Hamas’s assumption of the government of Gaza and the generous supplies provided by Iran enabled it to engage in continuous terrorist harassment of Israel. Extensive research
by a commission of the British House of Lords has revealed that the Hamas high command believed that their invasion of Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, would provoke a general Arab revolt within Israel and that Hamas would actually be able to threaten Jerusalem itself, and shake the Israeli state to its foundations. The ostensible goal was undoubtedly to prevent the extension of the Abraham Accords to Israel and Saudi Arabia, but once set on this course, the ambitions for the invasion, massacre, and hostage-taking were substantially amplified.
Since no Arab power will knowingly accept any possible Hamas adherents, and Hamas will never acknowledge the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state and premeditatedly went to war with Israel, the only hope for achieving a durable peace for the Arabs and the Jews is for the state of Israel to physically exterminate the terrorist apparatus of Hamas. This has always been the only acceptable end to this war and the only one that offered anything other than a continuation of frequent barbarous outrages by Hamas, with most of the world taking the dishonest position that “Israel has a right to defend itself,” meaning to expel the invaders but not take the steps necessary to ensure that such acts of war are not committed again.
Israel is pursuing the justified policy and the only one capable of producing a lasting resolution, but in order to be successful, it will have to alter its traditional vulnerability to being held for ransom by hostage-takers. The honour of the Jewish state surpasses the life of any individual, and if Israel can be blackmailed with hostages, there will never be peace. Given how many of the hostages Hamas has already murdered, and how they use the people as shields and
steal their food to sustain their authority, the military option is the likeliest method of retrieving the remaining hostages.
The announcement by the French, British, and Canadian governments of their intention to recognize a Palestinian faction as the legitimate government of the sovereign Palestinian state is especially irritating. They have selected the 89-year-old
Mahmoud Abbas, who has had one of the longest and most eventful terrorist careers in the region and is now the head of the Palestinian Authority, which is despised by most Palestinians as corrupt and ineffectual. Abbas promised a great many reforms and unprecedented democratizing events to be worthy of this honour.
After France got clear of the Algerian war, the French have generally felt that it is their destiny to be the champion of the Arabs among the Western powers. This action encourages Hamas. The conduct of the British is more reprehensible. In the dark days of World War I, the foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, made his famous
declaration promising a homeland for the Jews in Palestine without compromising the rights of non-Jews or of the Jews in other parts of the world. It was just mealy-mouthed casuistry to boost support for the Allied cause in the United States. In the light of Britain’s sabotaging of the efforts of hundreds of thousands of victims of anti-Semitism in Europe in the 1930s and ’40s to emigrate to Palestine, the ambition to be helpful to Jews not in the Middle East was a bit rich, and the UK is one of the last countries Canada should be emulating in its policy on Israel.
Israel will finish the war with whatever American diplomatic support is required, and then there will be a chance to create a Palestinian state.
2 Responses
However correct, I think the present issue is what constitutes acceptable collateral damage. If the concept is elastic, Israel is perhaps stretching it to its breaking point. If among a lineup of 200 civilians with soup bowls in arm, are two armed Hamas fighters, what constitutes a fair and just outcome as a consequence of eliminating the enemy? I would like to know what percentage of Gazans want Hamas to surrender?
@Dave, about 50% according to Google, Reuters, Palestine Center for Policy and Survey, Approx May 1-4 survey