An important story, and question, that must be asked again and again, not just in the press but on television, until an answer — not a satisfactory answer for there can not be such, but an answer — is received from someone in authority at the meretricious– and more and more unacceptable in its absurd coverage of everything having to do with Islam — New York Times.
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
2 Responses
Winston Smith at work in the Ministry of Truth.
At one time liberalism stood for freedom. It meant freedom of speech and freedom to criticize religion. Today, liberalism means multiculturalism and the moral equivalence of all cultures (ex. ISIS and the US are just as bad). It would thus be “racist” to imply that Islam has violent, intolerant beliefs, so the Times erases that unpleasantness.