Shamima Begum has lost an appeal against the removal of her British citizenship.
The east London schoolgirl, now 24, travelled to Syria in 2015 at the age of 15, before her citizenship was revoked on national security grounds shortly after she was found in a refugee camp in 2019.
After a series of legal battles, Ms Begum lost a challenge at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in February last year – but took her case to the Court of Appeal in October.
This morning Dame Sue Carr, one of the appeal judges who ruled on the case, said that they agreed with the commission’s decision on Ms Begum’s citizenship and dismissed her appeal.
The judge said: “Ms Begum may well have been influenced and manipulated by others but still have made a calculated decision to travel to Syria and align with ISIL [Islamic State]. It could be argued the decision in Ms Begum’s case was harsh. It could also be argued that Ms Begum is the author of her own misfortune. But it is not for this court to agree or disagree with either point of view. The only task of the court was to assess whether the deprivation decision was unlawful. Since it was not, Ms Begum’s appeal is dismissed.”
the Home Office, represented by Sir James Eadie KC, said the “key feature” of Ms Begum’s case is national security.
Ms Begum’s legal team is likely to appeal the latest ruling, with arguments over the consequences of today’s judgment adjourned for seven days.
One of her lawyers, Gareth Peirce, (a woman who never met an enemy of the UK she didn’t support) told Sky News home editor Jason Farrell ahead of the hearing: “As long as she is still there, this doesn’t end.”
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
One Response
Has Ms. Begum harmed anyone while being enthralled by ISIL?
Is Ms Begum’s decision while a teenager well-informed? Is her case analagous to that of a teenager agreeing to ‘trans’ treatment and later regreting the unwise, immature decision?
Is her stated remorse authentic (apostatic) in rejecting ISIL’s teachings, or is it bogus, opportunistic?
Is adherence to the law dispensation of justice or malice?
What would be adequate penance?