The Ahmadis are killed in Pakistan, for being Infidels who dare to consider themselves Muslims. They are not allowed, on official documents, to declare themselves to be Muslims. They are despised elsewhere, too, in the Muslim lands, and treated in many of them as hated “Qadianis” — the pejorative word for Ahmadis. That doesn’t keep Ahmadis from identifying themselves as Muslims, and conducting extensive conversion efforts in Africa (and then those they convert to Ahmadi Islam often move over to become non-Ahmadi Muslims, the very ones who despise and hate the Ahmadis), and in the Western world, they are active Defenders — Taqiyya-and-Kitman-and-Tu-Quoque masters of evasion and confusion whose sole aim seems to be to mislead the unwary Kuffar — of the Faith, the very Faith that they claim to be part of, and for which claim they are hounded and humiliated and killeed by other, more orthodox, Muslims. The fanatical desire to be accepted keeps them calling themselves “Muslims” in the hope that someday they will be accepted as such. How much more sensisble and logical for those born into Ahmadiyya Islam to jettison the whole thing altogether. After all, what has Islam ever done for anyone? What has it done for them?
Meanwhile, an Ahmadi cleric who lives in Canada (and for all I know has obtained Canadian citizenship, which as we all know no longer is an assurance that someone shares any of the loyalties or values or understandings that qualfiy someonee to be called “Canadian” — or “American” or “French” or British” any other Western nationality) says he’s all for freedom of the press and speech, but only if an exception is made for religious figures — which means, of course, exemption for Muhammad. And without criticism of Muhammad, the Western world is even more vulnerable to its worst menace since the Nazis, and perhaps the worst in its entire history.
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
One Response
A classic “Yes, but” response from a Muslim Apologist – they feel terrible about the blood on the ground, BUT if the victims had obeyed the rules of submission demanded by Islam then this never would have happened. AKA – Ahem, pay attention the rest of you kuffar !!
It is time to start challenging these apologists with simple direct questions. Some might be on whether they can articulate why the prophet should not be considered a murdering pirate and pedophile in comparison to Jesus, or Moses, or Abraham.
Or perhaps simply ask for the equivalent Koranic text that captures the Judeo/Christian golden rule.