Statement from T0mmy R0bins0n

From X tonight

As you all will know by now, I am being hunted down by the political and judicial establishment who want to send me away to prison for FOUR years.

Unfortunately they have decided to hit me with another ‘contempt of court’ charge, for simply telling the truth about what happened in Almondbury, where a white English boy was wrongfully labelled a racist bully on the back of a schoolground incident with a very troubled young Syrian asylum seeker.

Do I regret showing the world what really happened in Almondbury? Do I regret exposing the CORRUPTION AND LIES?

No, no I do not, I have no regrets.

Telling the truth really has become a revolutionary act.

And as reported by a mainstream newspaper, in the case The Independent,

Tommy Robinson could face jail after being issued with a new contempt of court claim against him following the airing of a film at a protest in central London.

Law officers allege Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is alleged to have breached a High Court order issued in 2021 barring him from repeating libellous allegations against a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him, the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) said.

It is understood that the airing of a film titled Silenced at a demonstration in Trafalgar Square last month (it wasn’t a demonstration, it was a celebration) is one of six actions claimed to have breached the injunction between June and July this year.

In 2021, teenager Jamal Hijazi won £100,000 in damages in a defamation battle against Yaxley-Lennon, who had falsely accused him of being a violent thug, claims repeated on social media.

After a clip of the incident went viral, Robinson made false claims, including about Mr Hijazi, as a boy, attacking girls in his school, leading to the libel case.

A judge ordered Robinson never to repeat the lies, but last year he began spreading his claims again.

Campaign group Hope Not Hate alleged that Robinson had ignored the injunction and repeated the allegations, providing a “dossier of evidence” to the Attorney General’s Office, with the Solicitor General then taking legal action.

The Attorney General’s Office said Robinson was served with the latest contempt application, made on behalf of Solicitor General Sarah Sackman, on his X account on Wednesday after the application was lodged on 19 August.

It follows an earlier contempt application concerning other alleged breaches of the order. A court hearing in London last month was told that Robinson had left the country.

A hearing for both applications will be held on 28 October.

Robinson, … was first served with contempt proceedings in June, after the Solicitor General told a previous court hearing that he knowingly breached the order by having “published, caused, authorised or procured” a film titled Silenced in May last year.

It is also claimed the 41-year-old repeated the allegations banned by the injunction in three interviews between February and June 2023.

Silenced was then shown again at a demonstration in Trafalgar Square last month, which is understood to be part of the alleged breach of the order under the second contempt application.

The day after the protest, Robinson was arrested for the “frustration” of a port stop at the Channel Tunnel at Folkestone under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Adam Payter, representing the Solicitor General at the hearing last month, said that it was believed that following his release on unconditional bail, Robinson then left the country and that there “was nothing to prevent him from doing so”.

Mr Justice Johnson issued a warrant for Robinson’s arrest but ordered that it not be carried out until early October to allow Robinson time to indicate that he would attend the next hearing voluntarily or to apply to “set aside” the warrant.

Robinson was accused of stoking the far-right riots that hit English cities this month, while still abroad.

Robinson’s tax affairs are also reportedly under investigation.

image_pdfimage_print

3 Responses

  1. If the Court is evidenced as operating contemptously, will its representatives be penalized, or at least held up in contempt, or derision?
    Is the Court an excellent example of an atrocious agency behaving unjustly?

  2. I watched an interview with Robinson. He’s quite energetic, vigorous, factually primed, and articulate – just what a good reporter should be. He’s being hounded for being effective, just as is Trump.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

New English Review Press is a priceless cultural institution.
                              — Bruce Bawer

Order here or wherever books are sold.

The perfect gift for the history lover in your life. Order on Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon, Amazon UK, or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon or Amazon UK or wherever books are sold


Order at Amazon, Amazon UK, or wherever books are sold. 

Order at Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Available at Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Send this to a friend