Bastards of Privilege

image_pdfimage_print

by Theodore Dalrymple

Some people, no doubt, will have been surprised to learn that the seven young Islamic fanatics who slaughtered 20 customers, mainly foreign, in a restaurant in Dhaka, Bangladesh this weekend weren’t impoverished or downtrodden, like so many of their countrymen. On the contrary, they were scions of the small, rich, and educated local elite. They were privileged as only the rich in poor countries can be privileged.

No one should have been surprised by this, however. Viciousness knows no class barriers and education is often more an aid than a hindrance to extreme evil committed in the name of ideology. The Soviets recruited their useful idiots in the West not from the supposedly ignorant proletariat, but from the ranks of the educated and the intellectuals. Even such pitiless people as the Soviets, though, didn’t expect their recruits personally to hack people to death if they couldn’t recite the Communist Manifesto—and then go straight to heaven as a result.

Early reports suggest that some of the killers fanaticized themselves only recently: from strumming guitars to decapitation, as it were, in three months. The parents of the alleged perpetrators found it difficult to believe that their sons—previously polite and without apparent problems, indeed with “humanitarian” sentiments of the modern kind—should have suddenly turned so psychopathically brutal. They seemed to be ordinary boys, not like Shakespeare’s Richard III, as described by his mother:

Thou cam’st on earth to make the earth my hell. A grievous burden was thy birth to me: Tetchy and wayward was thy infancy. Thy school-days, frightful, daring, bold, and venturous . . .

Where a child is cruel to animals, thieving, lying, and disobedient from an early age, we expect little good of him later in his life. It seems the perpetrators were not like this, nor could they have expected anything but a smooth passage through life. Lack of prospects was certainly not what impelled them.

Adolescence is a turbulent time, of course, and some privileged young people in impoverished countries feel guilt at their own privilege (not that it prevents them from exercising it); revolutionary movements are often led by some sprig of the upper class. But something else is required to make ordinary young men act in so conscienceless a fashion. Here, I think, we have to turn to Solzhenitsyn:

Macbeth’s self-justifications were feeble—and his conscience devoured him. Yes, even Iago was a little lamb, too. The imagination and spiritual strength of Shakespeare’s evildoers stopped short at a dozen corpses. Because they had no ideology. Ideology—that is what gives evildoing its long-sought justification and gives the evildoer the necessary steadfastness and determination. That is the social theory which helps to make his acts seem good instead of bad in his own and others’ eyes. . . . That was how the agents of the Inquisition fortified their wills: by invoking Christianity; the conquerors of foreign lands, by extolling the grandeur of their Motherland; the colonizers, by civilization; the Nazis, by race; and the Jacobins (early and late), by equality, brotherhood, and the happiness of future generations.

After the downfall of Communism, Islamism is the only ideology that supposedly answers all life’s questions and can appeal to the adolescent search for certainty about what life is for. It appeals only to born Muslims and a small number of converts. It has none of the cross-cultural appeal that Communism did, for example. But why person x rather than person y falls for it—that is a question that can never be fully answered.   

First published in City Journal.

3 Responses

  1.   Ideology works best in groups. People are social animals (the sheeple) and will be more apt to follow a set of ideas, even terrible ones, if they see other members of the herd running with it.  The ideologies mentioned here had significant social appeal, enough to attain a critical mass of support. That's why it's crucial to limit Islamic immigration before it gets too massive to oppose effectively.   

  2. I trust that throughout the human mass there are great differences in inclination, driven by genetic imperative, to persist in endeavoring to make the species successful. That contingent that would shirk at the thought of killing one man will not, of a sudden, turn into Achilles when called upon to do so, such as to defend the realm.

    Person x falls for it because "it" has entered his system as pathogen and his being has not the ability to withstand it if no antibody had been introduced to defend against the foreign substance. Person y is much less likely to fall for it by having been properly inoculated.

    I could easily fancy myself wielding a cutlass and making the world a bloody better place but I could not do it for having been given the antitoxin to Allahu Akbar – "All that hate Me love death" (Proverbs 8:36)  

    In all of Islam there is not a word as to the good of life and the evil of death. Islam has not a God but a demon and Mohammad can be found in that circle of hell where the poet found him – adjacent to the prime deceiver. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Order at Amazon US or Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Fetch yours from AmazonAmazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Order from Amazon, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon or Amazon UK today!

RSS
Follow by Email
Twitter
Reddit
GAB