bind, between pursuing war against Hamas with loss of soldiers’ lives and facing public protest; or bending to the pressure exerted by the families of the hostages and abandoning the strategic imperative of destroying Hamas to achieve a secure border for the communities proximate to Gaza. Public discourse did not honor the moment to discuss the issues in a spirit of national calm and respect.
An overriding strategic consideration for Israel is not to appear as a defeated nation. All eyes in the Middle East and beyond will scrutinize Israel’s tenacity, strength, and image, when the war ends, and how it ends. A weak or weakened Israel cannot be an option for the beleaguered Jews, because the consequences could be grave. The Muslim neighbors will whet their appetite and sharpen their swords if Israel falters and withers under the pressure of the Gaza War.
***
The hackneyed neologism “Crime Minister” to defame Bibi coincided with the charge that he headed a “criminal organization (Likud, the government…). The Left called Bibi a Nazi (!), while the Deputy Chief of Staff of the IDF, Yair Golan, said in 2016 that “processes” apparent in Israeli society aroused the sensation of Germany in the 1930s. No longer in the army, Golan offered a gruesome way to evoke the image of genocide when he accused the IDF in May 2025 “of murdering [Arab] babies as a hobby.” This graphically paralleled the Nazi practice of murdering Jewish babies.
Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert insidiously stated that Israel’s war in Gaza was close to a war crime. In August 2025, hundreds of musicians, actors, and singers signed a petition charging Israeli soldiers with war crimes. The Left never needed to provide proof, facts, examples or evidence, for their grotesque demonical portrayal of Netanyahu and the Rightist government.
***
Let us go back and beyond and suggest a historical and ideological perspective for the deep-seated rancor plaguing Israel.
Examples of the Left against the Right:
- Socialists maligned the Zichron Yaakov farmers who hired Arab labor in defiance of the ethos of Hebrew labor; and opposed the anti-Ottoman Nili espionage underground in the years of the First World War that skirted the establishment Zionist leadership.
- The Jewish-led Palestine Communist Party openly supported a campaign for an Arab Palestine and decried Zionist colonialism beginning in the 1920s.
- Brit Shalom rejected the idea of a Jewish State in 1926 in preference for a bi-national (non-Zionist) state.
- In 1933, the socialist Haganah Laborites attacked a parade in Tel-Aviv of the Revisionist Betar movement founded by Zev Jabotinsky, leaving bloodied youth.
- In 1933, senior Jewish Agency/Labor figure Haim Arlozorov was murdered in Tel-Aviv. Ben-Gurion and the Left immediately accused Revisionists, though none were found guilty of the crime, and the suspicion lay with an Arab murderer.
- In the 1940s, Jewish Agency Labor/Mapai affiliated personnel informed the British of Irgun activities, led by Menachem Begin, leading to the arrest of Jews.
- In 1948, a far-left Mapam member opposed a Mapai agreement with the Irgun because “it was capable of doing what the Nazis did.”
- In 1948, under orders from Ben-Gurion, the IDF fired on the Irgun arms vessel Altalena off the coast of Tel-Aviv, leaving 16 Jews dead.
Ben-Gurion refused as Prime Minister to allow the remains of Jabotinsky, who died in New York in 1940, to be buried in Israel. In 1964, Prime Minister Levi Eshkol agreed that the commander of Betar find his final resting place, fulfilling his personal testament, in Jerusalem.
Our brief list of the Left’s war against the nationalist Right Revisionists until the founding of Israel provides historical background and precedent, for what was to follow.
***
The Likud electoral victory in 1977, with Menachem Begin becoming Prime Minister, changed the contours of Israel’s political landscape. The curtain came down on a long streak of 29 years of Labor rule, leaving the party traumatized, reversing the political order. Likud promoted tradition, patriotism, and strategic realism in the violence-prone Islamic Middle East, and won again in 1981, a sign that 1977 was not an accident but a political redrawing of public sentiments. The Leftist elite was out of touch with the rhythms of Zionism and Judaism.
In response to Likud’s victory in 1977, Yitzhak Ben-Aharon, a leading figure in the Labor movement, asserted that: “If this is the people’s choice, he is not willing to respect it.” Here was a revelation of the Left’s enfeebled commitment to democracy.
The politics of Israel had crossed a historical threshold with Likud becoming the predominant party for many decades thereafter. The transformative revolution induced BDS—the Bibi Derangement Syndrome—leaving Netanyahu’s opponents bewildered and frustrated at the success of the Magician [Ha-Kosaim], Netanyahu’s moniker in Israel.
***
The Left’s solution to the democratic election process that produced disappointing results was to circumvent the system and sabotage Likud’s grip on power. Rather than searching within for the decay of the Left, healing elitist snobbism, and examining the demographic and social shift in the strengthening of the nationalist camp, the Left adopted a reactionary posture of ideological entrenchment. This would assure that the Left’s entanglement in the political wilderness would continue.
The Left’s sense of “born to rule” was unscathed. They relied on the functioning and unshakeable Deep State, with a self-assured arrogance to maintain control of the machinery of power and influence in the media, academia, the arts and culture, the civil service bureaucracy, the courts and the military. An ostensible Leftist cabal dominated the news outlets, the universities, the theatre companies, the state prosecution, and the highest echelons of the army—until today. This panoply of power repressed diversity, debate, and liberty, and signified the virtual disenfranchisement of the majority of the Israeli people—who voted Right, then muffled under Leftist hegemony.
Noteworthy public figures were victims of discrimination, intimidation, and character assassination. Some of the outstanding examples included satirist Ephraim Kishon, songwriter Naomi Shemer, singers Meir Ariel and Ariel Zilber, all of whom paid a price for not touting ‘the party line’, diverging from the Leftist cant. Army generals known for their activist and war ethos—Effie Eitan, Ofer Winter, Imad Fares, and Chico Moshe Tamir—failed to advance, or were dismissed from the upper ranks of the IDF. Academics, the likes of Emmanuel Sivan and Moshe Ma’oz, who stood in solidarity with Palestinian causes, strutted with moral pomposity.
Israelis who did not share the narrative of betrayal faced a few options. They could stand strong, give voice to their views, and pay whatever career or other price. They might choose silence and appear as non-political in an essentially very political society. Another option for penitents was to cross the political divide (going to Canossa), exclaim with contrition that they now see the light, rip into Netanyahu for a myriad of faults, and join the rival camp. Political apostasy could be a rational choice: Dan Meridor, Tsipi Livni, Meir Shitreet, and Limor Livnat, bolted Likud ranks to take cover under the Deep State. The most egregious example was hard-liner Ariel Sharon’s defection—deciding on Israel withdrawing from the Gush Katif settlement zone in 2005—to save himself the ignominy of a criminal trial and public defamation. The Left engaged in political extortion that would not embarrass dictatorial and totalitarian regimes from near and far.
***
To the extent politics deals with issues, the Left is largely bankrupt. More and more Israelis feel disdain for the image of the “Ashkenazi, White, Secular, Elitist Left.” The Labor Party of Ben-Gurion and Golda Meir, the historic center-left party, traveled to the far Left, then officially dissolved and disappeared in 2024.
The Left lost contact with the magic, the miracle, and the myth of the Jewish story. Asa Kasher, a public intellectual associated with the Left, proposed cancelling the Law of Return whereby any Jew in the world can come to Israel and acquire citizenship. His proposal would strip Israel of its Jewish identity and raison d’être.
***
Inspired and diverted by Marxism’s war on the family, religion, morality, property, and peoplehood, Socialist Zionism in its founding set out to eradicate—or redefine—the social, spiritual, and national attributes of the Jews. It threw common sense to the wind, planning that a new revolutionized community of Israelis would replace the historic Jewish people. The upshot in this downward slide was alienation from the Land of Israel – opposing Jewish settlement, conceding territory to the Arab enemy, recognizing the Palestinian fake people. The Left showed signs of a surreal case of self-hatred, ideological impoverishment, and political treachery. Moreover, they feign empathy for the Arabs, citizens and others, as a way to shield their hatred of the Right. The slogan of Israel as a “state of its citizens” is the knockout blow to Israel as a Jewish state.
Despair and pessimism became the lot of the Left. Rabin committed a gigantic security miscalculation in 1993 in recognizing the PLO and hoping it will become docile and peaceful. Barak pulled the IDF from Lebanon in 2000 and hoped Hezbollah would disarm and cease battling Israel. Sharon veered from the Right to the Left and decided Israel withdraw completely from the Gaza Strip in 2005. In all these cases, disaster and massacre of Israelis was the outcome as Islam’s war against the Jews charged forward. We sense a foreboding that the ongoing multi-front war Israel is fighting in 2025 may end with the IDF withdrawing from present military positions in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza.
I imagine the war against Netanyahu will continue, with or without the end of the Gaza war. The Left will invent new charges, fabricate new tactics, and sustain and escalate public protests. How all this will end only Heaven knows.
Table of Contents
Mordechai Nisan is a retired lecturer at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He also taught at Bar-Ilan University, the Open University, and the pre-army Lachish academy at Beit Guvrin. Among his books: Minorities in the Middle East, Toward a New Israel, The Crack-up of the Israeli Left, The Conscience of Lebanon, and Identity and Civilization.
10 Responses
Chief Anti Netanayahu, domestically first, is infamous fake news site Haaretz [changed a lot from its roots]. Not passing the Lynch Test in 2000 [as in mainstream Arab “Palestine” Ramallah Lynch (10.13.00). The animalistic organs waving by hundreds in public square in front of thousands cheering.]
It is also known for spreading falsehood especially about IDF. It’s English version is even worse. Its leadership promotes atheism and are often anti Jewish too. It uses often hyperbolic drama buzzwords: “racism/fascism” for click baits, it apologizes for racist Arab Muslim terrorism targeting Jews but demonizes those fearing it, what is known as Haaretzism.
From Feeding the Hungry to Fueling Falsehoods: Twisting Netanyahu’s Gaza Policy After Oct 7.
Netanyahu’s goal was never to help Hamas—it was to help Gazans and protect Israeli lives.
For years, Prime Minister Netanyahu pursued a policy aimed at providing humanitarian aid and employment opportunities for Gazans. The goal was twofold: to alleviate the suffering of the general population and to maintain relative calm by giving Hamas fewer excuses to ignite violence. And for a time, it worked.
But that fragile stability was shattered on October 7, when Hamas launched a brutal and unprecedented attack on Israeli civilians—exposing just how cynically they had exploited Israel’s goodwill. The same policies once hailed as efforts to “feed the hungry” are now being twisted by Netanyahu’s critics into accusations that he was “empowering Hamas.”
The irony is hard to miss: when Israel offered aid, it was condemned for being too generous. Now, as it takes steps to ensure that no assistance reaches Hamas leaders, it is accused of “starving the population.” It seems some voices will twist any policy—no matter how well-intentioned—to serve their political narratives.
The first time in my life I ever encountered Benjamin Netanyahu was in the appearance he made in Los Angeles at the Economic Club. It must have been Year 1996. What I saw was a televised record of that event. In ten seconds of listening to Mr. Netanyahu I KNEW he spoke truthfully and would not speak otherwise. The Marxist Leninist Communist Left is a godless consortium of lying satanic people who use the troubles caused by knowledge of good and evil to manufacture deceit, fraud & propaganda.
Arab “Palestinian” Terror: A Legacy of Violence Against the United States
While Israel has long stood as a reliable ally to the United States—sharing democratic values, intelligence, and strategic cooperation—the same cannot be said for elements within the Palestinian movement. Despite years of attempts to frame the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a one-sided struggle, history reveals a troubling pattern: individuals of Palestinian origin or ideology have repeatedly targeted Americans with violence and terrorism.
A History of Anti-American Terror Tied to Palestinians.
Yasser Arafat and the Khartoum Murders (1973)
Often romanticized as a political leader, Yasser Arafat was directly linked to the tragic events in Khartoum, Sudan, where U.S. diplomats Cleo Noel and George Curtis Moore were brutally murdered by the Black September Organization—an arm of Arafat’s Fatah faction. The U.S. government later confirmed Arafat’s personal involvement in the attack, demonstrating early and direct hostility toward American officials.
Sirhan Sirhan: The Murder of Senator Robert F. Kennedy
In 1968, the United States was shaken by the assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy—carried out by Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian Christian born in Jerusalem. Sirhan confessed that his motivation stemmed from Kennedy’s strong support for Israel, revealing a deadly manifestation of anti-Israel and anti-American sentiment.
World Trade Center Bombing Conspirator: Nidal Ayyad
One of the key figures in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, Nidal Ayyad, was born to Palestinian parents who had fled after the Six-Day War. Raised with deep animosity toward Israel and its allies, Ayyad became part of the deadly Islamist network that sought to bring terror to American soil long before 9/11.
Terror Recruiters and 9/11 Links
Muhammad Haydar Zammar, the man who recruited several of the 9/11 hijackers, was closely associated with Palestinian preacher Abu Qatada—an infamous Islamist ideologue linked to al-Qaeda. Abu Qatada’s rhetoric helped radicalize thousands, including those who would later strike the U.S. on its own soil.
A Stark Contrast: Israel as an Ally, Palestinian Movements as a Threat.
This pattern is not accidental. While Israel has consistently partnered with the U.S. in combating terror, advancing technology, and promoting regional stability, Palestinian-linked extremists have too often found themselves on the other side—aligning with terror groups, embracing anti-Western ideologies, and even targeting American lives.
Despite billions in foreign aid and decades of diplomatic engagement, factions within the Palestinian movement continue to praise or produce individuals who bring harm to U.S. interests. This isn’t a narrative rooted in bias—it’s a pattern proven by decades of bloody evidence.
Conclusion.
The contrast is clear: Israel remains a steadfast friend of the United States, while Palestinian-linked extremists have repeatedly acted as enemies. As the world navigates increasingly complex global threats, it is vital for Americans to remember who stands with them—and who, time and again, has chosen violence over peace, and terror over diplomacy.
Interested in becoming an expert on the truth behind ‘genocide’ claims? It’s almost free. You can also leverage it to push back against the distortion of the term, especially after it’s been hijacked by the politicized narrative of ‘Palestinization.’
The “Genocide” Accusation Against Israel Crumbles Under Scrutiny of Genocide Scholars Group.
The recent International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) resolution accusing Israel of committing “genocide” in Gaza has rapidly unraveled, exposing both the political motivations behind the accusation and the organization’s lack of academic rigor. What was initially presented as a serious, scholarly condemnation has turned into an embarrassing farce, demonstrating that the IAGS has become more of a political tool than a serious academic body.
At the core of the resolution lies a shocking absence of independent analysis. Rather than relying on original research or fact-based assessments, the IAGS has simply recycled reports from anti-Israel groups with questionable biases, such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. These reports often fail to meet even basic scholarly standards and rely heavily on sources with a known history of hostility towards Israel. This alarming trend is highlighted by the IAGS’s reliance on wire services and sources like Al Jazeera, which are widely known for their political agendas.
Despite the IAGS’s claims to expertise in genocide studies, their resolution does not contain a single research paper or legal analysis that addresses Israel’s actions in Gaza with the depth and objectivity that would be expected from a reputable academic organization. In fact, a search of the IAGS’s website reveals that the only paper discussing Gaza in relation to genocide is one by scholar Sara E. Brown, who condemns Hamas for its genocidal violence in the attacks of October 7, 2023. Yet, curiously, the IAGS chose not to publicly endorse or even acknowledge this paper, highlighting a troubling double standard. At the bottom of Brown’s paper, the IAGS makes clear that the views expressed are not representative of the organization itself, further distancing itself from any serious critique of Hamas.
This is part of a broader pattern within the academic and political establishment: the term “genocide,” once reserved for events as severe as the Holocaust, is increasingly being weaponized in modern conflicts. What we are witnessing is the gradual erosion of the term’s meaning, as it’s applied to situations where the legal threshold for genocide has not been met. This growing trend seems motivated not by a desire to uphold legal definitions but by a need to keep certain political narratives alive, whether or not they align with reality. The result is that “genocide” is at risk of becoming little more than a rhetorical weapon, stripped of its historical and legal weight.
The IAGS’s resolution, in fact, exemplifies a classic case of Pallyweid, the propaganda technique that bombards the public with buzzwords until they become a default truth. Just like this organization, the IAGS declares that Israel is committing genocide not because of objective evidence or scholarly rigor, but because “others say so.” This mindset is reminiscent of the “apartheid” slur that has been weaponized since October 1961 by figures like Ahmad Shukeiri, who, after justifying the Holocaust in 1946, proudly declared in his 1969 book that the Arab Palestine celebrated Hitler during World War II. Now, the “genocide” accusation has been introduced by propagandists like Ilan Pappe, who has no qualms about distorting history for ideological purposes. Pappe’s so-called “scholarship” has been discredited by serious historians like Benny Morris, who exposed the distortions and misrepresentations in his work (see The New Republic, March 17, 2010).
Further propagandist figures like Francesca Albanese — often dubbed the 21st century’s “Goebbels” for her inflammatory anti-Israel rhetoric — have only exacerbated the problem. Despite her long history of anti-Semitic statements and her radical agenda, she was hired by the UN in 2022. The UN and its affiliated organizations, already under the sway of the Islamic lobby (OIC), have increasingly become radicalized in their stance against Israel. The global narrative is no longer shaped by objective analysis but by ideologically motivated agendas that dismiss factual evidence in favor of rhetoric.
Perhaps most damning is the exposure of the IAGS’s lax membership policies. With just a $30 fee, anyone can join the organization — leading to embarrassing incidents where activists signed up under absurd pseudonyms, including “Adolf Hitler” and “Emperor Palpatine,” to demonstrate the organization’s utter lack of scholarly standards. If such an organization, with no proper vetting process or academic rigor, is issuing resolutions accusing Israel of genocide, the credibility of the entire accusation falls apart under scrutiny.
In fact, the real genocide in this conflict is not being perpetrated by Israel, but by the terrorist regime in Gaza. Hamas, with its openly genocidal rhetoric, continues to incite violence and terror with the ultimate goal of wiping Israel off the map. This is a group that not only targets civilians but also uses its own people as human shields, cynically manipulating international sympathy to further its genocidal agenda. Israel, on the other hand, is engaged in a legitimate and necessary defense against this existential threat, striving to protect its citizens from a regime that has shown, time and again, a complete disregard for human life.
The IAGS’s resolution does nothing to address the root cause of the violence: Hamas’s stated intent to destroy the Jewish state. Instead, it deflects attention from this reality by misapplying the term “genocide” to Israel’s defensive actions. This distortion of the term undermines the very concept of genocide and allows political agendas to overshadow genuine academic inquiry.
In reality, Israel is fighting a terror group that seeks not only to kill Israelis but to wipe out the entire Jewish population. This is the true genocidal threat, not Israel’s defensive actions, which are rooted in self-preservation and the protection of innocent civilians. The politicization of genocide accusations only serves to obscure the truth and divert focus away from the urgent need to defeat terrorism and secure peace for all.
_______
NOTES:
* Debunking the Genocide Allegations: A Reexamination of the Israel-Hamas War from October 7, 2023 to June 1, 2025.
By Prof. Danny Orbach, Dr. Jonathan Boxman, Dr. Yagil Henkin and Adv. Jonathan Braverman. BESA.September 2, 2025.
https://besacenter.org/debunking-the-genocide-allegationsa-reexamination-of-the-israel-hamas-war-2023-2025/
*$30 and You Can Become a Genocide Scholar.
Honest Reporting. Sep 3, 2025.
https://honestreporting.com/30-and-you-can-become-a-genocide-scholar/
* 𝔸𝕝𝕠𝕟𝕒 @Alona_il:
Meet Onur Uraz — Chair of the Resolutions Committee at the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS)..
Sep 3, 2025
https://x.com/Alona_il/status/1963194739613647160
* Pro-Israel activists join genocide scholars group, highlighting open entry for non-experts.
After International Association of Genocide Scholars passes anti-Israel resolution, critics using names of ‘Adolf Hitler’ and Star Wars characters join ‘world’s leading experts’.
By Luke Tress. Sep 4, 2025.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/pro-israel-activists-join-genocide-scholars-group-highlighting-open-entry-for-non-experts/
* The “genocide scholars” who cannot define genocide.
EoZ. September 02, 2025
The International Association of Genocide Scholars – of all groups – has now declared Israel guilty of genocide. But instead of expertise, what they bring is recycled propaganda.
https://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-genocide-scholars-who-cannot-define.html?m=1
“President Biden and I have known each other for over forty years. I want to thank him for half a century of friendship to Israel and for being, as he says, a proud Zionist.” — Benjamin Netanyahu < < < 🤡
Islamo Arab Racism Strikes, again.
The arabists keep claiming that Arab “Palestine” massacres on Jews are a “response” to something – supposedly. Nevermind that racist Arab Palestine began massacring Jews [especially since] April 1920 [Nebi Musa riots], there were cries of “we will drink the blood of the Jews,” and “Muhamme’s religion was born with the sword.” Actually, the genocidal call/aim of “adbakh al yahud,” was invented in the 1920s by Haj Amin al Husseini, their leader, over a decade before he rushed to beg Nazis for alliance.
Why target religious ultra Orthodox Talmudic Jews, conscientious objectors in their neighborhoods who even refuse to serve in Israeli army?
Such as various massacres, terror attacks in Jerusalem over the years, including the vicious murder of R. Y. Krishevsky by a ramming attack on Oct 15 2015;
or Ramot Junction ramming into children Feb 10, 2023;
or April 2021, ahead of ‘Guardian of Walls’, random beating of Haredim and filming it getting thousands of racist Arab-Muslims’ likes, a trend that began weeks after two racist Arab “Palestinian” brothers started it, harassing Haredi religious (non zionist) Jews in Belgium and filming it;
or March 29, 2022 terror atack shooting in Bnei Brak [a drawing of Al Aqsa mosque and swastika found where the Arab attacker worked];
or animalistic ax attack in Elad on May 5, 2022 [one of the injured victims laid in the hospital with his skull cut into a shape of a swastika];
or in Ramot neighborhoods of Jeruslem on Sep 8, 2025 firing in close range.
Every Arab knows the areas where Haredim live.
Proving again, it was always about hatred.
The Genocide Lie: Why the Accusation Against Israel Collapses Under Scrutiny.
In recent months, a disturbing narrative has taken hold in certain activist and media circles: that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The charge is not only false—it is an outrageous distortion of both international law and moral truth. The accusation dishonors the real victims of genocide, manipulates suffering for political purposes, and, worst of all, shields the genocidal intentions of Hamas behind a false moral equivalence.
This conclusion is supported by a strong consensus of international leaders, experts, and analysts. Based on the following evidence, Canada, Germany, France, the United States, the United Kingdom, Poland, Belgium, and others have all explicitly rejected the genocide label. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin plainly stated before Congress: ’We don’t have evidence of that to my knowledge.’ Similarly, a top international law expert told Euro News that there is ’no clear intent to commit genocide in Gaza.’
Even within the world of international law, where words carry legal weight, no credible consensus exists that Israel’s actions meet the legal threshold of genocide. Over 50 experts in genocide studies, military ethics, and international law—many of them with no political allegiance to Israel—have rejected the claim as unfounded. As international law scholar Nitsana Darshan-Leitner put it bluntly: ’It does not meet the legal definition of genocide.’
The legal definition of genocide—enshrined in the 1948 Genocide Convention—requires a clear, proven intent to destroy a group ’in whole or in part.’ No such intent exists here. As the American Jewish Committee notes, Israel’s objective is not the destruction of Palestinians, but the dismantling of a terror infrastructure embedded within a civilian population.
That distinction matters. Israel is not fighting Palestinians—it is fighting Hamas, an organization that carried out a premeditated massacre of 1,200 Israelis on October 7 and has openly declared its intent to exterminate Jews. To equate Israel’s military response to genocide is not just legally baseless—it’s morally perverse.
Meanwhile, some of the most aggressive promoters of the genocide smear are not objective observers at all. Chief among them is Francesca Albanese, the UN’s so-called “Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories.” Albanese’s long history of blatant antisemitism, including comparing Israel to Nazi Germany and dismissing the mass rape of Israeli women on October 7, exposes her as a propagandist rather than a neutral expert. She has been peddling genocide narratives against Israel since at least 2014, and in her current UN role, she has weaponized her position to demonize the Jewish state relentlessly—dragging even affiliated UN bodies into her campaign of disinformation. Human rights expert on Albanese: ‘She isn’t just a liar. She is a propagandist for violent antisemitic hatred, her closest likeness being Joseph Goebbels. ‘ Her conduct is not only disgraceful but actively undermines the credibility of the very institutions she claims to represent.
Her terrible case is not just about personal bias—it reflects a deeper structural problem: the UN’s long-standing institutional prejudice against Israel. This includes undue influence from the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), an Islamic bloc that routinely drives anti-Israel resolutions, and the continued presence of UNRWA, an agency deeply entangled with Hamas. UNRWA has repeatedly been exposed for facilitating and harboring Hamas operatives, effectively giving cover to genocidal terrorists under the UN flag. Albanese has dragged UN-linked bodies into her propaganda war, compounding the credibility crisis facing the UN when it comes to Israel.
The Sep-2025 so-called “independent” Pillay Commission is a complete oxymoron, especially given the long-standing anti-Israel bias of its chair, Navi Pillay. Her previous track record, including her actions as head of the 2021 Commission, shows a consistent pattern of skewed narratives that serve political agendas rather than objective fact-finding. It’s no surprise that she would align herself with figures like Francesca Albanese. This entire Commission’s supposed neutrality is nothing more than a facade, built on a foundation of pre-existing anti-Israel rhetoric.
Allegations that Israel is starving Gaza’s population have been firmly debunked. In fact, Hamas is responsible for stealing humanitarian aid and manipulating images to falsely depict Gazans as starving. Even former U.S. President Donald Trump noted that ’they’re in a war there,’ emphasizing the devastating reality of conflict rather than any genocidal intent.
And yet, certain voices persist in promoting this slander. Omer Bartov, a [biased] scholar featured in ’The New York Times,’ had been ’prepping’ his genocide case against Israel for years—long before the current war began. This reveals what many suspected: the genocide accusation isn’t a legal finding. It’s a political weapon dressed in the language of international justice.
The International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) has been exposed as a politicized, illegitimate organization, especially following its controversial resolution accusing Israel of genocide. Membership in IAGS surged among Islamists after the October 7 Hamas atrocities, further fueling the group’s anti-Israel bias, using genocidal regime Hamas data. The resolution was passed with only 28% of the membership participating, and without proper debate or dissent, undermining its credibility. The group’s open-door policy—allowing anyone to join for just $30—has led to mockery, with fake members even joining under names like “Adolf Hitler.” Over 500 scholars have demanded a retraction of the resolution, criticizing IAGS for prioritizing political agendas over academic integrity. What was once seen as a scholarly authority on genocide has become a partisan platform, tarnishing its credibility and academic legitimacy.
AJC summarized why the events in Gaza are not “genocide”:
1. “Genocide” refers to the physical destruction of an entire group in whole or in part that has been targeted on the basis of its identity. This is not Israel’s objective in Gaza.
Israel’s war is against Hamas.
2. Is Genocide Happening in Gaza? No. Israel is responding to a genocidal attack by Hamas.
3. Israel’s actions reflect its desire to spare Palestinian civilians from harm, not to deliberately harm them.
4. Hamas’ actions are designed to cause harm to Palestinian civilians and blame Israel.
Hamas puts civilians in harm’s way.
5. The “facts” of the genocide charge don’t add up:
The number of “innocents” vs. terrorists that have died;
The circumstances in which numerous innocents have been killed in Gaza;
The nature of the military objective of attacks carried out by the IDF in which Palestinian civilians have died.
Even some traditionally critical voices are pushing back. Amnesty International’s own Israel branch rejected the genocide conclusion of its parent organization, calling it predetermined and biased. Yad Vashem, the world’s preeminent Holocaust memorial, condemned the accusation as a grotesque abuse of Holocaust memory.
As Bernard-Henri Lévy wrote, there is no genocide in Gaza. What exists is a tragic war, initiated by a terror group that hides behind its own civilians. The accusation of genocide, he says, is not a judgment. It’s an ideological verdict without evidence.
Researchers have also found significant flaws in UN and international reporting on the Gaza conflict. A new study published by The Jerusalem Post proposed methodological frameworks to protect fact-finding missions from political and media-driven distortions, ensuring that future investigations remain grounded in evidence rather than narratives.
As Dennis Prager warns, the word genocide is losing its meaning. Worse, as Alan Dershowitz argues, equating Gaza with genocide is tantamount to Holocaust denial—because it erases the very definition of the term used to describe Nazi atrocities.
Let’s be clear: civilians are dying in Gaza. That is tragic. But tragedy is not genocide. The difference lies in intent, context, and fact. Hamas wants genocide. Israel does not. That distinction defines the moral landscape of this war.
The genocide accusation is not a defense of Palestinian lives. It’s a weapon against Jewish sovereignty.
And the world should recognize it for what it is—a lie.
—
Notes
1. ’Canada rejects genocide allegation made against Israel,’ ‘Toronto Star’, January 12, 2024. [https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/justin-trudeau-breaks-silence-over-canadas-position-on-israel-genocide-allegations/article_613ade0a-b16b-11ee-b3e1-4b98cc95f239.html]
2. ’Germany Rejects UN ’Genocide’ Charge Against Israel,’ ‘AFP via Barron’s’, January 12, 2024. [https://www.barrons.com/news/germany-rejects-un-genocide-charge-against-israel-6af01195]
3. ’France Rejects Genocide Accusations Against Israel in Gaza,’ ‘New York Times’, January 17, 2024. [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/17/world/middleeast/france-israel-genocide-gaza.html]
4. ’UK Government Rejects Determination of Israeli ’Genocide’ in Gaza,’ ‘Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD)’, September 11, 2025. [https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/09/11/uk-government-rejects-determination-of-israeli-genocide-in-gaza/]
5. ’Austin: No proof Israel is committing genocide,’ ‘Jewish News Syndicate (JNS)’, April 9, 2024. [https://www.jns.org/austin-no-proof-israel-committing-genocide/]
6. Salo Aizenberg, ’A strong consensus has formed: there is no genocide in Gaza,’ ‘X (formerly Twitter)’, May 20, 2025. [https://x.com/Aizenberg55/status/1924827781449322924]
7. Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, ’International law scholar: There is no genocide in Gaza,’ ‘Jerusalem Post’, July 28, 2025. [https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-862339]
8. ’5 Reasons Why the Events in Gaza Are Not ’Genocide’,’ ‘American Jewish Committee (AJC)’, July 22, 2025. [https://www.ajc.org/news/5-reasons-why-the-events-in-gaza-are-not-genocide]
9. Rachel O’Donoghue, ’I’m a Genocide Scholar… And I’ve Been Prepping My NYT Genocide Case Against Israel for Years,’ ‘Honest Reporting’, July 17, 2025. [https://honestreporting.com/im-a-genocide-scholar-and-ive-been-prepping-my-nyt-genocide-case-against-israel-for-years/]
10. Jeremy Sharon, Jacob Magid, and ToI Staff, ’Predetermined conclusions: Amnesty Israel workers slam parent group’s ’genocide’ charge,’ ‘Times of Israel’, December 5, 2024. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/predetermined-conclusions-amnesty-israel-workers-slam-parent-groups-genocide-charge/]
11. ’Yad Vashem rejects genocide allegation against Israel,’ ‘JNS via Columbus Jewish News’, July 28, 2025. [https://www.columbusjewishnews.com/jns/yad-vashem-rejects-genocide-allegation-against-israel/article_5e806ad9-0b74-5f07-8e22-19d527b91ab5.html]
12. Bernard-Henri Lévy, ’There Is No ’Genocide’ in Gaza,’ ‘New York Sun’, November 21, 2024. [https://bernard-henri-levy.com/en/there-is-no-genocide-in-gaza/]
13. ’There is no starvation in Gaza caused by Israel, Hamas at fault: Consul general,’ ‘NewsNation’, July 29, 2025. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VMLWiktY1g]
14. Charlie Kirk, ’No, Israel is NOT Starving Gazans: Debunking the Latest Propaganda Attacks Against Israel,’ ‘Facebook Video’, July 28, 2025. [https://www.facebook.com/realCharlieKirk/videos/no-israel-is-not-starving-gazans-debunking-the-latest-propaganda-attacks-against/679765591775249/]
15. ’They’re in a war there’: Trump rejects claims of genocide in Gaza,’ ‘The Jewish Chronicle’, August 4, 2025. [https://www.thejc.com/news/israel/trump-no-genocide-gaza-ia35ifye]
16. Dennis Prager, ’The word ’genocide’ is losing its meaning,’ ‘Facebook’, May 31, 2025. [https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1254178386065615&id=100044203970872]
17. Alan Dershowitz, ’Why ’Gaza genocide’ claims equal Holocaust denial,’ ‘New York Post’, July 15, 2025. [https://nypost.com/2025/07/15/opinion/why-gaza-genocide-claims-equal-holocaust-denial/]
18. Maïa de La Baume, ’There is no clear intent to commit genocide in Gaza, top international law expert says,’ ‘Euro News’, August 1, 2025. [https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/08/01/there-is-no-clear-intent-to-commit-genocide-in-gaza-top-international-law-expert-says]
19. ’New study debunks Gaza genocide claims, finds flaws in UN, int’l reporting on war,’ ‘Jerusalem Post’, August 3, 2025. [https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-866183]
20. Joe Brown, ’Want to be a renowned genocide scholar? Pay $30,’ ‘i24NEWS’, September 3, 2025. [https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/diplomacy/artc-want-to-be-a-renowned-genocide-scholar-pay-30]
* [https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/more-than-500-experts-sign-demand-that-genocide-scholars-group-retract-accusation-against-israel/ The Times of Israel] – “More than 500 experts sign demand that genocide scholars group retract accusation against Israel” (September 9, 2025)
*
[https://www.camera.org/article/abcs-selective-and-one-sided-coverage-of-the-iags-genocide-libel/ CAMERA] – “ABC’s Selective and One-Sided Coverage of the IAGS Genocide Libel” (September 5, 2025)
* [https://www.timesofisrael.com/genocide-scholar-says-group-pushed-through-israel-condemnation-without-debate/ The Times of Israel] – “Genocide scholar says group pushed through Israel condemnation without debate” (September 2, 2025)
* [https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/charade-academic-garb The Washington Institute] – “The Charade of Academic Garb” (September 2, 2025)
* [https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/diplomacy/artc-want-to-be-a-renowned-genocide-scholar-pay-30 i24 News] – “Want to be a renowned genocide scholar? Pay $30” (September 3, 2025)
* [https://themedialine.org/top-stories/only-28-of-scholars-associations-members-voted-on-gaza-genocide-resolution-but-global-media-missed-the-story/ The Media Line] – “Only 28% of Scholars Association’s Members Voted on Gaza Genocide Resolution, but Global Media Missed the Story” (September 4, 2025)
‘
* [https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-pr-jihad/ The Times of Israel Blogs] – “The PR Jihad” (September 7, 2025).
‘The International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) membership criteria was exposed on X by Salo Aizenberg of Honest Reporting. Soon after, people began joining under fake names, real names, their pets joined, and even “Adolf Hitler” joined. Actual genocide scholar, Professor Mia Bloom, Ph.D., one of the founding members of IAGS, and others, exposed the voting process as a sham vote without transparency, without the standard debate, and any dissent was blocked.’
21. Imogen Garfinkel, ’Dismissing October 7 Gang Rape and Comparing Israel to the Third Reich: Who is UN ‘Special Rapporteur’ Francesca Albanese?,’ ‘The JC’, November 28, 2024. [https://web.archive.org/web/20241129114816/https://www.thejc.com/news/world/dismissing-october-7-gang-rape-and-comparing-israel-to-the-third-reich-who-is-un-special-rapporteur-francesca-albanese-mc3h514n]
22. Human Rights Expert: ‘Francesca Albanese uses Nazi textbook to produce Oct. 7 denial’. ‘Human Rights Voices’, July 9, 2025.
[https://hrvoices.org/?post_type=article&p=393985]
23. [https://unwatch.org/tag/navi-pillay/ Navi Pillay Archives – UN Watch]
Thank you Mordechai Nisan.
One of the best articles ever in The New English Review.
Islamic-lobby OIC’s UN Walkout: A Betrayal of Diplomacy and Truth
The OIC-led walkout during Prime Minister Netanyahu’s UN address is a damning indictment of the United Nations’ surrender to the Islamic bloc’s agenda. Far from a principled stand, this coordinated exit by Muslim-majority nations was a cowardly evasion of Israel’s call for peace and truth. It exposed the Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s (OIC) stranglehold over international forums, where anti-Israel bias consistently drowns out reason and diplomacy. By refusing to engage with Netanyahu’s message—a message rooted in Israel’s right to exist and defend itself—these nations betrayed the UN’s founding ideals of dialogue and cooperation. This shameful display underscores a broader truth: the OIC’s obsession with demonizing Israel undermines any hope for genuine peace, revealing their walkout as not just anti-Israel, but anti-progress.